Public School Programs for Students with Significant Disabilities in Post-secondary Settings

Abstract

There is little literature that describes the development, implementation, or outcomes of age- appropriate public school programs or individual supports for older students, ages 18-21, with significant disabilities. However, such programs in post-secondary settings such as community and four-year colleges are developing around the country. This article overviews programs based in post-secondary settings in Maryland that serve students ages 18-21 with significant disabilities who are still receiving public school special education services. Student and setting characteristics, staffing, funding patterns, referral and admission practices, and program components are described. Challenges associated with program development and implementation are discussed. Finally, several areas that should be addressed through program evaluation and research are enumerated.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran

, Snow

, & Swaner

(1999). A survey of secondary level teachers' opinions on community-based instruction and inclusive education. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24, 58–62.

Best Buddies International, Inc. (2000). What is Best Buddies? Available FTP: http://www.bestbuddies.org/

Brolin

(1997). Life-centered career education: A competency-based approach. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

CASAS. (2000). About CASAS. Available FTP: http://www.casas.org/

Certo

N. J.

, Pumpian

, Fisher

, Storey

, & Smalley

(1997). Focusing on the point of transition: A service integration model. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 68–84.

Doyle

M. B.

(1997). College life: The new frontier. Impact, 10(3), 16–17.

Fisher

, & Sax

(1999). Noticing differences between secondary and postsecondary education: Extending Agran, Snow, and Swaner's discussion. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24, 303–305.

Ford

, Schnorr

, Meyer

, Davern

, Black

, & Dempsey

(1989). Syracuse community-referenced curriculum guide for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

Goldstein

M. T.

(1993). LINK: A campus-based transition program for non-college bound youth with mild disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 75–84.

10.

Guy

, Shin

, Lee

, & Thurlow

(1999, April). State graduation requirements for students with and without disabilities. Technical Report 24, National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.

11.

Hall

, Kleinert

H. L.

, & Kearns

F. J.

(2000). Going to college! Postsecondary programs for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(3), 58–65.

12.

Halpern

A. S.

, Herr

C. M.

, Wolf

N. K.

, Lawson

J. D.

, Doren

, & Johnson

M. D.

(1997). NEXT S.T.E.P.: Student transition and educational planning. Austin, TX: Pro-ED.

13.

Halpern

, Yovanoff

, Doren

, & Benz

M. R.

(1995). Predicting participation in postsecondary education for school leavers with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 151–164.

14.

Hunter

(1999, December). Lesson in transition partnerships: An innovative school district/university relationship. Presentation at the 1999 TASH Conference, Chicago, IL.

15.

Jones

L. A.

, & Moe

(1980). College education for mentally retarded adults. Mental Retardation, 18, 59–62.

16.

Kleinert

H. L.

, Haigh

, Kearns

J. F.

, & Kennedy

(2000). Alternate assessments: Lessons learned and roads to be taken. Exceptional Children, 67, 51–66.

17.

Kohler

P. D.

(1993). Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied? Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 107–121.

18.

Low

(1975). Single step for handicapped. Community and Junior College Journal, 46(3), 18–21.

19.

McAfee

J. K.

, & Sheeler

M. C.

(1987). Accommodations of adults who are mentally retarded in community colleges: A national study. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 262–267.

20.

McDonnell

, Mathot-Buckner

, & Ferguson

(1996). Transition programs for students with moderate/severe disabilities. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

21.

Maryland State Department of Education. (2000, May). State Grant Discretionary Funds: Request for Proposal. Maryland State Department of Education: Baltimore, MD.

22.

Moon

M. S.

, & Inge

K. V.

(2000). Vocational preparation and transition. In Snell

& Brown

(Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th Ed; pp. 591–628). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

23.

National Transition Alliance. (1999, April). 1999 Promising programs. Alliance Newsletter, 3, 3–15.

24.

National Transition Alliance. (2000, June). 1999 Selected model programs/promising practices. Alliance Newsletter, 4, 3–15.

25.

Page

, & Chadsey-Rusch

(1995). The community college experience for students with and without disabilities: A viable transition outcome? Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 85–95.

26.

Patton

J. R.

, Smith

T. E. C.

, Clark

G. M.

, Polloway

E. A.

, Edgar

, & Lee

(1996). Individuals with mild mental retardation: Postsecondary outcomes and implications for educational policy. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 75–85.

27.

Pearpoint

, Forest

, & O'Brien

(1996). MAPs, Circle of Friends, and PATH: Powerful tools help build caring communities. In Stainback

& Stainback

(Eds.), Inclusion: A guide for educators (pp. 67–86). Baltimore: Brookes.

28.

Peraino

(1992). Post-21 follow-up studies: How do special education students fare? In Wehman

(Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (pp. 21–70). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. Inc.

29.

Rusch

F. R.

, & Millar

D. M.

(1998). Emerging transition best practices. In Rusch

F. R.

, & Chadsey

J. G.

(Eds.). Beyond high school: Transition from school to work (pp. 36–59). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

30.

Smith

T. E. C.

, & Puccini

I. K.

(1995). Position statement: Secondary curricula and policy issues for students with mental retardation. Education and Training In Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 275–282.

31.

Sharpton

W. R.

(1998, December). Creating postsecondary options: Issues and strategies from the field. Presentation at the 1998 TASH Conference, Seattle, Washington.

32.

Snell

M. E.

(Ed.). (1993). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

33.

Tashie

, Malloy

J. M.

, & Lichtenstein

S. J.

(1998). Transition or graduation? Supporting all students to plan for the future. In Jorgensen

C. J.

(Ed.), Restructuring high schools for all students: Taking students to the next level (pp. 234–259). Baltimore: Brookes.

34.

TASH (2000, May). Definition of the people that TASH serves. Available FTP: tash.org/resolutions/R21PEOPL.html

35.

Wagner

, D'Amico

, Marden

, Newman

, & Blackorby

(1992). What happens next? Trends in post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities: The second comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED356 603).

36.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

, & Kelchner

(1995). Whose future is it anyway? A student-directed transition planning program. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.

37.

Wood

(1999, December). A transformation of services for students 18-21 years old. Presentation at the 1999 TASH Conference, Chicago, IL.