Abstract
Objectives:
The purpose of this systematic review and meta- analysis is to compare clinical results and functional outcomes in patients with osteochondritis dessicans (OCD) lesions of the capitellum treated with either osteochondral autograft transplantation (OATS) or debridement with or without microfracture.
Methods:
Systematic review of multiple medical databases was performed after PROSPERO registration and using PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed using the multiple medical databases and the methodological quality of the individual studies was assessed by two review authors using the Cochrane Collaboration’s “Risk of Bias” tool. Case reports were excluded and only case series of more than five patients and higher level of evidence were included. All study, subject, and surgery parameters were collected. Data was analyzed using statistical software. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated when possible. Data were compared using Pearson Chi-Square and independent sample T tests when applicable.
Results:
Fifteen studies were included involving 368 patients (326 males and 42 females). There were a total of 197 patients in the debridement group and 171 patients in the OATS group. The mean age was 16.9 +/-4.1 for the debridement group and 14.6 +/-1.2 for the OATS group. Mean follow up was 29.0 +/-24.3 and 38.0 +/-12.8 for the debridement and OATS groups, respectively. Patients that underwent an OATS procedure had a statistically significant improvement in overall arc range of motion compared to patients that had a debridement (P≤0.001). When compared to patients with debridement, patients with OATS were 5.6 times more likely to return to at least their pre-injury level of sports participation (p≤0.002).
Conclusion:
Post-operative range of motion was significantly improved in patients undergoing an OATS procedure versus a debridement for OCD lesions of the capitellum. Patients with an OATS were 5.7 times more likely to return to at least the pre-injury level of sports participation compared to patients undergoing a debridement. Further studies are necessary in order to directly compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing a debridement procedures versus and OATS procedure.