Abstract
Sleep disturbance is frequently reported by women during the menopausal transition due to various physiological changes and environmental factors. Insomnia is a critical treatment target for its deleterious effects on daytime functioning and quality of life and increased risk of developing a depressive disorder. Due to medication side effects and patient preferences, there is increased interest in the use of psychological treatments that address the myriad of menopausal symptoms, including cognitive-behavioural therapy, clinical hypnosis and mindfulness-based therapies. The objective of this article is to review the effects of psychological treatments for menopausal symptoms on sleep disturbance in peri-/postmenopausal women. We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and reference lists from inception until May 2023, including 12 studies that evaluated sleep as a secondary outcome. Most studies found that group and self-help (guided and unguided) cognitive-behavioural therapies and clinical hypnosis for menopausal symptoms have positive effects on sleep among women with significant vasomotor symptoms. There was preliminary support for mindfulness-based stress reduction. Future research including more diverse samples and women with sleep disorders is needed. Evaluating the implementation of psychological therapies in clinics where menopausal women seek care is an important next step.
Introduction
Menopause is characterized by several physical and psychological changes and role transitions. Sleep disturbance is often reported by women throughout and following the menopausal transition, and women with pre-existing difficulties sleeping are particularly vulnerable to worsening of sleep during menopause. 1 These sleep difficulties include poor sleep quality, 2 insomnia symptoms3–5 and sleep disordered breathing.5–7 There are multiple factors contributing to sleep disturbance during menopause, including but not limited to vasomotor symptoms (i.e., hot flashes and night sweats [HFNS]), depressive symptoms and the presence of primary sleep disorders with their own etiological factors. 8 The negative impacts of sleep disturbance during menopause are widespread, including poor quality of life and lower global functioning, cardiovascular disease, increased vasomotor symptoms and mood disturbance.9,10 Thus, sleep disturbance during the menopausal transition is an important treatment target.
Hormone replacement therapy and other medications may treat sleep disturbance in those experiencing HF-induced awakenings.11,12 However, these may not be viable or preferable for many women due to side effects, increased health risks, or attitudes towards medication.13–18 Psychological treatments for insomnia – including cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based therapies – are effective in postmenopausal women19–21, but access to these treatments is limited by a dearth of trained providers and limited availability in gynaecological or primary care settings where women seek care for their symptoms.
Psychological treatments for menopausal symptoms, including cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), clinical hypnosis (CH) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), have the benefit of targeting the myriad problems associated with menopause, including HFNS, mood/anxiety changes, urogenital symptoms and sleep disturbance across the spectrum of clinical severity.22–25 Using divergent methods, CBT and MBSR address reactions towards menopausal symptoms that increase distress and worsen the symptoms themselves; increase awareness of internal experiences; and promote acceptance.23,26–29 CH involves inducing deep relaxation and the use of focused attention, mental imagery and personalized suggestions to reduce core body temperature and increase perceived control. 25 These treatments have a positive effect on vasomotor symptoms and depression.25,30–32 Thus, for women struggling with impairing menopausal symptoms that include but may not be limited to sleep disturbance, these multifactorial treatments are important in facilitating access to treatment outside of speciality sleep clinics. The objective of this review is to evaluate whether CBT, CH and mindfulness-based therapies for menopausal symptoms improve sleep disturbance in women with HFNS.
Method
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Study selection
Included studies (1) were original research examining an intervention including CBT, CH, or mindfulness-based therapy for menopausal/vasomotor symptoms; (2) evaluated an active psychological intervention against a comparison group; (3) included an assessment of HFNS as the primary outcome; (4) included an assessment of sleep (e.g. insomnia symptoms, sleep disturbance and sleep quality) as a secondary outcome; (5) included peri- or postmenopausal women (natural or treatment-induced); and (6) were published in English. We reviewed whether psychological treatments for menopausal symptoms impact sleep among women seeking care for HFNS. Thus, we excluded studies in which the exclusive treatment focus was sleep (e.g. CBT-I) but included multi-component treatments for menopausal symptoms that included a sleep-focused component. These objectives differ on two important points: the treatment focus (menopausal symptoms vs. a sleep disorder), and the population of study (treatment seeking for menopausal symptoms vs. a sleep disorder). For a review of sleep treatments during the menopausal transition, see 21,33,34.
