Hepatitis B surface antigen and associated factors among mothers who had antenatal care contact in Attat Hospital,southern Ethiopia

Abstract

Introduction:

Hepatitis B virus is a viral infection which can cause both acute and chronic liver disease. Predominately, this virus transmitted through the mother-to-child route. It is an endemic disease in low-resource setting countries like Ethiopia.

Objective:

Therefore, this study was used to assess magnitude and associated factors of hepatitis B surface antigen among pregnant mothers, who had antenatal care in Attat Hospital.

Method:

The cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 September 2019 to 30 January 2020. The data were collected from serological testing in laboratory and interview in antenatal care on 422 pregnant mothers. The data were entered into Epi Data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 24.0 for further analysis. Variables on bivariate analysis at p < 0.25 were taken to multivariate analysis. A p value of less than 0.05 on multivariate analysis was considered significant.

Result:

From 438 total samples, 422 respondents were participated and the mean age of the participants was 25.4 years (standard deviation ± 4.85). Magnitude of hepatitis B surface antigen was 10.9% (95% confidence interval: 8.3, 14.0). Respondents whose occupation was in government or self-employed were 67% (adjusted odds ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.12, 0.91) and whose number of gravidity was 3 and below were 79% (adjusted odds ratio = 0.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.68) less likely to have hepatitis B surface antigen. Respondents who respond that hepatitis B surface antigen has cured were 1.52 times (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.7, 9.4) more likely to have hepatitis B surface antigen. Respondents who answered hepatitis B surface antigen has vaccine were 57% (adjusted odds ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.05, 0.75) less likely to have hepatitis B surface antigen.

Conclusion:

Magnitude of hepatitis B surface antigen among mothers who were on antenatal care in Attat Hospital was high compared to other studies. Being employed in government or self-employed, gravida 3 and below, those who think that the disease has vaccine and those who think hepatitis B surface antigen was curable were statistically significant factors. Health promotion should be an important recommendation to be done by the hospital.

Keywords

Fetal medicine obstetrics prenatal diagnosis

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is thought to be the main etiological agent for chronic liver disease (CLD) worldwide caused by a double-stranded DNA.^1–4 HBV infections can cause both acute and CLD, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).^5,6The hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is the serologic hallmark of HBV infection, while the soluble extractable protein, the hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg), is a marker for the highly infectious state.⁷

HBV accounts about 50%–80% of HCC cases worldwide.⁸ More than 780,000 people die per year as a result of HBV-related liver diseases including chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and HCC, making HBV infection the 10th leading cause of death globally.^9,10

In Nigeria, HBV is endemic and it has been estimated that 10%–12% of the total population are chronic carriers.^11,10Countries of sub-Saharan Africa have a high endemicity, and more than 50 million people are chronic carriers of the HBV.^12,13 In endemic areas, however, most individuals are infected by vertical transmission or in early after birth.^10,14

HBV is predominately transmitted through mother-to-child transmission (MTCT).^12,15 Chronic HBV infection during delivery occurs in approximately 90% of infants who are HBsAg-positive mothers.¹⁶ When pregnant mothers are infected with HBV, there is a 10%–20% chance of transmitting the virus to their neonates.¹⁷ Magnitude of HBV among pregnant women worldwide is approximately 5%, ranging from 0.6% in low-endemic regions to >20% in high-endemic areas in the Far East and Africa.¹⁶

Apart from its significant magnitude, liver disease contributes to approximately 12% of the hospital admissions and 31% of the mortality in Ethiopian Hospitals.¹⁸ In Ethiopia, a lack of information is the leading factor to have HBsAg among pregnant mothers.^5,19

Being urban dwellers, young age and unemployment were the common factors affecting HBsAg.^10,14 Educational status, having history of surgery, dental procedure, ear piercing, abortion and tattooing were other factors affecting HBsAg.¹⁶

However, routine antenatal screening and intervention strategies are not yet practiced in Ethiopia.¹ Even if Ethiopia rolled out childhood immunization against HBV in 2007, vaccine is delivered in a pentavalent form as part of Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) of newborns.¹⁸

However, primary (vaccines and post-exposure prophylaxis) and secondary prevention of HBV transmission by appropriate sexual and sanitary practices is not yet optimal in Ethiopia. A measure for early detection (serological, molecular) and treatment of infected pregnant women is not a practice. This study aimed to determine the magnitude of HBsAg and associated factors among mothers following antenatal care (ANC) in Attat Hospital.

