Arm Function After Arthroscopic Decompression of the Suprascapular Nerve at the Spinoglenoid Notch and Suprascapular Notch in Volleyball Players

Abstract

Background:

Suprascapular nerve (SSN) entrapment in volleyball players leads to infraspinatus (ISP) muscle atrophy and weakness of abduction and external rotation (ER) of the shoulder.

Purpose:

To assess functional outcome after arthroscopic extended decompression of SSN in the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch in a group of volleyball athletes.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Volleyballers who underwent arthroscopic SSN decompression were analyzed retrospectively. Assessment tools consisted of range of motion and ER strength on Lovett scale and postoperative ER strength measured by dynamometer, Constant-Murley score (CMS), and visual evaluation of ISP muscle recovery by assessing muscle bulk.

Results:

The study included 10 patients (9 male and 1 female). The mean age was 25.9 years (range, 19-33) and mean follow-up was 77.9 months (range, 7-123). The mean range of postoperative ER at 90° of abduction (ER2) was 105.6° (88°-126°) and 108.5° (93°-124°) for the contralateral side, while ER2 strength was 8 ± 2.6 and 12.65 ± 2.8 kg (P < .01) respectively. Mean CMS was 89.9 (84-100). In 5 cases, there was complete recovery of ISP muscle atrophy whereas 2 patients had partial recovery and 3 had none.

Conclusion:

Arthroscopic SSN decompression in volleyball players improves shoulder function, but results of ISP recovery and ER strength are variable.

Keywords

arthroscopic nerve decompression infraspinatus atrophy suprascapular nerve entrapment

Suprascapular nerve (SSN) entrapment in the spinoglenoid notch results in injury to the terminal branch of this nerve, which manifests clinically as infraspinatus (ISP) muscle atrophy, and was described in 1959 by Thompson and Kopell⁴⁶ and later in 1981 by Ganzhorn et al.¹⁵ Functionally, this results in decreased shoulder strength in external rotation (ER) and abduction. In the general patient population, the most common mechanism causing this pathology is a posterior labral tear with a cyst that compresses the SSN.^42,50

In volleyball players, ISP muscle atrophy without any concomitant pathologies is a common finding, reported by many authors.^§ Several theories have been proposed for this pathology, but the most popular was presented in 1984 by Guo and Xu,¹⁹ who described the injury as a result of traction with stretching in the spinoglenoid notch.^13,31 SSN entrapment is estimated to affect about 30% of professional indoor and beach volleyballers.²⁵ Ferretti et al^13,14 previously described the natural course of ISP muscle atrophy and results after surgical treatment. However, the results of these operations were not encouraging when it came to the muscle bulk improvement. Ghodadra et al¹⁷ and Plancher and Petterson³⁴ described arthroscopic release of SSN in the spinoglenoid notch in 2009 and 2014, respectively. Later, arthroscopic nerve release using direct posteromedial (PM) portal was published.^27,30 More recently, anatomic and epidemiological studies as well as case reports considering SSN entrapment and SSN decompression have been published.^12,33

As a result of the complexity of the movements in volleyball and the unclear cause of ISP atrophy, we treat SSN entrapment with extended release from the level of the suprascapular notch to the spinoglenoid notch, with full nerve release to ensure the maximum possible conditions for muscle regeneration and to minimize the risk of subsequent nerve compression.

The aim of this study was to report outcomes after arthroscopic, extended release of the SSN in the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch in competitive-level volleyball players belonging to teams from the amateur division to the national team. To our knowledge, this is the largest case series of professional volleyballers undergoing arthroscopic SSN release. We also performed a literature review of surgical treatment of SSN entrapment in volleyball players to establish what results should be expected after decompression of SSN.

