Perceptions of Male Circumcision among Married Couples in Rural Malawi

Abstract

Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is being suggested as an essential HIV prevention strategy in high-prevalence areas. These analyses reflect data collected from 360 married couples, 50% of which included a circumcised husband and the other 50% uncircumcised, in rural Malawi. Regardless of their circumcision status, men were more likely to perceive that being circumcised was less painful than having a tooth pulled, giving birth, and having malaria. Men reported having the same sexual pleasure regardless of the circumcision status, while women were 2.0 times more likely to report greater sexual pleasure with a circumcised partner. Participants identified the medical benefits of VMMC and highlighted the potential personal benefits of VMMC. As VMMC has become a promising method of HIV prevention, this study revealed opportunities for intervention development to increase rates of VMMC among men.

Keywords

HIV prevention voluntary medical male circumcision Malawi rural sub-Saharan Africa

Background

Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is currently recommended as an important, if not essential, HIV prevention strategy.^1
–3 Recent randomized controlled trials in South Africa, Kenya, and Uganda demonstrated that circumcision significantly lowers the likelihood of contracting HIV in men.^4

–7 This procedure is especially promoted in areas with high HIV prevalence rates and where the infection is primarily transmitted through heterosexual intercourse. The findings from these randomized trials have bolstered support for the increased provision of VMMC within countries of high HIV prevalence in Africa.⁸ However, circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa has traditionally been practiced as a nonmedical procedure and is often related to ethnic and religious identities, which may have contributed to the slower than expected uptake thus far.

According to the Malawi Demographic and Health Survey, as of 2010, HIV prevalence rates are estimated at 10.6% among Malawi adults between 15 and 49 years of age.⁹ This substantial infection rate has primarily been associated with heterosexual contact. Malawi experiences drastically different rates of HIV infection in the northern and southern regions of the country, with circumcision rates differing by geographic location as well. However, these trends appear to be paradoxical, with higher rates of VMMC in the south correlating with higher rates of HIV in this same area. Traditional circumcision practices have also been shown to be more common among individuals of Muslim faith than those who are Christians.¹⁰ Additionally, tribal affiliation is associated with higher and lower rates of VMMC among the Yao and Lomwe, respectively.¹¹ Furthermore, traditional circumcision practices differ by tribal affiliation. Age at traditional male circumcision (MC) fluctuates by region and tribe, with most boys being circumcised at the start of puberty; nevertheless, circumcision has been documented in boys ranging from 5 to 13 years of age.¹² Tribes also have differing total or partial circumcision practices, which have significant implications on HIV prevention.¹¹ These cultural influences contribute to diverging support for the uptake of VMMC among individuals in Malawi.

Few studies have examined the acceptability of adult VMMC among married couples, especially in rural, high-HIV prevalence environments.^13
–15 Primarily, these studies were conducted prior to the findings that suggest a 60% HIV risk reduction among circumcised men. Many factors have been shown to influence the acceptability of VMMC among individuals. Regional differences may exist among rural and urban populations, in addition to varying relationship dynamics within and outside of married couples. Several studies have examined attitudes on VMMC involving both sexes, where younger individuals were more likely to perceive VMMC as a tool of HIV prevention.¹⁵ A qualitative study conducted in Malawi prior to the VMMC recommendation identified that both men and women found VMMC potentially acceptable if it were to prevent HIV/sexually transmitted infections (STIs).¹⁴ The purpose of this study is to evaluate how married couples—with husbands of uncircumcised or circumcised status—perceive VMMC in rural Malawi. These findings suggest opportunities to enhance rates of VMMC and to develop interventions to deliver this medical procedure. By identifying potential barriers or opportunities within marriage to enable successful scale-up of VMMC and acknowledging differences in the perceptions of spouses, this study has important implications for enhancing the design of VMMC interventions and amplifying scale-up efforts in rural areas of high HIV prevalence.