Methods and materials

Study setting, design and period

Attat Hospital is a primary hospital located in Guraghe zone, Cheha woreda, 175 km south from Addis Ababa. The hospital ANC clinic gives routine antenatal screening services such as: HIV, hemoglobin, blood group, rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and urinalysis (glucose, protein, infection) tests for more than 15 pregnant women per day. Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant mothers attending antenatal Clinic. The study was conducted from 1 September 2019 to 30 January 2020.

Population

The source populations were all pregnant mothers who had ANC contact in the hospital. All pregnant mothers who had ANC contact were included, and those who have severe illness during data collection were excluded.

Data collection methods and procedures

The data for the study were collected from serological testing in laboratory, and interviewer-administered questionnaires were used in antenatal follow-up clinic. The interview parts of the questionnaire were done by two professional midwives and two medical laboratory technicians after having received a clear direction and signed agreement form. Pregnant woman were contacted in the hospital waiting room for mothers who have ANC checkup. Mothers who had interviewed in ANC were marked as interviewed on their laboratory request for the serum HBsAg test, and their result was recorded as positive or negative accordingly with their ANC registration number. At the end of the day, the questionnaire in ANC and result in laboratory were compiled.

Sampling

Sample size was determined using single population proportion formula by considering the 95% confidence level; since there were no similar studies in the similar setup, the p value of 0.05 was used, and on adding 15% non-response rate, the final sample size will be 438. Systematic random sampling method was used to select participants, and the average number of patient flow before 1 year of the data collection was 450. From this average number, the total number of expected clients in the 5 months of data collection period was 2250 which gives an interval value of 5.

Laboratory investigation and procedures

After obtaining oral and written informed consent, 5 mL of venous blood was collected in plane tubes under aseptic conditions from the peripheral vein by data collector. These tubes were labeled with their ANC registration number and processed at the time of collection. The blood samples taken from the individuals were centrifuged at 3000 r/min (RPM) for at least 20 min at room temperature, and the serum was separated.

All the serum samples were tested for HBsAg by using rapid HBsAg test kit following standard operating procedures; samples reactive for HBsAg were confirmed by the same method. Samples tested twice positive were considered positive. A study participant who is positive for HBsAg was referred to the attending physician for further evaluation.

The one-step HBsAg test strip (serum or plasma) was a qualitative lateral flow immune chromatographic assay for the detection of HBsAg in the serum or plasma. The membrane was precoated with anti HBsAg antibodies on the test line region of the strip. During testing, the serum of plasma specimen reacts with the particles coated with anti-HBsAg antibody. The mixture migrates upward in the membrane chromatography by capillary action to react with anti-HBsAg antibodies on the membrane and generate line. The presence of this colored line in the test region indicates a positive result, while its absence of a negative result. To serve as procedural control, a colored line always appears in the control line region indicating that proper volume of specimen has been added and membrane wicking has occurred.

Data quality control

The validity and completeness of the data were checked by the principal investigator daily at the end of data collection. One-day training was given to the interviewer and laboratory technician on methods and consensus of data collection method. The performance of the rapid HBsAg test kit was evaluated using known positive and negative control obtained from the rapid HBsAg test kit. Furthermore, formation of colored band to the control (C) line acts as a procedural control and serves to valid the results. Blood samples were collected aseptically from pregnant mothers and properly labeled by the patient identification number. The specimens were collected by trained laboratory personnel. The samples were centrifuged; the serum was evaluated and separated appropriately and stored until transported to the laboratory.

The reagent and test method were assessed with a known positive and negative control materials. The standard laboratory procedures were followed, and the result was checked by the supervisors.

Variables

HBsAg was the dependent variable, and socio-demographic characteristics (age, marital status, occupation, educational status, number of gravidity), information about HBsAg (heard about hepatitis; heard about HBV; is hepatitis B viral? can HBV affect any age group?; heard about symptoms of HBV; is it curable?; is it self-restricted?; is vaccination available?; may you get HBV; your reaction if you have HBV; with whom you talk to if you are positive?; how much is the diagnosis cost?; what will be your worries if you are positive?; when you will go to facilities if you have symptoms?; have you got vaccination?; do you ask for new syringe before use?; do you ask for screening of blood to be transfused?; if you are positive, would you go for further investigation?; would you avoid meeting if you are positive?; have you ever participated in health education?) and transmission of HBsAg (transmitted by unsterile tools, transmitted by contamination, transmitted by unsterile blades, transmitted by intercourse, MTCT) were the independent variables.

