Flexibility of the Transverse Arch of the Forefoot

Abstract

Purpose.

To measure the percentage of the transverse arch length (%TAL) in 2 positions using a 3-dimensional motion capture system to determine the flexibility of the transverse arch of the forefoot.

Methods.

19 men and 10 women with no lower extremity injury or deformity were included. The %TAL of the left foot was measured using a digital caliper in the standing position and the lower leg maximum anterior tilting (LMAT) position. The difference in the %TAL between the 2 positions (δ%TAL) was calculated. 10 markers were mounted on skin over each metatarsal head and base of the left foot. Motion was captured using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. Coordinates of each marker were manually digitised. The percentage of the transverse arch height (%TAH) and angle between the first and fifth metatarsals (M1M5) were calculated, and differences in each forefoot parameter in the 2 positions were defined as δ%TAL, δ%TAH, δM1M5, and the fore foot flexibility magnitude (FFM) was calculated. Subjects were divided into 3 groups based on their δ%TAL: <25th percentile (hypo-flexibility group, n=7), >26th percentile to <74th percentile (control group, n=15), and >75th percentile (hyper-flexibility group, n=7). The 3 groups were compared in terms of the δ%TAL. δ%TAH, δM1M5, and FFM.

Results.

The δ%TAL correlated with δM1M5 (r=0.61, p<0.001) and FFM (r=0.60, p=0.001). For the δM1M5, the hyper-flexibility group differed significantly from other groups (p=0.01). For the FFM, the hyper-flexibility group differed significantly from the hypo-flexibility group (p=0.02).

Conclusion.

Measurement of the %TAL in both the standing and LMAT positions provides a simple and quantitative method of assessing the flexibility of the transverse arch of the forefoot.

Keywords

forefoot,human metatarsal bones

References

Benvenuti

Ferrucci

Guralnik

Gangemi

Baroni

. Foot pain and disability in older persons: An epidemiologic survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:479–84.

Gorter

Kuyvenhoven

de Melker

. Health care utilisation by older people with non-traumatic foot complaints. What makes the difference? Scand J Prim Health Care 2001;19:191–3.

Redmond

Crosbie

Ouvrier

. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: The Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21:89–98.

Cornwall

McPoil

. Relationship between static foot posture and foot mobility. J Foot Ankle Res 2011;4:4.

Cavanagh

Morag

Boulton

Young

Deffner

Pammer

. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech 1997;30:243–50.

Jenkyn

Nicol

. A multi-segment kinematic model of the foot with a novel definition of forefoot motion for use in clinical gait analysis during walking. J Biomech 2007;40:3271–8.

Nester

Jones

Liu

Howard

Lundberg

Arndt

. Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers. J Biomech 2007;40:3412–23.

Chen

Mukul

Chou

. Soft-tissue movement at the foot during the stance phase of walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2011;101:25–34.

Kudou

Hamajima

Kaneiwa

Hatanaka

. Reliability of the transverse arch of the forefoot as an indicator of foot conditions. J Phys Ther Sci 2012;24:335–7.

10.

Nagayama

Yokoo

Uchida

. Measurement of spread foot. J Jap Soc Med Study Footwear 2006;20:64–8.

11.

Cavanagh

Rodgers

Liboshi

. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle 1987;7:262–76.

12.

Luger

Nissan

Karpf

Steinberg

Dekel

. Patterns of weight distribution under the metatarsal heads. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:199–202.

13.

Kanatli

Yetkin

Bolukbasi

. Evaluation of the transverse metatarsal arch of the foot with gait analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003;123:148–50.

14.

Daentzer

Wülker

Zimmermann

. Observations concerning the transverse metatarsal arch. Foot Ankle Surg 1997;3:15–20.

15.

Wang

Hsiao

Wang

Shau

Wang

. Measurement of vertical alignment of metatarsal heads using a novel ultrasonographic device. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:373–7.

16.

Suzuki

Tanaka

Takaoka

Kadono

Takakura

. Axial radiographic evaluation in hallux valgus: Evaluation of the transverse arch in the forefoot. J Orthop Sci 2004;9:446–51.

17.

Simonsen

Vuust

Understrup

Højbjerre

Bøttcher

Voigt

. The transverse forefoot arch demonstrated by a novel X-ray projection. Foot Ankle Surg 2009;15:7–13.

18.

Kapandji

. The physiology of the joints. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1981:204–5.

19.

McPoil

Vicenzino

Cornwall

Collins

Warren

. Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: A composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot. J Foot Ankle Res 2009;2:6.

20.

Nilsson

Friis

Michaelsen

Jakobsen

Nielsen

. Classification of the height and flexibility of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. J Foot Ankle Res 2012;5:3.

21.

D'Ambrogi

Giurato

D'Agostino

Giacomozzi

Macellari

Caselli

. Contribution of plantar fascia to the increased forefoot pressures in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1525–9.

22.

Flanigan

Nawoczenski

Chen

DiGiovanni

. The influence of foot position on stretching of the plantar fascia. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28:815–22.

23.

Rao

Saltzman

Yack

. Relationships between segmental foot mobility and plantar loading in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy. Gait Posture 2010;31:251–5.