Methods

The data used in this article come from the Circumcision, Information, and HIV prevention project that was conducted in 2008 and 2009. A census (of households and its members) was conducted in 70 randomly selected villages in the traditional authority of Kuntumanji in the Zomba district in Malawi. During the census process, approximately 1200 men (aged 25-40 years) were interviewed. During the baseline data collection period, these men were asked to provide information regarding their wives. From the 1131 wives identified by the male interviewees, a random sample of 518 women was selected and stratified according to the circumcision status of her husband (circumcised or not circumcised) at baseline. In 2009, we revisited this region, locating and interviewing 82.2% of the original 1200 men and 86.1% of the 518 wives from the baseline sample. It should be noted that the original 1200 men included husbands of the 518 wives randomly selected during the first sampling procedure. We did not observe differential attrition across husband’s circumcision status for the men and the women between the 2 interview periods. After this process, we constructed a sample of married couples in which both the husband and the wife provided survey data during the second interview. This resulted in a sample of 360 married couples, from a total of 720 individuals.

Survey questions relating to MC practices as well as knowledge and attitudes toward VMMC were asked during face-to-face interviews conducted by locally trained community members. To obtain unbiased answers, interviews were conducted with husbands and wives separately. Results were analyzed to provide descriptive statistics for the sample (stratified by circumcision status of the husband) and to determine differences between husband and wife perceptions (looking across and within couples). Outcomes were categorized into 3 broad themes: (1) general attitudes toward VMMC, (2) perceptions of the pain associated with the circumcision procedure, and (3) perceptions related to sexual pleasure and circumcision status.

Participants who were circumcised, or wives whose husbands were circumcised, were asked about the reasons for being circumcised (panel A), and those participants and wives who were not circumcised were asked about reasons against circumcision (panel B). The precoded options for panel A included health, religion, forced, please a woman, and HIV/AIDS. Through discussions, the researchers experienced with participants a tangible difference in responses given that were related to overall health compared to those related specifically to HIV/STI reduction (relevant in panel C, as well). The precoded options for panel B included the panel A options as well as pain, cost, don’t trust doctors, too old, afraid of dying, waste of money, and encourages premarital sex. For Panel B, the researchers also assessed differences in perceived cost and waste of money, as differentiated by the cost of VMMC being prohibitive, rather than it is not prioritized as a health issue to which assets should be allocated.

To elicit general attitudes favoring circumcision, both men and women were asked the following open-ended question: “What are some of the advantages of being circumcised?” Interviewers were provided with the following precoded options: reduce HIV risk, women will enjoy sex more, reduce STI risk, healthier/cleanliness, pleases God, and acceptance in village. During training, interviewers were instructed to ask each question without reading the responses aloud but to mark all precoded options that applied to the responses provided by the participants. These instructions were also included in the questionnaire. Similarly, to elicit perceptions regarding the disadvantages of circumcision, respondents were asked, “What are the disadvantages of circumcision?” Precoded options in the questionnaire included increase HIV risk, women will enjoy sex less, displeases God, encourages premarital sex, painful procedure, it can be fatal, and can lead to other diseases.

Respondents were asked additional questions to elicit perceptions of the pain related to the circumcision procedure. This entailed asking respondents to compare their perception of the pain associated with VMMC to their perception of the pain related to other common health services/diseases in rural Malawi, namely, having a tooth pulled, childbirth, malaria, and having blood taken. For each health issue, respondents were asked to rank pairwise the condition or procedure they qualified as more painful. Pain perceptions were ranked on a scale of 0 to 4, with 4 representing the most painful and 0 representing the least painful.

To measure perceptions of sexual satisfaction and its relation to circumcision status, we asked respondents the following 2 questions: “Do you think circumcised men enjoy sex more, the same or less than uncircumcised men?” and “Do you think women enjoy sex with a circumcised man more, the same, or less than with an uncircumcised man?” Table 1 presents these results for both men and women interviewees.

Table 1.

