Mobile media and communication: A new field,or just a new journal?

Abstract

This journal represents a step forward in the development of mobile communication studies as a field. This field has been establishing itself through a number of other initiatives as well, including conferences, symposiums, edited books, listservs, and centers for research. Despite this momentum, little attention has been given to defining – and justifying – the field itself. This essay begins by questioning whether there really is, or should be, a distinct field of study for research and theory on mobile media and communication. I then proceed to address this question by highlighting themes in the literature that illustrate how mobile communication is distinct from other forms of mediated communication and information exchange, with correspondingly distinctive social consequences. The essay argues that there are indeed justifiable reasons for treating mobile communication studies as a field. However, like the technology itself, this field is – or at least should be – highly integrated with research and theory of media and communication more broadly.

Keywords

cell phone field of study mobile communication mobile communication studies mobile media mobile phone

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell

S. W.

(2008). Mobile technology and the body: Apparatgeist, fashion, & function. In Katz

(Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 153–164). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Castells

Fernandez-Ardevol

Qiu

Sey

(2006). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

de Souza e Silva

Frith

(2012). Mobile interfaces in public spaces: Locational privacy, control, & urban sociality. New York, NY: Routledge.

Donner

(2005). The social and economic implications of mobile telephony in Rwanda: An ownership/access typology. In Glotz

Bertschi

Locke

(Eds.), Thumb culture: The meaning of mobile phones for society (pp. 37–52). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.

Habuchi

(2005). Accelerating reflexivity. In Ito

Okabe

Matsuda

(Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 165–182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Humphreys

, (2007). Mobile social networks and spatial practice: A case study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 17. Retrieved from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/humphreys.html

International Telecommunication Union (2012). The world in 2011: ICT facts and figures. Retrieved from: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/facts/2011/material/ICTFactsFigures2011.pdf

Ito

Okabe

(2005). Technosocial situations: Emergent structuring of mobile e-mail use. In Ito

Okabe

Matsuda

(Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 257–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Katz

J. E.

Aakhus

M. A.

(2002). Conclusion: Making meaning of mobiles – a theory of Aparatgeist. In Katz

Aakhus

(Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 301–320). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Licoppe

(2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone. In Katz

(Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of communication technology (pp. 171–186), New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

11.

Ling

(2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Ling

(in press). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Turkle

(2008). Always-on/always-on you: The tethered self. In Katz

(Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 121–138). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

14.

Turkle

(2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.

15.

Vincent

(2006). Emotional attachment and mobile phones. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 19(1), 39–44.