Pancreatic colloid adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: Radiologic-pathologic correlation with cinematic rendering

Abstract

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas have the potential for malignant progression into adenocarcinoma. Colloid or mucinous non-cystic carcinoma of the pancreas is an uncommon variant neoplasm that can arise within an intestinal type IPMN and have a relatively improved prognosis but may mimic the more lethal tubular or ductal adenocarcinoma. Colloid carcinoma is an infiltrating ductal epithelial neoplasm containing primarily extracellular stromal mucin pools and scant amount of centrally floating neoplastic cells. While several reports have evaluated the unique pathologic and immunohistochemical profile of colloid carcinomas, there has been limited radiologic–pathologic correlation in the literature. We report a case of an 83-year-old female who presented for evaluation of slowly progressive abdominal pain and was found to have colloid carcinoma arising from an IPMN. This is one of the first reports to correlate the multimodality radiology including cinematic rendering (CR) and histopathology features associated with this tumor. An enhanced understanding of the correlation between imaging appearance and specific histopathologic findings may aid in the early recognition and treatment of this rare neoplasm. Emphasis is placed on CR as this may help guide surgical management.

Keywords

colloid adenocarcinoma intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm cinematic rendering

Introduction

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are well described pancreatic lesions accounting for 3–5% of all pancreatic tumors.¹ IPMNs are classified into four histopathological types: gastric, intestinal, pancreatobiliary, and oncocytic.² When invasive, IPMNs are distinguished as either colloid (mucinous non-cystic) carcinoma or conventional tubular/ductal carcinoma. Colloid carcinoma arises from intestinal-type IPMN and represents 25% of all invasive IPMNs, while tubular/ductal adenocarcinoma arises from pancreatobiliary type IPMN.^3–5 These two tumors have similar appearances and clinical presentations.^6–8 Colloid carcinoma is differentiated by its less aggressive features and superior long-term prognosis compared to that of conventional ductal carcinoma, with reports of 5-year survival of 40–60% versus 10–15%, respectively.^3,5–12 The WHO classification defines both tumors as malignant as they have invasive potential, however, their differing prognoses and metastatic tendencies make it important to carefully diagnose and monitor colloid carcinoma.²

While several reports have evaluated the unique pathologic and immunohistochemical profile of colloid carcinomas, there has been limited radiologic pathologic correlation of colloid (mucinous non-cystic) adenocarcinoma in the literature particularly with reference to cinematic rendering (CR). We present a case of an 83-year-old female who presented for evaluation of slowly progressive intermittent abdominal pain and was found to have pancreatic colloid carcinoma. To our knowledge, this is one of the first reports to evaluate the radiologic features associated with this tumor in conjunction with pathology. We also explore how CR of computed tomography (CT) images may help in surgical planning and risk stratification.

The pancreas protocol CT is often considered the preoperative gold standard imaging modality to assess for vascular involvement and whether complete tumor resection can be achieved. A standard pancreas protocol CT includes multi-phase dynamic post contrast CT imaging using thin slice thickness, and in some instances standard 3D reconstructions. However, 3D cinematic rendered (CR) images are not routinely obtained. Previous authors have shown significant interobserver variability in determining relevant vascular involvement across different radiologists. Additionally, the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative pancreas protocol CT in predicting pancreatic tumor vascular involvement as compared to surgical findings only ranged from 73 to 83%.^13–15 Such uncertainty could lead to unnecessary surgeries and unexpected intraoperative findings.

CR 3D evaluation of tumor vessel interfaces allows for real-time, dynamic assessment where the user can fully manipulate the rendering and view 3D perspectives that would best reveal critical tumor involvement.¹³ Light and shadowing are presented in a photorealistic manner which more closely resembles the intraoperative appearance of structures compared to conventional radiologic images and could potentially lead to more accurate preoperative diagnosis. An enhanced understanding of the correlation between imaging including CR and specific histopathologic findings may aid clinicians in earlier recognition and improved risk stratification of this neoplasm.

