Social Identity Can be a Team Game: Social Identity and Other Factors that Widen and Bridge Partisan Gaps in Political Perceptions of Sports Media Topics
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Social Identity Can be a Team Game: Social Identity and Other Factors that Widen and Bridge Partisan Gaps in Political Perceptions of Sports Media Topics
Sport and politics are often intertwined, as political and social issues “play out” during a game. Not all sports media consumers may read the same news topics as political, however. By analyzing data from three years of cross-sectional surveys of sports fans in the United States, we generate inferences about how political perceptions of sports media topics may vary by political party and other key variables. Guided by social identity theory, results support the idea that social identification with a person’s political group may be associated with seeing some sports media topics as more political and may increase partisan differences in political perceptions. By contrast, social identification with being a sports fan may have the opposite relationship for some sports media topics. Political efficacy may also decrease partisan differences for some sports media topics. These results are discussed in the context of contemporary political debate around sports issues.
AllenM. S.IliescuD.GreiffS. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science: A call to action [editorial]. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699
2.
Al MarriA.Al AnsariH. (2023, January 26). World Cup in Qatar: Human rights and normalization - Carnegie endowment for international peace. World cup in Qatar: Human rights and normalization. https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/88890
3.
Ardèvol-AbreuA.Gil de ZunigaH.GámezE. (2020). The influence of conspiracy beliefs on conventional and unconventional forms of political participation: The mediating role of political efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(2), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12366
4.
BaileyA.JonesL. (2023). ‘Fairness versus inclusion’: Representations of transgender athletes in British newspaper reports. The language of inclusion and exclusion in sports (pp. 193–216). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110789829-010
5.
BillingsA. C.HundleyH. L. (2010). Examining identity in sports media. In HundleyH.BillingsA. (Eds.), Examining identity in sports media (pp. 1–16). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452274904.n1
6.
BroussardR. (2020). “Stick to sports” is gone: A field theory analysis of sports journalists’ coverage of socio-political issues. Journalism Studies, 21(12), 1627–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2020.1853491
7.
BroussardR.HeathW.BarnidgeM. (2021). Incidental exposure to political content in sports media: Antecedents and effects on political discussion and participation. The Communication Review, 24(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2020.1853491
8.
BrownK. A.LewisN.BarnidgeM.BomanC. D. (2022). Black lives matter to the NBA: The impact of sport fanship and political affiliation on the perception of the NBA’s racial justice initiatives during the 2020 playoff bubble. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2022-0150
9.
Brown-DevlinN.BrownK. A. (2020). When crises change the game: Establishing a typology of sports-related crises. Journal of international crisis and risk communication research, 3(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.30658/jicrcr.3.1.3
10.
CampbellA.GurinG.MillerW. E. (1954). The Voter Decides. (pp. 187–187). Row, Peterson and Co.
11.
CapraraG. V.VecchioneM.CapannaC.MebaneM. (2009). Perceived political self-efficacy: Theory, assessment, and applications.European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 1002–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.604
12.
CoombsD. S.LambertC. A.CassiloD.HumphriesZ. (2020). Flag on the play: Colin Kaepernick and the protest paradigm. Howard Journal of Communications, 31(4), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2019.1567408
13.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM. (2007). Multiple social categorization. Advances in experimental social psychology (39, pp. 163–254). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39004-1
GiftT.MinerA. (2017). “DROPPING THE BALL”: The understudied nexus of sports and politics. World Affairs, 180(1), 127–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820017715569
GolanG. J.WaddellT. F.BarnidgeM. (2021). Competing identity cues in the hostile media phenomenon: Source, nationalism, and perceived bias in news coverage of foreign affairs. Mass Communication and Society, 24(5), 676–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1884263
21.
GrieveR.DavenportJ. (2023). An exploration of the correlation between students’ political orientation and sport fandom. Findings in Sport, Hospitality, Entertainment, and Event Management, 3(1), 4. https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/finsheem/vol3/iss1/4.
22.
HanJ.FedericoC. M. (2017). Conflict-framed news, self-categorization, and partisan polarization. Mass Communication and Society, 20(4), 455–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1292530
23.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
HyltonK. (2021). Black lives matter in sport…?Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 40(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-07-2020-0185
28.
