Land Acquisition,Rehabilitation and Resettlement

Abstract

This article² explores key issues in the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR Act) read with recent changes proposed by the central government. The LARR Act has to be read in the context of political contestation and changing political winds, the spate of decisions by the Supreme Court in the run up to the enactment and the need for ‘balancing’ multiple viewpoints. In such context, the twin categories—federal and judicial—become prominent. The nature of the LARR Act’s response to both will determine its continued existence and significance. This article examines legal dimensions of issues such as ‘Eminent Domain’ and ‘public purpose’, R&R, compensation, safeguards for project-affected families and other relevant processes. The article asks larger legal and political questions regarding land acquisition within constitutional debates pertaining to the LARR Act’s implications for federalism and a detailed analysis of recent pronouncements of the Supreme Court. The article also looks at potential scenarios, and in particular, possible consequences of the enactment for future urbanisation patterns in India.

Keywords

LARR Act federalism Supreme Court urbanisation federal and judicial balance

References

Austin

Granville

. (1999). Working a democratic Constitution: The Indian experience. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Banerjee

Abhijit

. (2011, September 19). The plots thicken. The Hindustan Times.

Chakravorty

Sanjoy

. (2011). A lot of skepticism and some hope. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(41), 29–31.

Chakravorty

Sanjoy

. (2013). The price of land: Acquisition, conflict, consequence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Comptroller and Auditor General of India. (2014). Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India for the year 2012–13, on performance of SEZs. New Delhi: Government of India.

Fernandes

Walter

. (2008). Sixty years of development-induced displacement in India: Scale, impacts and the search for alternatives. In Mathu

H. M.

(Ed.), India social development report 2008: Development and displacement. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Government of India. (2013, July 24). Draft national land reforms policy. New Delhi: Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India.

Kumar

Rajiv

. (2011, September 11). Land bill will act as drag on industry. Hindu Business Line.

Ministry of Rural Development. (1998). National rehabilitation policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India.

10.

Ministry of Rural Development. (2003). National rehabilitation policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India.

11.

Ministry of Rural Development. (2006). National rehabilitation policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India.

12.

Ramanathan

Usha

. (2009). A word on Eminent Domain. In Mehta

Lyla

(Ed.), Displaced by development: Confronting marginalisation and gender injustice. New Delhi: SAGE Publication.

13.

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill (2007).

14.

Sanyal

Bishwapriya

Deuskar

Chandan

. (2012). A better way to grow? Town planning schemes as a hybrid land readjustment process in Ahmedabad, India. In Ingram

Gregory K.

Hong

Yu–Hung

(Eds), Value capture and land politics. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

15.

Sarkar

Swagato

. (2011). The impossibility of just land acquisition. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(41), 35–38.

16.

Sarma

E. A. S.

(2011). Sops for the poor and a bonus for industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(41), 32–34.

17.

Shaw

Malcolm N.

(1997). International law on territorial sovereignty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Singh

M. P.

(2008). V.N. Shukla’s Constitution of India (11th ed.). Lucknow: Eastern Book Company.