Methods

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. From 2008 to 2014, 10 volleyball players with substantial, clinically visible, atrophy of the ISP muscle of the dominant hand underwent arthroscopic SSN release. All 10 players were involved in volleyball at a competitive level, from the amateur division to the national team. The indication for surgery was poorly explained posterior shoulder pain with decreased range of ER and ISP muscle wasting. Surgery was performed only after failed rehabilitation for a minimum of 6 months focused on improvement in the kinetics of the scapula during arm movement as well as strengthening and electrostimulation of the ISP muscle. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in which substantial atrophy of the ISP muscle was confirmed (Figure 1) and those patients with substantial concomitant pathologies, such as rotator cuff tear, supraspinatus (SSP) muscle atrophy, or paralabral cyst, as a source of the symptoms were excluded.

Figure 1.

Photograph showing substantial atrophy preoperatively and corresponding sagittal view on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan. Arrows indicates infraspinatus muscle and its atrophy.

Outcome measures included pre- and postoperative range of motion on the operated and contralateral side, pre- and postoperative strength in ER as per the modified Lovett scale (Table 1).²⁸ Postoperative strength for the operated shoulder was measured with the Beslands SF-500 dynamometer; the selected unit was kilograms, which is more familiar to patients. The measurements were taken after a few minutes of warm-up, and the result was the arithmetic mean of 3 measurements. Strength was measured and compared with the contralateral side in 3 positions: ER with the arm at the side (ER1), ER with the elbow flexed to 90°, the arm abducted to 90° in the scapular plane, the forearm pronated (ER2), and Jobe test position.²³ Objective shoulder functional was assessed with the Constant-Murley score (CMS).^8,44 At the final follow-up, all athletes underwent radiological assessment with an ultrasound and a radiograph (anteroposterior and Y views). Last, muscle bulk was assessed visually and described as either having no improvement in atrophy, partial improvement, or complete recovery.

Table 1

Modified Lovett Scale for Postoperative External Rotation Strength

Points	Strength
0	Lack of muscle activity
1	Inability to maintain the weight of the limb
2	Partial ability to maintain the weight of the limb
3	Full ability to maintain the weight of the limb
4	Ability to maintain partial weightbearing
5	Ability to maintain full weightbearing

Surgical Technique

All patients had a general anesthetic with an interscalene block and were positioned in the beach-chair position with the arm in an arm holder with 1 kg traction. In draping, the entire scapula was exposed (Figure 2). A standard posterior portal (PP) was used as a viewing portal for joint exploration and subacromial space. Two further portals were utilized: The first working portal was posterolateral (PL), 3 cm lateral to the PP, and the second was a standard anterolateral (AL) portal.

Figure 2.

Posterior and posterolateral side views of patient preparing and draping. Shown are the Lafosse portal to suprascapular nerve release in the suprascapular notch (1), posteromedial portal (2), standard posterior portal (3), posterolateral portal (4), and anterolateral portal (5).

A standard diagnostic arthroscopy was performed first. After confirming the absence of intra-articular injuries, the subacromial space was inspected to perform suprascapular nerve release at suprascapular notch. Upon reaching the level of the suprascapular notch, a radiofrequency wand inserted through the AL portal served to retract the SSP muscle, and a Lafosse portal was made under direct visualization and safely nerve release was performed.²⁴ The nerve was then released posteriorly, up to the level of the scapular spine to achieve complete decompression. After that posterior joint capsule was dissected by radiofrequency inserted through PL portal and under direct visualization PM working portal was created 2-3 medial to the PP (Figure 2).

The PM portal was the main working portal, and the PP was the viewing portal. A blunt trocar was inserted via the working PM portal to create some space by teasing soft tissue up to the spinoglenoid notch without the risk of nerve injury. The blunt trocar was then used as the retractor, and a radiofrequency wand was adjusted through the same PM portal and used to dissect the tissues around the spinoglenoid ligament (if present) and around the nerve (Figure 3). In case of small patients, if more convenient, a blunt trocar was introduced as a retractor via the PL portal and the PM served as a portal for the radiofrequency wand. Complete dissection was performed to decompress the main trunk of the nerve and small branches to the ISP muscle.