Perceptions of Circumcision and Sexual Satisfaction.^a

	Circumcised Men						Uncircumcised Men
	Women	Men	Log Odds	CI (95%)	κ	κ (P Value)	Women	Men	Log Odds	CI (95%)	κ	κ (P Value)
Circumcised men get more pleasure	0.611	0.543	1.191	(0.654-2.168)	.208	.003	0.508	0.266	1.463^b	(0.944-2.267)	.177	.003
Uncircumcised men get more pleasure	0.080	0.029	5.293^b	(0.804-34.837)	.066	.158	0.062	0.011	7.998^c	(1.161-55.095)	−.019	.642
Circumcised and uncircumcised men get equal pleasure	0.269	0.394	0.593^b	(0.325-1.079)	.164	.012	0.401	0.678	0.549^c	(0.341-0.883)	.099	.060
Women get more pleasure with circumcised man	0.703	0.589	1.920^c	(1.028-3.587)	.165	.012	0.554	0.260	1.912^d	(1.234-2.961)	.054	.191
Women get more pleasure with uncircumcised man	0.000	0.006	0	0			0.011	0.011	0.664	(0.075-5.863)	−.011	.560
Women get equal pleasure with circumcised and uncircumcised men	0.257	0.354	0.588^b	(0.315-1.099)	.110	.067	0.412	0.667	0.612^c	(0.393-0.952)	.050	.225

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

^a The sample includes a matched sample of 356 women and their male spouses. Data are from 2009 for both men and women. Sample size for panel A includes those with nonmissing data, 146 men and women where both the men and the women report that the man is circumcised. Panel B includes 352 men and women, panel C includes 314 men and women, and panel D includes 311 men and women.

Table 2 provides summary statistics for general attitudes toward circumcision using nonmissing, matched data. Panel A depicts only couples in whom the male was circumcised, panel B depicts only couples in whom the male was not circumcised, and panels C and D include both. In instances where a husband or wife did not respond to a question, the couple was eliminated from the analysis of that question. This resulted in different sample sizes for each question, specifically, a lower sample size in panel A. For women who did not know their husband’s correct circumcision status, the analyses were conducted wherever status was relevant, based on the husband’s response. Results are reported separately for men and women, with panel A representing only those couples in whom the husband was circumcised, and Panel B representing only those couples in whom the husband was uncircumcised. Panels C and D include responses for both men and women, regardless of the husband’s circumcision status.

Table 2.

General Attitudes Toward Voluntary Male Medical Circumcision.^a

	Wives	Husbands	Log Odds	CI (95%)	κ	κ (P Value)
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)
Panel A: reasons for circumcision (n = 146)
Health	0.322	0.068	3.922^b	(1.648-9.337)
Religion/culture	0.863	0.918	0.618	(0.254-1.502)
Forced/no choice	0.103	0.075	1.170	(0.390-3.507)
Please a woman/women	0.110	0.007	9.091^c	(0.913-90.480)
HIV/AIDS	0.055	0.034	1.330	(0.266-6.662)
Panel B: reasons against circumcision (n = 356)
Health	0.023	0.077	0.371^d	(0.147-0.935)
Religion/culture	0.429	0.503	0.789	(0.477-1.306)
Please a woman/women	0.006	0.003	2.476	(0.252-24.374)
Pain	0.472	0.264	2.255^b	(1.504-3.381)
Cost	0.040	0.097	0.367^d	(0.159-0.846)
Don’t trust doctors	0	0.023	0	0
Too old	0.011	0.057	0.068^d	(0.008-0.567)
Afraid of dying	0.065	0.119	0.650	(0.311-1.358)
Waste of money	0.057	0.034	1.120	[0.493-2.546)
Encourages premarital sex	0.026	0.026	1.097	(0.256-4.704)
Panel C: advantages of being circumcised (n = 650)
Reduce HIV risk	0.207	0.529	0.199^b	(0.107-0.371)	−.005	.540
Women will enjoy sex more	0.264	0.137	1.516^c	(0.930-2.470)	.012	.407
Reduces STI risk	0.143	0.283	0.468^c	(0.219-1.002)	.078	.066
Healthier/cleanliness	0.389	0.318	1.205	(0.808-1.797)	.111	.022
Pleases/displeases God	0.019	0.035	0.860	(0.215-3.432)	−.025	.681
Acceptance in village	0.080	0.092	0.720	(0.361-1.433)	−.053	.827
Panel D: disadvantages of being circumcised (n = 648)
Increase HIV risk	0.151	0.280	0.451^b	(0.276-0.734)	.090	.044
Women will enjoy sex less	0.039	0.006	2.010	(0.377-10.714)	−.011	.612
Displeases God	0.013	0.016	1.543	(0.306-7.779)	−.015	.602
Encourages premarital sex	0.215	0.100	1.822^d	(1.137-2.919)	−.040	.780
Painful procedure	0.254	0.170	1.647^d	(1.034-2.623)	.086	.058
Fatal	0.106	0.132	0.891	(0.464-1.708)	.112	.024
Lead to other diseases	0.167	0.215	1.245	(0.756-2.051)	.037	.253

