Further Validation of the SIGMAR1 c.151+1G>T Mutation as Cause of Distal Hereditary Motor Neuropathy

Case Summary

The now 17-year-old right-handed male proband was referred for neurological evaluation at age 13 years, with a 3-year history of slowly progressive distal symmetric upper and lower limb weakness, distal intrinsic hand and foot muscle wasting, and distal joint deformities. He was born to first cousin parents (maternal grandfather and paternal grandmother are siblings) who emigrated from Afghanistan to Canada during pregnancy, which was otherwise unremarkable. The mother is in good health, the father’s history is unavailable to us, and the proband has a healthy half-sister born to a different mother. Delivery was spontaneously at term, with good Apgar scores and normal growth parameters; tone was unremarkable, and orthopedic manifestations were absent. Investigation of excessive bruising at age 4 years led to the diagnosis of type 3 von Willebrand disease (homozygous c.5557C>T/p.Arg1853X variant in VWF gene), requiring intermittent medical treatment. There was no history of intracranial bleeding nor significant trauma to the head, neck, or spine. Aside from mild asthma, requiring occasional use of inhalers, he was in good health. Early neurodevelopmental milestones were normal: he crawled and sat without support at 6 months, walked independently at age 1 year, and spoke in 2-word phrases by age 2 years. His school performance was age appropriate; he was able to write, run, and play sports. However, by age 10 years, he was often noted to trip and fall while running. By age 13 years, he was no longer able to run; his hands and feet were weak, with claw deformities of fingers and toes (Figure 1B and C) and with impeding skills such as writing and using utensils. There was no history of cognitive regression, seizures, impairment of vision/hearing, diplopia, facial weakness/numbness, dysphagia/dysarthria, upper/lower limb paresthesias or sensory loss, significant cervical, thoracic, lumbosacral, or limb pain, or impairment of bowel/bladder sphincter control.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Figure 1.

A, Pictures of proband’s extremities at age 7 years. B and C, Pictures of proband’s extremities at age 13 years. D, Family pedigree and Sanger resequencing results. The mother is a carrier, and the index is homozygous for the variant in SIGMAR1.

Physical examination at age 13 years (Figure 1B and C) revealed normal mental status and normal cranial nerves. Tone was normal in upper limbs and slightly increased in lower limbs. Triceps reflexes were present, but biceps and brachioradialis reflexes were absent in both upper limbs; patellar and ankle reflexes were diminished bilaterally, without ankle clonus. Plantar reflexes were both downgoing. Proximal upper and lower limb bulk and power was normal in all the 4 limbs. However, there was marked symmetric weakness of distal small intrinsic muscles of both hands and feet, with wasting of thenar and hypothenar eminences bilaterally; no fasciculations were noted. At rest, the thumbs were held adducted and all the 4 fingers were clawed. His toes were also clawed bilaterally, with pes planus of both feet. Coordination was normal; Romberg sign was absent. Gait was wide based; he was unable to walk on his heels or toes. Sensory examination (light touch, vibration, proprioception, temperature, and pinprick) was normal, proximally and distally, in all the 4 limbs.

At age 13 and 16 years, motor nerve conduction studies (Table 1) showed diffusely and markedly reduced amplitudes, with mild slowing of conduction velocities and normal distal latencies. Sensory nerve conduction studies were normal. Needle electromyography studies (right extensor digitorum communis, right first dorsal interosseous, right tibialis posterior, and right vastus lateralis) showed markedly large amplitudes of motor unit action potentials, most pronounced in the right tibialis anterior where motor unit action potentials measured up to 10 mV. These findings were interpreted as consistent with anterior horn cell disease.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 1.

Comparison of Conduction Study Results of Our Patient to Those Reported by Li et al. ²

	Our Patient		Patient Reported by Li et ala
Sex	Male		Male
Age at examination, years	13b	16b	30
Motor nerve conduction velocities/compound muscle action potentials, m/s, mV (O–P)
Right median	37.5/0.81	40.4/0.16	43.4/1.2
Right ulnar	45.9/0.53	52.0/0.48	Not available
Right tibial anterior	101/1.73	36.3/0.049	Not available
Right deep peroneal	35.2/1.02	52.9/0.51	Not available
Right peroneus	Not done	Not done	32.5/0.1
Left peroneus	Not done	Not done	34.9/0.2
Sensory nerve conduction velocities/sensory nerve action potentials, m/s, µV
Right median	60.4/13.2	62.2/12.2	58/45
Right ulnar	59.5/8.1	57.7/4.7	Not available
Right radial	61.7/30.3	Not done	Not available
Right sural	52.9/8.5	46.1/7.8	Not available
Left sural	Not done	Not done	55.5/39
Right peroneus	Not done	Not done	63.3/41
Left peroneus	Not done	Not done	61.2/34

^aConduction studies were done only for 1 patient in the study of Li et al. ²

^bOur patient was examined twice, at different ages.

Because his inability to move his right thumb or extend his fingers compromised his ability to write, he underwent right-hand tendon transfer surgery at age 14 years. Postoperatively, he noted not only modest improvement in right thumb motion but also intermittent right hand pain and paresthesias.

