Students in 80 kindergarten to grade six classrooms photographed and captioned experiences in class which they identified as examples of democratic citizenship education. With the assistance of a teacher candidate placed in their classroom for a semester, students chose and captioned five of the photographs they considered to best represent demonstrate citizenship education. Four main categories of citizenship events emerged describing key elements associated with democratic citizenship education; shared decision making, participating in a learner-oriented classroom context in which students have some individual choice of daily activities, equality of opportunity, and activities extending into the community and integrating community and classroom. Early grades students (K-3) identified activities they associated with democratic citizenship education while upper grades (4-6) students additionally presented rationales and gave evidence to support their representations. Empowerment, problem solving, and contributing to the common good were additional elements associated with democratic citizenship education in the classes sampled, although these were not strongly represented as were the four key elements. This study provides an initial portrait indicating a need for deeper investigation of K-6 students ’ own representations of the democratic citizenship education they experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnotM. &DillaboughJ.(2001). Challenging democracy? International perspectives on gender, education and citizenship. London: Routledge Falmer.
2.
BaldiS.PerieM.SkidmoreD.GreenbergE. & HahnC., (2001). What democracy means to ninth graders: US results from the international IEA civic education study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement
3.
BanksJ. (2008). Educating Citizens in a Multicultural Society. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4.
BickmoreK. (1999). Elementary curriculum about conflict resolution: Can children handle global politics?Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(1), 35-69.
5.
Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (2009). The civic mission of schools. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York. Retrieved from http://www.civicmissionofschools.org
6.
DeweyJ. (1916/2004). Democracy and education. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
7.
DudleyR. L. & GitelsonA. R., (2002). Political literacy, civic education, and civic engagement: A return to political socialization?Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 175-182.
8.
GagnonP. (2003). In pursuit of a “civic core.”American Educator, 27(3), 24- 31.
9.
GalstonW. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217-234
10.
HahnC. (2001). Democratic understanding: Cross-national perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 40(1), 14-22.
11.
HarritosC. (2004). Understanding teaching through the minds of teacher candidates: A curious blend of realism and idealism. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(6), 637-654.
12.
HarwoodD. (2001). The teacher’s role in democratic pedagogies in UK primary and secondary schools: A review of ideas and research. Research Papers in Education, 16, 293-319.
13.
KahneJ. & SporteS.(2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 738-766.
14.
KaneT. M. (2005). Political literacy. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Learning, University of Granada. Retrieved fromhttp://105.cgpublisher.com
15.
KerrD. (2003). A clear agenda. Teaching Citizenship, 6, 14-23.
16.
KerrD.CleaverE.I & BlenkinsopS., (2003). Citizenship educational longitudinal study first cross-sectional survey 2001-2003. DfES Research Report 26, London: DfES.
17.
KrippendorfK. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodologies. London: Sage.
18.
KymlickaW. (1995). Multicultural citizenship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
Learning to Give(1937/2009). Quotation from Justice Louis Brandeis (1937). Retrieved from http://leamingtogive.org/search/quotes/Display Quotes.asp?subiect_id=58& search tvpe=subject
20.
LutzC. & CollinsJ., (1993). Reading national geographic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
MaherF. (2001). The feminist classroom: Dynamics of gender, race, and privilege. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
22.
National Council for the Social Studies(1994). Expectations of Excellence. Curriculum Standards for Social Studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
23.
National Council for the Social Studies(2006). Creating effective citizens. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/positions/ability/.
24.
NeuendorfK. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
NiemiR.&NiemiN., (2007). The content and focus of high school civics teaching, Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(1), 32-61.
26.
NiemiR. G. & SmithJ., (2001). Enrollments in high school government classes: Are we short-changing both citizenship and political science training?PS: Political Science & Politics, 34, 281-287.
27.
O’MahonyC. (2009). Understanding core democratic values and citizenship in the fifth grade, Social Studies Research and Practice, 4(3), 1-16.
28.
OslerA. & StarkeyH., (2003). Learning for cosmopolitan citizenship: Theoretical debates and young people’s experiences. Educational Review, 55(3), 243-254.
29.
ParkerW. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
30.
PrintM. (2006). From civics deficit to critical mass: The new civics education. Retrievedfromhttp://www.abc.net.au/civics/teach/articles/mprint1.htm
31.
RockT.HeatherT.O’ConnorK.PasseJ.OldendorfS.GoodA. & ByrdS., (2006). One state closer to a national crisis: A report on elementary social studies education in North Carolina schools, Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(4), 455-483.
32.
RoseG. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.
33.
SantoraS. (2006). Narrating democratic education. Social Studies Research and Practice, 7(1), 17-29.
34.
SunalC. (2008). What is a citizen? Changing definitions. InVanFossenP. & BersonM.(Eds.),The electronic republic: The impact of technology on education for citizenship, (pp. 17-36).
35.
SunalC. & HaasM., (2005). Social studies for the elementary and middle grades: A constructivist approach. 2nd edition, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
SunalC.KelleyL. & SunalD., (Spring, 2009). Elementary teacher candidates’ categorization and interpretation of photographic representations of democratic citizenship education, Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(1), 33-70.
37.
Tomey-PurtaJ. &BarberC. H.(2004). Strengths and weaknesses in U.S. students ’ civic knowledge and skills: Analysis from the IEA civic education study. CIRCLE Fact Sheet. College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, University of Maryland, College Park.
38.
VontzT. (2007). Forward: Special issue: Democracy and education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(1), 6.
39.
WestheimerJ. (2004, April). The Politics of Civic Education. Political Science & Politics, 38, 57-61.
40.
WragaW. (Summer, 1993). The interdisciplinary imperative for citizenship education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(3), 201-231.
41.
YoungI. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
