A Comparison of the Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap and Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap in Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Abstract

French

Purpose

To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps in postmastectomy reconstruction.

Methods

A decision analytic model with seven clinically important health outcomes (health states) was used, incorporating the Ontario Ministry of Health's perspective. Direct medical costs were estimated from a university-based hospital. The utilities of each health state converted into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were obtained from previously published data. Health state probabilities were computed from a systematic literature review. Analyses yielded SIEA and DIEP expected costs and QALYs allowing calculation of the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted under five plausible scenarios, assessing result robustness.

Results

Five SIEA and 27 DIEP studies were identified. The baseline SIEA expected cost was slightly higher than that for the DIEP ($16,107 versus $16,095), with slightly higher QALYs (33.14 years versus 32.98 years), giving an ICUR of $77/QALY. Taking into account conversions from SIEA to DIEP, the ICUR increased to $4,480/QALY. Sensitivity analysis gave ICURs ranging from $2,614/QALY to ‘dominant’, all consistent with the adoption of the SIEA over the DIEP.

Conclusion

The best available evidence suggests the SIEA is a cost-effective procedure. However, given the high SIEA to DIEP conversion rates and small marginal differences in cost and effectiveness, the ICUR may be sensitive to minor changes in costs or QALYs. The ‘truth’ can only be obtained from a randomized, controlled trial comparing both techniques side by side, simultaneously capturing the costs of the competing interventions.

Keywords

Breast reconstruction Cost-effectiveness Cost-utility analysis Quality-adjusted life years Postmastectomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Radovan

I.C.

. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the temporary expander. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 195-208.

Olenius

, Jurell

. Breast reconstruction using tissue expansion. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992; 26: 83-90.

Agha-Mohammadi

, De La Cruz

, Hurwitz

D.J.

. Breast reconstruction with alloplastic implants. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94: 471-8.

Hartrampf

C.R.

Jr . The transverse abdominal island flap for breast reconstruction: A 7-year experience. Clin Plast Surg 1988; 15: 703-16.

Grotting

J.C.

, Urist

M.M.

, Maddox

W.A.

, Vasconez

L.O.

. Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83: 828-41.

Chevray

P.M.

. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: A prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1077-83.

Allen

R.J.

, Treece

. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 32-8.

Blondeel

P.N.

, Boeckx

W.D.

. Refinements in free flap reconstruction: The free bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap anastomosed to the internal mammary artery. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47: 495-501.

Nahabedian

M.Y.

, Tsangaris

, Momen

. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: Is there a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 436-44.

10.

Taylor

G.I.

, Daniel

R.K.

. The anatomy of several free flap donor sites. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 56: 243-53.

11.

Grotting

. The free abdominoplasty flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 27: 351-4.

12.

Stern

H.S.

, Nahai

. The versatile superficial inferior epigastric artery free flap. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 95: 270-4.

13.

Arnez

Z.M.

, Khan

, Pogorelec

, Planisek

. Rational selection of flaps from the abdomen in breast reconstruction to reduce donor site morbidity. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52: 351-4.

14.

Serafin

, ed. Atlas of Microsurgical Composite Tissue Transplantation, Durham: WB Saunders, 1996.

15.

Tachi

, Yamada

. Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction. Int J Clin Oncol 2005; 10: 289-97.

16.

Craigie

J.E.

, Allen

R.J.

, DellaCroce

F.J.

, Sullivan

S.K.

. Autogenous breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Clin Plastic Surg 2003; 30: 359-69.

17.

Thoma

, Khuthaila

, Rockwell

, Veltri

. Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2003; 23: 287-95.

18.

Thoma

, Veltri

, Khuthaila

, Rockwell

, Duku

. Comparison of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1650-61.

19.

Cheng

M.H.

, Lin

J.Y.

, Ulusal

B.G.

, Wei

F.C.

. Comparisons of resource costs and success rates between immediate and delayed breast reconstruction using DIEP or SIEA flaps under a well-controlled clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 2139-42.

20.

Thoma

, Sprague

, Tandan

. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: How to use an article on economic analysis. Can J Surg 2001; 44: 347-54.

21.

Russell

L.B.

, Gold

M.R.

, Siegel

J.E.

, Daniels

, Weinstein

M.C.

. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine: Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 1996; 276: 1172-7.

22.

Thoma

, Sprague

. Methodological issues in the comparison of microsurgical flaps/techniques in head and neck reconstruction. Clin Plastic Surg 2005; 32: 347-59.

23.

Chevray

. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: A prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1077-83.

24.

Rizzuto

R.P.

, Allen

R.J.

. Reconstruction of a partial mastectomy defect with the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20: 441-5.

25.

Ontario Ministry of Health. Ontario Ministry of Health Schedule of Benefits: Physician Services Under the Health Insurance Act (July 1, 2006). Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, July 2006.

26.

Drummond

M.F.

, O'Brien

B.J.

, Stoddart

G.L.

, Torrance

G.W.

. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 2nd edn. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

27.

Laupacis

, Feeny

, Detsky

A.S.

, Tugwell

P.X.

. How attractive does a technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ 1992; 146: 473-81.

