Overlapping regional security institutions in South America: The case of OAS and UNASUR

Abstract

The Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) has positioned itself as a regional security organization aimed at reducing the influence of the Organization of American States (OAS) in South America. At the same time, the OAS paradoxically serves as a model for UNASUR because of its operational capacity and its legitimacy as a regional organization. This article analyzes the seemingly contradictory tendencies of replication and dissociation that UNASUR exhibits towards the OAS in terms of security conceptions and practices. In the first part of the paper, we will draw on recent debates on international regime complexity to develop a framework to study institutional overlap. The second part analyzes to what extent and in which respects UNASUR, and particularly its Defense Council, overlaps with the OAS in terms of security conceptions and practices, while the third part examines the causes of the emergence of a “competitor” for the OAS in South America.

Keywords

Organization of American States regime complexity regional security organization South America Union of South American Nations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acharya

(2007) The emerging regional architecture of world politics. World Politics 59(4): 629–652.

Acharya

(2011) Norm subsidiarity and regional orders: Sovereignty, regionalism, and rule-making in the Third World. International Studies Quarterly 55(1): 95–123.

Adler

Greve

(2009) When security community meets balance of power: Overlapping regional mechanisms of security governance. Review of International Studies 35(S1): 59–84.

Adler

Pouliot

(2011) International practices: Introduction and framework. In: Adler

Pouliot

(eds) International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–35.

Aggarwal

(1998a) Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Aggarwal

(1998b) Reconciling multiple institutions: Bargaining, linkages, and nesting. In: Aggarwal

(ed.) Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages, and Nesting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–31.

Aggarwal

(2005) Reconciling institutions: Nested, horizontal, overlapping, and independent institutions. In: Conference “Nested and Overlapping Institutions”, Princeton University, 24 February 2006. Available at: http://www.princeton.edu/~smeunier/Aggarwal%20memo.pdf (accessed 30 November 2012).

Aggarwal

Koo

(2005) Beyond network power? The dynamics of formal economic integration in Northeast Asia. The Pacific Review 18(2): 189–216.

Alter

Meunier

(2006) Nested and overlapping regimes in the transatlantic banana trade dispute. Journal of European Public Policy 13(3): 362–382.

10.

Alter

Meunier

(2009) The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 13–24.

11.

Amorim

(2010) Brazilian foreign policy under President Lula (2003–2010): An overview. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53: 214–240.

12.

Aris

Wenger

(eds) (2013) Regional Organizations and Security: Conceptions and Practices. London:Routledge, forthcoming.

13.

Barnett

Finnemore

1999. The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization 53(4): 699–732.

14.

Battaglino

(2012) Defence in a post-hegemonic regional agenda: The case of the South American Defence Council. In: Riggirozzi

Tussie

(eds) The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism. The Case of Latin America. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 81–100.

15.

Biermann

(2008) Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking. The Euro-Atlantic security institutions interacting. Review of International Organizations 3(2): 151–177.

16.

Brands

(2010) Dilemmas of Brazilian Grand Strategy. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.

17.

Brazilian Ministry of Defense (2008) National Strategy of Defense. Available at: http://www.defesa.gov.br/projetosweb/estrategia/arquivos/estrategia_defesa_nacional_ingles.pdf (accessed 30 November 2012).

18.

Briceño-Ruiz

(2010) From the South American Free Trade Area to the Union of South American Nations: The transformations of a rising regional process. Latin American Policy 1(2): 208–229.

19.

Burges

(2008) Consensual hegemony: Theorizing the practice of Brazilian foreign policy after the Cold War. International Relations 22(1): 65–84.

20.

Busch

(2007) Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade. International Organization 61(4): 735–761.

21.

Cardozo

(2006) Brasil y Colombia en la Agenda de Seguridad de Venezuela. Caracas: ILDIS-Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

22.

Cepik

(2009) Regional security and integration in South America: What UNASUR could learn from the OSCE and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. In: Kanet

(ed.) The United States and Europe in a Changing World. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters Publishing, pp. 229–251.