Figure 3.

SSN release at the spinoglenoid notch. (A) Example of SSN decompression in case of no transverse ligament. (B) Decompression with ligament release. White arrows indicate the SSN, black arrows indicate the transverse ligament, and stars indicate retinaculum of the infraspinatus muscle. SSN, suprascapular nerve.

Rehabilitation

Patients were immobilized in a shoulder sling for the first 2 weeks postoperatively. While in the sling, isometric deltoid exercises and passive ER, internal rotation (IR), and elbow flexion/extension exercises were performed twice a day. Active movements within painless range of motion were introduced from the second week. Starting from week 6, gradually forced active movements in closed kinetic chain were introduced to restore muscle strength and full range of motion with caution to avoid overstressing. Special attention was given to pain-free ER exercises. After week 12, isolated exercises for the ISP and SSP muscles were introduced. Patients were allowed to return to daily activities after 4 weeks and to the previous sport 3 months postoperatively if pain free.

Results

A total of 10 patients underwent arthroscopic extended SSN decompression at both the suprascapular notch and the spinoglenoid notch levels. There were 9 men and 1 woman, with a mean age of 25.9 years (range, 19-33 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 77.9 months (range, 7-123). There was no loss to follow-up, and all 10 patients were included for final analysis. Individual results for each patient are presented in Table 2. A clinical photograph and MRI scan are shown in Figure 4 as an example.

Table 2

Results of Strength Testing for Each Study Patient ^a

				Strength, ER1					Strength, ER2			Strength, Jobe Test Position
Patient	Sex	Age, y	Follow-up, m	LS, Preop	LS, Postop	DM, kg, Affected	DM, kg, Contra	Contra, %	DM, kg, Affected	DM, kg, Contra	Contra, %	DM, kg, Affected	DM, kg, Contra	Contra, %
1	M	30	90	2	4	3.3	7.9	41.8	6.4	14.8	43.2	3.2	9	35.6
2	M	25	123	2	4	2.4	5.2	46.2	4.6	13.6	33.8	5.5	8.9	61.8
3	M	24	118	2	3	3.9	7.3	53.4	7.6	13	58.5	3	8.1	37
4	M	20	85	2	3	5.8	7.8	74.4	9.2	13.8	66.7	8.1	9.8	82.7
5	M	33	61	3	5	7.2	8.6	83.7	12.1	15.4	78.6	9.1	11	82.7
6	M	26	50	3	5	6.8	8.1	84	10.2	14.2	71.8	8	9.2	87
7	F	26	121	3	4	2.2	4.8	45.8	4	7.1	56.3	2.3	5.8	39.7
8	M	23	116	3	4	4.4	7.6	57.9	6.8	14.1	48.2	4.6	8.2	56.1
9	M	19	7	2	5	7.6	8.2	92.7	9.9	12	82.5	8.2	8.8	93.2
10	M	19	8	2	5	7.2	7	102.9	8.8	8.5	103.5	7.6	7.5	101.3
Mean	—	24.5	77.9	2.4	4.2	5.1	7.3	69.9	8.0	12.7	63	6.0	8.6	69.8

^a Contra, %, percentage of contralateral strength; DM, dynamometer; ER, external rotation; ER1, ER with arm at side; ER2, ER in abduction; F, female; LS, Lovett scale; M, male; Postop, postoperative; Preop, preoperative.

Figure 4.

Photograph showing ISP 50 months postoperatively and corresponding sagittal view on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan. White arrows indicate regeneration of ISP. ISP, infraspinatus.