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

Results

Sample Description

A total of 360 married couples, or 720 individuals, completed the survey, with one half of the married couples having a circumcised husband. The mean age for men was 32.3 years, while their wives were younger with a mean age of 28.1 years (P < .01). Men completed more years of education than their wives (P < .01), and uncircumcised men completed more years of education than their circumcised peers (P < .01). The largest proportion of men (46%) belonged to the Nyanja tribe, where 56% of the men were uncircumcised. Differences in circumcision rates were also identified among other tribal affiliations, with men of the Lomwe and Nyanja tribes being more likely to be uncircumcised, while those of the Yao or “other” tribes were more likely to be circumcised (P < .01 for all). A majority of husbands reported Christianity as their religious faith, which was associated with a higher rate of uncircumcised men (82%, P < .01) than with men of Muslim faith (8%, P < .01). Nearly 90% of the spouses shared the same religion. In all, 51% of wives with uncircumcised husbands accurately reported their husband’s circumcision status compared to 83% of wives with circumcised husbands (P < .01). The majority of circumcisions were reported to be conducted during a traditional ceremony at the mean age of 12.1 years. These sample descriptions are shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Married Couples Sample (N = 360).^a

	All	Circumcised Husband	Uncircumcised Husband	Difference
	N = 360	n = 180	n = 180
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)
Demographics
Age (husband)	32.307	31.804	32.810	−1.006
Age (wife)	28.073	27.778	28.350	−0.572
Years of education (husband)	6.204	5.715	6.693	−0.978^b
Years of education (wife)	4.673	4.534	4.810	−0.276
Any children	0.947	0.939	0.955	−0.017
# of children	3.151	3.235	3.067	0.168
Tribe of the husband
Chewa	0.059	0.056	0.061	−0.006
Lomwe	0.196	0.140	0.251	−0.112^c
Nyanja	0.466	0.369	0.564	−0.196^c
Yao	0.271	0.430	0.112	0.318^c
Other	0.269	0.428	0.111	0.317^c
% of spouses of the same tribe	0.403	0.422	0.383	0.039
Religion of the husband
Christian	0.640	0.464	0.816	−0.352^c
Muslim	0.271	0.458	0.084	0.374^c
% of spouses of the same religion	0.897	0.856	0.939	−0.083^c
Household wealth
Income (USD)	15 485.30	14 666.52	16 299.51	−1632.99
Farmer	0.653	0.601	0.704	−0.103^d
# assets	4.536	4.620	4.453	0.168
Circumcision related
Female reports husband is circumcised	0.667	0.831	0.508	0.323^c
Age at circumcision		12.068
Traditional circumcision		0.944

Abbreviations: MWK, Malawian Kwacha; USD, United States dollar.

^a Circumcision status is based on husband's reported status at baseline (2008). Reported income includes earnings over the past 3 months for the following categories: farming, casual labor, salary income, self-employment income, and remittances and transfers. The income reported is in USD using the average exchange rate for 2009 at 1 USD = 141.2 MWK.

Advantages and Disadvantages of VMMC

For married couples including a circumcised husband, men and women reported religion and/or culture as the most common reason for obtaining VMMC. Women were 3.9 times more likely than men to believe that being circumcised was better for men’s health (P < .001), and 9.1 times more likely to report that circumcised men were more likely to please women sexually (P < .05). Table 2 presents a descriptive summary of the matched sample of wives and their husbands.