Data analysis

Data were checked manually for completeness. Then, the data were cleaned and stored for consistency after entering into Epi Data version 3.1 software. For further analysis, the data were exported to statistical package for social sciences version 24.0 software. Descriptive statistics were carried out. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was used to see the effect of independent variables over HBsAg. Variables which were significant on bivariate analysis at the p value less than 0.25 were taken to multivariate analysis. The fitness of model was checked by the Hosmer and Lemeshow test. In multivariate analysis, the p value of less than 0.05 and 95% confidence level was used as a cutoff point for presence of association. Finally, results were compiled and presented using tables, graphs, charts and texts.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondent

In this study, from 438 total sample sizes, 422 respondents were participated with a 96.35% response rate. The mean age of the respondents was 25.4 years with a standard deviation of 4.85. Most of the respondents were married, and more than half of the respondents were self-employed (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents for HBsAg and its associated factors among mothers following antenatal care in Attat Hospital, April 2020 (N = 420).

Variables/Category	Frequency	Percent
Age category (years)
15–29	314	74.4
30–49	108	25.6
Marital status
Married	418	99.1
Single	2	0.5
Divorced	2	0.5
Educational status
Uneducated	101	23.9
Primary education	128	30.3
Secondary education	112	26.5
College level	81	19.2
Occupational status
Self-employed	248	58.8
Housewife	113	26.8
Government employee	60	14.2
Not employed	1	0.2
Number of gravidity
First	57	13.5
Second	83	19.7
Third	147	34.8
Fourth and above	135	32

HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen.

Information about HBsAg

From the total respondents, 301 (71.3%) respondents’ response was HBV is curable. In addition to this, about 46 (10.9%) of them answered that it was self-restricted (Table 2)

Table 2.

Information about HBsAg and its associated factors among mothers following antenatal care in Attat Hospital, April 2020 (N = 420).

Variables/Category	Frequency	Percent
Heard about hepatitis
Yes	414	98.1
No	8	1.9
Heard about HBV
Yes	218	51.7
No	204	48.3
Heard about transmission of HBV
Yes	389	92.2
No	33	7.8
Is hepatitis B viral?
Yes	286	67.8
No	136	32.2
Can HBV affect any age group?
Yes	252	59.7
No	170	40.3
Heard about symptoms of HBV
Yes	342	81
No	80	19
Is it curable?
Yes	301	71.3
No	121	28.7
Is it self-restricted?
Yes	46	10.9
No	376	89.1
Is vaccination available?
Yes	272	64.5
No	150	35.5
May you get HBV
Yes	16	3.8
No	406	96.2
Your reaction if you have HBV
Fear	71	16.8
Surprise	10	2.4
Sadness	5	1.2
Go to health center	336	79.6
With whom you talk to if you are positive?
Physician	102	24.2
Spouse	248	58.8
Parent	61	14.5
Other relatives	11	2.6
How much is the diagnosis cost?
Free	47	11.1
Reasonable	101	23.9
Somewhat expensive	2	0.5
Do not know	272	64.5
What will be your worries if you are positive?
Fear of death	99	23.5
Fear of disease to family	318	75.4
Isolation from the society	1	0.2
Nothing to worry	4	0.9
When you will go to facilities if you have symptoms?
Immediately	338	80.1
1–2 weeks	76	18
2–3 weeks	8	1.9
Have you got vaccination?
Yes	8	1.9
No	414	98.1
Do you ask for new syringe before use?
Yes	406	96.2
No	16	3.8
Do you ask for screening of blood to be transfused?
Yes	299	70.9
No	123	29.1
If you are positive, would you go for further investigation?
Yes	304	72
No	118	28
Would you avoid meeting if you are positive?
Yes	22	5.2
No	400	94.8
Have you ever participated in health education?
Yes	191	45.3
No	231	54.7

HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV: hepatitis B virus.

Participants’ response about the transmission of HBsAg

From the respondents, 164 (38.9%) of them respond that unsterile blade cannot transmit HBsAg. Similarly 157 (37.2%) of the respondents answer HBsAg cannot be transmitted from mother to child (Figure 1). From the total test results, 46 (10.9%) of them were positive for HBsAg test (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Information about transmission of HBsAg and its associated factors among mothers following antenatal care in Attat Hospital, April 2020 (N = 420).

Figure 2.

Laboratory results of HBsAg and its associated factors among mothers following antenatal care in Attat Hospital, April 2020 (N = 420).

