Understanding factors that facilitate the inclusion of pain education in undergraduate curricula: Perspectives from a UK survey

Abstract

Background:

Studies in Europe, North America and Australasia suggest that one in five adults suffer from pain. There is increasing recognition that pain, particularly chronic pain, represents a global health burden. Many studies, including two national surveys exploring the content of undergraduate curricula for pain education, identify that documented pain education in curricula was limited and fragmentary.

Methods:

The study design used a questionnaire which included an open text comment box for respondents to add ‘further comments’ as part of larger study previously published. The sample consisted of 19 UK universities that offered 108 undergraduate programmes in the following: dentistry, medicine, midwifery, nursing (adult, child, learning disabilities and mental health branches), occupational therapy (OT), pharmacy, physiotherapy and veterinary science. An inductive content analysis was performed, and the data were managed using NVivo 10 software for data management.

Results:

A total of 57 participants across seven disciplines (dentistry, medicine, midwifery, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy and OT) completed the open text comment box (none were received from veterinary science). Analysis revealed two major themes of successes and challenges. Successes included expansion (extending coverage and/or increased student access), multidimensional curriculum content and diversity of teaching methods. Challenges included difficulties in identifying where pain is taught in the curriculum, biomedical versus biopsychosocial definitions of pain, perceived importance, time, resources and staff knowledge, and finally a diffusion of responsibility for pain education.

Conclusion:

This study identifies new insights of the factors attributed to successful implementation of pain education in undergraduate education. Many of the challenges previously reported were also identified. This is one of the first studies to identify a broad range of approaches, for pain education, that could be deemed as ‘successful’ across a range of health disciplines.

Keywords

Pain education curriculum health professional interprofessional teaching

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Breivik

Collett

Vetafridda

. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006; 10(4): 287–333.

Institute of Medicine. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research (Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education). Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), 2011.

Eriksen

Jensen

Sjøgren

. Epidemiology of chronic non-malignant pain in Denmark. Pain 2003; 106(3): 221–228.

Blyth

March

Barnabic

AJM

. Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study. Pain 2001; 89(2–3): 127–134.

Bridges

. Chronic pain. Health Survey England 2011. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre,http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB09300/HSE2011-Ch9-Chronic-Pain.pdf

Brennan

Carr

Cousins

. Pain management: a fundamental human right. Anesth Analg 2007; 105(1): 205–221.

Visentin

Trentin

de Marco

. Knowledge and attitudes of Italian medical staff towards the approach and treatment of patients in pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 22(5): 925–930.

Zanolin

Visentin

Trentin

. A questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of health care providers on pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 33(6): 727–736.

Watt-Watson

McGillion

Hunter

. A survey of prelicensure pain curricula in health science faculties in Canadian universities. Pain Res Manag 2009; 14(6): 439–444.

10.

Briggs

Carr

ECJ

Whittaker

. Survey of undergraduate pain curricula for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom. Eur J Pain 2011; 15(8): 789–795.

11.

Mezei

Murinson

. Pain education in North American medical schools. J Pain 2011; 12(12): 1199–1208.

12.

International Association for the Study of Pain. Interprofessional pain curricula outline, 2012, http://www.iasp-pain.org/Education/CurriculumDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=2057

13.

Watt-Watson

Carr

McGillion

. Moving the pain education agenda forward: innovative models. Pain Res Manag 2011; 16(6): 400–401.

14.

Murinson

Nenortas

Mayer

. A new program in pain medicine for medical students: integrating core curriculum knowledge with emotional and reflective development. Pain Med 2011; 12(2): 186–195.

15.

Rochman

Sheehan

Kulich

. Evaluation of a pain curriculum for occupational therapists: experiences from a master’s-level graduate program over six years. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35(22): 1933–1940.

16.

Fishman

Young

Lucas Arwood

. Core competencies for pain management: results of an interprofessional consensus summit. Pain Med 2013; 14(7): 971–981.

17.

O’Cathain

Thomas

. ‘Any other comments?’ Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Med Res Methodol 2004; 4: 25.

18.

McKinnon

Prosser

Miller

. What women want: qualitative analysis of consumer evaluations of maternity care in Queensland, Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14(1): 366.

