Leadership has long been recognized as a major factor determining the success of an organization. A major challenge facing an organization is how to adapt successfully to the rapidly changing environment. This study focused on the effect of leadership on innovative behaviors, hypothesizing that transformational leadership and self-leadership of human resource within an organization affect innovative behaviors directly and indirectly through psychological empowerment. Using a sample of 217 organizational members employed by the various types of firms in Korea, this study identified the positive influence of self-leadership on innovative behaviors, and also found the evidence that empowerment mediated the relations between transformational leadership and innovative behavior relations. However, the mediating effect of empowerment between self-leadership and innovative behaviors was not found. Implications for research and practice of our findings are discussed.
AvolioB.BassB.JungD.Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional using Multi-factor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1999, 72, 441–462
2.
AvolioB.J.GibbsonT.C.. Developing transformational leader: A life span approach, In: KanungJ. A.KanungoR. N. (Eds.), Charismatic Leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness, 1988, 276–308. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass276–308
3.
BassB. M., Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press1985
JaskyteK.“Organizational Culture and Innovation in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations.”Dissertation Abstracts International, 2003, 63 (10), 3729A
13.
JungD.AnneW.. “The Role of Transformational Leadership in Enhancing Organizational Innovation: Hypotheses and Some Preliminary Findings.”The Leadership Quarterly, 2003, 14, 525–544
14.
JungD.SosikJ. J.. “Transformational Leadership in Work Groups: The Role of Empowerment, Cohesiveness, and Collective-Efficacy on Perceived Group Performance,”Small Group Research, 2002, 33(3), 313–337
15.
KanterR. M.The Change Masters, 1983, New York: Simon & Schuster
16.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z.The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987
17.
LuthansF.DavisT.. Behavioral self-management (BSM): the missing link in managerial effectiveness, Organizational Dynamics, 1979, 42–60
18.
ManzC.Self-leadership: toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11, 585–600
19.
ManzC.“Self-leadership… the heart of Empowerment.”Journal for Quality and Participation, July/August, 1992a, 80–85
20.
ManzC.NeckC. P.. Mastering Self-Leadership, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1999
21.
ManzC.SimsH. P.Jr.Super leadership: Leading others to lead themselves, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989
ScheinE. H.Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass1985
25.
SchinJ.McClombG.E.“Top Executive Leadership and Organizational Innovation: An Investigation of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations.”Social Work Administration, 1998, 22 (3), 1–21
26.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A.. “Determinants of innovation behavior; A path model of individual innovation in the workplace.”Academy of Management Journal1994, 37 (3), 580–607
27.
SpreitzerG.M.“Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, measurement and Validation.”Academy of Management Journal, 1995, Vol. 38, 1442–1485
28.
ThomasK. W.VelthouseB.A.. “Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation.”Academy of Management Review. 1990. Vol. 15. 666–681
29.
YuklG.Leadership in Organizations (5th ed.), Prentice Hall, 2002
30.
WoodmanR.SawyerJ.GriffinR.“Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity.”Academy of Management Review, 1993, j Vol. 18: 293–321
31.
ZhouJ.“Feedback valence, Feedback style, Task autonomy, and Achievement orientation: Interactive Effects on Creative Performance.”Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83, 261–276