Factors associated with HBsAg

In bivariate analysis Occupation, number of gravidity, heard about HBsAg, heard about transmission, hear about cause of HBsAg, Measure taken for symptoms, is HBsAg curable, is HBsAg self-restricted, is vaccination available for HBsAg, have chance to get HBsAg, participated in health education program and actions if there are symptoms were included. From this only occupation, number of gravidity, did it have cure and is vaccination available were stay statistically significant in multivariate analysis (Table 3).

Table 3.

HBsAg and its associated factors among mothers following antenatal care in Attat Hospital, April 2020 (N = 420).

HBsAg test
Variables	Category	Positive, N (%)	Negative, N (%)	COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)
Occupation	Government/self-employed	32 (69.6)	276 (73.4)	0.83 (0.42, 1.62)	0.33 (0.12, 0.91)*
Occupation	Housewife/not employed	14 (30.4)	100 (26.6)	1	1
Number of gravidity	3 and below	24 (52.2)	263 (69.9)	0.47 (0.25, 0.87)	0.21 (0.04, 0.68)*
Number of gravidity	4 and above	22 (47.8)	113 (30.1)	1	1
Heard about HBsAg	Yes	17 (37)	201 (53.5)	0.51 (0.27, 0.96)	0.82 (0.94, 4.97)
Heard about HBsAg	No	29 (63)	175 (46.5)	1	1
Heard about transmission	Yes	38 (82.6)	351 (93.4)	0.34 (0.14, 0.80)	0.88 (0.93, 8.92)
Heard about transmission	No	8 (17.4)	25 (6.6)	1	1
Heard about cause	Yes	30 (65.2)	256 (68.1)	0.87 (0.46, 1.67)	0.46 (0.18, 1.14)
Heard about cause	No	16 (34.8)	120 (31.9)	1	1
Measure for symptom	Immediately	31 (67.4)	307 (81.6)	0.46 (0.24, 0.91)	0.80 (0.67, 4.81)
Measure for symptom	After a week	15 (32.6)	69 (18.4)	1	1
Have cure	Yes	37 (80.4)	264 (70.2)	1.74 (0.82, 3.73)	1.52 (1.7, 9.4)*
Have cure	No	9 (19.6)	112 (29.8)	1	1
Self-restricted	Yes	4 (8.7)	42 (11.2)	0.76 (0.26, 2.22)	0.85 (0.82, 9.86)
Self-restricted	No	42 (91.3)	334 (88.8)	1	1
Is vaccination available?	Yes	22 (47.8)	250 (66.5)	0.46 (0.25, 0.85)	0.43 (0.05, 0.75)*
Is vaccination available?	No	24 (52.2)	126 (33.5)	1	1
Chance to get hepatitis B	Yes	3 (6.5)	13 (3.5)	1.95 (0.53, 7.11)	0.43 (0.09, 2.05)
Chance to get hepatitis B	No	43 (93.5)	363 (96.5)	1	1
Participated in health education	Yes	19 (41.3)	172 (45.7)	0.84 (0.45, 1.55)	0.61 (0.26, 1.43)
Participated in health education	No	27 (58.7)	204 (54.3)	1	1
If you have symptoms	Will be emotional	14 (30.4)	72 (19.1)	1.84 (0.94, 3.64)	0.72 (0.28, 1.83)
If you have symptoms	Will go to health facility	32 (69.6)	304 (80.9)	1	1

HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; COR: crude odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; AOR: adjusted odds ratio. *p ≤ 0.05.

Bold values are significant variables with p value less than or equal to 0.05.

Respondents whose occupation was in government or self-employed were 67% (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12, 0.91) less likely to have HBsAg compared to those who were housewife or not employed. Respondents whose number of gravidity was 3 and below were 79% (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.68) less likely to have HBsAg compared to those whose gravidity was 4 and above. Respondents who respond that HBsAg has cure were 1.52 times (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.7, 9.4) more likely to have HBsAg test compared those who respond that it does not have cure. Respondents who answered HBsAg has vaccine were 57% (AOR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.75) less likely to have HBsAg compared to those who answered it does not have vaccine (Table 3).

Discussion

Magnitude of positive HBsAg test among mothers following ANC in Attat Hospital was 46 (10.9%) (95% CI: 8.3, 14.0) which is higher than a study in the Gojjam zone 7.5%,⁵ Yirgalem hospital 7.2%,¹ Dawuro zone 3.5%,⁴ Adis Abeba 6.0%,¹⁸ in Nigeria 6.78%,⁷ in Mali 8%¹² and in southern 7.8%.²⁰ The magnitude of this result was similar to that in studies in Nigeria and Uganda.^8,21 In summary, global magnitude of HBsAg is clustered as high (⩾8%), intermediate (2%–7%) and low (<2%).²² Thus, the result of this study belongs to the high magnitude category. This difference might be due to inadequate information as stated by the result of this study. Other reason for this higher magnitude might be location of the study area which is remote.

Respondents whose occupation was in government or self-employed were less likely to have HBsAg compared to those who were housewife or not employed. Similarly, a study in Gojjam zone state’s housewives has higher risks,⁵ and recent meta-analysis shows that income has impact on HBsAg.²³ Possible reason for this might be exposing factors may decrease when there is source of income.

Respondents whose numbers of gravidity were 3 and below were less likely to have HBsAg compared to those whose gravidity was 4 and above. A study in southern Ethiopia also shows that higher gravidity was risky for HBsAg,³ and another study in Germany shows similar impact of being higher gravidas.²⁴ This might be due to decrease in exposure either during delivery or during termination of the pregnancy when most of the deliveries were at home and also when hospital setup was not safe enough when the number of gravidity was lower.

Respondents who respond that HBsAg has cure were more likely to have HBsAg test compared those who respond it does not have cure. Similar to a study in northern Tigray,² a study in different hospitals of Ethiopia states mothers in ANC have low awareness about HBsAg.²⁵ This might be because more than half (54.7) of mothers have never been participated in health education and most of them were housewives who have limited source of information.

Respondents who answered HBsAg has vaccine were less likely to have HBsAg compared to those who answered it does not have vaccine, which is similar to a study conducted in Yirgalem.⁵ This might be because those who know that it has vaccination were better understanding to prevent the disease.

Strength and limitation of the study

Each patient participated in this study had laboratory investigation with either positive or negative result. This could provide an exact characteristic of the outcome variable.

Participants who had found to be positive for HBsAg were linked to follow-up as special case, considering hepatitis B immune globulin and hepatitis B vaccine for their neonate.

Data collectors were professionals who were on their routine activities in the study area which could substantially reduce errors on sampling and measurements.

Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to see statistically significant effect of independent variable over the outcome variable.

Nature of the study design employed could not appreciate cause-and-effect relationship.

Since enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was not routinely available in the study area, false-negative values of the rapid diagnostic tests result might deflate the prevalence of HBsAg.

Conclusion

Magnitude of HBsAg among mothers who were on ANC follow-up in Attat Hospital was high compared to other studies. Being employed in government or self-employed, gravida 3 and below and those who think that the disease has vaccine were less likely to have HBsAg, whereas those who think that the disease was curable were more likely to have HBsAg. Therefore,

Since the magnitude of HBsAg was high, the test should be routine so that neonates from positive mothers need to receive immunoglobulin and vaccination by the hospital;

Mothers who have no regular job need to be addressed by woreda and zonal health office, woreda and zonal administration office and other non-governmental organizations working on women’s empowerment.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

My subjects, mothers who have antenatal care follow-up, who have been included in this study; this research report cannot be a plan if you are not here, many thanks dear mothers and live long. Mr Tewodros Tesfa never needs to be missed from this section for his important comments.

Author contributions

All authors have substantial contributions to conception, study design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data. H.D. has drafted and Y.F.G., H.D., M.M.G. and T.M.B. have critically reviewed the article. All authors have agreed on the journal to which the article will be submitted. They have reviewed and agreed on all versions of the article before submission, during revision, the final version accepted for publication and any significant changes introduced at the proofing stage. Y.F.G. agrees to take responsibility and be accountable for the contents of the article.

Data sharing

Dataset supporting this study can be accessed discussing with the corresponding author. Since the data have confidential participant results, it could be available upon reasonable request.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Haromaya University research review board with a review ID of 29/2012.

Ethical clearance

Permission was obtained from Gurage zone health office and Attat Hospital medical director office. Confidentiality and anonymity were ensured, and participants were informed that their participation was voluntary. The results were recorded with patients’ identification number, to avoid errors in the results of the test, repeatedly checked before reporting. The laboratory results were given to the hospital and to each pregnant woman.

Informed consent

Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.

ORCID iD

Yohannes Fikadu Geda

References

Amsalu

Ferede

Eshetie

, et al. Prevalence, infectivity, and associated risk factors of hepatitis B virus among pregnant women in Yirgalem hospital, Ethiopia: implication of screening to control mother-to-child transmission. J Pregnancy 2018; 2018: 8435910.