Literature search
Articles were obtained from PubMed using the following MeSH terms: ‘menopause’ AND ‘cognitive-behavioural therapy’ OR ‘hypnosis’ OR ‘mindfulness’ from inception until May 2023. Reference lists of full-texts and review papers were also reviewed. The search was conducted by the first author. The search returned 123 records from PubMed and 10 records from reference lists. All records were screened by title, which led to the exclusion of 59 records not meeting our inclusion criteria. The remaining 74 records were screened by abstract, leading to the exclusion of another 55 records. Fourteen full-texts were assessed for eligibility, leading to the inclusion of 12 full-texts for review (see Figure 1). PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Data extraction
We collected the following data: first author; year of publication; study location; intervention and control treatments; sample size (per group); description of intervention (n of sessions, frequency and length); assessment timepoints; primary outcome measure and group × time result or between-group difference; and sleep outcome measure and group × time result or between-group difference (when unavailable, separate within-group results are reported).
Cognitive-behavioural interventions
Effect of cognitive-behavioural therapy for menopause on sleep disturbance.
Abbreviations: BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II; BC, breast cancer; BCN, breast care nurse; CBT, cognitive-behavioural therapy; CI, confidence interval; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; FACT-ES, Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Endocrine Symptoms; GCS, Greene Climacteric Scale; GSQS, Groningen Sleep Quality Scale; HFNS, hot flushes/night sweats; HFRDIS, Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale; HFRS, Hot Flush Rating Scale; HT, hormone therapy; dCBT, internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy; MD, mean difference; MRS, Menopause Rating Scale; NTC, no treatment control; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SH, self-help; SSC, sternal skin conductance; STRAW, Stages of Reproductive Ageing Workshop; SUD, substance-use disorder; UC, usual care; WHQ, Women’s Health Questionnaire; WLC, waitlist control.
aOutcomes reported for post-treatment unless otherwise specified.
bDuplicate sample.
Mann and colleagues compared a 6-week CBT group for HFNS to usual care among 96 breast cancer survivors (MENOS 1). 35 The protocol included two sessions focused on sleep, discussing behavioural and cognitive strategies for managing wakefulness after night sweats, respectively. Modified intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses revealed that compared to usual care, CBT led to significant improvements in sleep disturbance, as measured by the Women’s Health Questionnaire sleep problems scale (WHQ), at 9 weeks and 26 weeks post-randomization.
The MENOS 2 RCT (N = 147) compared group CBT, guided self-help CBT 36 (involving two phone contacts with a psychologist) and no treatment control (NTC) for HFNS among peri- and postmenopausal women with problematic HFNS. 37 Both CBT interventions lasted 4 weeks and included psychoeducation, stress management, paced respiration and cognitive and behavioural strategies. One session reviewed the mechanisms of sleep and cognitive and behavioural strategies for dealing with awakenings and night sweats. Sleep problems were assessed using the WHQ. ITT analyses indicated that compared to NTC, self-help CBT, but not group CBT, was associated with improvements in sleep problems at post-treatment. Differences in sleep problems between self-help CBT and NTC were no longer significant at follow-up (26 weeks post-randomization).
The MENOS@WORK trial included 124 women with problematic HFNS across 8 organizations in the UK who were randomized to receive unguided self-help CBT or waitlist control. 38 Self-help CBT was based on the MENOS 2 protocol but was shortened and adapted for a workplace setting and included four chapters to be completed over 4 weeks. The CBT intervention included ‘advice and strategies to improve sleep and CBT is an effective treatment for insomnia’. Women receiving self-help CBT reported significant improvements in sleep problems, assessed with the WHQ, and sleep quality as assessed by a single item from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The difference between groups demonstrated a medium effect size at both post-treatment and follow-up (20 weeks post-randomization).