Case report

An 83-year-old female with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus presented with a 3-year history of slowly progressive intermittent abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting and was found to have an 11 × 3 cm cystic pancreatic mass on imaging. Relevant surgical history included remote cholecystectomy and right breast mastectomy. Physical exam was notable for a soft, non-tender abdomen without palpable mass. Serum laboratory testing revealed normal values for CEA 2.7 ng/mL (normal <5.2 ng/mL) and CA19-9 26.8 U/ml (normal <35 U/ml).

Radiologic imaging ultimately yielded a suspicious complex cystic mass involving the body and tail of the pancreas for which surgical resection was warranted. The patient underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with curative intent. The histopathology was compatible with colloid adenocarcinoma arising within an IPMN and histopathologic analysis suggested the tumor was completely confined to the pancreas and completely excised. The patient recovered well from the surgery and was doing well at her last noted post-operative visit 6 months post operation.

Radiologic features

Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis performed during the workup showed a complex cystic mass in the pancreatic body and tail with dilation of the main pancreatic duct. Peripheral internal solid components were suggested (Figure 1). No vascular invasion or distant metastases were noted. Findings were suspicious for main duct IPMN and MRI was obtained for further evaluation.

Figure 1.

(a) Noncontrast axial CT image through the pancreas demonstrates a hypodense mass expanding the pancreatic body and tail. Associated main pancreatic duct dilatation is noted. (b) Arterial phase post contrast CT demonstrates peripheral solid enhancing components within the pancreatic mass. No vascular invasion or distant metastases were noted. (c) Axial fused PET/CT shows hypermetabolic activity within the solid peripheral enhancing components of the pancreatic mass. SUV max of the solid components was 5.2. CT: Computed tomography; PET: Positron emission tomography.

PET/CT showed increased metabolic activity within the solid peripheral components of the complex distal pancreatic mass. Maximum standard uptake value (SUV max) within the lesion was 5.2 (Figure 1).

MRI of the abdomen demonstrated a complex cystic mass involving the main pancreatic duct. Internal soft tissue nodular components showed post contrast enhancement and restricted diffusion (Figure 2). MRI better showed the expansile nature of the mass along with heterogeneous low T2 signal regions within the larger cystic appearing mass which is compatible with the diagnosis of colloid adenocarcinoma in the setting of IPMN.

Figure 2.

(a) Axial T2 weighted MR shows marked pancreatic ductal dilatation with a complex cystic mass with multiple poorly defined lower T2 signal filling defects. (b) Axial T1 weighted fat saturated non-contrast and (c) arterial phase post contrast show central low T1 signal with peripheral increased T1 corresponding to the solid peripheral components. (d) Coronal T2 weighted MR demonstrates the expanded nature of the pancreatic tail secondary to a high T2 signal mucinous lesion. (e) Axial DWI b value 1000 and (f) Axial ADC map demonstrate multi focal restricted diffusion within the pancreatic tail and body lesion. MR: Magnetic resonance; DWI: Diffusion weighted imaging; ADC: Apparent diffusion coefficient.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) demonstrated a complex mixed cystic and solid mass involving the body and tail (Figure 3). The mucinous nature of internal components is reflected by internal echogenic components on EUS.

Figure 3.

(a) and (b) Endoscopic ultrasound images of the large pancreatic mass involving the body and tail. The complex cystic nature is appreciated with the overall hypoechoic appearance of the mass with multiple scattered hyperechoic foci corresponding to the mucinous nature of colloid adenocarcinoma.

CR reconstructions were performed on CT venous phase images (Figure 4). In this case, CR allowed enhanced preoperative visualization of the peripancreatic vasculature to support the notion that no critical tumor vessel involvement was present. Additionally, CR improved the surgical confidence that no unexpected intraoperative findings such as altered vascular anatomy would be encountered. CR also helped to further delineate the complex cystic and solid configuration within the tumor itself which could help suggest colloid carcinoma over other more solid tumors.

