Special Education Teachers’ Practices in Preparing Students With Disabilities for Postsecondary Education in Saudi Arabia

Abstract

This study explored how special education teachers (SETs) in public secondary schools in Saudi Arabia prepare students with disabilities (SWDs) for postsecondary education institutions. A literature review of best practices and predictors of secondary transition for SWDs guided the development of an instrument to examine SETs’ practices regarding transition assessment, transition planning, and instructional support provided to SWDs. After the validity and reliability of the instrument were tested, SETs (n = 111) working in public secondary schools in Riyadh responded. Findings revealed that SETs’ implementation of most transition practices in assessment, planning, and instruction provision was high. However, using formal and informal assessment tools to assess self-determination skills, developing students’ summaries of performance, including plans of study and instructional and test accommodations in the SWDs’ transition individualized educational plans, and involving representatives from disability support services in higher education institutions were moderately implemented. The results are discussed considering the literature on secondary best practices, predictors, and transition services in Saudi Arabia. Recommendations include expanding the scope of the study to cover other areas in Saudi Arabia and utilizing other research methods to examine how SETs implement transition practices. Implications for practice and policy are also discussed.

Keywords

postsecondary education Saudi Arabia special education teachers students with disabilities transition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2001). Missing data. SAGE.

Almalki

(2020). Components of transition services in the individualized education program for students with an intellectual disability. The Saudi Journal of Special Education, 13, 115–140. https://doi.org/10.33948/1640-000-013-004

Almalki

(2022). Transition services for high school students with intellectual disability in Saudi Arabia: Issues and recommendations. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 68(6), 880–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2021.1911564

Almalky

H. A.

Alqahtani

S. S.

(2022). School and business partnerships to support job training for students with developmental and other disabilities: Employers’ perspectives. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(9), 3949–3957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05276-2

Alquraini

(2011). Special education in Saudi Arabia: Challenges, perspectives, future possibilities. International Journal of Special Education, 26(2), 149–159. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ909292

Alrusaiyes

R. F.

(2014). Perspectives toward transition program for females with intellectual disability in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Alsalamah

A. A.

(2016). The current situation of the commitment to regulation rules by institutes and programs for deaf and hard of hearing students in primary schools [Conference presentation]. 15th Annual International Globalization, Diversity, and Education Conference, Pullman, WA, United States. https://shorturl.at/DbtsJ

Alsalamah

A. A.

Poppen

M. I.

(2023). Postsecondary transition experiences of young women who are deaf and hard of hearing in Saudi Arabia. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 46(2), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221091198

Authority for the Care of Persons with Disabilities [@APD_ksa]. (2023, October 22). Get to know the reality of students and employees with disabilities in Saudi universities. X. https://twitter.com/apd_ksa/status/1716031649039696151?s=46&t=TOtMGwuGB_wJyspuCsOtAA

10.

DeVellis

R. F.

Thorpe

C. T.

(2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. SAGE.

11.

Dong

Peng

C. Y. J.

(2013). Principled missing data methods for researchers. Springer Plus, 2, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-222

12.

Field

Sarver

M. D.

Shaw

S. F.

(2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240060501

13.

Getzel

E. E.

Thoma

C. A.

(2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728808317658

14.

Hadley

W. M.

(2006). LD students’ access to higher education: Self-advocacy and support. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/42733306

15.

Hamblet

E. C.

(2014). Nine strategies to improve college transition planning for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(3), 53–59. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/l-d-students-access-higher-education-self/docview/228534867/se-2

16.

Janiga

S. J.

Costenbader

(2002). The transition from high school to postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A survey of college service coordinators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350050601

17.

Karr

A. F.

(2006). Secure statistical analysis of distributed databases, including condensation. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 1(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.29012/jpc.v1i2.573

18.

Kochhar-Bryant

Bassett

D. S.

Webb

K. W.

(2009). Transition to postsecondary education for students with disabilities. Corwin Press.

19.

Kohler

P. D.

Field

(2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030701

20.

Kohler

P. D.

Gothberg

J. E.

Fowler

Coyle

(2016). Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs. National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: The Collaborative. https://www.transitionta.org

21.

Kohler

P. D.

Greene

(2004). Strategies for integrating transition-related competencies into teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700206

22.

