Abstract
Objective:
This study represents the first direct comparison of management of epididymo-orchitis (EO) by Accident and Emergency (A&E), Urology and Genito-Urinary Medicine (GUM) departments in a large tertiary care centre, and their compliance with international guidelines.
Methods:
Case notes of patients with EO who attended A&E, Urology and GUM between January and June 2014 were analysed retrospectively.
Results:
A total of 127 men were seen (median age: 33, range: 15–79). Forty-four attended A&E (median age: 35), 30 Urology (median age: 37), and 53 GUM (median age: 31).
MSU was sent in 17/44 (38.6%) of A&E, 11/30(36.7%) of Urology, and 35/53(66%) of GUM patients. Fifty-three of 53 (100%) of GUM, 14/44 (31.8%) of A&E and four of 30 (13.3%) of Urology patients had chlamydia and gonorrhoea NAAT testing.
Of these, 90.9% of A&E, 93.3% of Urology and 100% of GUM patients were prescribed antibiotics.
Twelve A&E and one Urology patient were referred to GUM. Conversely, only three of 11 A&E and zero of five GUM patients aged over 50 were referred for urological follow-up.
Conclusion:
The management of EO, especially in younger men at risk of STIs by A&E and Urology, and older men at risk of urological problems by GUM, is an area for significant improvement. Closer co-operation between departments, unifying local management protocols, abandoning the traditional demographic divide, and ensuring effective referral pathways are essential to improving care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.