Abstract
Objectives:
The medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) includes the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL). Recent reports have described reconstruction of this fan-shaped ligament to treat patellar instability using a double stranded technique to recreate both components of the complex, with a common origin on the medial femur. Much effort has been placed on accurately identifying the “point” of femoral origin during reconstruction due to the influence of femoral tunnel position on MPFC graft function, however, the MPFC origin is elongated in nature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the shape and orientation of the MPFC origin and identify the difference between the most proximal and distal margins of the elongated femoral footprint.
Methods:
20 paired fresh frozen cadaveric knees were dissected. From an intraarticular approach, the MPFC was exposed and followed to its footprint on the medial femur. All other soft tissue was removed from the distal femur, and the footprint of the MPFC, the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle were marked. Images of the medial femur were analyzed using Image J software. The length and width of the MPFC footprint was described to the nearest 0.1mm, as well as the angle of the long axis of the footprint relative to the axis of the femoral shaft (0.1 degrees). The position of the footprint’s most proximal and distal margins were identified and described in relation to the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle. The positions for each were compared using paired t tests.
Results:
17 knees from 10 cadavers (7M, 3F, mean age 73.1) were included in this study. The MPFC femoral footprint had a length of 11.7mm+/-1.8mm (Range 9.6,15.7) and a width of 1.7mm+/-0.4mm (Range, 0.9, 2.2). The long axis of the footprint was found to lie at an angle 14.6+/-16.6 degrees anterior to the axis of the femoral shaft. The most proximal fibers originated 7.4mm+/-3.8mm anterior and 1.8mm+/-4.7mm distal to the adductor tubercle, and 4.1mm+/-2.6mm posterior and 8.4mm+/-5.6mm proximal to the medial epicondyle. The most distal fibers originated 4.9mm+/-4.2mm anterior and 1.3mm+/-4.3mm and distal to the adductor tubercle, as well as 7.1mm+/-2.4mm posterior and 0.5mm+/-5.6mm distal to the medial epicondyle. Overall, the distal margin of the footprint was 10.9mm+/-1.7mm distal (p<0.001) and 2.6mm+/-3.2mm more posterior (p=0.005) than the proximal margin of the MPFC origin.
Conclusions:
The femoral footprint of the MPFC is ribbon shaped, with the distal margin being 10.9 mm distal and 2.6 mm posterior to the proximal margin. This differential anatomy of the femoral origin suggest that MPFL and MQTFL reconstruction may require separate placements of the femoral tunnels to anatomically recreate these fibers. Further biomechanical studies are needed to determine the optimal femoral tunnel placement in the setting of double-limbed MPFC reconstruction, as well as the long term benefit of this technique in the treatment of patellar instability.