Endometriosis is the therapeutic and clinical complexity extends beyond its effects on the body’s organic system, with psychological and social impacts. However, studies analyzing the quality of attachment and couple adjustment, beyond the effects on sexuality and fertility, are currently lacking.
Methods:
The main objective of this study was to investigate the quality of past attachment by means of the Parental Bonding Instrument, current attachment through the Relationship Questionnaire, and the perception of couple quality and satisfaction by means of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, in a sample of 68 women aged between 23 and 54 years.
Results:
The analysis revealed that women with endometriosis reported experiencing greater paternal and maternal control, and less paternal care compared to those in the control group. Moreover, women in the endometriosis group exhibited a higher degree of insecure attachment in adult intimate relationships when compared to the predominantly secure control group. Regarding the DAS, women with endometriosis reported lower scores than the control group.
Conclusion:
Despite the limitations of a pilot study, it provides a foundational basis for future research aiming to explore endometriosis within the context of women’s relationships. It also contributes to the planning of prevention and support programs for significant figures in women’s lives.
CoxHSkiCFWoodR, et al. Endometriosis, an unknown entity: the consumer’s perspective. Int J Consum Stud2003; 27(3): 200–209.
3.
FacchinFBarbaraGDridiD, et al. Mental health in women with endometriosis: searching for predictors of psychological distress. Hum Reprod2017; 32(9): 1855–1861.
4.
AgarwalSKChapronCGiudiceLC, et al. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am J Obstetr Gynecol2019; 220(4): 354.e1–354.e12.
5.
ArdentiR.Sindrome da sterilità: il complesso d’inferiorità e la relativa compensazione. Rivista Psicologia Individuale2011; 69: 51–61.
6.
CarvalhoACPoli NetoOBCrippaJADS, et al. Associations between chronic pelvic pain and psychiatric disorders and symptoms. Arch Clin Psychiatry2015; 42: 25–30.
7.
FourquetJGaoXZavalaD, et al. Patients’ report on how endometriosis affects health, work, and daily life. Fertil Steril2010; 93(7): 2424–2428.
8.
LaganàASLa RosaVLRapisardaAMC, et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with endometriosis: impact and management challenges. Int J Women’s Health2017; 9: 323–330.
9.
SepulcriRDPDo AmaralVF. Depressive symptoms, anxiety, and quality of life in women with pelvic endometriosis. Eur J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol2009; 142(1): 53–56.
10.
AertsLGrangierLStreuliI, et al. Psychosocial impact of endometriosis: from co-morbidity to intervention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstetr Gynaecol2018; 50: 2–10.
11.
Chaman-AraKBahramiMABahramiE.Endometriosis psychological aspects: a literature review. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord2017; 9(2): 105–111.
12.
FacchinFBuggioLVercelliniP, et al. Quality of intimate relationships, dyadic coping, and psychological health in women with endometriosis: results from an online survey. J Psychosom Res2021; 146: 110502.
13.
Van NiekerkLWeaver-PirieBMatthewsonM. Psychological interventions for endometriosis-related symptoms: a systematic review with narrative data synthesis. Arch Women’s Mental Health2019; 22(6): 723–735.
14.
SantonaAVismaraLGorlaL, et al. The relationship between attachment, dyadic adjustment, and sexuality: a comparison between infertile men and women. Int J Environ Res Public Health2023; 20(4): 3020.
15.
DennyE.Women’s experience of endometriosis. J Adv Nurs2004; 6: 641–648.
16.
JonesGJenkinsonCKennedyS.The impact of endometriosis upon quality of life: a qualitative analysis. J Psychosom Obstetr Gynecol2004; 25(2): 123–133.
17.
HuntingtonAGilmourJA.A life shaped by pain: women and endometriosis. J Clin Nurs2005; 14(9): 1124–1132.
18.
FagervoldBJenssenMHummelshojL, et al. Life after a diagnosis with endometriosis-a 15 years follow-up study. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scand2009; 88(8): 914–919.
19.
De GraaffAAHoogheTMDunselmanGAJ, et al. The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod2013; 28(10): 2677–2685.
20.
CulleyLLawCHudsonN, et al. A qualitative study of the impact of endometriosis on male partners. Hum Reprod2017; 32(8): 1667–1673.
21.
HudsonNCulleyLLawC. “We needed to change the mission statement of the marriage”: biographical disruptions, appraisals and revisions among couples living with endometriosis. Sociol Health Illn2016; 38: 721–735.
SimpsonJARholesWSNelliganJS.Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: the role of attachment styles. J Pers Soc Psychol1992; 62(3): 434–446.
24.
MaunderRGHunterJJ.Attachment relationships as determinants of physical health. J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry2008; 36(1): 11–32.
25.
BowlbyJ. A secure base. Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.
26.
MaunderRGHunterJJ.Attachment and psychosomatic medicine: developmental contributions to stress and disease. Psychosom Med2001; 63(4): 556–567.
27.
SchmidtSNachtigallCWuethrich-MartoneO, et al. Attachment and coping with chronic disease. J Psychosom Res2002; 53(3): 763–773.
28.
ParkerGTuplingHBrownLB.A parental bonding instrument. Br J Med Psychol1979; 52(1): 1–10.
29.
BonaiutoMParrucchiniPPierroA.L’adolescente ei membri significativi della sua rete sociale. Qualità delle relazioni interpersonali. Età evolutiva1997; 57: 40–56.
AnnoKShibataMNinomiyaT, et al. Paternal and maternal bonding styles in childhood are associated with the prevalence of chronic pain in a general adult population: the Hisayama Study. BMC Psychiatry2015; 15: 1–8.
32.
BartholomewKHorowitzLM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991l; 61(2): 226–244.
33.
GriffinDWBartholomewK.The metaphysics of measurement: the case of adult attachment. In: BartholomewKPerlmanD (eds) Advances in personal relationships, Vol. 5. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1994, pp.17–52.
34.
SpanierGB.Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam1976; 38(1): 15–28.
35.
GentiliPContrerasLCassanitiM, et al. La Dyadic Adjustment Scale: una misura dell’adattamento di coppia. Minerva Psichiatr2002; 43(2): 107–116.
36.
CulleyLLawCHudsonN, et al. The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review. Hum Reprod Update2013; 19(6): 625–639.
37.
TaylorSESiroisFM.Health psychology. Toronto: Canadian EDS; McGraw-Hill, 2009
38.
MikulincerMFlorianV.The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In: SimpsonJARholesWS (eds) Attachment theory and close relationships. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 1998, pp.143–165.
39.
Van NiekerkLMSchubertEMatthewsonM.Emotional intimacy, empathic concern, and relationship satisfaction in women with endometriosis and their partners. J Psychosom Obstetr Gynecol2021; 42(1): 81–87.
FernandezIReidCDziurawiecS.Living with endometriosis: the perspective of male partners. J Psychosom Res2006; 61(4): 433–438.
42.
BaggettEShafferAMuetzelfeldH.Father–daughter parentification and young adult romantic relationships among college women. J Fam Issues2015; 36(6): 760–783.
43.
Alsheikh AliADaoudFS. Early father–daughter relationship and demographic determinants of spousal marital satisfaction. Psychol Res Behav Manag2016; 9: 61–70.
44.
Mohd HasimMJHashimNHMustafaH.Married life: measuring adult romantic attachment and satisfaction. Couple Family Psychol2023; 12(3): 119.
