Related party transactions (RPTs) either bring efficiency in transaction or result in conflict of interest between majority and minority shareholders. RPTs realize efficiency in transactions by reducing the transaction cost and facilitating smooth transfer of goods and services between parties. Conflict of interest may arise if the majority shareholders use RPTs as a tool for expropriating the wealth of minority shareholders. When RPTs are in line with efficiency enhancing theory, they help to improve firm performance; and when they are the results of opportunistic behaviour of the majority shareholders, they negatively affect the performance of firm. Since most companies in India engage in various kinds of business dealings with their related parties, it is relevant to analyse RPTs in India. The study based on 2002 firms listed in BSE for the period of 2011–2017 shows that RPTs positively affect firm performance. Considering various types of RPTs, total revenue income from related parties and revenue expenses by them positively affect firm performance. Also, the results underline that promoters’ holding does not have any interaction effects on the association between RPTs and firm performance.
Al-gamrhR. A. A. B. (2018). Related party transactions and audit fees: The role of the internal audit function. Journal of Management & Governance, 22(1), 187–212. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9376-6
2.
AriffA. M.HashimH. A. (2013). The breadth and depth of related party transactions disclosures. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 4(6), 388–392. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2013.V4.323
3.
Arvind BabuM. C.RentalaS. (2018). Role of leadership and corporate governance: The case of Tata group and Infosys. FIIB Business Review, 7(4), 252–272. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714518813589
4.
BlackB. S.KhannaV. S. (2007). Can Corporate Governance Reforms Increase Firm Market Values? Event Study Evidence from India. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 749–796. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00106.x
5.
Bona-SánchezC.Fernández-SenraC. L.Pérez-AlemánJ. (2017). Related-party transactions, dominant owners and firm value. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 20(1), 4–17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.07.002
6.
ChauhanY.LakshmiK. R.DeyD. K. (2016). Corporate governance practices, self-dealings, and firm performance: Evidence from India. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 12(3), 274–289. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.10.002
7.
Chee YoongL.AlfanE.DeviS. S. (2015). Family firms, expropriation and firm value: Evidence from related party transactions in Malaysia. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(5), 139–152. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0048
8.
ChenY.ChenC. H.ChenW. (2009). The impact of related party transactions on the operational performance of listed companies in China. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 12(4), 285–297. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870903314575
9.
ChenJ. J.ChengP.XiaoX. (2011). Related party transactions as a source of earnings management. Applied Financial Economics, 21(3), 165–181. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2010.528361
10.
ChenS.WangK.LiX. (2012). Product market competition, ultimate controlling structure and related party transactions. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5(4), 293–306. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2012.11.001
11.
ChenC.WuC. (2010). Related party transactions and ownership concentration: Theory and evidence. Paper presented at E-Leader Conference, Singapore, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.g-casa.com/conferences/singapore/papers_in_pdf/wed/Chen.pdf
12.
CheungY. L.JingL.LuT.RauP. R.StouraitisA. (2009). Tunneling and propping up: An analysis of related party transactions by Chinese listed companies. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 17(3), 372–393. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2008.10.001
13.
ChienC.-Y.HsuJ. C. S. (2010, January 20). The role of corporate governance in related party transactions. 1–27. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1539808
14.
CopelandT.TimK.JackM. (2000). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, Auflage, NewYork.
15.
DharmapalaD.KhannaV. (2013). Corporate Governance, Enforcement, and Firm Value: Evidence from India. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(5), 1056–1084. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ews011
16.
DjankovS.La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430–465. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007
17.
DownsD. H.OoiJ. T. L.WongW. C.OngS. E. (2016). Related party transactions and firm value: Evidence from property markets in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 52(4), 408–427. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-015-9509-0
18.
El-HelalyM. (2014). Corporate governance and related party transactions research: An assessment of theories and methodologies. Corporate Ownership and Control, 11(2), 578–582.
19.
El-HelalyM. (2016). Related party transactions and accounting quality in Greece. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 24(4), 375–390. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-04-2016-0044
20.
El-HelalyM.GeorgiouI.LoweA. D. (2018). The interplay between related party transactions and earnings management: The role of audit quality. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.07.003
21.
ElkelishW. W. (2017). IFRS related party transactions disclosure and firm valuation in the United Arab Emirates emerging market. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(2), 173–189. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-05-2015-0035
22.
GalleryG.GalleryN.SupranowiczM. (2008). Cash-based related party transactions in new economy firms. Accounting Research Journal, 21(2), 147–166. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/10309610810905935
23.
GeW.DruryD. H.FortinS.LiuF.TsangD. (2010). Value relevance of disclosed related party transactions. Advances in Accounting, 26(1), 134–141. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2010.02.004
24.
GordonE. A.HenryE.DariusP. (2004). Determinants of related party transactions and their impact on firm value. In American Accounting Association 2004 Annual Conference Paper, 1–60. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.195.7480&rep=rep1&type=pdf
25.