The CBT-Meno trial compared a 12-week group CBT to waitlist control (WLC) in 71 women with problematic HFNS and depressive symptoms. 39 A module on sleep included psychoeducation, a cognitive-behavioural conceptualization of sleep disturbance, behavioural strategies for sleep (stimulus control and sleep restriction) and cognitive restructuring. ITT analyses revealed a small effect of CBT-Meno on sleep quality (PSQI total score) at post-treatment that was maintained at 3-month follow-up. Women in the WLC did not experience any improvement in sleep quality. Secondary analyses in a subset of participants (N = 36) and compared subjective and objective measures of HFNS (using ecological momentary assessments and sternal skin conductance, respectively) and their relation to sleep quality. 40 At baseline, the difference on the PSQI between CBT-Meno and WLC was small and not significant; at post-treatment (12 weeks post-baseline), the between-group difference was large and significant. At baseline, sleep quality correlated with subjective momentary ratings of hot flash severity and bother. At post-treatment, sleep quality no longer correlated with hot flash assessments.
One study compared 6-week guided and unguided digital CBT (dCBT) and WLC in women with breast cancer treatment-induced menopausal symptoms (N = 254). 41 Guided dCBT involved one telephone call and weekly written feedback. Unguided dCBT completed the program in a fixed order. The intervention included one module on sleep, including psychoeducation on the relationship between HFNS and sleep problems, assessment of sleep hygiene and setting goals and ‘helpful cognitive and behavioural reactions to night sweats/sleep problems’ (p. 812). Sleep quality was assessed using the Groningen Sleep Quality Scale. ITT analyses revealed that compared to WLC, guided dCBT was associated with significantly greater improvements at 10- and 24-weeks post-randomization. Unguided dCBT yielded a significantly greater improvement than WLC at 10 weeks, but this was not significant at 24 weeks. The study was not powered to compare the two dCBT groups. Compliance was higher in guided dCBT compared to unguided dCBT.
Lastly, the multisite MENOS 4 RCT compared breast care nurse-facilitated CBT group to usual care in women with breast cancer (N = 127) in their regular care setting. 42 Nurses were trained by a clinical psychologist and expert in CBT for menopause. At baseline, sleep quality assessed by the PSQI was in the nonclinical range in both groups. Modified ITT analyses revealed that CBT was associated with moderate improvements in sleep quality at 9 weeks post-baseline and large improvements at 26 weeks post-baseline. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity and adherence (94%), and sensitivity analyses did not reveal effects of individual therapist or site.
Clinical hypnosis
Effect of hypnosis interventions for menopausal symptoms on sleep disturbance.
Abbreviations: BC, breast cancer; BPD, borderline personality disorder; CH, clinical hypnosis; HF, hot flushes; M, mean; MOS Sleep Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale; NTC, no treatment control; PH, placebo + hypnosis; PS, placebo + sham hypnosis; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SAC, structured-attention control; VH, venlafaxine 75 mg + hypnosis; VS, venlafaxine 75 mg + sham hypnosis.
aOutcomes reported for post-treatment unless otherwise specified.
bStandard deviations not reported; additional information about age distribution is provided when available.
A single-blind RCT compared 5-week CH to a structured-attention control (SAC) in postmenopausal women with bothersome HFNS (N = 187). 44 CH was delivered by trained therapists and consisted of the same components as43. Participants were likewise instructed to practice daily self-hypnosis. The SAC intervention matched CH on therapist attention, discussion of symptoms, positive encouragement and monitoring and measurement. SAC participants listened to an audiotape providing information about HFNS. Both interventions were manualized and included fidelity checklists. Modified ITT analyses revealed that sleep quality (PSQI total score) improved by 9% at endpoint and 10% at 6 weeks post-treatment in SAC, and by 44% and 54%, respectively, in CH. Between-group effects at both timepoints were large.
Lastly, a single-blind pilot RCT in postmenopausal women experiencing bothersome HFNS (N = 70) compared venlafaxine XR (75 mg) + hypnosis (VH), venlafaxine + sham hypnosis (VS), placebo + hypnosis (PH) and placebo + sham hypnosis (PS). 45 Hypnosis included the same components described above, and sham hypnosis involved listening to white noise. Both hypnosis conditions were described to participants as behavioural interventions for HFNS to control for expectancy effects. All conditions involved four in-person and three at-home sessions and included discussions of HFNS and the intervention with a clinician and problem solving of barriers to adherence. Clinicians had varied educational backgrounds and were trained by an expert in hypnosis. Sleep was assessed using a checklist of possible side effects, with a positive score representing improvement and a negative score representing deterioration. Paired t-tests showed that sleep improved from baseline in all treatment groups; analyses did not assess for group-by-time interactions or provide effect sizes for comparison. Descriptively, the VS condition demonstrated the largest improvement in sleep, followed by PH, VH and PS.