Leake

Black

(2005). The cultural and linguistic diversity: Implications for transition personnel. The National Center on Secondary Education and Transition: University of Minnesota. https://shorturl.at/efTHW

23.

Leake

D. W.

(2012). Self-determination requires social capital, not just skills and knowledge. Review of Disability Studies, 8(1), 34–43. https://www.rdsjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/107

24.

Leake

D. W.

Burgstahler

Rickerson

Applequist

Izzo

Picklesimer

Arai

(2006). Literature synthesis of key issues in supporting culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities to succeed in postsecondary education. Journal on Postsecondary Education and Disability, 18(2), 149–165. https://shorturl.at/YK39r

25.

Little

R. J.

Rubin

D. B.

(2019). Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons.

26.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Kwiatek

Voggt

Chang

W. H.

Fowler

C. H.

Poppen

Sinclair

Test

D. W.

(2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793

27.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Sinclair

Poppen

Woods

W. E.

Shearer

M. L.

(2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047

28.

Ministry of Education. (2002). Regulations of special education programs and institutes of Saudi Arabia. https://shorturl.at/bm985

29.

Ministry of Education. (2016). The regulatory guide for special education. http://departments.moe.gov.sa/EducationAgency/RelatedDepartments/SPECIALEDUCATION/Pages/guide.aspx

30.

Ministry of Education. (2020). Transition services manual for teachers of learning disabilities. https://rb.gy/fp1tb

31.

Ministry of Education. (n.d.). High school tracks. https://moe.gov.sa/ar/hayyak/Documents/thanawyah-guideline.pdf

32.

Newman

L. A.

Madaus

J. W.

Javitz

H. S.

(2016). Effect of transition planning on postsecondary support receipt by students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915615884

33.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1975). Psychometric theory: 25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x004010007

34.

Palmer

Roessler

R. T.

(2000). Requesting classroom accommodations: Self-advocacy and conflict resolution training for college students with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 38–43. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/requesting-classroom-accommodations-self-advocacy/docview/236229832/se-2?accountid=35481

35.

Ray

A. B.

(2019). Evidence-based learning strategies: Preparing students with high-incidence disabilities for college. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(4), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218782416

36.

Ruland

Baker

Cushing

Getzel

Hart

Johnston

Reardon

Smith

Stahl

Thurlow

(2023). Postsecondary education and training preparation toolkit. National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: The Collaborative. https://transitionta.org/postsecondary-education-training-prep/

37.

Santiago

J. H.

Tarantino

S. J.

(2002). Individualism and collectivism: Cultural orientation in locus of control and moral attribution under conditions of social change. Psychological Reports, 91(3), 1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2002.91.3f.1155

38.

Schafer

J. L.

Graham

J. W.

(2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147

39.

Schreuer

Sachs

(2014). Efficacy of accommodations for students with disabilities in higher education. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-130665

40.

Tavakol

Dennick

(2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

41.

Test

D. W.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Mustian

A. L.

Fowler

C. H.

Kortering

L. J.

Kohler

P. H.

(2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960

42.

Thoma

C. A.

Getzel

E. E.

(2005). “Self-determination is what it’s all about”: What postsecondary students with disabilities tell us are important considerations for success. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 40(3), 234–242. https://www-jstor-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/23879718

43.

Toutain

(2019). Barriers to accommodations for students with disabilities in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 32(3), 297–310. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1236832

44.

Tukey

J. W.

(1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.

45.

Webb

K. W.

Patterson

K. B.

Syverud

S. M.

Seabrooks-Blackmore

J. J.

(2008). Evidenced based practices that promote transition to postsecondary education: Listening to a decade of expert voices. Exceptionality, 16(4), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830802412182

46.

Weis

Bittner

S. A.

(2022). College students’ access to academic accommodations over time: Evidence of a Matthew effect in higher education. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(12), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09429-7

47.

Novak

J. A.

Lavery

M. R.

Vostal

B. R.

Matuga

J. M.

(2018). Predicting college completion among students with learning disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(4), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417750093

48.

Zeng

Zhang

(2024). The relationships among parent involvement, student self-determination, and postsecondary education enrollment for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 35(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221130748

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB