Coronary care units were established in the 1960s to reduce acute-phase mortality in acute coronary syndrome. In the 21st century, the original coronary care unit concept has evolved into an intensive cardiovascular care unit. The aim of this study was to analyse trend changes in characteristics and mortality of patients admitted to a coronary care unit over the past three decades.
Method:
Between February 1989 and December 2017, a total of 18,334 patients was consecutively admitted to the coronary care unit of a university hospital in Barcelona. Data were analysed in five time frames: 1989–1994, 1995–1999, 2000–2004, 2005–2009 and 2010–2017. We analysed demographic profile, diagnoses at admission and trend changes in mortality across periods.
Results:
During the periods, the patients’ ages and comorbidities increased. Diagnoses at admission have evolved. Acute coronary syndrome cases declined from the first to the last period (72.6% vs. 62.8%) while heart failure (6.0% vs. 8.6%) and malignant arrhythmias (0.8% vs. 4.0%) increased significantly. Overall, coronary care unit mortality decreased 34% from the first to the last period (6.8% vs. 4.5%, P<0.001). Furthermore, the cause of death has changed, those due to acute coronary syndrome declining (66.7% vs. 45.5%), and death from malignant arrhythmias increasing (1.9% vs. 16.2%) from the first to the last period.
Conclusions:
Although acute coronary syndrome remained the main diagnosis, heart failure and arrhythmias have increased. Despite the aging and comorbidities, overall mortality in the coronary care unit decreased by 34% in the past three decades. Deaths due to acute coronary syndrome have declined, whereas those due to malignant arrhythmias have increased.
JulianD. Treatment of cardiac arrest in acute myocardial ischaemia and infarction. Lancet1961; 2: 840–844.
2.
WilburnM. Coronary care unit: new approach to treatment of acute coronary occlusion. Circulation1961; 24: 1071.
3.
WilburneMFieldsJ. Cardiac resuscitation in coronary artery disease: a central coronary care unit. JAMA1963; 184: 453–457.
4.
DayH. Preliminary studies of an acute coronary care area. Lancet1963; 83: 53–55.
5.
KillipTIIIKimballJ. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: a two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1967; 20: 457–464.
6.
MasonFJr. Cine coronary arteriography. Anesth Analg1967; 46: 499–508.
7.
DotterCJudkinsM. Transluminal treatment of arteriosclerotic obstruction: description of a new technic and a preliminary report of its application. Circulation1964; 30: 654–670.
SigwartUPuelJMirkovitchV, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med1987; 316: 701–706.
11.
MauriFPampallonaSBossiM, et al. Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Lancet1986; 1: 397–402.
12.
GrinesCBrowneKMarcoJ, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group (PRAMI). N Engl J Med1993; 328: 673–679.
13.
ZijlstraFJan de BoerMHoorntjeJ, et al. A comparision of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med1993; 328: 680–684.
14.
KeeleyEBouraJGrinesC. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet2003; 361: 13–20.
15.
AndersenHNielsenTRasmussenK, et al. A comparision of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med2003; 349: 733–742.
16.
CarrilloXFernandez-NofreriasERodriguez-LeorO, et al. Early ST elevation myocardial infarction in non-capable percutaneous coronary intervention centers: in situ fibrinolysis vs. percutaneous coronary intervention transfer. Eur Heart J2016; 37: 1034–1040.
17.
Rodriguez-LeorOFernandez-NofreriasEMauriJ, et al. Integration of a local into a regional primary angioplasty action plan (the Catalan Codi Infart network) reduces time to reperfusion. Int J Cardiol2013; 168: 4354–4357.
18.
RegueiroABoschJMartín-YusteV, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a European ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction network: results from the Catalan Codi Infart network. BMJ2015; 5: e009148.
19.
BuskMMaengMRasmussenK, et al. The Danish multicentre randomized study of fibrinolytic therapy vs. primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (the DANAMI-2 trial): outcome after 3 years follow-up. Eur Heart J2008; 29: 1259–1266.
