Affective and Cognitive Trust as Mediators in the Influence of Leader Motivating Language on Personal Initiative

Abstract

We investigated the mediating effects of affective and cognitive trust on the relationship between leaders’ use of motivating language and employees’ personal initiative. Hierarchical linear modeling was performed on nested data obtained from a sample of 238 participants from mainland China. The results showed that leaders’ motivating language positively influenced employees’ personal initiative at the team level and their affective and cognitive trust at the individual level. Additionally, both affective and cognitive trust significantly mediated the relationship between motivating language used by leaders and personal initiative demonstrated by employees. These findings point to the positive implications for an organization of a mechanism that fosters employees’ trust in their leaders through the translation of motivational language used by leaders into employees’ behavior demonstrating their personal initiative.

Keywords

personal initiative leader motivating language affective trust cognitive trust

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

L. C.

Cross

Lesser

Levin

D. Z.

(2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.11851845

Anand

Chhajed

Delfin

(2012). Job autonomy, trust in leadership, and continuous improvement: An empirical study in health care. Operations Management Research, 5(3-4), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-012-0068-8

Arendt

J. F. W.

Pircher Verdorfer

Kugler

K. G.

(2019). Mindfulness and leadership: Communication as a behavioral correlate of leader mindfulness and its effect on follower satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00667

Bauer

D. J.

Preacher

K. J.

Gil

K. M.

(2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11(12), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142

Bledow

Frese

(2009). A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship to performance. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 229-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01137.x

Bliese

P. D.

(2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). Jossey-Bass.

Boies

Fiset

Gill

(2015). Communication and trust are key: Unlocking the relationship between leadership and team performance and creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1080-1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.007

Brislin

R. W.

(1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In Triandis

H. C.

Berry

J. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 389-444). Allyn & Bacon.

Burke

C. S.

Sims

D. E.

Lazzara

E. H.

Salas

(2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006

10.

Butler

J. K.

(1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17(3), 643-663. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700307

11.

Colquitt

J. A.

LePine

J. A.

Piccolo

R. F.

Zapata

C. P.

Rich

B. L.

(2012). Explaining the justice-performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer? Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025208

12.

Cropanzano

Mitchell

M. S.

(2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602

13.

Dirks

K. T.

Ferrin

D. L.

(2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450-467. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640

14.

Dutton

J. E.

Workman

K. M.

Hardin

A. E.

(2014). Compassion at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 277-304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091221

15.

Enders

C. K.

Tofighi

(2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

16.

Frese

Fay

(2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6

17.

Frese

Fay

Hilburger

Leng

Tag

(1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x

18.

Frese

Garst

Fay

(2007). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal Initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1084-1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084

19.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

20.

Holmes

W. T.

(2012). The motivating language of principals: A sequential transformative strategy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Nevada.

21.

Holmes

W. T.

(2016). Motivating language theory: Antecedent variables: Critical to both the success of leaders and organizations. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 30(3), 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-10-2015-0085

22.

Holmes

W. T.

Parker

M. A.

(2017). Communication: Empirically testing behavioral integrity and credibility as antecedents for the effective implementation of motivating language. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675450

23.

Holmes

W. T.

Parker

M. A.

(2019). Motivating language intensity: A study of Wyoming superintendents motivating language use as perceived by their principals. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419868520

24.

Holmes

W. T.

Scull

W. R.

(2019). Reframing organizations through leadership communications: The four-frames of leadership viewed through motivating language. Development and Learning in Organizations, 33(5), 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-09-2018-0107

25.

Isaac

R. G.

Zerbe

W. J.

Pitt

D. C.

(2001). Leadership and motivation: The effective application of expectancy theory. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(2), 212-226. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/40604345?seq=1

26.

Kacmar

K. M.

Bachrach

D. G.

Harris

K. J.

Noble

(2012). Exploring the role of supervisor trust in the associations between multiple sources of relationship conflict and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.004

27.

Kannan-Narasimhan

Lawrence

B. S.

(2012). Behavioral integrity: How leader referents and trust matter to workplace outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1199-9

28.