At age 17.5 years, he underwent repeat neurological evaluation, which was unchanged. He continued to attend a regular school program, but he was falling behind academically most likely due to his physical disabilities. No regression or signs of an evolving cognitive have been observed; formal neurocognitive testing has not been performed due to logistical issues. He complained of ongoing intermittent cramping and pain in his right hand, provoked by prolonged handwriting with postsurgical paresthesias in dorsum and ulnar side of the hand; his left hand had normal sensation and was pain free. He noted intermittent pain in feet and ankles after prolonged walking or standing but denied paresthesias or impairment of sensation in lower limbs. Strength was unchanged compared to the previous examination.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine showed mild to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis at age 14 years, with anterior–posterior dimension of the spinal canal measuring 9 mm at L4; the stenosis is deemed unrelated to the SIGMAR1 deficiency. There was no evidence of Chiari malformation, syrinx, or spinal cord pathology; the spinal cord ends with the inferior border at L1.

Detailed biochemical investigations based on a published algorithm ⁵ did not yield a diagnosis. Creatine kinase levels were within normal range. Molecular analysis of SMN and PMP22 revealed no pathogenic variants, deletions, or duplications. Chromosome microarray analysis (CytoScan HD; Affymetrix, Santa Barbara, CA) showed large regions of homozygosity (22 identified regions using a threshold of homozygosity regions >4 MB) but was otherwise unremarkable.

After enrollment of the family within the TIDEX gene discovery project (University of British Columbia Institutional Review Board approval H12-00067), whole exome sequencing was performed for the proband and his unaffected mother using the Agilent SureSelect kit and Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Perkin-Elmer, Santa Clara, CA). The sequencing reads were mapped to the hg19 human reference genome. Rare variants (those with minor allele frequency <0.01) were assessed for predicted impact on protein function and screened under multiple inheritance models. Given the consanguinity, the variants were prioritized for homozygous-recessive inheritance and filtered to focus on regions of homozygosity. Further details on the bioinformatics processing are available in Supplemental Material. Whole exome sequencing revealed 49 recessive candidate variants (4 hemizygous, 33 homozygous, and 12 compound heterozygous). Of those, the homozygous c.151+1 G>T variant in SIGMAR1 (located in a 8.5 MB long region of homozygosity spanning chromosome 9p21.1-p13.2) was considered a functional candidate based on the (1) report by Li et al ² of the same recessive SIGMAR1 variant in a family with highly overlapping phenotypes; (2) rarity of the variant—aside from the recent report, ² the variant has not been observed in dbSNP (release 142), Exome Aggregation Consortium (v.0.3), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Project (v.0.0.30), or our in-house database of more than 350 whole exome/whole genome sequencing results; and (3) high deleteriousness (26.7) predicted by Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion. Sanger resequencing confirmed that the proband was homozygous for the variant, and the mother was heterozygous for the same variant (Figure 1D); the father’s DNA was unavailable.

Discussion

In summary, this report further validates causality of the c.151+1G>T SIGMAR1 variant for a distal hereditary motor axonal neuropathy affecting the upper and lower extremities; the phenotypic presentation is highly similar to the patients first reported by Li et al. ² Interestingly, the first reported patients (in their 30 seconds at the time of the report) and our patient present a similar pattern of disease progression: onset of symptoms at age 9 to 13 years, subsequent progression during growth spurt, and stabilization by early adulthood (age 16-20 years). The authors speculate a mechanistic disease pathophysiology: the ability of motor axons to remain viable was limited while being required to elongate. This hypothesis is supported by a recent report by Tsai et al, ⁶ which describes the role of SIGMAR1 protein (sigma-1 receptor) in regulating axon elongation and tau phosphorylation. The authors propose that the longest anterior horn cell motor axons are most vulnerable, explaining the neurodegenerative symptoms during the growth spurt.

In addition to distal hereditary motor neuropathy, SIGMAR1 has been tied to other neurodegenerative phenotypes, such as juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ⁷ A recent report of the SIGMAR1 knockout mice is consistent with the human phenotypes described: the mice displayed motor function defects, decreased muscle strength, progressive denervation of neuromuscular junctions in fast-twitch tibialis anterior muscle, and small progressive motor neuron death in the lumbar spinal cord. ⁸

Another notable finding in our case is the presence of 2 different genetic defects (in VWF and SIGMAR1), accounting for the proband’s hematological and neurological features. The chance of dual genetic diagnoses increases with consanguinity, but such diagnoses have also been reported in offspring of unrelated parents, ⁹ emphasizing the importance of thorough bioinformatics interpretations of whole exome sequencing data in the context of the patients’ phenotype.

The authors conclude that the SIGMAR1 deficiency should be added to the differential diagnosis of distal hereditary motor neuropathies. Further research including identification of other affected individuals with follow-up into adulthood—with repeat electrophysiological studies, as planned for our patient—is needed to confirm the favorable prognosis (stabilization during early adulthood) of the c.151+1G>T variant, including the contribution of other SIGMAR1 variants to distal hereditary motor neuropathy-related phenotypes.