19.

Twamley

Craig

Kelly

. Underlying barriers to referral to paediatric palliative care services: knowledge and attitudes of health care professionals in a paediatric tertiary care centre in the United Kingdom. J Child Health Care 2014; 18(1): 19–30.

20.

Miles

Huberman

. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 1994.

21.

Elo

Kyngas

. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62(1): 107–115.

22.

Weber

. Basic content analysis (SAGE university press paper series on quantitative applications in the social science, series no 007-49). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1990, p. 74

23.

Mason

. Qualitative researching. London: SAGE Publications, 2002, pp. 56–72.

24.

Lincoln

Guba

. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, 1985.

25.

Sandelowski

. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. J Adv Nurs 1993; 16(2): 1–8.

26.

Rolfe

. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. J Adv Nurs 2006; 53(3): 304–310.

27.

Sleight

Reznich

. Implementation of curriculum by family medicine fellows: what factors help and what factors hinder? Fam Med 2006; 38(4): 270–274.

28.

Gibbins

McCourbrie

Maher

. Incorporating palliative care into undergraduate curricula: lessons for curriculum development. Med Educ 2009; 43: 776–783.

29.

Hawkins-Walsh

Crowley

Mazurek Melnyk

. Improving health-care quality through an AFPNP National Nursing Education Collaborative to strengthen PNP curriculum in mental/behavioral health and EBP: lessons learned from academic faculty and clinical preceptors. J Prof Nurs 2011; 27(1): 8–10.

30.

Murinson

Agarwal

Haythornthwaite

. Cognitive expertise, emotional development, and reflective capacity: clinical skills for improved pain care. J Pain 2008; 9(11): 975–983.

31.

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards of proficiency for pre-registration nurse education. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2010.

32.

General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors. 2nd ed. London: General Medical Council, 2009.

33.

Keefe

Wharrad

. Using e-learning to enhance nursing students’ pain management education. Nurs Educ Today 2012; 32(8): e66–e72.

34.

National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS services issued. NICE Clinical Guidelines, no. 138, 2012, http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG138

35.

Murinson

Gordin

Flynn

.; Medical Education Sub-committee of the American Academy of Pain. Recommendations for a new curriculum in pain medicine for medical students: towards a career distinguished by competence and compassion. Pain Med 2013; 14(3): 345–350.

36.

Rhodes

. User involvement in health and social care education: a concept analysis. Nurse Educ Today 2012; 32: 185–189.

37.

Southgate

. Confounding expectations: reflection on simulation with learning disability service users. Int Pract Dev J 2013; 3(1): 1–8, http://www.fons.org/Resources/Documents/Journal/Vol3No1/IDPJ_0301_08.pdf

38.

Bollard

Lahiff

Parkes

. Involving people with learning disabilities in nurse education: towards an inclu-sive approach. Nurse Educ Today 2012; 32: 173–177.

39.

Lanning

Dahig

. A strategy for incorporating palliative care and end-of-life instruction into physician assistant education. J Physician Assist Educ 2010; 21(4): 41–46.

40.

Lax

Watt-Watson

Lui

. Innovation and design of a web-based pain education interprofessional resource. Pain Res Manag 2011; 16(6): 427–432.

41.

Puljak

Sapunar

. Web-based elective courses for medical students: an example in pain. Pain Med 2011; 12(6): 854–863.

42.

Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE). Defining IPE. London: CAIPE, 2002, http://www.caipe.org.uk/about-us/defining-ipe

43.

Suter

Arndt

Arthur

. Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. J Interprof Care 2009; 23(1): 41–51.

44.

Thistlewaite

. Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda. Med Educ 2012; 46: 58–70.

45.

Ury

Reznich

Weber

. A needs assessment for a palliative care curriculum. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000; 20(6): 408–416.

46.

Mindell

Bartle

Wahab

. Sleep education in medical school curriculum: a glimpse across countries. Sleep Med 2011; 12(9): 928–931.

47.

Tamas

Miller

Martin

. Addressing patient sexual orientation in the undergraduate medical education curriculum. Acad Psychiatry 2010; 34(5): 342–345.