28.

Vermeulen

, Fabre

, Vandevoort

. The superficial inferior epigastric artery flap for breast reconstruction. Results and complications in 43 cases. Meeting of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, January 15-18, 2005. (Abst)

29.

Craigie

J.E.

, Allen

R.J.

, Heitland

A.S.

. Autogenous breast reconstruction with the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. Meeting of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, January 11-14, 2003. (Abst)

30.

Vega

S.J.

, Bossert

R.P.

, Serletti

J.M.

. Improving outcomes in bilateral breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56: 487-90.

31.

Bajaj

A.K.

, Chevray

P.M.

, Chang

D.W.

. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 737-46.

32.

Benditte-Klepetko

, Sommer

, Steinbach

, Czembirek

, Deutinger

. Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of donor site morbidity after tram-flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2004; 24: 174-81.

33.

Blondeel

, Vanderstraeten

G.G.

, Monstrey

S.J.

The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.

Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50: 322-30.

34.

Blondeel

P.N.

. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: A personal experience. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52: 104-11.

35.

Blondeel

P.N.

, Arnstein

, Verstraete

Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.

Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 1295-9.

36.

Futter

C.M.

, Webster

M.H.

, Hagen

, Mitchell

S.L.

. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53: 578-83.

37.

Garvey

P.B.

, Buchel

E.W.

, Pockaj

B.A.

, Gray

R.J.

, Samson

T.D.

. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 447-57.

38.

Gill

P.S.

, Hunt

J.P.

, Guerra

A.B.

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1153-60.

39.

Guerra

A.B.

, Metzinger

S.E.

, Bidros

R.S.

Bilateral breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: An experience with 280 flaps.

Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52: 246-52.

40.

Guzzetti

, Morris

, Webster

M.H.

. Early experience with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg 1997; 20: 205-8.

41.

Hamdi

, Weiler-Mithoff

E.M.

, Webster

M.H.

. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: Experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 86-95.

42.

Hamdi

, Blondeel

, Van Landuyt

, Tondu

, Monstrey

. Bilateral autogenous breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps: A single center's experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 83-9.

43.

Keller

. The deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 46: 474-9.

44.

Kroll

S.S.

. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 576-83.

45.

Lundberg

, Mark

. Avoidance of complications after the use of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for reconstruction of the breast. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2006; 40: 79-81.

46.

Misra

, Chester

, Park

. A comparison of postoperative pain between DIEP and extended latissimus dorsi flaps in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 1108-12.

47.

Munhoz

A.M.

, Ishida

L.H.

, Montag

Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: An anatomical and clinical analysis.

Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 62-8.

48.

Munhoz

A.M.

, Sturtz

, Montag

Clinical outcome of abdominal wall after DIEP flap harvesting and immediate application of abdominoplasty techniques.

Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 1881-93.

49.

Nahabedian

M.Y.

, Momen

, Galdino

, Manson

P.N.

. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: Patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 466-75.

50.

Nahabedian

M.Y.

, Dooley

, Singh

, Manson

P.N.

. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: The role of muscle preservation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 91-101.

51.

Nahabedian

M.Y.

, Momen

, Manson

P.N.

. Factors associated with anastomotic failure after microvascular reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 74-82.

52.

Nahabedian

M.Y.

, Momen

. Lower abdominal bulge after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54: 124-9.

53.

Vesely

, Stupka

, Drazan

, Holusa

, Licata

, Corradini

. DIEP flap breast reconstruction – new experience. Acta Chir Plast 2001; 43: 3-6.

54.

Statistics Canada. Complete life table, Canada, 2000 to 2002: females. <www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/84-537-XIE/tables/pdftables/caf.pdf>. (Version current at April 22, 2008).

55.

Asim

, Petrou

. Valuing a QALY: Review of current controversies. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2005; 5: 667-9.

56.

McGregor

, Caro

J.J.

. QALYs: Are they helpful to decision makers? Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24: 947-52.

57.

Vijan

. Should we abandon QALYs as a resource allocation tool? Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24: 953-4.

58.

Pearson

S.D.

, Rawlins

M.D.

. Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service. JAMA 2005; 294: 2618-22.

59.

Buxton

M.J.

. Economic evaluation and decision making in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24: 1133-42.

60.

Thoma

, Veltri

, Haines

, Goldsmith

, O'Brien

, Quartly

. A methodological guide to performing a cost-utility study comparing surgical techniques. Can J Plast Surg 2004; 12: 179-87.

61.

Furlong

W.J.

, Feeny

D.H.

, Torrance

G.W.

, Barr

R.D.

. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med 2001; 33: 375-84.

62.

Feeny

, Furlong

, Torrance

G.W.

Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

Med Care 2002; 40: 113-28.

63.

Horsman

, Furlong

, Feeny

, Torrance

. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties, and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Oct 16;1:54.

64.

Brooks

. EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 27: 53-72.

65.

Rabin

, de Charro

. EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001; 33: 337-43.

66.

Kaplan

R.M.

, Anderson

J.P.

. A general health policy model: Update and applications. Health Serv Res 1988; 23: 203-35.