Conversely, religion and culture were listed as the most common reason for not getting circumcised, which was also reported by both husbands and wives. Women were more likely than their spouses to think that pain was a deterrent to VMMC (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-3.4; P < .001), while men more than their wives often reported cost as a barrier to VMMC (OR: 2.72; 95% CI = 1.18-6.29). A small, yet significant proportion of men thought they were too old to be circumcised (OR: 0.068 95% CI = 0.068-0.567).

The most commonly reported advantages for being circumcised included reduced HIV/STI risk, improved health/cleanliness, and enhanced sexual pleasure for female partners. Women were 1.51 times (95% CI: 0.93-2.47) more likely than men to report greater female sexual enjoyment as an advantage of VMMC, while men were more likely to report that circumcision reduced HIV (OR: 0.199; 95% CI: 0.11-0.37) and STI risk (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-1.00) as an advantage. When assessing disadvantages of circumcision, couples reported increased risk of HIV as a concern, with more men than women reporting this belief (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.28-0.73). Furthermore, more women than men reported encouragement of premarital sex (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.34-2.92) and pain during the procedure (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.03-2.62) to be disadvantages associated with circumcision.

We assessed the reliability of responses within couples in their reports of advantages and disadvantages for circumcision to determine the level of agreement between husbands and wives. Although differences in mean responses were not significant, differences between husband and wife responses were of interest to better understand communication between married individuals. There were significant differences in reports from husbands and wives, with more wives reporting that circumcision was cleaner or healthier (κ = .11; P < .05). Within couples, more husbands reported increased HIV risk (κ = .09; P < .05) and fatality associated with the procedure (κ = .11; P < .05) as disadvantages of circumcision.

Perceptions of Pain Related to VMMC

When asked whether circumcision was more, less, or equally painful as other common medical events, men were more likely than women to report that having a tooth pulled (OR: 0.482, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74), giving birth (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.313-0.935), and having malaria (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.68) were less painful than being circumcised. The pattern of differences by gender was similar, but within couples, husbands reported more often that circumcision was less painful than having a tooth pulled (κ = .09, P < .05), having blood drawn (κ = .12, P < .05), or having malaria (κ = .08, P < .05). Table 4 presents additional details of these relationships.

Table 4.

Perceptions of Circumcision and Relative Pain.^a

	Women	Men	Log Odds	CI (95%)	κ	κ (P Value)
Circumcision relative ranking (4 = most painful, 0 = least painful)	2.431	1.885	2.435	(0.239-24.844)	−.019	.721
Tooth pulled versus circumcision
Tooth pulled is more painful than circumcision	0.155	0.339	0.482^b	(0.312-0.744)	.088	.036
Tooth pulled is less painful than circumcision	0.718	0.460	2.397^b	(1.463-3.926)	−.001	.505
Tooth pulled and circumcision are equally painful	0.126	0.201	0.605	(0.297-1.232)	−.023	.667
Childbirth versus circumcision
Circumcision is more painful than childbirth	0.080	0.063	1.259	(0.660-2.401)	.058	.139
Circumcision is less painful than childbirth	0.770	0.874	0.541^c	(0.313-0.935)	.071	.086
Circumcision and childbirth are equally painful	0.149	0.063	2.289^c	(1.182-4.430)	.028	.287
Drawing blood versus circumcision
Circumcision is more painful than drawing blood	0.977	0.948	1.537	(0.425-5.564)	.069	.091
Circumcision is less painful than drawing blood	0.017	0.034	0.608	(0.108-3.413)	.115	.014
Circumcision and drawing blood are equally painful	0.006	0.017	0.719	(0.088-5.901)	−.008	.561
Malaria versus circumcision
Circumcision is more painful than malaria	0.655	0.414	2.381^b	(1.630-3.479)	.003	.473
Circumcision is less painful than malaria	0.276	0.511	0.467^b	(0.322-0.678)	.078	.050
Circumcision and Malaria are equally painful	0.069	0.075	0.615	(0.278-1.361)	.009	.433

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

^a The sample includes a matched sample of women and their male spouses. Circumcision status is determined from male reports at baseline (2008). Data are from 2009 for both men and women. Sample size includes 357 men and women.