Mindfulness-based interventions
Effect of mindfulness-based interventions for menopausal symptoms on sleep disturbance.
Abbreviations: BC, breast cancer; HF, hot flushes; M, mean; MBSR, mindfulness-based stress reduction; MENQOL, menopause-related quality of life; SD, standard deviation; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; WHIIRS, Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale; WLC, waitlist control.
aOutcomes reported for post-treatment unless otherwise specified.
Discussion
This review evaluated the sleep effects of psychological treatments for menopausal symptoms. Studies support that CBT, CH and MBSR for menopausal symptoms have some benefit on self-reported sleep problems (e.g. WHQ and MOS Sleep Scale; n = 5), sleep quality (PQSI and GSQS; n = 5), and insomnia symptoms (WHIIRS; n = 1) in women undergoing natural menopause and breast cancer treatment-induced menopause.
CBT was evaluated in various formats, including groups delivered by psychologists35,37,39,40 and nurses, 42 and guided and unguided self-help via the internet 41 or a booklet.37,38,46 In six RCTs, CBT was associated with improvements in sleep disturbance; studies reported small,35,39 medium38,41 and large effects40,42 on sleep. One study did not find an effect of group CBT for HFNS on sleep disturbance. 37 This study included a briefer CBT group (4 vs 6-12 weeks) than other studies. Sleep disturbance severity at baseline and magnitude of improvements were similar to a previous study, 35 suggesting that this study was underpowered to detect small between-group differences in sleep improvements. Future research should investigate barriers to improvement in group CBT. Effects of self-help CBT were also mixed regarding optimal treatment length and therapist contact to produce lasting improvements. Identifying the variables that yield stronger and more durable effects is an important area for future research. Protocols included components of CBT for insomnia (CBT-I) over 1-2 sessions (psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, stimulus control and sleep restriction). Sleep improvements with CBT for menopause may be driven by inclusion of single-session CBT-I (a dose that is evidence-based 47 ). Qualitative outcomes indicated that participants found key ingredients of CBT-I (e.g., completing sleep diaries and de-catastrophizing sleep loss) helpful to manage sleep. 48 Some have speculated that improvements in subjective HFNS or mood symptoms may contribute to improved sleep quality. 40 Given that menopausal sleep disturbance is heterogeneous and multifactorial, mechanisms of improvement may differ across women. Importantly, how much women are bothered by their HFNS at post-treatment seems to be mediated by improvements in sleep and their beliefs about sleep.49–51 Thus, identifying the mechanisms of sleep improvement with CBT for menopause and the characteristics of women who benefit is an important goal to improve sleep and HFNS-related distress.
CH also improved sleep disturbance and quality43–45 with large effect sizes at post-treatment compared to no treatment or a structured-attention control.43,44 In one study 44 sleep quality continued to improve over a 6-week follow-up. The mechanisms of CH are unknown. Some have suggested that CH is associated with a shift in the balance of sympathetic and parasympathetic tone. 44 However, evidence of altered sympathovagal balance in people with insomnia is mixed, and HF-induced insomnia is associated with increased psychological arousal but not cardiovascular reactivity. 52 CH may have similar mechanisms to other relaxation therapies that reduce somatic tension and cognitive arousal. 53 Investigation of CH as an intervention for sleep disturbance is still in its infancy. One recent study supports the use of CH for sleep disturbance in postmenopausal women using a different CH protocol.54,55 Future studies should investigate possible mediators of improvements in HFNS and sleep with longer follow-up periods.
MBSR improved insomnia symptoms in one RCT,26,56 consistent with meta-analytic evidence of a small effect of mindfulness meditation on sleep quality.57,58 Mindful awareness practices also improve sleep quality and HFNS in young breast cancer survivors. 59 Mindfulness meditation may improve sleep via improvements in negatively toned cognitive activity, arousal and changes to sleep architecture.60,61 Recent studies have evaluated MBSR for menopausal symptoms29,62 but have not included assessments of sleep. This is an important future direction as the effect of MBSR on sleep on menopausal women warrants replication.
