A Comparison between Internal and Surface Temperature Measurement Techniques during Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: Thermocamera versus Thermocouple

Abstract

Purpose

Corneal and scleral burns, one of the main complications that can occur during a cataract operation, are produced by overheating due to the use of the phacoemulsifier. The temperature of the anterior chamber of the eye can be measured both invasively using thermocouples and non-invasively but only superficially, using a thermocamera.

Methods

To compare the measures obtained from both techniques an in vitro experimental analysis was conducted on pigs’ eyes. During a simulated phacoemulsification cataract operation both the surface temperature with a thermocamera and the temperature inside the anterior chamber with a thermocouple were recorded. For each procedure, the maximum temperature values measured by each technique were compared.

Results

The results of this research show that the difference between the maximum values measured with the two techniques is on average 0.5 °C.

Conclusions

It is possible to employ a thermocamera technique instead of a thermocouple technique to provide an indication of the temperature inside the anterior chamber.

Keywords

Thermography Thermocouple Cataract surgery In vitro measurement Temperature analysis

References

Bahadur

G.G.

, Sinskey

R.M.

Manual of cataract surgery 2nd edn. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann, 2000.

Buratto

, Werner

, Zanini

, Apple

D.J.

Phacoemulsification: principles and techniques 2nd edn. Slack, Thorofare, 2003.

Steinert

R.F.

Cataract surgery, techniques complications and surgery, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003.

Kelman

C.D.

Phaco-emulsification and aspiration: a new technique of cataract removal. A preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 64: 23–35.

Polack

F.M.

, Sugar

The phacoemulsification procedure: III. Corneal complications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16: 39–46.

Cionni

R.J.

, Osher

R.H.

Intraoperative complications of phacoemulsification surgery. In Steinert

R.F.

, ed. Cataract surgery: techniques, complications and management. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1995.

ECRI. Scleral and corneal burns during phacoemulsification with viscoelastic materials. Health Devices 1988; 17: 377–9.

Majid

M.A.

, Sharma

M.K.

, Harding

S.P.

Corneoscleral burn during phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 1413–5.

Sugar

, Schertzer

R.M.

Clinical course of phacoemulsification wound burns. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 688–92.

10.

Roncin

Case report of a severe corneoscleral burn caused by the phacoemulsification probe. J Fr Ophtalmol 2002; 25: 627–31. French.

11.

Khodabakhsh

A.J.

, Zaidman

, Tabin

Corneal surgery for severe phacoemulsification burns. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 332–4.

12.

Soscia

, Howard

J.G.

, Olson

R.J.

Bimanual phacoemulsification through 2 stab incisions, a wound temperature study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1039–43.

13.

Soscia

, Howard

J.G.

, Olson

R.J.

Microphacoemulsification with WhiteStar, a wound-temperature study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1044–6.

14.

Donnenfeld

E.D.

, Olson

R.J.

, Solomon

. Efficacy and wound temperature gradient of WhiteStar phacoemulsification through a 1.2 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1097–100.

15.

Goldblatt

W.S.

, Finger

P.T.

, Perry

H.D.

, Stroh

E.M.

, Weiser

D.S.

, Donnenfeld

E.D.

Hyperthermic treatment of rabbit corneas. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 1778–83.

16.

Rubin

, Farber

J.L.

Pathology vol 1, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1994.

17.

Yamagami

, Yamagami

Direct measurement of wound temperature during phacoemulsification. Ophthalmologica 1998; 212: 50–2.

18.

Bissen-Miyajima

, Shimmura

, Tsubota

Thermal effect on corneal incisions with different phacoemulsification ultrasonic tips. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 60–4.

19.

Ernest

, Rhem

, McDermott

, Lavery

, Sensoli

Phacoemulsification conditions resulting in thermal injury. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 1829–39.

20.

Tsuneoka

, Shiba

, Takahashi

Feasibility of ultrasound cataract surgery with a 1.4 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 934–40.

21.

Mackool

R.J.

Incision burns. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 233–6.

22.

Veromann

, Sunter

, Juronen

, Tasa

, Panov

Eye lens crystallins: a component of intraocular pseudoexfoliative material. Opthalmic Res 2004, 36: 51–4.

23.

Wilson

M.E.

Jr. . Anterior lens capsule management in pediatric cataract surgery. Trans Am Opthalmol Soc 2004; 102: 391–422.

24.

Simpanya

M.F.

, Ansari

R.R.

, Suh

K.I.

, Leverenz

V.R.

, Giblin

F.J.

Aggregation of lens in an in vivo hyperbaric oxygen guinea pig model of nuclear cataract: dynamic light-scattering and HPLC analysis. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 4641–51.

25.

Oshika

, Okamoto

, Kaji

. Retention and removal of a new viscous dispersive ophthalmic device during cataract surgery in animal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 485–7.

26.

AGEMA Infrared Systems

“Thermovision® 800 BRUT Series - Data file”

AGEMA Infrared Systems AB 1991, Danderyd, Sweden.

27.

Mapstone

Measurement of corneal temperature. Exp Eye Res 1968; 7: 237–43.

28.

Scott

J.A.

A finite element model of heat transport in the human eye. Phys Med Biol 1988; 33: 227–41.

29.

Le Grand

, El Hage

S.G.

Physiological optics, Springer series in optical sciences. New York: Springer, 1980.

30.

Corvi

, Innocenti

, Mencucci

Thermography used for analysis and comparison of different cataract surgery procedures based on phacoemulsification. Physiol Meas 2006; 27: 371–84.

31.

Innocenti

, Corvi

, Mencucci

Thermographic analysis of phacoemulsification based cataract surgery procedures. QIRT Journal 2007; 2: 129–40.

32.

Miki

, Miyajima

, Nagamoto

Pathological change in the corneoscleral incision caused by thermal change in the phacoemulsification tip. Atarashii Ganka 1992; 9: 75–7.