Figure 4.

(a) Axial CT image (cinematic rendering) through the pancreatic tail mass. (Syngo Via, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) (b) Corresponding axial post contrast venous phase image through the pancreatic mass. (c) Coronal oblique cinematic rendered image through the pancreatic tail mass. Note the visualization of vasculature surrounding the pancreatic lesion. (d) Corresponding post contrast coronal reconstructed CT image. CT: Computed tomography.

Pathologic features

Gross examination revealed a 17.5 × 7.0 × 4.5 cm distal pancreas and spleen with a moderate amount of associated peripancreatic and splenic hilar adipose tissue. The pancreatic duct lumen was dilated up to 1.1 cm and visible at the resection margin extruding tan and mucoid material. The pancreas was sectioned along its long axis, revealing an 8.0 × 3.5 × 2.8 cm multilocular cystic lesion replacing the pancreatic duct and extending to the distal end of pancreas. Approximately 1 cm from the pancreatic margin of resection within the wall of the cyst was a 3.5 × 3.0 × 2.0 cm pink–white, fibrotic area with unevenly distributed smaller cysts. Microscopic evaluation revealed abundant mucin which was expanding an intestinal type IPMN with overt high-grade dysplasia. The lesion was focally lined by atypical cells and rare atypical cells were floating within the mucin. Focal fibrotic reaction was noted in the surrounding stroma (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Mucinous (colloid) adenocarcinoma arising in an IPMN. (a) and (b) Low and high magnification of IPMN with pancreatic parenchyma alteration and high-grade morphology (arrows). (c) and (d) Colloid carcinoma and mucin dissecting fibrotic stroma, with detachment (arrow). (e) Colloid carcinoma abuts an artery (arrow); benign glands do not share this behavior. (f) Colloid carcinoma and mucin surrounds and abuts a nerve bundle (arrow). IPMN: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Immunostains for IgG and IgG4 performed on tissue block B6 show focal features of IgG4-related chronic pancreatitis. Immunostains for synaptophysin and chromogranin performed on tissue block B18 were negative. The immunohistologic features were consistent with colloid adenocarcinoma, stage PT2, PN0, arising in an IPMN.

Discussion

IPMNs, which are considered precursor lesions, fall under the WHO classification of digestive system tumors malignant epithelial category and are further classified into four histopathological types: gastric, intestinal, pancreatobiliary, and oncocytic IPMNs (Table 1).¹⁶ When invasive, IPMNs can be characterized as colloid (mucinous non-cystic) or conventional tubular/ductal carcinoma, which also are defined as malignant epithelial tumors.² Colloid carcinoma arises from intestinal-type IPMN while tubular adenocarcinoma arises from pancreatobiliary type IPMN.^3–5 Colloid carcinoma accounts for 1–3% of the malignant neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas with an incidence of only a few cases per 1 million individuals per year.^4,6–8 Although both colloid carcinoma and tubular adenocarcinoma are defined as malignant based on their invasive tendencies, colloid carcinomas demonstrate a median 5-year overall survival of 40–60%, compared with that of tubular/ductal carcinomas at 10–20%. Colloid carcinoma exhibits lower T stage and decreased rates of lymph node metastases, poor tumor differentiation, vascular/perineural invasion, and microscopic margin involvement.^6,9,10

Table 1.

Pathologic and radiologic findings in pancreatic tumors.