In ER1, the strength per the Lovett scale increased from a mean 2.4 (range, 2-3) preoperatively to 4.2 (range, 3-5) postoperatively, which was a statistically significant difference (P < .01). The range of ER1 in the affected shoulder increased from 44.5° ± 29.6° preoperatively to 59.9° ± 18.8° at the final follow-up (P = .07). Strength as measured by dynamometer in the ER1, ER2, and Jobe test positions was 5.1 ± 2.1 kg, 8.0 ± 2.6 kg, and 6.0 ± 2.5 kg, respectively, for the operated shoulder; and 7.3 ± 1.3 kg, 12.7 ± 2.8 kg, and 8.6 ± 1.4 kg, respectively, for the contralateral shoulder (Table 3). For all parameters, there was a statistically significant difference in strength between the operated and contralateral shoulder (P < .01 for all), indicating that the surgical treatment allowed for the regaining of 69.9% strength in the ER1 position, 63% in the ER2 position, and 69.8% in the Jobe test position in comparison with the contralateral shoulder. The mean postoperative CMS was 89.9 (range 84-100).

Table 3

Summary of ROM and Strength Measurements for the Different Positions ^a

Position	Mean (range)
ROM, deg
ER1 preoperative	44.5 (0-90)
ER1 postoperative	59.9 (35-85)
ER1 contralateral	61.6 (33-90)
ER2 postoperative	105.6 (88-126)
ER2 contralateral	108.5 (93-124)
Strength, kg, affected vs contralateral
ER1	5.1 (2.2-7.6) vs 7.3 (4.8-8.6)
ER2	8.0 (4-12.1) vs 12.7 (8.5-15.4)
Jobe test	6.0 (2.3-9.1) vs 8.6 (5.8-11)
IR	12.7 (7.6-18.1) vs 11.2 (7.2-16.4)

^a ER, external rotation; ER1, ER with arm at side; ER2, ER in abduction; IR, internal rotation; ROM, range of motion.

At the final follow-up, 5 of 10 patients had complete clinical recovery of the ISP muscle bulk, 2 patients had partial regeneration, and 3 patients had no signs of muscle regeneration. Furthermore, 3 out of 10 patients had tendinopathy of ISP muscle tendons seen on ultrasound during final examination. The results are summarized in Table 4. Postoperatively, there were no radiographic changes seen, and there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All 10 patients returned to sport at the same level as before their symptoms, and none reported pain during daily routines or sport activities.

Table 4

Patients With Muscle Regeneration

Muscle regeneration	No. of Patients (%)
Complete	5/10 (50)
Partial	2/10 (20)
None	3/10 (30)

Discussion

This study has shown that arthroscopic extended decompression of the SSN, at both the spinoglenoid notch and the suprascapular notch levels, in a group of professional volleyball players, led to an improvement in shoulder function and relief of pain and allowed for a full return to competition. Furthermore, there was an increase in the range of motion and a partial improvement in strength in ER. However, compared with the contralateral side, there was a significant decrease in strength in ER in most patients, and recovery of muscle atrophy was inconsistent.

To explain SSN entrapment in the spinoglenoid notch in volleyball players, a number of different theories have been proposed that are neither structural nor constrictual due to ganglioma.^42,48,50 Most studies suggest traction of the nerve as the most likely mechanism.^{7,13,14,18,39,43} Anatomic studies suggest that there are plenty of variations in morphology of suprascapular and the spinoglenoid notch,^35

–38,52 as well as in the course and angle of the lateral trunk of the SSN.¹² Witvrouw et al⁵¹ and Lajtai et al²⁵ found a significant difference in shoulder range of motion and scapular protraction between the dominant shoulder with and without ISP muscle atrophy, which supports the “stretch” theory in the pathogenesis of this pathology.

On the other hand, in some studies analyzing increased ER in overhead athletes,² no correlation between ISP atrophy and ER weakness was found.^21,22,41 However, the positive posterosuperior impingement signs noticed by Lajtai et al,²⁵ typical of the glenohumeral IR deficit (GIRD) syndrome described by Burkhart et al⁶ as a thickening of the posterior capsule, which was also confirmed by Mihata et al,²⁹ could be responsible for this pathology. That said, Ferretti et al^13,14 and electromyographic analysis suggest that the mechanism of injury is correlated with the characteristic movement during “floating service,” in which the player aims not for maximum speed, as in other throwing motions, but rather to launch the ball in a so-called floating trajectory.⁴⁰ This requires a much more intense stabilization of the shoulder than that provided by the external rotators; thus, the ISP muscle is activated much more intensely than in other throwing actions.

