Efficacy of excision versus ablation for improving endometriosis related pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background:

Surgical treatment of superficial peritoneal endometriosis includes excision or ablation. Controversy exists about which method is better for providing pain relief. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of excision versus ablation for improving the most frequently encountered endometriosis pain symptoms: dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-cyclic pelvic pain, and dyschezia.

Methods:

A search from inception to May 2020 was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. RCTs comparing excision versus ablation for peritoneal endometriosis were included if they assessed dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, and pelvic pain/non-menstrual pain. Exclusion criteria included extra-peritoneal endometriosis or endometriomas, and non-English publications. Publications were assessed for risk of bias and quality of evidence using Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) and GradePro.

Results:

Of the 2025 records identified initially, four met inclusion criteria. The sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 24 to 133 participants. The excision and ablation groups included 204 participants each. There was no difference after excision or ablation for dysmenorrhea when comparing the mean change in pain scores from baseline to 12 months after surgery (−0.31, 95% CI −1.66, 1.04, p = 0.65), dyspareunia (−0.24, 95% CI −1.78, 1.30, p = 0.76), dyschezia (−0.72, 95% CI −1.94, 0.50, p = 0.25), or non-cyclic pain (−0.78, 95% CI −2.47, 0.91, p = 0.37).

Conclusions:

We found low to moderate quality evidence suggesting that neither excision nor ablation is superior in reduction of endometriosis-related pain up to 12 months after surgery.

Keywords

Endometriosis medical treatment laparoscopy surgical treatment pain robotics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Reis

Petraglia

Taylor

. Endometriosis: hormone regulation and clinical consequences of chemotaxis and apoptosis. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19(4): 406–418.

Brosens

Gellersen

. The uterus under hormonal control – cycling for life. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 358(2): 145.

Bulun

Yang

Fang

, et al. Estrogen production and metabolism in endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 955: 75–85.

Giudice

. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 2389–2398.

Missmer

Hankinson

Spiegelman

, et al. Reproductive history and endometriosis among premenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104(5 Pt 1): 965–974.

Carter

. Combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic findings in patients with chronic pelvic pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 2(1): 43–47.

Andysz

Jacukowicz

Merecz-Kot

, et al. Endometriosis – the challenge for occupational life of diagnosed women: a review of quantitative studies. Med Pr 2018; 69(6): 663–671.

Aerts

Grangier

Streuli

, et al. Psychosocial impact of endometriosis: from co-morbidity to intervention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 50: 2–10.

Laganà

Garzon

Götte

, et al. The pathogenesis of endometriosis: molecular and cell biology insights. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20(22): 5615.

10.

Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 1997; 67(5): 817–821.

11.

Johnson

Hummelshoj

; and World Endometriosis Society Montpellier Consortium. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 1552–1568.

12.

Dunselman

Vermeulen

Becker

, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29(3): 400–412.

13.

Kuznetsov

Dworzynski

Davies

, et al. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2017; 6: j3935.

14.

Rehmer

Flyckt

Goodman

, et al. Management of endometriomas. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2019; 74(4): 232–240.

15.

Bafort

Beebeejaun

Tomassetti

, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 10: CD011031.

16.

Pundir

Omanwa

Kovoor

, et al. Laparoscopic excision versus ablation for endometriosis-associated pain: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24(5): 747–756.

17.

Budden

Ravendran

Abbott

. Identifying the problems of randomized controlled trials for the surgical management of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 27(2): 419–432.

18.

Bajzak

. Laparoscopic excision versus ablation for endometriosis-associated pain: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018; 25(2): 341.

19.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7): e1000097.

20.

Review Manager (RevMan) [computer program], version 5.3 . Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

21.

Sterne

JAC

Savović

Page

, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898.

22.

GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro guideline development tool [software] . McMaster University, 2015.

23.

Riley

Benton

Deimling

, et al. Surgical excision versus ablation for superficial endometriosis-associated pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26(1): 71–77.

24.

Healey

Cheng

Kaur

. To excise or ablate endometriosis? A prospective randomized double-blinded trial after 5-year follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21(6): 999–1004.

25.

Wright

Lotfallah

Jones

, et al. A randomized trial of excision versus ablation for mild endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2005; 83(6): 1830–1836.

26.

Barton-Smith

. An investigation of the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Doctoral Thesis, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, 2010, http://ethos.bl.uk (accessed 10 October 2020).

27.

Pundir

Kovoor

Lancaster

, et al. Author’s reply. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018; 25(2): 341–342.

28.

Balshem

Helfand

Schünemann

, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64(4): 401–406.

29.

Higgins

JPT

Thomas

Chandler

, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020, www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

30.

Kristman

Manno

Côté

. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19(8): 751–760.

31.

Kahale

Assem

Khamis

, et al. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study. BMJ 2020; 370: m2898.

32.

Ebrahim

Akl

Mustafa

, et al. Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66(9): 1014–1021.

33.

Hirsch

Duffy

JMN

Kusznir

, et al. Variation in outcome reporting in endometriosis trials: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214(4): 452–464.

34.

Williamson

Altman

Blazeby

, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 2012; 13: 132.

35.

Dworkin

Turk

Wyrwich

, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008; 9(2): 105–121.

36.

Khan

. The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women’s health. BJOG 2014; 121(10): 1181–1182.

37.

Gao

Koupil

Sjöqvist

, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity among women with endometriosis: nationwide cohort study in Sweden. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223(3): 415.e1–415.e16.

38.

Bellessort

Bachelot

Grouthier

, et al. Comparative analysis of molecular signatures suggests the use of gabapentin for the management of endometriosis-associated pain. J Pain Res 2018; 11: 715–725.

39.

Tietjen

Bushnell

Herial

, et al. Endometriosis is associated with prevalence of comorbid conditions in migraine. Headache 2007; 47(7): 1069–1078.

40.

Greenbaum

Weil

Chodick

, et al. Evidence for an association between endometriosis, fibromyalgia, and autoimmune diseases. Am J Reprod Immunol 2019; 81(4): e13095.

41.

Saidi

Sharma

Ohlsson

. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 246: 99–105.

42.

Carey

Martin

Siedhoff

, et al. Biopsychosocial correlates of persistent postsurgical pain in women with endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 124(2): 169–173.

43.

Martin

Johnson

Wechter

, et al. Catastrophizing: a predictor of persistent pain among women with endometriosis at 1 year. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(11): 3078–3084.

44.

van Aken

MAW

Oosterman

van Rijin

, et al. Pain cognition versus pain intensity in patients with endometriosis: toward personalized treatment. Fertil Steril 2017; 108(4): 679–686.

45.

McPeak

Allaire

Williams

, et al. Pain catastrophizing and pain health-related quality-of-life in endometriosis. Clin J Pain 2018; 34(4): 349–356.