IPMN histological type		Intestinal	Pancreatobiliary	Gastric	Oncocytic
Associated pancreatic lesion		Colloid (mucinous non-cystic) adenocarcinoma	Tubular/ductal adenocarcinoma
Histology		Infiltrating ductal epithelial neoplasm of pancreas characterized by the presence, in at least 50% of the neoplasm, of abundant extracellular stromal mucin pools and scant neoplastic cells floating in the center	Involve the main pancreatic duct, and form thin, branching papillae with high-grade dysplasia. The neoplastic cells are cuboidal, with round, hyperchromatic nuclei, prominent nucleoli, moderately amphophilic cytoplasm, and have a less mucinous appearance	Composed of innocuous, tall columnar cells with basally oriented nuclei and abundant pale mucinous cytoplasm, reminiscent of gastric foveolar epithelium. The peripheral portions of the lesion often form pyloric-like glands	Complex and arborizing papillae, delicate stroma. The papillae are lined by 2–5 layers of cuboidal to columnar cells with abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm. The nuclei are round, large, and fairly uniform and typically contain single, prominent, eccentrically located nucleoli. Goblet cells may be interspersed
Immunohisto-chemistry	MUC1	–	++	–	+
	MUC2	++	–	–	–
	MUC5AC	++	++	++	+
	MUC6	–	+	–	++
	CDX2	++	–	–	–
Radiology		CT: Poorly enhancing, hypodense mass; round or lobular margins, usually have clear boundaries (Ren, 2010)MRI: Very high signal intensity on T2 due to abundant extracellular mucinous components; central poorly enhancing mucin pools with gradual peripheral and internal mesh-like enhancement of the intervening stroma resulting in hyperintense salt-and-pepper-like appearance (Ren, 2010)	CT: Usually hypodense; often see dilatation of both the biliary and pancreatic ducts (“double-duct sign”) pointing to origin in the head of the pancreasMRI: Delayed enhancement and ductal obstruction (early stages), which are well depicted on T2-weighted images; complex cystic areas representing adjacent pseudocysts, internal tumor necrosis, or side-branch ductal obstruction within or adjacent to the primary soft-tissue lesion

Note: Reference table for histology, immunohistochemistry and radiology findings for differential considerations in pancreatic tumors commonly arising from IPMN. Adapted from reference (Bosman, 2010; Ren, 2010).

CT: computed tomography; IPMN: intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

Radiologically, colloid carcinoma appears as a poorly enhancing low attenuated mass on contrast-enhanced CT and very high signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI due to abundant extracellular mucinous components. On dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, they show central poorly enhancing mucin pools with gradual peripheral and internal mesh-like enhancement of the intervening stroma causing a salt-and-pepper-like appearance.^17–19 Conversely, tubular/ductal carcinomas appear as a hypodense mass with upstream dilatated biliary and pancreatic ducts, resulting in the “double-duct sign.”² MRI demonstrates enhancement with ductal obstruction but are often hypoattenuating in the pancreatic and portal venous phases secondary to fibroblastic proliferation and decreased vascularity.²⁰

Given the rarity of colloid carcinoma, there are no specific widely acknowledged preoperative workup guidelines currently available. The recommended diagnostic workup of colloid carcinoma is therefore the same for ductal adenocarcinoma, which includes imaging with CT or MRI and EUS.^6–8 Colloid carcinomas are typically diagnosed after surgical resection, rather than during the preoperative workup.

Due to its low prevalence, treatment guidelines for colloid carcinoma mirror those for ductal adenocarcinoma. For resectable tumors, surgery is the recommended treatment, which can include pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, or total pancreatectomy based on location. Treatment with adjuvant therapy similar to ductal adenocarcinoma is recommended as comparable studies for colloid carcinoma specifically have not been performed.^21,22

This is where CR may play a vital role in diagnostic workup and surgical management. Some authors have closely analyzed the preoperative CT features between colloid carcinoma and tubular carcinoma but did not correlate this with histopathologic findings.²³ Others have explored the utility of CR in improving pancreatic cancer surgical planning but mainly in regard to ductal adenocarcinoma and not colloid carcinoma.²⁴ As mentioned previously, CR is an emerging technology with roots in animation that uses multiple light sources to produce astoundingly life-like 3D images and exceptional visualization of nuanced anatomy, vascular supply, and surrounding structures. The settings can be manipulated to accentuate subtle differences in features such as internal architecture, enhancement, and vascular involvement.