In this study, the most important parameter was ISP muscle strength in comparison with the contralateral side. ISP muscle strength was assessed by ER force measured by dynamometer with (1) the elbow at the side and (2) the elbow at 90° abduction. It has been shown previously that this means of assessment best reflects ISP muscle function.^16,26,32 A similar criterion together with dynamometric evaluation was used in only 2 other studies.^33,41 In their case report, Ozer et al³³ showed a small deficit in the diagonal pattern in peak torque and total work values (10% and 32%, respectively) of the operated shoulder. In our study, this deficit was higher, because strength regaining rate was 69.9% in the ER1 position and 63% in the ER2 position). However, the patient reported by Ozer et al³³ was only 18 years old, which may promote better recovery. Sandow and Ilic⁴¹ reported an increase in ER strength from 50% of intact shoulder preoperatively to 80% to 90% postoperatively in 4 volleyball players. In other studies in which strength was assessed and compared with the unaffected side,^1,11,14,20 Lovett scores or the authors’ own clinical scores were used as measurement tools, which can lead to increased risk of bias because methods of measurement were subjective. Among these 4 studies, Dramis and Pimpalnerkar¹¹ and Ferretti et al¹⁴ reported total ER strength recovery in 4 out of 4 patients and in 1 out of 3 patients, respectively, whereas recovery was reported as partial in the other 2 studies.^1,20 Overall shoulder strength was evaluated in 6 other studies (totaling N = 24),^{1,11,14,20,33,41} of which 8 (33.3%) cases achieved total recovery of ER strength.^11,14,33,41 Of the 24 patients, 15 (62.5%) showed partial improvement,^10,13,22,34 and 1 out of 24 patients (4.2%) lacked any improvement.

In our study, muscle bulk recovery was observed in 70% cases overall, and in 50% of cases, there was complete restoration of ISP muscle bulk. In other published studies, overall percentage of muscle volume enlargement were even higher, amounting to 43.5% for complete and 47.8% for partial recovery.^1,11,14,20 Sandow and Ilic⁴¹ found that the best ISP muscle recovery results were achieved in younger patients (range, 24-28 years) in follow-up periods of >12 months. This may suggest that decompression at a younger age and longer rehabilitation are needed for good muscle regeneration, which was also noted in our study. This statement agrees with the hypothesis proposed by Ferretti et al,¹⁴ who noticed a decrease in muscle atrophy only in the youngest patient and subsequently hypothesized that surgical treatment should be performed at an early stage of the neuropathy in young volleyballers to increase the likelihood of reinnervation. However, there is a paucity of data in the literature reporting improvement in ISP atrophy after arthroscopic decompression,^3,30,47 making any direct comparison difficult. In the technique presented in this study, extensive decompression of the SSN was performed at the level from the suprascapular notch to the spinoglenoid notch. It was assumed that extended release would minimize the risk of later microtraumas during volleyball training and promote better reinnervation of the ISP muscle. However, data published in this study do not support this assumption.

Functional results in our study were very good, with a mean CMS of 89.9 (range, 84-100) and no pain in all cases. CMS was used as a tool for functional assessment in 2 other studies.^3,47 Tsikouris et al⁴⁷ reported a mean CMS of 91 (range, 76-95), whereas in their case report, Baums et al³ showed an increase in CMS from 72 preoperatively to 94 postoperatively. In 2 other studies, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and the University of California, Los Angeles score were used,^33,47 and in both a noticeable improvement was observed postoperatively. The results reported by Tsikouris et al are particularly promising considering the fact that the article is a case series of 17 patients with SSN entrapment and accompanying lesions treated simultaneously. Our results are consistent with these studies.

