Stakeholder Opinions on Accessible Informational Products Helpful in Building Positive,Practical Solutions to Behavioral Challenges of Individuals with Mental Retardation and/or Autism
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2001
Stakeholder Opinions on Accessible Informational Products Helpful in Building Positive,Practical Solutions to Behavioral Challenges of Individuals with Mental Retardation and/or Autism
The purpose of the study was twofold: (a) to explore the perceptions of administrators and policy makers, families, friends, individuals with challenging behavior and mental retardation and/or autism, researchers, and teachers regarding current behavioral information and dissemination and (b) to elicit suggestions on the kinds of user-friendly, low-cost informational products that they thought would be most helpful in increasing quality of life while reducing or eliminating behavioral challenges in individuals with disabilities. A qualitative method of inquiry using telephone focus groups and individual interviews was used. The study points to the importance of receiving condensed positive behavioral support information on both awareness and skill levels and to the continued existence of a longstanding gap between research and practice, a gap that exists despite the extensive research base on effective dissemination strategies and techniques.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottM., WaltonC., TapiaY., & GreenwoodC. R. (1999). Research to practice: A “blueprint” for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65, 339–352.
2.
AlbertoP. A., & TroutmanA. C. (1990). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
3.
BashinskiS., WickhamD., HoughtonJ., BeegleG., VogtsE., KillingerA., MatthewsD., Murphy-HerdM., & ScopecS. (1999, December). Creating field-based networks to meet the personnel needs of students with severe disabilities and deaf-blindness. Report presented at the annual conference of The Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities (TASH). Chicago.
4.
BeutlerL. E., WilliamsR. E., & WakefieldP. J. (1993). Obstacles to disseminating applied psy-chological science. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 2, 53–58.
5.
BiklenS. K., & MoselyC. R. (1988). “Are you retarded?” “No, I'm Catholic”: Qualitative meth-ods in the study of people with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Hand-icaps, 13, 155–162.
6.
BillupsL. H. (1997). Response to Bridging the Research-To-Practice Gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 525–527.
7.
BlacherJ. (1994). Placement and its consequences. In BlacherJ. (Ed.), When there's no place like home: Options for children living apart from their natural families (pp. 213–244). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
BoumaR., & SchweitzerR. (1990). The impact of chronic childhood illness on family stress: A com-parison between autism and cystic fibrosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 722–730.
9.
BromleyB. E., & BlacherJ. (1991). Parental rea-sons for out-of-home placement of children with severe handicaps. Mental Retardation, 29, 275–280.
10.
BrothersonM. J. (1994). Interactive focus group interviewing: A qualitative research method in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 101–118.
11.
BruyereS. M. (1993). Participatory action research: Overview and implications for family members of persons with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Re-habilitation, 3, 62–68.
12.
BrunerC. (1993). So you think you need some help? Making effective use of technical assistance. New York: Columbia University, National Center for Service Integration.
13.
CarnineD. (1995a). Trustworthiness, useability, and accessibility of educational research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 251–258.
14.
CarnineD. (1995b). The professional context for collaboration and collaborative research. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 368–371.
15.
CarnineD. (1997). Bridging the research-to-prac-tice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513–521.
16.
CarrE. G., HornerR. H., TurnbullA. P., MarquisJ. G., Magito McLaughlinD., McAteeM. L., SmithC. L., Anderson RyanK., RuefM. Β., & DoolabhA. (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
17.
CubanL. (1993). The lure of curricular reform and its pitiful history. Phi Delta Kappa, 75, 182–185.
18.
EnglertC. S., & TarrantK. L. (1995). Creating collaborative cultures for educational change. El-ementary School Journal, 16, 325–336.
19.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (1990). Making educational research more important. Exceptional Chil-dren, 57, 102–107.
20.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to improve instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 126–137.
21.
FuhrmanS. (1994). Uniting producers and con-sumers: Challenges in creating and utilizing edu-cational research. In TuijnmanT. (Ed.), Educational research and reform: An international perspective (pp. 133–147). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
22.
GerstenR., MorvantM., & BrengelmanS. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62, 52–67.
23.
GerstenR., VaughnS., DeshlerD., & SchillerE. (1997). What we know about using special education research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466–476.
24.
GlaserB., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
25.
HornerR. H., DiemerS. M., & BrazeauK. C. (1992). Educational support for students with se-vere problem behaviors in Oregon: A descriptive analysis from the 1987-1988 school year. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 154–169.
26.
HoshmandL. T., & PolkinghorneD. E. (1992). Redefining the science-practice relationship and. professional training. Education and Training in Psychology, 47, 55–66.
27.
HubermanM. (1990). Linkage between research-ers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 363–391.
28.
KaestleC. F. (1993). The awful reputation of edu-cational research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23–31.
