PRAJA: A Customary Village Council of the Pangwala of Himachal Pradesh

Abstract

Customary village councils are pre-democratic informal councils found in almost every tribal village in India. Praja is one such customary village council, yet unique in its own terms and is found in villages of Pangi tehsil of Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh. It owes its uniqueness to its geographical conditions. This article discusses about the Praja and the role it plays in the lives of the Pangwala. Praja is a social organisation which works in a close relation with the other units of the Pangwala society. Pangi’s rough geographical conditions like rugged topography and harsh climate, and lack of contact with other areas in earlier times led to formation of Praja, whose function was to deal with socio-cultural, developmental and legal matters. However, with time it became quasi-judicial in nature. Its peculiarity lies in the fact that it is an apolitical organisation. Though changes have been observed in Praja’s role, it is still the supreme body responsible for social solidarity of the Pangwala.

Keywords

Praja the Pangwala Pangi customary village council social organisation social solidarity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aye

K. V.

Sangtam

K. V.

(2018). Customary laws and traditional system ofadministration with special reference to Sumi tribal chief. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention , 7(10), 30–36.

Bose

(Majumdar). (2016). Changing lives of Birhors in Purulia: A socio-economic observation in twenty-first century. Contemporary Voice of Dalit , 8(2), 206–219.

Brown

G. G.

Barnett

J. H.

(1942). Social organization and social structure. American Anthropologist , 44, 31–36.

Durkheim

(1893). The division of labour in society. (W. D. Halls, Trans., Introduction by Lewis A. Coser). New York, NY: Free Press.

Krishna

(2002). Active social capital . New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Logan

(2009). Selected chiefs, elected councillors, and hybrid democrats: Popular perspectives on the coexistence of democracy and traditional authority. Journal of Modern African Studies , 47(1), 101–128. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Negi

T. S.

(1976). Scheduled tribe of Himachal Pradesh . Shimla: DK Publishers.

Phull

(2019, April 2). Lok Sabha elections 2019: Isolated Pangi, the ‘Kalapani’ of Himachal, talks of poll boycott. The Statesman . Retrieved from https://www.thestatesman.com/elections–2019/lok-sabha-elections–2019-isolated-pangi-kalapani-of-himachal-talks-of-poll-boycott–1502742500.html

Pur

K. A.

Moore

(2010). Ambiguous institutions: Traditional governance and local democracy in rural South India. The Journal of Development Studies , 46(4), 603–623.

10.

Rajpurohit

G. S.

Prakash

(2015). Khap panchayat in India:legitimacy, reality and reforms. IJAPRR International Peer Reviewed Refereed Journal , II(III), 81–90.

11.

Singh

R. C. P.

(Ed.). (1964). Census of India 1961 Volume XX-Part VI-No.7 Himachal Pradesh A village survey Kupha, Parmas, Thamoh and Malet. Himachal Pradesh: Superintendent of Census Operations.

12.

Srinivas

M. N.

(1955). The social system of a Mysore village. In M. Marriott (Ed.), Villiage India . Chicago: University of Chicago.

13.

Sutton

J. R.

(2003). Research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 19: Social structure and organizations revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly , 48(4), 715–717.

14.

Vaidya

K. L.

(1977). The cultural heritage of the Himalayas . New Delhi, India: National.

15.

Verma

(1997). Pangi: A tribal habitat in mid-Himalaya . New Delhi, India: Indus. https://nicobars.andaman.nic.in/tribal-council/