Kock

Mayfield

Sexton

De La Garza

L. M.

(2019). Empathetic leadership: How leader emotional support and understanding influences follower performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818806290

29.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Klein

K. J.

(2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Ed.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). Jossey-Bass.

30.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice Hall.

31.

Madlock

P. E.

(2013). The influence of motivational language in the technologically mediated realm of telecommuters. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(2), 196-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00191.x

32.

Madlock

P. E.

Hildebrand Clubbs

(2019). The influence of supervisors’ use of motivating language in organizations located in India. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419835599

33.

Mayfield

(2007). The effects of leader communication on a worker’s intent to stay: An investigation using structural equation modeling. Human Performance, 20(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280701332018

34.

Mayfield

(2018). Motivating language theory: Effective leader talk in the workplace. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66930-4

35.

Mayfield

(2019). The diffusion process of strategic motivating language: An examination of the internal organizational environment and emergent properties. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(3), 368-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416629093

36.

Mayfield

Kopf

(1998). The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 37(3-4), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199823/24)37:3/4%3C235::AID-HRM6%3E3.0.CO;2-X

37.

Mayfield

Neck

C. P.

(2017). Speaking to the self: How motivating language links with self-leadership. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417731861

38.

Mayfield

Sharbrough

W. C.

(2015). Strategic vision and values in top leaders’ communications: Motivating language at a higher level. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414560282

39.

Mayfield

(2015). The effects of leader motivating language use on employee decision making. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415572787

40.

McAllister

D. J.

(1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/256727

41.

Mensmann

Frese

(2019). Who stays proactive after entrepreneurship training? Need for cognition, personal initiative maintenance, and well-being. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2333

42.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998/2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

43.

Oldham

G. R.

Fried

(2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136(September), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.002

44.

Palanski

M. E.

Kahai

S. S.

Yammarino

F. J.

(2011). Team virtues and performance: An examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7

45.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J.-Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

46.

Pondy

L. R.

(1989). Leadership is a language game. In Leavitt

L. H. J.

Pondy

Boje

D. M.

(Eds.), Readings in managerial psychology (pp. 224-233). University of Chicago Press.

47.

Preacher

K. J.

Kelley

(2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658

48.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

49.

Sarros

J. C.

Luca

Densten

Santora

J. C.

(2014). Leaders and their use of motivating language. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(3), 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2012-0073

50.

Schaubroeck

Lam

S. S.

Peng

A. C.

(2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022625

51.

Selig

J. P.

Preacher

K. J.

(2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org/

52.

Simons

(2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.1.18.543

53.

Snijders

T. A. B.

Bosker

R. J.

(1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, England: Sage

54.

Sullivan

J. J.

(1988). Three roles of language in motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306798

55.

Swift

Littlechild

(2015). Building trust through communication. Journal of Financial Planning, 28(11), 28-32.

56.

Thomas

G. F.

Zolin

Hartman

J., L

. (2009). The central role of communication in developing trust and its effect on employee involvement. Journal of Business Communication, 46(3), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943609333522

57.

Van Quaquebeke

Felps

. (2018). Respectful inquiry: A motivational account of leading through asking open questions and listening. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0537

58.

Wang

C. W.

Fan

K. T.

Hsieh

C. T.

Menefee

M. L.

(2009). Impact of motivating language on team creative performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 133-140.

59.

Wang

Zhou

Liu

(2014). Multilevel issues in leadership research. In Day

D. V.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 146-166). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.013.009

60.

Warr

Fay

(2001). Age and personal initiative at work. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000717

61.

Weick

K. E.

(1995). Sensemaking in organizations (1st ed.). Sage.

62.

Whitener

E. M.

Brodt

S. E.

Korsgaard

M. A.

Werner

J. M.

(1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513-530. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926624

63.

Yukl

G. A.

(2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.

64.

Zhu

W. C.

Newman

Miao

Hooke

(2013). Revisiting the mediating role of trust in transformational leadership effects: Do different types of trust make a difference? Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.08.004