Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Donor Site Morbidity Following a Graft of the Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Primary Fascial Repair After ALT Flap Harvesting
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2021
Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Donor Site Morbidity Following a Graft of the Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Primary Fascial Repair After ALT Flap Harvesting
The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is one of the most useful flaps in reconstruction because of its reliability, large skin flap territory, and versatility. The relatively small number of side effects is a common reason for preferring this flap. Primary repair is usually performed at the donor site closure; however, this requires substantial tension and causes many donor site morbidities, including pain. We attempted to use acellular dermal matrix graft to overcome these problems.
Methods:
We analyzed a total of 41 cases (41 flaps) in this study. Among these flaps, we conducted donor fascia suture with artificial dermis in 20 cases (study group) and primary fascial suture in 21cases (control group). Post-operative ambulation recovery times, pain scores, drainage removals, and wound problems of the donor site were recorded.
Results:
There were no serious complications, including infection, at the donor sites of all 41 cases. Of 20 cases using the acellular dermal matrix, seroma occurred in 2 cases and partial skin necrosis occurred in 2 cases. In 1 case of skin necrosis, the acellular dermal matrix was removed. However, in comparison to the control group, the group using the artificial dermis recovered ambulatory ability 3.9 days earlier and had a 1.8-point lower visual analogue scale score 5 days post-operatively.
Conclusions:
Our study suggested that, if used selectively, the acellular dermal matrix may play an effective role in donor site closure in cases with procedures involving the ALT flap.
SongYGChenGZSongYL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the sept cutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37(3):149–159.
2.
WeiFCJainVCelikNChenHCChuangDCLinCH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):e2219–e2226; discussion 27-30.
3.
ChrisovalantisLMichaelVDKevinHReubenFKaren EvansBS. Donor-site morbidity following free tissue harvest from the thigh: a systematic review and pooled analysis of complications. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016;32(5):342–357.
4.
ChenCMChenCHLaiCSLinSDHuangIYShiehTY. Anterolateral thigh flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(4):948–952.
5.
KimataYUchiyamaKEbiharaSNakatsukaTHariiK. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(5):1517–1523.
6.
KimuraNSatohKHasumiTOstukaT. Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(4):1197–1208.
7.
AliRSLangnerRRodriguezEDChengMH. The versatility of the anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):395–407.
8.
XuDCZhongSZKongJM, et al.Applied anatomy of the anterolateral femoral flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82(5):305–310.
9.
CollinsJAyeniOThomaA. A systematic review of anterolateral thigh flap donor site morbidity. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(1):17–23.
10.
AddisonPDLannonDNeliganPC. Compartment syndrome after closure of the anterolateral thigh flap donor site: a report of two cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(3):635–638.
11.
HuangCHChenHCHuangYLMardiniSFengGM. Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(2):1704–1710.
12.
KimataYUchiyamaKEbiharaS, et al.Anterolateral thigh flap donor-site complications and morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(1):584–589.
13.
TommasoADavideLGiuseppeS, Anterolateral thigh flap: systematic literature review of specific donor-site complications and their management. J Craniomaxil Surg. 2013;41(5):15. e21
14.
ChrisovalantisLMichaelVDKevinHReubenFKarenE. Donor-site morbidity following free tissue harvest from the thigh: a systematic review and pooled analysis of complications. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016;32(4):342–357.
15.
HanasonoMMSkorackiRJYuP. A prospective study of donor site morbidity after anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous free flap harvest in 220 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(1):209. e14.
16.
ShiehSJChiuHYYuJC, et al.Free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects following cancer ablation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2349–2357.
17.
KoshimaIYamamotoHHosodaMMoriguchiTOritaYNagayamaH.Free combined composite flaps using the lateral circumflex femoral system for repair of massive defects of the head and neck regions: an introduction to the chimeric flap principle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(2):411.
18.
KimuraNSatohK. Consideration of a thin flap as an entity and clinical applications of the thin anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(3):985.
19.
KuoYRJengSFKuoMH, et al.Free anterolateral thigh flap for extremity reconstruction: clinical experience and functional assessment of donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(3):1766.
20.
RodriguezEDBluebond-LangnerRParkJYouXRossonGSinghN. Does fascia lata repair facilitate closure and does it affect compartment pressure of the ALT donor site?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(3):1300–1304.
21.
ScotBGRichardAD. Use of regenerative human acellular tissue (Allo Derm) to reconstruct the abdominal wall following pedicle TRAM flap breast reconstruction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(2):8.
22.
KetanMPJohnSRexHLindsayHMauriceYN. Reinforcement of the abdominal wall following breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: a comparison of synthetic and biological mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):700.
23.
AllenCGlasziouPDel MarC. Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation. Lancet. 1999;354(4):1229–1233.
24.
ShimpeiMShujiKMAsahideF, et al.Early mobilization after free-flap transfer to the lower extremities: preferential use of flow-through anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(2):e127.
25.
AlbertLSJoanDPKennethSB, et al.Early ambulation after hip fracture effects on function and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(7):766–771.
26.
KuoYRKuoMHLutzBS, et al.One-stage reconstruction of large midline abdominal wall defects using a composite free anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia lata. Ann Surg. 2004;239(3):352–358.
27.
KuoYRKuoMHChouWCLiuYTLutzBSJengSF. One-stage reconstruction of soft tissue and Achilles tendon defects using a composite free anterolateral thigh flap with vascularized fascia Lata: clinical experience and functional assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(3):149–155.
28.
MatthewMHRomanJPeirongY. Prospective study of donor-site morbidity after anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous free flap harvest in 220 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:209,
29.
BenjaminM. The fascia of the limbs and back–a review. J Anat. 2009;214(1):1–18.
30.
SteccoCPorzionatoALancerottoL, et al.Histological study of the deep fasciae of the limbs. J Bodywork Move Therap. 2008;12(3):225–230.32.
31.
LangevinHM. Connective tissue: a body-wide signaling network?Med Hypotheses. 2006;66(6):1074–1077.
32.
KassolikKJaskólskaAKisiel-SajewiczKMarusiakJKawczyńskiAJaskólskiA. Tensegrity principle in massage demonstrated by electro- and mechanomyography. J Bodywork Move Therap. 2009;13(2):164–170.
33.
PatelKM, Bhanot P. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(4):216S.
34.
DavidAPKarenSAAnthonyCC, Michael HR Incidence of seromas and infections using fenestrated versus non fenestrated acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(1):e569.
35.
ViscontiGSalgarelloM. Anteromedial thigh perforator-assisted closure of the anterolateral thigh free flap donor site. J Plast Recon Aesthetic Surg. 2013;66(7):e189–e192.
36.
YamadaNKakibuchiMKitayoshiHMatsudaKYanoKHosokawaK. A new way of elevating the anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(6):1677.e82.
37.
ZhaoYQiaoQLiuZ, et al.Alternative method to improve the repair of the donor site of the anterolateral thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(6):593. e8.
38.
TurinSYJamieASKarinaAMarcoFE. Decreasing ALT donor site morbidity with the keystone flap. Microsurgery. 2018;38(6):621–626.