20.
PavesiPCNobilioLDe PalmaR, et al. The evolution of intensive cardiac care units and the effects of interhospital networks for reperfusion implantation. Analysis of the Emilia-Romagna regional data 2002–2007. G Ital Cardiol2011; 12: 31–42.
21.
RoubilleFMercierGDelmasC, et al. Description of acute cardiac care in 2014: a French nation-wide database on 277.845 admissions in 270 ICCUs. Int J Cardiol2017; 240: 433–437.
22.
KatzJShahBVolzE, et al. Evolution of the coronary care unit: clinical characteristics and temporal trends in healthcare delivery and outcomes. Crit Care Med2010; 38: 375–381.
23.
AwaidaJPDupuisJThérouxP, et al. Demographics, treatment and outcome of acute coronary syndromes: 17 years of experience in a specialized cardiac centre. Can J Cardiol2006; 22: 121–124.
24.
RogersWCantoJLambrewC, et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.55 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2, 3. J Am Coll Cardiol2000; 36: 2056–2063.
25.
KatzJTurerABeckerR. Cardiology and the critical care crisis. A perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol2007; 49: 1279–1282.
26.
MorrowDFangJFintelD, et al. Evolution of critical care cardiology: transformation of the cardiovascular intensive care unit and the emerging need for new medical staffing and training models: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2012; 126: 1408–1428.
27.
HollandEMossT. Acute noncardiovascular illness in the cardiac intensive care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 69: 1999–2007.
28.
DudzinskiDJanuzziJJr. The evolving medical complexity of the modern cardiac intensive care unit. Editorial comment. J Am Coll Cardiol2017; 69: 2008–2010.
29.
Bonnefoy-CudrazEBuenoHCasellaG, et al. Acute Cardiovascular Care Association position paper on intensive cardiovascular care units: an update on their definition, structure, organization and function. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2018; 7: 80–95.
30.
OlivariZSteffeninoGSavonittoS, et al. The management of acute myocardial infarction in the cardiological intensive care units in Italy: the “BLITZ 4 Qualità” campaign for performance measurement and quality improvement. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2012; 1: 143–152.
31.
Di ChiaraAChiarellaFSavonittoS, et al. Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in the Italian CCU network: the Blitz study. Eur Heart J2003; 24: 1616–1629.
32.
Di ChiaraAFrescoCSavonittoS, et al. Epidemiology of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in the Italian cardiology network: the BLITZ-2 study. Eur Heart J2006; 27: 393–405.
33.
CasellaGCassinMChiarellaF, et al. Epidemiology and patterns of care of patients admitted to Italian Intensive Cardiac Care units: the BLITZ-3 registry. J Cardiovasc Med2010; 11: 450–461.
34.
WatsonRBohulaEGillilandT, et al. Prospective registry of cardiac critical illness in a modern tertiary care cardiac intensive care unit. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care2019; 8: 755–761.
35.
O’GaraTAdamsJIIIDraznerM, et al. COCATS 4 Task Force 13: training in critical care cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol2015; 65: 735–1097.
36.
ParikhAHuangSMurthyP, et al. Quality improvement and cost savings after implantation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard at a community teaching hospital. Crit Care Med2012; 40: 2754–2759.
37.
Van DiepenSBakalJLinM, et al. Variation in critical care unit admission rates and outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndromes or heart failure among high- and low-volume cardiac hospitals. J Am Heart Assoc2015; 4: e001708.
38.
McNeerJWagnerGGinsburgP, et al. Hospital discharge one week after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med1978; 298: 229–232.
39.
MarshallRBlountSJrGentonE. Acute myocardial infarction: influence of a coronary care unit. Arch Intern Med1968; 122: 473–475.
40.
JentzerJVan DiepenSBarsnessG, et al. Changes in comorbidities, diagnoses, therapies and outcomes in a contemporary cardiac intensive care unit population. Am Heart J2019; 215: 12–19.
