From Indoctrination to Initiation: A Non-Coercive Approach to Faith-Learning Integration

Abstract

THIS ARTICLE CONTRIBUTES to ongoing discussions related to the nature, scope, and methods of faith-learning integration. The “initiation” approach developed by Tim McDonough (2011) is adapted to faith-learning integration in an attempt to bridge polarizing discussions regarding indoctrination versus rational autonomy and critical inquiry. The three stages of initiation are reconceived as conflict, creativity, and commitment. Using this model of initiation, teachers in Christian schools may strive toward educating students to be creative and responsive thinkers within the context of the tradition and community of the Christian faith. Ultimately, as the students of today become the scholars of tomorrow, they must be prepared to solve problems, face conflict, and deal with ambiguity. Initiation, as a non-coercive alternative to indoctrination, provides an opportunity to achieve such goals.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Badley

(1996). Two “cop-outs” in faith-learning integration: Incarnational integration and worldviewish integration. Spectrum, 28(2), 105–118.

Cooling

(2012). What is a controversial issue? Implications for the treatment of religious beliefs in education. Journal of Beliefs and Values 33(2), 169–181.

Copley

(2005). Indoctrination, education and God. London, SPCK Publishing.

Glanzer

P. L.

(2008). Why we should discard “the integration of faith and learning”: Rearticulating the mission of the Christian scholar. Journal of Education and Christian Belief, 12(1), 41–51.

Hand

(2003). A philosophical objection to faith schools. Theory and Research in Education, 1(1), 89–99. doi:10.1177/1477878503001001006

Hasker

(1992). Faith-learning integration: An overview. Christian Scholar's Review, 21(3), 231–248.

Hill

(2008). How learners respond to the teaching of beliefs and values. Journal of Education and Christian Belief, 12(2), 101–113.

Hirst

(1974). Moral education in a secular society. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Hustedt

Jacobsen

(2001). Scholarship and Christian faith: Enlarging the conversation New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Mannoia

V. J.

(2000). Christian liberal arts: An education that goes beyond. Rowman & Littlefield.

11.

Marsden

(1997). The outrageous idea of Christian scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

McDonough

(2011). Initiation, not indoctrination: Confronting the grotesque in cultural education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(7), 706–723.

13.

Peters

R. S.

(1965). Education as initiation. In Archambault

R. D.

(Ed.), Philosophical analysis and education (pp. 87–110). London: Routledge.

14.

Reich

(2002). Bridging liberalism and multiculturalism in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

15.

Shortt

(2000). Editorial. Journal of Education and Christian Belief 4(1).

16.

Shortt

(2011). Reflections of a journal editor. Journal of Education and Christian Belief, 15(1), 3–5.

17.

Stone

Duke

(2006). How to think Theologically. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

18.

Thiessen

E. J.

(2008). Teaching for committed openness. In Winsor

K. A.

(Ed.), Cultivating inquiry across the curriculum (pp. 159–185). Lexington, MA: Lexington Christian Academy.

19.

Thiessen

E. J.

(1985). Initiation, Indoctrination, and Education. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 10(3), 229. doi:10.2307/1494324

20.

Thiessen

E. J.

(1993). Teaching for commitment: Liberal education, indoctrination, and Christian nurture. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

21.

Turner

(1967) The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

22.

Wolterstorff

(2001). Ivory tower or holy mountain? Faith and academic freedom. Academe, 87(1), 17–22.