Delivering Breast Reconstruction Information to Patients: Women Report on Preferred Information Delivery Styles and Options

Abstract

French

Purpose:

To discover missed opportunities for providing information to women undergoing breast reconstruction in an effort to decrease regret and improve patient education, teaching modalities, and satisfaction.

Method:

Thirty- to 45-minute semi-structured interviews were conducted exploring patient experiences with information provision on breast reconstruction. Purposeful sampling was used to include women with a variety of reconstruction types at different time points along their recovery. Using grounded theory methodology, 2 independent reviewers analyzed the transcripts and generated thematic codes based on patient responses. BREAST-Q scores were also collected to compare satisfaction scores with qualitative responses.

Results:

Patients were interested in a wide variety of topics related to breast reconstruction including the pros and cons of different options, nipple-sparing mastectomies, immediate breast reconstruction, oncological safety/monitoring and the impact of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, secondary procedures (balancing, nipple reconstruction), post-operative recovery, and long-term expectations. Patients valued accessing information from multiple sources, seeing numerous photographs, being guided to reliable information online, and having access to a frequently asked questions file or document. Information delivery via interaction with medical personnel and previously reconstructed patients was most appreciated. Compared with BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with the plastic surgeon (mean: 95.7, range: 60-100), informational satisfaction scores were lower at 74.7 (50-100), confirming the informational gaps expressed by interviewees.

Conclusions:

Women having recently undergone breast reconstruction reported key deficiencies in information provided prior to surgery and identified preferred information delivery options. Addressing women’s educational needs is important to achieve appropriate expectations and improve satisfaction.

Keywords

breast reconstruction information transfer decision-making patient satisfaction quality of life

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zhong

McCarthy

Min

. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1701–1709.

Wilkins

Cederna

Lowery

. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1014–1025.

Macadam

Lennox

Pusic

. Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3):431–441.

Sisco

Warner

Howard

Winchester

Yao

. Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(5):658–666.

Alderman

Wei

Birkmeyer

. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the women’s health and cancer rights act. JAMA. 2006;295(4):383–388.

ASPS Secures Passage of the Breast Cancer Patient Education Act. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. http://www.breastreconusa.org/breast-cancer-patient-education-act/. Copyright 2012-2017. Accessed December 18, 2017.

Lee

Hultman

Sepucha

. What are patients’ goals and concerns about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(5):567–569.

Temple-Oberle

Ayeni

Webb

Bettger-Hahn

Ayeni

Mychailyshyn

. Shared decision-making: applying a person-centered approach to tailored breast reconstruction information provides high satisfaction across a variety of breast reconstruction options. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(7):796–800.

Malterud

. The art and science of clinical knowledge. Lancet 2001;358(9279):397–400.

10.

Braun

Clarke

. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

11.

Cemal

Albornoz

CR Disa

Joseph

. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: part 2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3):320e–326e.

12.

Macadam

Lennox

Pusic

. Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3);431–441.

13.

Temple-Oberle

Harrop

Mehling

Temple-Oberle

Webb

Rollheiser

. Maximizing success of BRA day events. Plast Surg. 2014;22(2):143.

14.

Sisco

Johnson

Wang

Rasinski

Rundell

Yao

. The quality-of-life benefits of breast reconstruction do not diminish with age. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(6):663–668.

15.

Kronowitz

Kuerer

. Advances and surgical decision-making for breast reconstruction. Cancer. 2006;107(5):893–907.

16.

Sheehan

Sherman

Lam

Boyages

. Association of information satisfaction, psychological distress and monitoring coping style with post-decision regret following breast reconstruction. Psychooncology. 2007;16(4):342–351.

17.

Wolf

The information needs of women who have undergone breast reconstruction. Part I: decision-making and sources of information. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8(3):211–223.

18.

Begum

Grunfeld

Ho-Asjoe

Farhadi

. An exploration of patient decision-making for autologous breast reconstructive surgery following a mastectomy. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(1):105–110.

19.

Cordeiro

. Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;359(15):1590–1601.

20.

Potter

Mills

Cawthorn

Wilson

Blazeby

. Exploring information provision in reconstructive breast surgery: a qualitative study. Breast. 2015;24(6):732–738.

21.

Mayor

. National audit of care after mastectomy points to need for better information on reconstruction. BMJ. 2010;340:c3506.

22.

Potter

Mills

Cawthorn

Wilson

Blazeby

. Exploring inequalities in access to care and the provision of choice to women seeking breast reconstruction surgery: a qualitative study. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(5):1181–1191.

23.

Klassen

Cano

Scott

Pusic

. Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: the importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):212e–220e.

24.

Spector

Mayer

Knafl

Pusic

. Not what I expected: informational needs of women undergoing breast surgery. Plast Surg Nurs. 2010;30(2):70–74.

25.

Murray

Turner

Rehan

Kovacs

. Satisfaction following immediate breast reconstruction: experiences in the early post-operative stage. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;20(3):579–593.