Regarding surgical planning, CR is transpiring as a tool to determine resectability, assess arterial and portovenous involvement, identify anatomic variants, and detect occult metastases in other pathologies including pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, so it would not be a stretch to apply these same principles in discriminating colloid carcinoma and tubular carcinoma.²⁴ Our case showed a cystic mass in the pancreatic body and tail which communicated with a dilated pancreatic duct. It exhibited peripheral areas of mural nodularity consistent with the salt-and-pepper mesh-like appearance with some invasion of the peripancreatic fat. These imaging findings reliably reflect underlying histopathologic characteristics that can be accentuated with CR to aid in early recognition of these neoplasms.

Colloid carcinoma is pathologically defined as an infiltrating ductal epithelial neoplasm of pancreas characterized by extracellular stromal mucin pools in >50% of the neoplasm and scant centrally floating neoplastic cells.^18,25 The lesion is usually >1 cm in diameter, arises from the main pancreatic duct or branch ducts, with varying degrees of duct dilatation.^26,27 Colloid carcinoma cells exhibit inverse polarization, whereby basilar cells secrete mucin between the stroma and cells instead of toward the lumen, thereby separating the cell from the underlying stroma. The mucin surrounding the epithelial cells then serves as a physical barrier, allowing for predominantly expansile growth of the tumor rather than invasion of neoplastic cells.^9,18,25,28 As presented in our report, this marked expansion of the lesion with presence of mucin pools pushing their way into the wall of the pancreatic duct corresponds with the heterogenous T2 weighted MRI appearance of the lesion.

Immunohistochemical profiles are often helpful in aiding the differentiation between colloid (mucinous non-cystic) and ductal carcinomas (Table 1). Immunohistochemical studies of colloid carcinoma, which is associated with intestinal-type IPMN, typically reveal diffuse expression of the surface glycoproteins CDX2 and MUC2 (features of intestinal differentiation).¹¹ While these were not available in our case, they would have been helpful in further confirming the diagnosis. In contrast, conventional ductal carcinoma, which is most often associated with pancreatobiliary type IPMN, exhibits the more aggressive MUC1 without MUC2 or CDX2 expression.^{5,11,12,29–31} MUC2 may exhibit tumor suppressor activity, which could explain the superior prognosis of colloid carcinoma and contribute to its indolent nature.²⁸

In conclusion, colloid carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare subtype of IPMN-associated epithelial tumor that necessitates further exploration. Colloid carcinoma of the pancreas presents radiologically as a poorly enhancing, low attenuated cystic mass with abundant mucin and peripheral and internal mesh-like enhancement of the intervening stroma. This is one of the first dedicated reports to evaluate the multimodality radiologic features with CR in conjunction with histopathology of this tumor type. Future studies involving CR of CT images would be helpful in defining its benefits in clinical and surgical management of these specific pancreatic cancers. An enhanced understanding of the clinical history, radiologic appearance, and histopathology can aid clinical teams in the early recognition of this rare neoplasm and distinguish it from the more lethal ductal adenocarcinoma.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, No. R37CA229810.

ORCID iDs

Michael Markovitz

Daniel Kim

Daniel Jeong

References

Machado

al Qadhi

al Wahibi

. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas. N Am J Med Sci 2015; 7: 160–175.

Bosman

Carneiro

Hruban

, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. http://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20113051318 (2010, accessed 9 October 2020).

Orcutt

Coppola

Hodul

. Colloid carcinoma of the pancreas: case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Pancreat Cancer 2016; 2: 40–45.

Liszka

Zielinska-Pajak

Pajak

, et al. Colloid carcinoma of the pancreas: review of selected pathological and clinical aspects. Pathology 2008; 40: 655–663.

Adsay

Pierson

Sarkar

, et al. Colloid (mucinous noncystic) carcinoma of the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25: 26–42.