Limitations of the studies included samples not selected or screened for sleep disorders and use of outcome measures with variable psychometric properties that assess different constructs, including self-reported sleep quality, ratings of sleep problems and insomnia symptoms. These limitations make it challenging to compare study results and to generalize to women with sleep disorders. Most studies included women who were predominantly White and highly educated. A continued effort to reach marginalized communities is required as socioeconomic status, race and racism, and geography influence sleep health disparities. 63 Lastly, many studies did not report effect sizes alongside statistical significance. Our review is limited by lack of quantitative synthesis. As the first review on the effect of psychological treatments for menopause on sleep, and with a small number of included studies, we prioritized a summary of the literature that accounts for nuanced findings that can guide the research agenda. Quantitative syntheses are an important next step and can help identify moderators of clinical outcome.
Notwithstanding, the reviewed studies were mostly methodologically strong with large samples, blind randomization and assessments and ITT analyses. We found support for psychological treatments in menopause on sleep in women in natural menopause with bothersome HFNS, with mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms, and breast cancer patients and survivors. The results also support different modes of treatment delivery that can facilitate increased access to care; this is promising considering the increased demand for remote interventions following the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions delivered by non-specialist providers also yielded positive effects on sleep and were delivered with high fidelity42,45; evaluating the implementation of CBT, CH and mindfulness-based interventions for menopause with non-specialist providers in settings where women receive care is an important future direction.
The results may support the use of stepped care in treating sleep disturbance during menopause. Effective low-intensity interventions that can be delivered by various practitioners can improve access to care for those with mild-to-moderate symptomatology, whereas those with clinically significant sleep problems should be referred for targeted sleep interventions delivered by specialized providers. Access to credentialed providers of psychological treatments for menopause remains limited 30 ; self-help protocols with various levels of therapist guidance may overcome this barrier but may not be appropriate for those with more severe clinical presentations. Among those with a diagnosis of insomnia disorder, cognitive-behavioural and behavioural therapies for insomnia are effective. 21 Given that sleep disturbance is multifactorial in this population, a strong assessment and case formulation is important to guide the selection of the most appropriate clinical intervention.64,65
Conclusion
Among postmenopausal women and breast cancer survivors, CBT for menopause improves sleep across different formats. CH for HFNS improves sleep, although durability beyond 6 weeks remains unknown. Support for MBSR is preliminary and more studies are needed. Positive effects may be driven by the inclusion of modules that specifically address sleep in CBT (e.g. sleep psychoeducation and behavioural and cognitive strategies for sleep) or by effects on sleep regulatory systems (e.g. decreasing hyperarousal via mindfulness meditation or deep relaxation/hypnosis). Evaluating efficacy in more diverse samples and women with sleep disorders are important next steps. Future research should continue to evaluate the effectiveness of delivering these interventions where women receive care.
Practice points
• Sleep disturbance is common throughout the menopausal transition – presenting as poor sleep quality, insomnia and/or sleep disordered breathing – and is impacted by hot flashes and night sweats that interfere with sleep, worsening mood symptoms and hormonal changes. • Among women seeking treatment for vasomotor symptoms, psychological treatments for menopause (cognitive-behavioural therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction and clinical hypnosis) were found to have a positive impact on sleep at post-treatment. Studies supported cognitive-behavioural therapy in various formats and offered preliminary support for clinical hypnosis and mindfulness-based stress reduction. Studies with longer follow-ups are needed to identify the durability of improvements and to identify factors that influence maintenance of treatment gains over time. • Findings suggest that psychological treatments for menopause may be an effective treatment option for women experiencing mild-to-moderate sleep disturbance in the context of menopausal symptoms and can increase access to interventions that promote sleep health in the settings where they seek care. Studies evaluating whether these treatments improve sleep among women with more severe presentations/diagnosed sleep disorders are an important future direction; these women likely benefit from more specialized sleep treatments. A thorough assessment of the history, causes and current severity of the presenting problem is necessary to inform treatment decisions.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr Rachel Liebman for her comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
Contributorship
Nicole Carmona contributed to the concept, design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, data acquisition, manuscript preparation, editing and review. Elisha Starick and Geneva Millett contributed to data acquisition and manuscript preparation, editing and review. Sheryl Green and Colleen Carney contributed to manuscript editing and review.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Guarantor
Nicole E. Carmona.