23.

Costa Vaz

Jácome

(2009) El Consejo de Defensa Suramericano. Retos para la cooperación en seguridad y defensa en suramérica. Caracas: FES: Programa de Cooperación en Seguridad Regional.

24.

Daase

(2007) International Risks and the Perils of Proactive Security Policy. In: Sixth Pan-European International Relations Conference, Turin, 12–15 September 2007. Available at: http://turin.sgir.eu/uploads/Daase-daase_perils.pdf (accessed 16 November 2012).

25.

Drezner

(2009) The power and peril of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 65–70.

26.

Flemes

(2005) Seguridad Cooperativa en el Sur de América Latina – Una Propuesta Teórica. In: Bodemer

Rojas Aravena

(eds) La seguridad en las Américas: nuevos y viejos desafíos. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert, pp. 145–165.

27.

Flemes

Nolte

Wehner

(2011) Una Comunidad de Seguridad Regional en Formación: La UNASUR y su Consejo de Defensa. Revista de Estudios Internacionales 170: 105–127.

28.

FOCAL (ed.) (2010) Latin American Multilateralism: New Directions. Ottawa: Canadian Foundation for the Americas.

29.

Galbreath

Gebhard

(eds) (2010) Cooperation or Conflict? Problematizing Organizational Overlap in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.

30.

Garay Vera

(2009) El Consejo de Defensa Sudamericano. Perspectiva de una propuesta brasileña en el contexto regional. Report. Available at: http://www.ndu.edu/chds/SRC-Colombia09/Papers/Garay%20CHI.pdf (accessed 16 November 2012).

31.

Gehring

Faude

(2013) The dynamics of regime complexes: Microfoundations and systemic effects. Global Governance 19(1): 119–130.

32.

Gehring

Oberthür

(2009) The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions. European Journal of International Relations 15(1): 125–156.

33.

Gratius

(2008) Hacia una OTAN sudamericana? Brasil y un Consejo de Defensa Sudamericana. Madrid: FRIDE Comentario.

34.

Hajer

(2005) Coalitions, practices, and meaning in environmental politics: From acid rain to BSE. In: Howarth

Torfing

(eds) Discourse Theory in European Politics. Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 297–315.

35.

Herz

(2011) The Organization of American States (OAS). New York: Routledge.

36.

Hofmann

(2009) Overlapping institutions in the realm of international security: The case of NATO and ESDP. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 45–52.

37.

Hofmann

(2011) Why institutional overlap matters: CSDP in the European security architecture. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(1): 101–120.

38.

Hofmann

Mérand

(2012) Regional organizations à la carte: the effects of institutional elasticity. In: Paul

(ed.) International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–157.

39.

Hurrell

(1998) An emerging security community in South America? In: Adler

Barnett

(eds) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 228–264.

40.

Jácome

(2008) Venezuela en el contexto de las Medidas de Fomento de la Confianza y la Seguridad. Caracas: ILDIS-Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

41.

Jupille

Snidal

(2006) The choice of international institutions: Cooperation, alternatives and strategies. Manuscript. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008945 (accessed 25 June 2012).

42.

Kelly

(2007) Security theory in the “new regionalism”. International Studies Review 9(2): 197–229.

43.

Klepak

(2010) Defence and cooperation in the hemisphere: Today’s puzzling scenario. In: RESDAL (ed.) A Comparative Atlas in Defence in Latin America and the Caribbean 2010 edition. Buenos Aires: RESDAL, pp. 15–18. Available at: http://www.resdal.org/atlas/atlas-libro-10-ingles.html (accessed 30 November 2012).

44.

Malamud

(2011) A leader without followers? The growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy. Latin American Politics and Society 53(3): 1–24.

45.

Malamud

Gardini

(2012) Has regionalism peaked? The Latin American quagmire and its lessons. The International Spectator 47(1): 116–133.

46.