HabibA.JiangH.ZhouD. (2015). Related-party transactions and audit fees: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting Research, 14(1), 59–83. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51020
26.
HabibA.MuhammadiA. H.JiangH. (2017). Political Connections and Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Accounting, 52(1), 45–63. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2017.01.004
27.
HuS.-H.LiG.XuY.-H.FanX.-A. (2012). Effects of internal governance factors on cross-border-related party transactions of Chinese companies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 48(Suppl 1), 58–73. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X4801S105
28.
HuangW. (2016). Tunneling through related-party loan guarantees: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in China. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 47(3), 857–884. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-015-0523-3
29.
HwangS.KimW. (2016). When heirs become major shareholders: Evidence on pyramiding financed by related-party sales. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 23–42. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.08.013
30.
JamesonM.PrevostA.PuthenpurackalJ. (2014). Controlling shareholders, board structure, and firm performance: Evidence from India. Journal of Corporate Finance, 27, 1–20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.04.003
31.
JianM.WongT. J. (2010). Propping through related party transactions. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(1), 70–105. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-008-9081-4
32.
KangM.LeeH. Y.LeeM. G.ParkJ. C. (2014). The association between related-party transactions and control-ownership wedge: Evidence from Korea. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 29, 272–296. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.04.006
33.
KotaH. M.TomarC. (2010). Corporate governance practices of Indian firms. Journal of Management and Organisation, 16, 266–279. Retrieved from https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.5172/jmo.16.2.266
34.
KumarN.SinghJ. P. (2012). Outside directors, corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(2), 39–55. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v4i2.1737
35.
LeeM. G.KangM.LeeH. Y.ParkJ. C. (2016). Related-party transactions and financial statement comparability: Evidence from South Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(2), 224–252. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2014.957706
36.
LinW.LiuY. A.KengI. (2010). Related party transactions, firm performance and control mechanisms: Evidence from Taiwan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 35(35), 83–97.
37.
LoA. W. Y.WongR. M. K. (2016). Silence is golden? Evidence from disclosing related-party transactions in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 540–564. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.002
38.
MagdalenaR.DananjayaY. (2015). Effect of related parties transactions to the value of enterprises listed on Indonesian stock exchange. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(6), 47–57.
39.
MarchiniP. L.MazzaT.MedioliA. (2018). The impact of related party transactions on earnings management: Some insights from the Italian context. Journal of Management and Governance, 1–34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9415-y
40.
MishraR. K.KapilS. (2018). Board characteristics and firm value for Indian companies. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 2–32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-07-2016-0074
41.
NekhiliM.CherifM. (2011). Related parties transactions and firm’s market value: The French case. Review of Accounting and Finance, 10(3), 291–315. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/14757701111155806
42.
PandeSantoshAnsariValeed Ahmad. (2013). A Note on the Efficacy of the Current Corporate Governance Regulations in India. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2333023
43.
PozzoliM.VenutiM. (2014, January). Related party transactions and financial performance: Is there a correlation ? Empirical evidence from Italian listed companies. Open Journal of Accounting, 3, 28–37. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2014.31004
44.
SariR. C.FatimahP. L. R.DjajadikertaH. G. (2016). Development of tunneling detection model: A new corporate performance improvement. Jurnal Pengurusan, 48, 33–46.
45.
SrinivasanP. (2013, September). An analysis of related party transactions in India. Retrieved from http://www.iimb.ernet.in/research/sites/default/files/WPNo.402_0.pdf
46.
TareqM.HouqeM. N.van ZijlT.TaylorD. W.MorleyC. (2017). Discriminatory related party transactions: A new measure. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 25(4), 395–412. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-10-2016-0102
47.
UtamaS.UtamaC. A.YuniasihR. (2010). Related party transaction efficient or abusive: Indonesia evidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1(1), 77–102.
48.
VakilifardH. R.SalmanianM. (2015). Examination of the Relationships between Transactions with Related. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 4(3), 257–262.
49.
VargheseR. (2014). Corporate valuation and profitability of Indian companies. FIIB Business Review, 3(1), 46–53. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/2455265820140108
50.
WanY.WongL. (2015). Ownership, related party transactions and performance in China. Accounting Research Journal, 28(2), 143–159. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-08-2013-0053
51.
WilliamsM. P.TaylorD. W. (2013). Corporate propping through related-party transactions. International Journal of Law and Management, 55(1), 28–41. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431311303804
52.
WongR. M. K.KimJ. (2015). Are related-party sales value-adding or value-destroying? Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 26(1), 1–38.
53.
WongR. M. K.KimJ. B.LoA. W. Y. (2015). Are Related-Party Sales Value-Adding or Value-Destroying? Evidence from China. Journal of International finance Management and Accounting, 26, 1–38.
54.
YanT.HuachengW. (2008), Related party transactions, benefits of control and earnings quality. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 2(2), 187–203.
55.
YaronA.UriB.-Z.AhronR. (2016). Tunneling or propping ? Evidence for related party transactions in Israel. International Journal of Management Sciences, 7(6), 332–349.
