Biblical performance criticism (BPC) is a provincial practice with particular North American and European historical indices. When entering into a new context, this methodological genealogy needs to be recognized, because within those indices overt and covert interests are served. In order for BPC to be contextualized to serve local interests, it must recognize practices on the ground and how those practices have already been shaped or reshaped to serve local interests. I will highlight three practices in the Bik m context of Ghana to see how their ideological pathways have been (re)shaped to serve local interests: written Bible translation, oral tradition, and preaching. I will discuss two examples where written Bible translation has partially imitated the pathways of oral tradition and sermonic practice to better serve local interests. Then I will discuss the material dimensions of written Bibles and oral tradition as instructive for the way BPC materially contextualizes. Finally, I will suggest that if contextual Bible study as developed in South Africa could be adapted for the Bik m context, it could be helpful to Bible interpreters, translators, and performers as they seek to embed their Bible practices in locally controlled ways that foster local liberation.
BakhtinMikhail M.1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Translated by EmersonCarylHolquistMichael. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2.
BaumanRichard. 2013. “Discovery and Dialogue in Ethnopoetics.” Journal of Folklore Research50(1): 175–90.
3.
BaumanRichardBriggsCharles L.1990. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology: 59–88.
4.
BaumanRichardBriggsCharles L.2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BermannSandra. 2014. “Performing Translation.” Pages 285–97 in A Companion to Translation Studies. Edited by BermannSandraPorterCatherine. John Wiley & Sons.
6.
BriggsCharles L.2013. “Contested Mobilities: On the Politics and Ethnopoetics of Circulation.” Journal of Folklore Research50(1): 285–99.
7.
ButlerJudith. 2000. “Competing Universalities.” Pages 136–81 in Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. Edited by ButlerJudithLaclauErnestoŽižekSlavoj. London: Verso.
8.
ButlerJudith. 2012. Parting Ways: Jewishness and the Critique of Zionism. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
ChakrabartyDipesh. 1992. “Provincializing Europe: Postcoloniality and the Critique of History.” Cultural Studies6(3): 337–57.
10.
ChatterjeePartha. 1993. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ComaroffJeanComaroffJohn L.1991. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
De WitHans. 2012. Empirical Hermeneutics, Interculturality, and Holy Scripture. Intercultural Biblical Hermeneutics Series 1. Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies.
14.
DoanWilliamGilesTerry. 2008. “The Song of Asaph: A Performance-Critical Analysis of 1 Chronicles 16:8-36.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly70: 29–43.
15.
EsalaNathan. 2013. “Implementing Skopostheorie in Bible Translation.” The Bible Translator64(3): 300–323.
16.
EsalaNathan. 2014. “Measuring the Adequacy of the Host Text Using Skopostheorie in Bible Translation: The Ethics of Operational Transparency.” The Bible Translator65(3): 308–36.
17.
EsalaNathan. 2015. “Towards Contextualizing ‘Contextual Bible Study’ among the Bikɔɔm Peoples and Their Neighbors in Ghana.” Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature, Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 24.
18.
EngelkeMatthew. 2009. “Reading and Time: Two Approaches to the Materiality of Scripture.” Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology74(2): 151–74.
19.
FoleyJohn Miles. 2002. How to Read an Oral Poem. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
20.
FoleyJohn Miles. 2012. Oral Tradition and the Internet: Pathways of the Mind. Urbana: University of Illinois.
21.
GentzlerEdwin. 2008. Translation and Identity in the Americas: New Directions in Translation Theory. London: Routledge.
22.
HorsfieldPeterAsamoah-GyaduKwabena. 2011. “What Is It about the Book? Semantic and Material Dimensions in the Mediation of the Word of God.” Studies in World Christianity17(2): 175–93.
23.
HymesDell H.1996. Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Toward an Understanding of Voice. Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education. London: Taylor & Francis.
24.
LaryeaPhilip T.2012. “The Impact of Mother Tongue Translation.” Paper presented at “The State of Bible Translation in Africa,”Accra, Ghana, September 20.
25.
MahmoodSaba, and American Council of Learned Societies. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
MaxeyJames A.2009. From Orality to Orality: A New Paradigm for Contextual Translation of the Bible. Biblical Performance Criticism 2. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
27.
MaxeyJames A.WendlandErnst R.2012. Translating Scripture for Sound and Performance: New Directions in Biblical Studies. Biblical Performance Criticism 6. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
28.
NadellaRaj. 2012. “Postcolonialism, Translation, and Colonial Mimicry.” Pages 49–58 in Ideology, Culture, and Translation. Edited by BoerRolandElliottScott S. Society of Biblical Literature Semeia Studies 69. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.
29.
NiditchSusan. 1996. Oral World and Written Word. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.
ReilingJ.SwellengrebelJ. L.1971. A Handbook on the Gospel of Luke. New York: United Bible Societies.
32.
RhoadsDavid. 2006. “Performance Criticism: An Emerging Methodology in Second Testament Studies—Part I.” Biblical Theology Bulletin36: 1–16.
33.
RowlandChristopher. 2006. “Social, Political, and Ideological Criticism.” Pages 655–71 in The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies. Edited by RogersonJ. W.LieuJudith M.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
SannehLamin O.1989. Translating the Message: The Missionary Impact on Culture. American Society of Missiology Series 13. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
35.
ScottJames C.1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
36.
SmithJustine. 2005. “Indigenous Performance and Aporetic Texts: A Performative Analysis of Sacred Scriptures.” Union Seminary Quarterly Review59: 114–24.
37.
SpivakGayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Pages 271–313 in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Edited by NelsonCaryGrossbergLawrence. Urbana: University of Illinois.
38.
ViswanathaVanamalaSimonSherry. 2002. “Shifting Grounds of Exchange.” Pages 162–81 in Post-Colonial Translation Theory and Practice. Edited by BassnettSusanTrivediHarish. London: Routledge.
39.
WestGerald O.1997. “On the Eve of an African Biblical Studies: Trajectories and Trends.” Journal of Theology for Southern Africa99: 99–115.
40.
WestGerald O.2004a. “Early Encounters with the Bible among the Batlhaping: Historical and Hermeneutical Signs.” Biblical Interpretation12(3): 251–81.
41.
WestGerald O.2004b. “Artful Facilitation and Creating a Safe Interpretive Site: An Analysis of Aspects of a Bible Study.” Pages 211–37 in Through the Eyes of Another: Intercultural Reading of the Bible. Edited by de WitHans. Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies.
42.
WestGerald O.2009. “The Not So Silent Citizen: Hearing Embodied Theology in the Context of HIV and AIDS in South Africa.” Pages 23–42 in Heterotopic Citizen: New Research on Religious Work for the Disadvantaged. Edited by WyllerTrygve. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
43.
WestGerald O.2011. “Do Two Walk Together? Walking with the Other through Contextual Bible Study.” Anglican Theological Review93(3): 431–49.