Nolte

(2011) Regional powers and regional governance. In: Godehardt

Nabers

(eds) Regional Powers and Regional Orders. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 49–67.

47.

Nolte

Wehner

(2013) UNASUR and regional security in South America. In: Aris

Wenger

(eds) Regional Organizations and Security: Conceptions and Practices. London: Routledge, forthcoming.

48.

OAS (1948) Charter of the Organization of American States. Available at: http://www.oas.org/juridico/English/charter.html (accessed 30 November 2012).

49.

OAS (2003) Declaration on Security in the Americas. Available at: http://www.oas.org/documents/eng/DeclaracionSecurity_102803.asp (accessed 30 November 2012).

50.

Raustiala

Victor

(2004) The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization 58(2): 277–309.

51.

Riggirozzi

(2012) Region, regionness and regionalism in Latin America: Towards a new synthesis. New Political Economy 17(4): 421–443.

52.

Riggirozzi

Tussie

(2012) The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism in Latin America. In: Riggirozzi

Tussie

(eds) The Rise of Post-hegemonic Regionalism. The Case of Latin America. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–16.

53.

Rittberger

Zangl

(2006) International Organization. Polity, Politics and Policies. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

54.

Sanahuja

(2012) Post-liberal Regionalism in South America: The Case of UNASUR. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2012/05, Florence: European University Institute.

55.

Schirm

(2010) Leaders in need of followers: Emerging powers in global governance. European Journal of International Relations 16(2): 197–221.

56.

Serbin

(2010) Old factors and new challenges in regional multilateralism: A Latin American idiosyncrasy? In: FOCAL (ed.) Latin American Multilateralism. New Directions. Ottawa: Canadian Foundation for the Americas, pp. 8–11.

57.

Serbin

Martínez

Ramanzini

Jr (2012) (eds) El regionalismo “post-liberal” en América Latina y el Caribe: Nuevos Actores, nuevos temas, nuevos desafíos. Anuario de la Integración Regional de América Latina y el Gran Caribe 2012. Buenos Aires: Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Economicas y Sociales.

58.

Shaw

(2004) Cooperation, Conflict, and Consensus in the Organization of American States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

59.

Tavares

(2010) Regional Security. The Capacity of International Organizations. London: Routledge.

60.

Tulchin

(2005) Creando una comunidad de seguridad en el hemisferio. In: Tulchin

Benítez Manaut

Diamint

(eds) El Rompecabezas. Conformando la seguridad hemisférica en el siglo XXI. Buenos Aires: Bononiae Libris, pp. 97–117.

61.

Tussie

(2009) Latin America: Contrasting motivations for regional projects. Review of International Studies 35(S1): 169–188.

62.

UNASUR (2008a) UNASUR Constitutive Treaty, 23 May 2008. Available at: http://unasursg.org/PDFs/unasur/tratado-constitutivo/Tratado-constitutivo-version-ingles.pdf (accessed 16 November 2012).

63.

UNASUR (2008b) Statute of the South American Defense Council, 11 December 2008. Available at: http://www.unasurcds.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=78&Itemid=188&lang=en (accessed 16 November 2012).

64.

UNASUR (2010) Statute of the Center for Strategic Defense Studies of the South American Defense Council. Available at: http://www.unasurcds.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=434%3Astatute-of-the-center-for-strategic-defense-studies-of-the-south-american-defense-council&catid=58%3Aingles&Itemid=189&lang=es (accessed 16 November 2012).

65.

Villa

RAD

Viana

(2010) Security issues during Lula’s administration: From the reactive to the assertive approach. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 53(special issue): 91–114.

66.

Wallander

Keohane

(1999) Risk, threat, and security institutions. In: Haftendorn

Keohane

Wallander

(eds) Imperfect Unions. Security Institutions over Time and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–47.

67.

Weiffen

(2012) Persistence and change in regional security institutions: Does the OAS still have a Project? Contemporary Security Policy 33(2): 360–383.

68.

Young

(1996) Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance 2(1): 1–23.