Results from 9 studies after surgical treatment by decompression of the SSN in the spinoglenoid notch are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5

Summary of 9 Studies After Surgical Decompression of the SSN ^a

Lead Author (Year)	No. of Patients	Arthroscopic vs Open	Additional Procedures	Functional Improvement	Functional Scores	Strength Increase	Muscle Enlargement
Antoniadis (1996)¹	8	Open	No	Yes	VAS	All partial	1 complete, 7 partial
Baums (2006)³	1	Arthroscopic	1 cyst	Yes	CMS, VAS	NR	NR
Dramis (2005)¹¹	4	Open	No	Yes	VAS	Yes	Yes
Ferretti (1998)¹⁴	3	Open	No	Yes	VAS	1 full, 1 partial	1 partial, 2 none
Hama (1992)²⁰	3	Open	No	Yes	VAS	All partial	2 complete, 1 partial
Ming (2018)³⁰	1	Arthroscopic	No	NR	NR	NR	NR
Ozer (2007)³³	1	Open	No	Yes	DASH, VAS	Yes	NR
Sandow (1998)⁴¹	5	Open	No	Yes	VAS	2 full, 3 partial	3 complete, 2 partial
Tsikouris (2018)⁴⁷	17	Arthroscopic	17	Yes	UCLA, CMS, VAS	NR	NR

^a CMS, Constant-Murley score; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; NR, not reported; SSN, suprascapular nerve; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score; VAS, visual analog sale.

Postoperatively, all of the patients returned to sports at the same level as before surgery. Postoperative return to sports was also possible in all of the patients among the studies included for analysis.

Strengths and Limitations

The strength of this study is that it is the largest, single-surgeon consecutive and uniform series published to date of professional volleyball players treated by arthroscopic extended decompression of the SSN at the level of both the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch. The results published both in our study and in the literature so far are encouraging but inconclusive because of small number of heterogeneous cases available for analysis.^3,30,47 Furthermore, the biggest challenge with data available in the literature is the lack of consistency regarding the criteria for assessing the success of the treatment and inclusion criteria for surgery with concomitant pathologies.

This study has several limitations, including that the small group of patients analyzed could be associated with increased risk of bias. In addition, there were no preoperative dynamometer readings, thus the partially subjective Lovett and Martin²⁸ scale was used to gauge how much strength was gained. Moreover, there was lack of homogeneous criteria used in the assessment of the postoperative outcomes, especially assessment of muscle bulk. These limitations render it challenging to make a complete and reliable comparison of the results of this study with the available literature. Last, we did not perform postoperative electromyography assessments or radiological follow-up with an MRI scan in every single case, which could potentially help objective assessment of muscle innervation and bulk, respectively. Further studies should focus on larger numbers of professional volleyball players, assessing the occurrence of GIRD, range of motion, positioning on the pitch, and the manner of serving the ball (floating or striking trajectory). Any possible impact on the incidence of ISP muscle atrophy and/or decrease in ER strength should be studied to understand the likely mechanism of injury.

Conclusion

This study has shown that arthroscopic extended decompression of SSN in a group of professional volleyball players is a safe and effective procedure likely to improve shoulder function. However, the results are not completely predictable when it comes to restoring the volume and strength of the ISP.

Footnotes

Notes

References

Antoniadis

Richter

Rath

Braun

Moese

. Suprascapular nerve entrapment: experience with 28 cases. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(6):1020–1025.

Astolfi

Struminger

Royer

Kaminski

Swanik

. Adaptations of the shoulder to overhead throwing in youth athletes. J Athl Train. 2015;50(7):726–732.

Baums

Seil

Kettler

Steckel

Schultz

Klinger

. Treatment option in a SLAP-related ganglion cyst resulting in suprascapular nerve entrapment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126(9):621–623.