Araya Mezgebo

Niguse

Gebrekidan Kahsay

, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection and associated risk factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in health facilities of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. J Med Virol 2019; 90(3): 503–509.

Deme

Edao

Jaya

, et al. Prevalence of hypertension, anemia, asymptomatic urinary tract infection, syphilis, hiv and hepatitis b virus infection among pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic at a rural hospital in southern Ethiopia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2016; 47(5): 1032–1039.

Chernet

Yesuf

Alagaw

Seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus surface antigen and factors associated among pregnant women in Dawuro zone, SNNPR, Southwest Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10(1): 418.

Abera

Adem

Yimer

, et al. Community seroprevalence of hepatitis B, C and human immunodeficiency virus in adult population in Gojjam zones, northwest Ethiopia. Virology J 2017; 14(1): 21.

Tegegne

Desta

Tegbaru

, et al. Seroprevalence and transmission of Hepatitis B virus among delivering women and their new born in selected health facilities, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Research Notes 2014; 7(1): 239.

Esan

Omisakin

Ojo-Bola

, et al. Sero-prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus co-infection among pregnant women in Nigeria. Am J Biomed Res 2014; 2(1): 11–15.

Anaedobe

Fowotade

Omoruyi

, et al. Prevalence, socio-demographic features and risk factors of Hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in Southwestern Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J 2015; 20: 406.

Noubiap

JJN

Nansseu

JRN

Ndoula

, et al. Prevalence, infectivity and correlates of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in a rural district of the Far North Region of Cameroon. BMC Public Health 2015; 15(1): 454.

10.

Rabiu

Akinola

Adewunmi

, et al. Risk factors for hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in Lagos, Nigeria. Acta Obstetricia Gynecol Scand 2010; 89(8): 1024–1028.

11.

Yohanes

Zerdo

Chufamo

Seroprevalence and predictors of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women attending routine antenatal care in Arba Minch Hospital, South Ethiopia. Hepat Res Treat 2016; 2016: 9290163.

12.

MacLean

Hess

Bonvillain

, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen among pregnant women attending the Hospital for Women & Children in Koutiala, Mali. South Afr Med J 2017; 102(1): 47–49.

13.

Fekadu

Knowledge attitude and utilization of emergency contraception among health science and medical students of Arba Minch University, 2015. J Women Health Care 2017; 6(4): 1000383.

14.

Umare

Seyoum

Gobena

, et al. Hepatitis B virus infections and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care clinic at Deder Hospital, Eastern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2016; 11(11): e0166936.

15.

Molla

Munshea

Nibret

Seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen and anti HCV antibody and its associated risk factors among pregnant women attending maternity ward of Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Virol J 2015; 12(1): 204.

16.

Mohebbi

Sanati

Cheraghipour

, et al. Hepatitis C and hepatitis B virus infection: epidemiology and risk factors in a large cohort of pregnant women in Lorestan, West of Iran. Hepat Mon 2011; 11(9): 736–739.

17.

Yakasai

Ayyuba

Abubakar

, et al. Sero-prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection and its risk factors among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. J Basic Clin Reprod Sci 2012; 1(1–2): 49–55.

18.

Desalegn

Wassie

Beyene

, et al. Hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection among pregnant women in resource-limited high endemic setting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: implications for prevention and control measures. Eur J Med Res 2016; 21(1): 16.

19.

Geda

YF.

Determinants of teenage pregnancy in Ethiopia: a case-control study, 2019. Current Med Iss 2019; 17(4): 112–117.

20.

Metaferia

Dessie

Ali

, et al. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of hepatitis B virus among pregnant women in southern Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Epidemiol Health 2016; 38: e2017027.

21.

Bayo

Ochola

Oleo

, et al. High prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care: a cross-sectional study in two hospitals in northern Uganda. BMJ Open 2019; 4(11): e005889.

22.

Zenebe

Mulu

Yimer

, et al. Sero-prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B virus and human immunodeficiency virus infection among pregnant women in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14(1): 118.

23.

Kebede

Abateneh

Belay

AS.

Hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of prevalence studies. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 18(1): 322.

24.

Lobstein

Faber

Tillmann

HL.

Prevalence of hepatitis B among pregnant women and its impact on pregnancy and newborn complications at a tertiary hospital in the eastern part of Germany. Digestion 2017; 83(1-2): 76–82.

25.

Desalegn

Mihret

Beyene

, et al. Survey of hepatitis B virus infection and risk factors among pregnant women at public hospital in Ethiopia. Int J Biomed Res 2018; 7(7): 450–456.