29.
KatzL. G., & RothenbergD. (1996). Issues in dissemination: An ERIC perspective. The ERIC Review, 5, 2–9.
30.
KaufmanM., SchillerE., BirmanB., & CoutinhoM. (1993). A federal perspective on improving practices, programs, and policies in special edu-cation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16, 263–269.
31.
KennedyM. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4–12.
32.
KlappO. E. (1986). Overload and Boredom. New York: Greenwood Press.
33.
KnodelJ. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In MorganD. L. (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35–50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
KoegelR. L., SchriebmanL., LoosL. M., Dirlich-WilhelmH., DunlapG., RobbinsF., & PlienisA. J. (1992). Consistent stress profiles in mothers of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 22, 203–216.
35.
KornbletA. (1997). Response to bridging the re-search-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 523–524.
36.
KruegerR. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
LeungP. (1992). Translation of knowledge into practice. National Institute of Disability and Rehabil-itation Research National CRP Panel Final Report. Washington, DC: Walcott & Associates.
38.
Lieb-BrilhardB. (1989, April). What is the appropri-ate level of redundancy in federally sponsored education dissemination programs? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
39.
LincolnY. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative inquiry, 1, 275–289.
40.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41.
MaloufD. B., & SchillerE. P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414–424.
42.
MarkeyU. A. (2000). Partnerships. Journal of Positve Behavioral Interventions, 2, 188–189, 192.
43.
MarshallC., & RossmanG. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
MaxwellJ. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jos-sey-Bass.
46.
MeyerL. H., ParkH. S., Grenot-ScheyerM., SchwartzI., & HarryB. (1998). Participatory research: New approaches to the research to prac-tice dilemma. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 165–177.
47.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
MorganD. L., & KruegerR. A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In MorganD. L. (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research. (1996). A review of the literature on dis-semination and knowledge utilization. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Library.
50.
NewmanS., & VashC. (1994). Gray matter: Utilization of rehabilitation research results. Rehabilitation Education, 8, 380-385.
51.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Robbins, F., Dunlap, G., & Plienis, A. J. (1991). Family characteristics, family training, and the progress of young children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 173-184.
54.
RodgersJ. E.AdamsW. C. (1994). Media guide for academics. Los Angeles: Foundation for American Communications.
55.
RuefM. B., TurnbullA. P., TurnbullH. R., & PostonD. (1999). Perspectives of five stakeholder groups: Challenging behavior of individuals with mental retardation and/or autism. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 1, 43-58.
56.
SantelliB.SingerG. H. S.DiVenereN.GinsbergC.PowersL. E. (1998). Participatory action research: Reflections on critical incidents in a PAR project.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 211-222.
57.
Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of “way of life.”Library and Information Science Research, 17, 259-294.
58.
SchwartzI. S.; CartaJ. J.; & GrantS. (1996). Examining the use of recommended language-intervention practices in early childhood special education classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 251-272.
59.
SeidelJ., FrieseS., & LeonardD. C. (1995). The ethnograph V4.0: A user's guide. Salt Lake City, UT: Quality Research Associates.
60.
SeidmanI. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
61.
SilvermanG. R. (1992). New capabilities improve telephone focus groups. Orangeburg, NY: Market Navigation, Teleconference Network.
62.
SpragueJ. R., & RianV. (1993). Support systems for students with severe problem behaviors in Indiana: A descriptive analysis of school structure and student demographics. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington.
63.
StewartD. W., & ShamdasaniP. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice (Vol. 20). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64.
Turnbull, A. P., Friesen, B. J., & Ramirez, C. (1998). Participatory action research as a model for conducting family research. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 178-188.
65.
TurnbullA. P., & RuefM. B.. (1996). Family perspectives on problem behavior. Mental Retardation, 34, 280-293.
66.
TurnbullA. P., & RuefM. B. (1997). Family perspectives on inclusive lifestyle issues for people with problem behavior. Exceptional Children, 63, 211-227.
67.
TurnbullA. P. & TurnbullH. R. (2000). Achieving “rich” lifestyles. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 2, 190-192.
68.
Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (1997). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
69.
WestbrookJ. D. & BoethelM. (1997). The dissemination and utilization of disability research: The National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research approach, [World Wide Web: http://www.ncddr.org/du/products/ncddrapproach.htm]. The National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research.
70.
Whyte, W. F., Greenwood, D. J., & Lazes, P. (1991). Participatory action research: Through practice to science in social research. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 19-55). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
WoodwardJ. (1993). The technology of technology-based instruction: Comments on the research, development, and dissemination approach to innovation.Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 345-360.
72.
ZarbG (1992). On the road to Damascus: First steps towards changing the relations of disability research production. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, 125-138.