Bhatia

de Beer

van Rooyen

du Toit

. Arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression at the suprascapular notch. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(9):1009–1013.

Briner

Jr Benjamin

. Volleyball injuries: managing acute and overuse disorders. Phys Sportsmed. 1999;27(3):48–60.

Burkhart

Morgan

Kibler

. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology part I: pathoanatomy and biomechanics. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(4):404–420.

Clavert

Thomazeau

. Peri-articular suprascapular neuropathy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(8)(suppl):409–411.

Constant

Murley

. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160–164.

Contemori

Biscarini

. Isolated infraspinatus atrophy secondary to suprascapular nerve neuropathy results in altered shoulder muscles activity. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28(3):219–228.

10.

Cummins

Messer

Schafer

. Infraspinatus muscle atrophy in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(1):116–120.

11.

Dramis

Pimpalnerkar

. Suprascapular neuropathy in volleyball players. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71:269–272.

12.

Fabis-Strobin

Topol

Fabis

, et al. A new anatomical insight into the aetiology of lateral trunk of suprascapular nerve neuropathy: isolated infraspinatus atrophy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018;40(3):333–341.

13.

Ferretti

Cerullo

Russo

. Suprascapular neuropathy in volleyball players. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(2):260–263.

14.

Ferretti

De Carli

Fontana

Injury of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch. The natural history of infraspinatus atrophy in volleyball players. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26(6):759–763.

15.

Ganzhorn

Hocker

Horowitz

Switzer

. Suprascapular-nerve entrapment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(3):492–494.

16.

Gerber

Blumenthal

Curt

Werner

. Effect of selective experimental suprascapular nerve block on abduction and external rotation strength of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):815–820.

17.

Ghodadra

Nho

Verma

, et al. Arthroscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch through the subacromial space. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:439–445.

18.

Greiner

Golser

Wambacher

Kralinger

Sperner

. The course of the suprascapular nerve in the supraspinatus fossa and its vulnerability in muscle advancement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(3):256–259.

19.

Guo

. Entrapment injury of the suprascapular nerve, mechanism of musculus infraspinatus atrophy in volleyball players. Chin J Sports Med. 1984;3:127–128.

20.

Hama

Ueba

Morinaga

Suzuki

Kuroki

Yamamuro

. A new strategy for treatment of suprascapular entrapment neuropathy in athletes: shaving of the base of the scapular spine. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992;1(5):253–260.

21.

Hibberd

Oyama

Tatman

Myers

. Dominant-limb range-of-motion and humeral-retrotorsion adaptation in collegiate baseball and softball position players. J Athl Train. 2014;49:507–513.

22.

Holzgraefe

Kukowski

Eggert

. Prevalence of latent and manifest suprascapular neuropathy in high-performance volleyball players. Br J Sports Med. 1994;28(3):177–179.

23.

Jobe

. Painful athletic injuries of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:117–124.

24.

Lafosse

Piper

Lanz

. Arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release: indications and technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(2)(suppl):9–13.

25.

Lajtai

Pfirrmann

Aitzetmüller

Pirkl

Gerber

Jost

. The shoulders of professional beach volleyball players: high prevalence of infraspinatus muscle atrophy. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(7):1375–1383.

26.

Liu

Hughes

Smutz

Niebur

Nan-An

. Roles of deltoid and rotator cuff muscles in shoulder elevation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997;12(1):32–38.

27.

Loirat

Tierny

Hervé

, et al. A new approach for endoscopic neurolysis of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch: a preliminary cadaver study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(6):861–864.

28.

Lovett

Martin

. Certain aspects of infantile paralysis and a description of a method of muscle testing. JAMA. 1916;66:729–733.

29.

Mihata

Gates

McGarry

Neo

Lee

. Effect of posterior shoulder tightness on internal impingement in a cadaveric model of throwing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(2):548–554.

30.

