Using data from the Jiangsu Fertility Intention and Behavior Study (JFIBS), this study examines multidimensional influences of intergenerational ties on married women’s intended and ideal family size in Jiangsu Province, China, an extremely low-fertility setting. Our results suggest that preference for a grandson and a granddaughter, and a woman’s willingness to take advice from the parental generation promotes fertility motivation. In addition, potential (or actual) childcare provision from grandparents shifts fertility intention upward. Some family influences (e.g. family size of origin) tend to be more salient from parents-in-law than from parents, reflecting the patrilineal and patriarchal tradition in China. At the same time, we do not find any pronatalistic effect of co-residence with parents or parents-in-law.
AndertonDLTsuyaNOBeanLL (1987) Intergenerational transmission of relative fertility and life course patterns. Demography24: 467–480.
2.
AxinnWGClarkbergMEThorntonA (1994) Family influences of family-size preferences. Demography31: 65–79.
3.
AxinnWGYabikuST (2001) Social change, the social organization of families, and fertility limitation. American Journal of Sociology106: 1219–1261.
4.
BarberJS (2001) The intergenerational transmission of age at first birth among married and unmarried men and women. Social Science Research30: 219–247.
5.
BrewsterKL (1994) Neighborhood context and the transition to sexual activity among young black women. Demography31: 603–614.
6.
BurchTKGendellM (1970) Extended family structure and fertility – Some conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family32: 227–236.
7.
CaiY (2008) Assessing fertility levels in China using variable-r method. Demography45: 371–381.
8.
CaiY (2010) China’s below-replacement fertility: Government policy or socioeconomic development?Population and Development Review36: 419–440.
9.
CaldwellJC (1982) Theory of Fertility Decline, New York: Academic Press.
10.
ChenF (2005) Residential patterns of parents and their married children in contemporary China: A life course approach. Population Research and Policy Review24: 125–148.
11.
ChenFKorinekK (2010) Family life course transitions and rural household economy during China’s market reform. Demography47: 963–987.
12.
ChenFShortSE (2008) Household context and subjective well-being among the oldest old in China. Journal of Family Issues29: 1379–1403.
13.
Chen F, Liu G and Mair CA (2011) Intergenerational ties in context: Grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. Social Forces 90(2): 571--594.
14.
ChenFShortSEEntwisleB (2000) The impact of grandparental proximity on maternal childcare in China. Population Research and Policy Review19: 571–590.
15.
CrollEJ (2006) The intergenerational contract in the changing Asian family. Oxford Development Studies34: 473–491.
16.
DavisK (1955) Institutional patterns favoring high fertility in underdeveloped areas. Eugenics Quarterly2: 33–39.
17.
DavisKBlakeJ (1956) Social structure and fertility: An analytic framework. Economic Development and Cultural Change4: 211–235.
18.
DuncanODFreedmanRCobleJM (1965) Marital fertility and family size of orientation. Demography2: 508–515.
19.
EasterlinRA (1980) Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare, New York: Basic Books.
20.
EntwisleBMasonWM (1985) The multilevel effects of socioeconomic development and family planning programs on children ever born. American Journal of Sociology91: 616–649.
21.
FisherR (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
22.
FreedmanRChangMCSunTH (1982) Household composition, extended kinship and reproduction in Taiwan: 1973-1980. Population Studies36: 395–411.
23.
FreedmanRFreedmanDSThorntonAD (1980) Changes in fertility expectations and preferences between 1962 and 1977: Their relation to final parity. Demography17: 365–378.
24.
FreedmanDSFreedmanRWhelptonPK (1960) Size of family and preference for children of each sex. The American Journal of Sociology66: 141–146.
25.
Goode WJ (1970) World Revolution and Family Patterns. 2nd edition. The Free Press.
26.
GoodkindD (2011) Child underreporting, fertility, and sex ratio imbalance in China. Demography48: 291–316.
27.
GuBWangFGuoZ (2007) China's local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review33: 129–147.
28.
HagewenKJMorganSP (2005) Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970-2002. Population and Development Review31: 507–527.
29.
JohnsonNEStokesCS (1976) Family size in successive generations: The effects of birth order, intergenerational change in lifestyle, and familial satisfaction. Demography13: 175–187.
30.
KahnJRAndersonKE (1992) Intergenerational patterns of teenage fertility. Demography29: 39–57.
31.
KirkKMBlombergSPDuffyDL (2001) Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: A twin study. Evolution55: 423–435.
32.
KohlerH-PRodgersJLChristensenK (1999) Is fertility behavior in our genes? Findings from a Danish twin study. Population and Development Review25: 253–288.
33.
LorimerF (1954) Culture and Human Fertility, Paris: UNESCO.
34.
LyngstadTHPrskawetzA (2010) Do sibling’s fertility decisions influence each other?Demography47: 923–934.
35.
MareRD (2011) A multigenerational view of inequality. Demography48: 1–23.
36.
MorganSPKirosimaK (1983) The persistence of extended family residence in Japan: Anachronism or alternative strategy?American Sociological Review48(2): 269–281.
37.
MorganSPRindfussRR (1984) Household structure and the tempo of family formation in comparative perspective. Population Studies38: 129–139.
38.
MorganSPGuoZHayfordSR (2009) China’s below replacement fertility: Recent trends and future prospects. Population and Development Review35: 605–629.
39.
MurphyM (1999) Is the relationship between fertility of parents and children really weak?Social Biology46: 122–145.
40.
RaudenbushSWBrykAS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Second Edition. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
41.
RichterKPodhisitaCChamratrithirongA (1994) The impact of child care on fertility in urban Thailand. Demography31(4): 651–662.
42.
RodgersJLKohlerHPKyvikKO (2001) Behavior genetic modeling of human fertility: Findings from a contemporary Danish twin study. Demography38: 29–42.
43.
SouthSJCrowderK (2010) Neighborhood poverty and nonmarital fertility: Spatial and temporal Dimensions. Journal of Marriage and Family72: 89–104.
44.
ThorntonA (1980) The influence of first generation fertility and economic status on second generation fertility. Population and Environment3: 51–72.
45.
ThorntonAFrickeTE (1987) Social change and the family: Comparative perspectives from the West, China, and South Asia. Sociological Forum2(Special Issue: Demography as an Interdiscipline): 746–779.
46.
WangF (1996) A decade of one-child policy in China: Achievements and implications. In: GoldsteinAWangF (eds) China: The Many Facets of Demographic Change, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 97–120.
47.
WangF (2011) The future of a demographic overachiever: Long-term implications of the demographic transition in China. Population and Development Review37(supplement): 173–190.
48.
WeinsteinMSunTHChangMC (1990) Household composition, extended kinship, and reproduction in Taiwan: 1965-1985. Population Studies44: 217–239.
49.
WestoffCF (1990) Reproductive intentions and fertility rates. International Family Planning Perspectives16: 84–89, 96.
50.
WestoffCFPotvinRH (1967) College Women and Fertility Values, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Whyte MK (2003) (ed) China’s Revolutions and Intergenerational Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Chinese Studies.
52.
ZengYWangZ (2003) Dynamics of family and elderly living arrangements in China: New lessons learned from the 2000 Census. The China Review3: 95–119.
53.
ZhengZCaiYWangF (2009) Below-replacement fertility and childbearing intention in Jiangsu province, China. Asian Population Studies5: 329–347.
54.
ZengYWangZJiangL (2008) Future trend of family households and elderly living arrangement in China. GENUS - An International Journal of DemographyLXIV(No. 1–2): 9–36.