JeritJ.BarabasJ. (2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000187
29.
KarpJ. A.BanducciS. A. (2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000161
30.
KlarS. (2013). The influence of competing identity primes on political preferences. The Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1108–1124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000698
31.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.HastallM. R. (2010). Please your self: Social identity effects on selective exposure to news about in-and out-groups. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01495.x
32.
KossakowskiR.NosalP.WoźniakW. (2020). Politics, ideology and football fandom: The transformation of modern Poland. Routledge.
LevenduskyM. S. (2018). Americans, not partisans: Can priming American national identity reduce affective polarization?The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/693987
35.
LevenduskyM. S. (2023). Our common bonds: Using what Americans share to help bridge the partisan divide. University of Chicago Press.
36.
LongJ. A.EvelandW. P.Jr.SlaterM. D. (2019). Partisan media selectivity and partisan identity threat: The role of social and geographic context. Mass Communication and Society, 22(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1504302
37.
MastromartinoB.ChouW.-H. W.ZhangJ. J. (2018). The passion that unites us all: The culture and consumption of sports fans. In Lu WangC. (Ed.), Exploring the rise of fandom in contemporary consumer culture (pp. 52–70). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3220-0.ch004
PanJ. Z.EdelsteinE.BanskyP.WynerA. (2021). A knowledge graph based approach to social science surveys. Data Intelligence, 3(4), 477–506. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00107
40.
PetersonE.MuñozM. (2022). “Stick to sports”: Evidence from sports media on the origins and consequences of newly politicized attitudes. Political Communication, 39(4), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2039979
41.
Rankin-WrightA. J.HyltonK.NormanL. (2016). Off-colour landscape: Framing race equality in sport coaching. Sociology of Sport Journal, 33(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2015-0174
ReynoldsK. J.SubasicE. (2016). “We see things not as they are, but as we are”: Social identity, Self-Categorization, and perception. Psychological Inquiry, 27(4), 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1215665
44.
RuggA. (2020). Incorporating the protests: The NFL, social justice, and the constrained activism of the “Inspire Change” campaign. Communication & Sport, 8(4-5), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519896325
45.
SchneiderR. C. (2018). Sport as a facilitator of positive international relations. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 4(20), 843–851. https://doi.org/10.14486/IntJSCS634
46.
SeippelØ.DalenH. B.SandvikM. R.SolstadG. M. (2018). From political sports to sports politics: On political mobilization of sports issues. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 10(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2018.1501404
47.
SerazioM.ThorsonE. (2020). Weaponized patriotism and racial subtext in Kaepernick’s aftermath: The anti-politics of American sports fandom. Television & New Media, 21(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419879917
48.
SeviB.AltmanN.FordC. G.ShookN. J. (2021). To kneel or not to kneel: Right-wing authoritarianism predicts attitudes toward NFL kneeling protests.Current Psychology, 40(6), 2948–2955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00239-4
49.
SharrowE. A. (2021). Sports, transgender rights and the bodily politics of cisgender supremacy. Laws, 10(3), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030063
StempelC. (2006). Televised sports, masculinist moral capital, and support for the US invasion of Iraq. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 30(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723505282472
SuttonA.ClowesM.PrestonL.BoothA. (2019). Meeting the review family: Exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 36(3), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276
54.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
55.
ThorsonE. A.SerazioM. (2018). Sports fandom and political attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy018
56.
ToweryN. A. (2023). A sense of belonging: A qualitative investigation into the origination of collegiate sport fanship and fandom. Communication & Sport, 12(5), 859–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795231171604
57.
TurnerJ. C.ReynoldsK. J. (2012). Self-categorization theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 399–417). Sage Publications Ltd.
58.
WannD. L. (2002). Preliminary validation of a measure for assessing identification as a sport fan: The Sport Fandom Questionnaire.International Journal of Sport Management, 3, 103–115.
59.
WannD. L.GrieveF. G.PeetzT. B.ZapalacR. K. (2021). Comparing the identity centrality of sport team identification and sport fandom.Journal of Sport Behavior, 44(4), 500–510.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