Perceptions of Sexual Satisfaction Related to VMMC Status

Across the entire sample of both circumcised and uncircumcised couples, men were more likely than women (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.83) to report equal sexual pleasure regardless of the circumcision status. However, women were 2.0 times (95% CI: 1.34-2.98) more likely to report that women experience greater sexual pleasure with a circumcised partner. Within couples, more wives reported greater sexual pleasure for men (κ = .21; P < .001) and women (κ = .15; P < .001) if a husband is circumcised, while more husbands reported that men (κ = .16; P < .001) and women (κ = .12; P < .05) experience the same sexual pleasure regardless of a husband’s circumcision status.

These significant patterns were identical when analyses were conducted among couples in whom the husband was circumcised. The magnitude of these relationships is depicted in Table 1. Among couples with an uncircumcised husband, women were more likely to report that a man would experience greater sexual pleasure if he were circumcised (OR: 1.47, 95% CI = 0.94-2.27). This trend persisted during reliability analysis, with more wives of uncircumcised men reporting that their husbands would experience greater sexual pleasure if they were circumcised (κ = .18; P < .05). Furthermore, women were more likely to report that they experience greater sexual pleasure with a circumcised man (OR: 0.55; 95% CI = 0.31-0.88).

Discussion

As VMMC has become a promising method of HIV prevention, this study revealed perceptions of VMMC that provides insight into some of the barriers in promoting this form of prevention. This study was conducted in rural Malawi and included married couples, of which one-half included circumcised husbands and one-half included uncircumcised husbands. Our sample included husbands and wives who both reported their perceptions separately. Benefits and disadvantages of VMMC were clearly aligned with religion and/or culture, which identify both a barrier and a benefit. Circumcision rates were seen to be significantly higher among men of the Yao tribe and those reporting Muslim as their primary religion. Additionally, favored cultural practices stipulating circumcision of boys at 12 years of age highlight challenges and opportunities apparent in the cultural and religious undertones of this procedure. These findings may serve as an opportunity to develop targeted messages to increase the uptake of VMMC.

HIV and STI prevention messages seem to be infiltrating communities, even in rural Malawi.^4
–6 Although our sample reported HIV/STI transmission risk both as an advantage and disadvantage of VMMC, acceptability of VMMC as a method of HIV prevention was prevalent in this sample, which aligns with previous findings published before and after the dissemination of circumcision recommendations in sub-Saharan Africa.^15
–17 These data suggest that prevention messages may need to be clarified as further scale-up efforts occur. Additionally, while the evidence of female to male transmission reduction is stronger,^4
–6 it is unlikely that these details and nuances are clear through health communication strategies to increase the rates of VMMC. Further, while many respondents were able to identify the benefits of VMMC, anecdotal evidence also indicates that clarification of the sexual and reproductive effects of MC is important to ensure that men continue to use condoms, regardless of the circumcision status. Future studies will examine the impact of condom use on uptake of VMMC.

Pain was identified as a key concern associated with VMMC, possibly driven by the fact that most circumcisions in rural Malawi are not conducted in clinics under local or general anesthetic. Specifically, we were able to identify that perceptions of pain varied in this sample, and VMMC was clearly more painful than a blood draw and less painful than childbirth. Yet, there was no clear pain relationship between VMMC and malaria and a tooth extraction. Literature from the United States also suggests that mothers place higher concern on the pain of the procedure when referencing their sons, which may explain why wives in the current study were also more likely to report pain as a disadvantage of VMMC for their husbands.

Interestingly, we were able to explore how women perceived MC. One of our initial and important findings was that women were not overwhelmingly accurate in identifying their husbands’ circumcision status, with only 51% of wives with uncircumcised husbands accurately reporting their husband’s circumcision status compared to 83% of wives with circumcised husbands. This highlights an unmet need in understanding anatomy, physiology, and overall sexual health and suggests that future interventions should incorporate basic sexual health knowledge and images for both men and women.