Waters

Schnelldorfer

Aguilar-Saavedra

, et al. Survival after resection for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional comparison according to American Joint Committee on cancer stage. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213: 275–283.

Whang

Danial

Dunn

, et al. The spectrum of mucin-producing adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Pancreas 2000; 21: 147–151.

Gao

Zhu

Y-Y

Yuan

. Colloid (mucinous non-cystic) carcinoma of the pancreas: a case report. Oncol Lett 2015; 10: 3195–3198.

Poultsides

Reddy

Cameron

, et al. Histopathologic basis for the favorable survival after resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-associated invasive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 470–476.

10.

Koh

Y-X

Chok

A-Y

Zheng

H-L

, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the surgical outcomes of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21: 2782–2800.

11.

Adsay

Merati

Basturk

, et al. Pathologically and biologically distinct types of epithelium in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: delineation of an “intestinal” pathway of carcinogenesis in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28: 839–848.

12.

Tanaka

Fernández-del Castillo

Adsay

, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012; 12: 183–197.

13.

Javed

Young

RWC

Habib

, et al. Cinematic rendering: novel tool for improving pancreatic cancer surgical planning. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2022; 51: 878–883.

14.

Megibow

Zhou

Rotterdam

, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability—report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 1995; 195: 327–332.

15.

Soriano

Castells

Ayuso

, et al. Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 492–501.

16.

Bosman

Carneiro

Hruban

, et al. WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system. 4th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. 1997, pp. 279–337.

17.

Youn

Rha

Jung

, et al. Pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma with cystic features on cross-sectional imaging: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Diagn Interv Radiol 2018; 24: 5–11.

18.

Yoon

Lee

Kim

, et al. MRI features of pancreatic colloid carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: W308–W313.

19.

Ren

Shao

Zuo

C-j

, et al. CT features of colloid carcinomas of the pancreas. Chin Med J 2010; 123: 1329–1332.

20.

Cho

H-W

Choi

J-Y

Kim

M-J

, et al. Pancreatic tumors: emphasis on CT findings and pathologic classification. Korean J Radiol 2011; 12: 731–739.

21.

Oettle

Neuhaus

Hochhaus

, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1473–1481.

22.

Regine

Winter

Abrams

, et al. Fluorouracil vs gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 299: 1019–1026.

23.

Fouladi

Raman

Hruban

, et al. Invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: CT features of colloid carcinoma versus tubular adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214: 1092–1100.

24.

Javed

Young

RWC

Habib

, et al. Cinematic rendering: novel tool for improving pancreatic cancer surgical planning. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2022; 51: 878–883. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2022.04.001.

25.

Hruban

Boffetta

Hiraoka

. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. 4th ed. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010, pp. 281–295.

26.

Hruban

Takaori

Klimstra

, et al. An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28: 977–987.

27.

Campbell

Azadeh

. Cystic neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas. Histopathology 2008; 52: 539–551.

28.

Adsay

Merati

Nassar

, et al. Pathogenesis of colloid (pure mucinous) carcinoma of exocrine organs: coupling of gel-forming mucin (MUC2) production with altered cell polarity and abnormal cell-stroma interaction may be the key factor in the morphogenesis and indolent behavior of colloid carcinoma in the breast and pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 571–578.

29.

Adsay

Merati

Andea

, et al. The dichotomy in the preinvasive neoplasia to invasive carcinoma sequence in the pancreas: differential expression of MUC1 and MUC2 supports the existence of two separate pathways of carcinogenesis. Mod Pathol 2002; 15: 1087–1095.

30.

Yonezawa

Taira

Osako

, et al. MUC-1 mucin expression in invasive areas of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Pathol Int 1998; 48: 319–322.

31.

Nakamura

Horinouchi

Goto

, et al. New classification of pancreatic intraductal papillary–mucinous tumour by mucin expression: its relationship with potential for malignancy. J Pathol 2002; 197: 201–210.