This study examined the effectiveness of the ANSWER Strategy (Hughes, Schumaker, & Deshler, 2005) in improving the essay composition skills of post-secondary students with developmental disabilities. The six-step strategy incorporated analyzing essay prompts, creating an outline, generating an essay response, and reviewing the answer. The students (N = 16) were assigned via a stratified random sample method to treatment or control groups. A pre- and post-test design was employed and the results were evaluated using a strategy scoring rubric. Statistically significant differences were found between the post-tests in favor of the treatment group related to their knowledge of the ANSWER strategy and the use of the strategy steps. Overall, the results indicated that the ANSWER strategy holds promise as an effective writing intervention for individuals with developmental disabilities in post-secondary settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
De La PazS.Learning Disabilities Research and PracticeSelf-regulated strategy instruction in regular education settings: Improving outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities1492–1061999
2.
DelanoM. E.Use of strategy instruction to improve the story writing skills of a student with asperger syndrome 10.1177/10883576070220040701 Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities22252–2392007
3.
DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B.Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for lowachieving adolescentsExceptional Children52583–5901986
4.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciencesLawrence Earlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ1988nd ed.
5.
EnglertC. S.MariageT. V.OkoloC. M.ShanklandR. K.MoxleyK. D.CourtadC. A.
6.
ChenH. Y.The learning-to-learn strategies of adolescent students with disabilities: Highlighting, note taking, planning, and writing expository texts 10.1177/1534508408318804 Assessment for Effective Intervention34147–1612009
7.
EnglertC. S.RaphaelT. E.AndersonL. M.Socially mediated instruction: Improving students’ knowledge and talk about writingThe Elementary School Journal92411–4491992
8.
GerstenR.BakerS.Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis 10.1086/499668 The Elementary School Journal101252–2742001
9.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.SwansonL.HarrisK. R. & GrahamS.Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studiesHandbook of research on learning disabilitiesGuilfordNew York323–3442003
10.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.Almost 30 years of writing research: Making sense of it all with The Wrath of Khan 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.01277 Learning Disabilities Research2458–682009
11.
GrigalM.NeubertD. A.MoonM. S.Public school programs for students with significant disabilities in post-secondary settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities36244–2542001
12.
GrigalM.NeubertD. A.MoonM. S.Postsecondary options for students with significant disabilitiesTeaching Exceptional Children3568–732002
13.
Guzel-OzmenR.The effectiveness of modified cognitive strategy instruction in writing with mildly mentally retarded Turkish students. Council for Exceptional Children72281–2972006
14.
HallM.KleinertH. L.KearnsJ. F.Going to college! Postsecondary programs for students with moderate to severe disabilitiesTeaching Exceptional Children3258–652000
15.
HallenbeckM. J.Taking charge: Adolescents with learning disabilities assume responsibility for their own writingLearning Disability Quarterly25227–2462002
16.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.MasonL. H.Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilitiesFocus on Exceptional Children3571–162003
17.
HayesJ. R.FlowerL. S.On the structure of the writing processTopics in Language Disorders7419–301987
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No.108–4462004
20.
LaneK. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS.WeisenbachJ. L.BrindleM.MorphyP. 10.1177/0022466907310370 The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing performance of second-grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. The Journal of Special Education41234–2532008
21.
MercerC. D.MercerA. R.PullenP. C.Teaching students with learning problemsPearsonUpper Saddle River, NJ2011th ed.
22.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M.ShaverD.Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 Years after high school: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010 -3008)SRI Internationalhttp://www.nlts2.org/reports/2010_09/nlts2_report_2010_09complete.pdfMenlo Park, CA2010
23.
Penner-WilliamsJ.SmithT. E CGartinB. C.Written language expression: Assessment instruments and teacher tools 10.1177/153408408318805 Assessment for Effective Intervention34162–1692009
24.
PollowayE. A.Witten language assessment: Introduction to the special series 10.1177/1534508408318801 Assessment for Effective Intervention34132–1332009
25.
Salahu-DinD.PerskyH.MillerJ.National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education SciencesThe Nation's Report Card:Writing 2007 (NCES 2008 -468)U.S. Department of EducationWashington, DC2008
26.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00282.x Adolescents with learning disabilities as writers: Are we selling them short? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice2481–922009
27.
StoddenR. A.WhelleyT.Postsecondary education and persons with intellectual disabilities: An introduction. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities396–152004
28.
TherrienW. J.HughesC. A.KapelskiC.MokhtariK.Effectiveness of a test-taking strategy on achievement in essay tests for students with learning disabilities 10.1177/0022219408326218 Journal of Learning Disabilities4214–232009
29.
WeirC.Person-centered and collaborative supports for college success. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities3967–732004
30.
ZaftC.HartD.ZimbrichK.College career connection: A study of youth with intellectual disabilities and the impact of postsecondary education. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities3945–532004