Women reported that they would expect more pain to be associated with VMMC than men. It is likely that men are socialized in a manner to accept pain from a traditional circumcision, as their brothers, fathers, and other male family members have undergone. Regardless of their husband’s current circumcision status, women were more likely to report the potential for increased female sexual pleasure with a circumcised partner. Understanding these differential perceptions among men and women and more specifically among sexual partners could yield important insights about the decision-making process surrounding circumcision. In large-scale circumcision roll-out strategies, women could play an important role in motivating their partners to get circumcised on the basis of enhanced sexual pleasure. Additional formative research would be necessary, yet including images of women supporting the notion of increased sexual pleasure due to VMMC on print messages or having spokeswomen willing to discuss their increased sexual pleasure in open forums are some ways in which women may lead this HIV prevention tactic. Developing health messages that focus on increased sexual pleasures with VMMC should be included in future testing of effective HIV prevention efforts. Also, approximately 80% of youth in Malawi have had sex before the age of 18, which suggests that circumcision at earlier ages might be optimal to achieve widespread HIV prevention. Thus, additional VMMC promotion as a prevention strategy should be targeted toward parents. These messages may begin to occur during the prenatal period and throughout the child’s growth, through many avenues including health care providers and in school settings.

There were several limitations included in these findings. The precoded responses for reasons to be circumcised may have been perceived as not mutually exclusive, as were analyzed in this study. Improving health may be perceived as reducing risk of STI/HIV.

We identified significant differences in husband and wife perceptions of VMMC, with differences in perceptions of procedure pain and sexual pleasure offering insight into intervention development. Recognizing these differential attitudes among married couples is important in affecting the demand for VMMC among adult men as well as young children or neonates. More focus should be placed on integrating women into the discussion of VMMC, specifically as a method of increasing female sexual pleasure.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: Funding for this study was provided by Michigan Center for Demography of Aging (MiCDA), OVPR, and Rackham at the University of Michigan as well as the Institute for Research on Women and Gender. We acknowledge the extensive contributions of the field team.

References

Weiss

Halperin

Bailey

Hayes

Schmid

Hankins

. Male circumcision for HIV prevention: from evidence to action? AIDS. 2008;22(5):567–574.

WHO. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in high HIV prevalence settings: what can mathematical modelling contribute to informed decision making? Strategies and approaches for male circumcision programming. PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000109.

WHO/UNAIDS. Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability. 2009.

Agot

Kiarie

Nguyen

Odhiambo

Onyango

Weiss

. Male circumcision in Siaya and Bondo districts, Kenya: prospective cohort study to assess behavioral disinhibition following circumcision. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(1):66–70.

Gray

Kigozi

Serwadda

. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):657–666.

Bailey

Moses

Parker

. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):643–656.

Auvert

Taljaard

Lagarde

Sobngwi-Tambekou

Sitta

Puren

. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2(11):e298.

World Health Organization. Progress in Male Circumcision Scale-Up: Country Implementation and Research Update; 2010.

Demographic and Health Survey. HIV Prevalence: Data from the 2010 Malawi Demographic and Health Survey; 2010. http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/PR4/PR4.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2012.

10.

Latkin

Weeks

Glasman

Galletly

Albarracin

. A dynamic social systems model for considering structural factors in HIV prevention and detection. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(suppl 2):222–238.

11.

Bhthenthal

Watters

. Multimethod research from targeted sampling to HIV risk environments. NIDA Res Monogr. 1995;157:212–230.

12.

Stiffman

Dore

Cunningham

Earls

. Person and environment in HIV risk behavior change between adolescence and young adulthood. Health Educ Q. 1995;22(2):211–226.

13.

Westercamp

Bailey

. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(3):341–355.

14.

Ngalande

Levy

Kapondo

Bailey

. Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV infection in Malawi. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(4):377–385.

15.

Wilcken

Miiro-Nakayima

Hizaamu

Keil

Balaba-Byansi

. Male circumcision for HIV prevention - a cross-sectional study on awareness among young people and adults in rural Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):209.

16.

Lagarde

Dirk

Puren

Reathe

R-T

Bertran

. Acceptability of male circumcision as a tool for preventing HIV infection in a highly infected community in South Africa. AIDS. 2003;17(1):89–95.

17.

Mattson

Bailey

Muga

Poulussen

Onyango

Acceptability of male circumcision and predictors of circumcision preference among men and women in Nyanza Province, Kenya. AIDS Care. 2005;17(2):182–194.