Ming

Min

Andrew

. Unusual case of a volleyball athlete presenting with posterior shoulder pain and infraspinatus muscle wasting. J Orthop Case Rep. 2018;8(5):11–14.

31.

Montagna

Colonna

. Suprascapular neuropathy restricted to the infraspinatus muscle in volleyball players. Acta Neurol Scand. 1993;87(3):248–250.

32.

Neumann

. Kinematics at glenohumeral joint, Chapter V: Shoulder complex. In: Neumann

, ed. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation. Mosby/Elsevier; 2010:155–159.

33.

Ozer

Baltaci

Leblebicioglu

. Rehabilitation and shoulder function after suprascapular nerve entrapment operation in a volleyball player. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:759–761.

34.

Plancher

Petterson

. Posterior shoulder pain and arthroscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2014;22:73–87.

35.

Polguj

Jędrzejewski

Podgórski

Topol

. Morphometric study of the suprascapular notch: proposal of classification. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011;33:781–787.

36.

Polguj

Jędrzejewski

Topol

. Sexual dimorphism of the suprascapular notch–-morphometric study. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(1):177–183.

37.

Polguj

Sibiński

Grzegorzewski

Grzelak

Majos

Topol

. Variation in morphology of suprascapular notch as a factor of suprascapular nerve entrapment. Int Orthop. 2013;37(11):2185–2192.

38.

Rengachary

Burr

Lucas

Brackett

. Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. Part 3: comparative study. Neurosurgery. 1979;5(4):452–455.

39.

Ringel

Treihaft

Carry

Fisher

Jacobs

. Suprascapular neuropathy in pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(1):80–86.

40.

Rokito

Jobe

Pink

Perry

Brault

. Electromyographic analysis of shoulder function during the volleyball serve and spike. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(3):256–263.

41.

Sandow

Ilic

. Suprascapular nerve rotator cuff compression syndrome in volleyball players. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(5):516–521.

42.

Schroder

Skare

Stiris

Gjengedal

Uppheim

Brox

. Treatment of labral tears with associated spinoglenoid cysts without cyst decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(3):523–530.

43.

Shi

Boykin

Lin

Warner

. Association of suprascapular neuropathy with rotator cuff tendon tears and fatty degeneration. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(3):339–346.

44.

Slezak

Lubiatowski

LŁepski

Imirowicz

Romanowski

Polish cultural adaptation of general shoulder assessment scores in use for painful shoulder: ASES, UCLA, Constant Score, SST (part I). Preliminary study. Issue Rehabil Orthop Neurophysiol Sport Promot. 2016;17(17):7–27.

45.

Tengan

Oliveira

Kiymoto

Morita

De Medeiros

Gabbai

. Isolated and painless infraspinatus atrophy in top-level volleyball players. Report of two cases and review of the literature. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1993;51:125–129.

46.

Thompson

Kopell

. Peripheral entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremity. N Engl J Med. 1959;260(25):1261–1265.

47.

Tsikouris

Bolia

Vlaserou

Odantzis

Angelis

Psychogios

. Shoulder arthroscopy with versus without suprascapular nerve release: clinical outcomes and return to sport rate in elite overhead athletes. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(9):2552–2557.

48.

Vigasio

Marcoccio

. Hourglass-like constriction of the suprascapular nerve: a contraindication for minimally invasive surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:29–37.

49.

Wang

Koehler

. Isolated infraspinatus atrophy in a collegiate volleyball player. Clin J Sport Med. 1996;6(4):255–258.

50.

Westrick

Fogarty

Johnson

. Posterior labral tear with a paralabral cyst causing suprascapular nerve compression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(7):511.

51.

Witvrouw

Cools

Lysens

, et al. Suprascapular neuropathy in volleyball players. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34(3):174–180.

52.

Won

Han

Chung

Yoon

. Morphological study of the inferior transverse scapular ligament. Clin Anat. 2014;27(5):707–711.