The Historical Empathy Measurement Tool (HEMT)

Abstract

This study is unique in that it presents the first empirically developed framework for use as a tool for measuring historical empathy. The Historical Empathy Measurement Tool (HEMT) was developed using a design-based research method with three iterative macrocycles of design, experiment, and retrospective analysis. The study involved question responses from 276 students in grade 8 studying WWI trench warfare. The research resulted in a framework of seven levels. (0) Non-response, (1) Facts, (2) Assumptions and Deficits, (3) General Comparison of the Past and Present, (4) Emotional Comparison of the Past and Present, (5) Understanding Motives, Behaviors, Thoughts, & Emotions in the Past, and (6) Acknowledgement of Differences from those in the Past. The inter-rater reliability at the end of macrocycle three was 95%.

Keywords

Historical empathy Measurement Empathy Design-based research WWI History

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barton

K. C.

Levstik

L. S.

(2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Belur

Tompson

Thornton

Simon

(2018). Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372

Brooks

(2008). Displaying historical empathy: What impact can a writing assignment have. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(2), 130–146.

Brooks

(2011). Historical empathy as perspective recognition and care in one secondary social studies classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(2), 166–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473452

Clark

A. J.

(2010). Empathy: An integral model in the counseling process. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(3), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00032.x

Collette

J. P.

Jones

S. H.

(2020). Empathic concern and perspective taking: A tale from middle school history. Social Studies Research and Practice, 15(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-04-2020-0014

Crompton

Sykora

(2021). Developing instructional technology standards for educators: A design-based research study. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100044.

Cuff

Brown

S. J.

Taylor

Howat

(2015). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466

D’Adamo

Fallace

(2011). The multigenre research project: An approach to developing historical empathy. Social Studies Research & Practice, 6(1), 75–88.

10.

Davis

O. L.

Anne Yeager

Foster

S. J.

(2001). Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies. Rowman & Littlefield.

11.

Davison

(2017). Teaching about the first world war today: Historical empathy and participatory citizenship. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 16(3), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173417736906

12.

Decety

Jackson

P. L.

(2006) A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 54–58.

13.

diSessa

A. A.

Cobb

(2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77–103.

14.

Doppen

F. H.

(2000). Teaching and learning multiple perspectives: The atomic bomb. The Social Studies, 91(4), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990009602461

15.

Downey

M. T.

(1995, April 22). Doing history in a fifth-grade classroom: Perspective taking and historical thinking. American Educational Research Association.

16.

Elliott

Bohart

A. C.

Watson

J. C.

Greenberg

L. S.

(2011). Empathy. In: Norcross

J. C.

(Ed.), Psychotherapy Relationships That Work (pp. 132–152). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737208.003.0006

17.

Endacott

J. L.

(2010). Reconsidering affective engagement in historical empathy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 6–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473415

18.

Endacott

J. L.

Brooks

(2013). An updated theoretical and practical model of historical empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 8(1), 41–58.

19.

Endacott

J. L.

Brooks

(2018). Historical empathy. In: Endacott

J. L.

Brooks

(Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 203–225). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119100812.ch8

20.

Endacott

J. L.

Pelekanos

(2015). Slaves, women, and war! Engaging middle school students in historical empathy for enduring understanding. The Social Studies, 106(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2014.957378

21.

Endacott

J. L.

Sturtz

(2015). Historical empathy and pedagogical reasoning. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2014.05.003

22.

Engelen

E. -M.

Röttger-Rössler

(2012). Current disciplinary and interdisciplinary debates on empathy. Emotion Review, 4(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911422287

23.

Foster

Yeager

(2001). Historical empathy in theory and practice: Some final thoughts. Rowman and Littlefield.

24.

Gehlbach

(2004). Social perspective taking: A facilitating aptitude for conflict resolution, historical empathy, and social studies achievement. Theory & Research in Social Education, 32(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2004.10473242

25.

Gravemeijer

(1994). Educational development and developmental research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(5), 443–471.

26.

Gravemeijer

Cobb

(2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In: den Akker

J. V.

Gravemeijer

McKenney

Nieveen

(Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 29–63). Routledge. https://www-taylorfrancis-com-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203088364-12/design-research-learning-design-perspective-koeno-gravemeijer-paul-cobb

27.

Gravemeijer

van Eerde

(2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 510–524.

28.

Hartmann

Hasselhorn

(2008). Historical perspective taking: A standardized measure for an aspect of students’ historical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.10.002

29.

Haydn

(2001). From a very peculiar department to a very successful school: Transference issues arising out of a study of an improving school. School Leadership & Management, 21(4), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430120108943

30.

Hilton

J. L.

von Hippel

(1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 237–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237

31.

Jensen

(2008). Developing historical empathy through debate: An action research study. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(1), 55–67.

32.

Kohlmeier

(2006). “Couldn’t she just leave?”: The relationship between consistently using class discussions and the development of historical empathy in a 9^th grade world history course. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(1), 34–57.

33.

Lee

Shemilt

(2011). The concept that dares not speak its name: Should empathy come out of the closet? Teaching History, 143, 39.

34.

Levstik

L. S.

Barton

K. C.

(2011). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle school. Routledge.

35.

Main

Walle

E. A.

Kho

Halpern

(2017). The interpersonal functions of empathy: A relational perspective. Emotion Review, 9(4), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669440

36.

Milburn

Iuricich

(2020). The skill of historical empathy. Agora, 55(2), 46–49.

37.

Muetterties

C. C.

Bronstein

E. A.

(2020). Scoundrel or freedom fighter? Creating historical empathy inquiries. Social Studies Research and Practice, 15(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-12-2019-0063

38.

National Council for the Social Studies. (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. https://www.socialstudies.org/standards/national-curriculum-standards-social-studies

39.

Oner

Kinaci

M. K.

(2020). The views of social studies teachers on historical empathy. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(3), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2020.03.011

40.

Peck

Seixas

(2008). Benchmarks of historical thinking: First steps. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(4), 1015–1038. https://doi.org/10.2307/20466737

41.

Rantala

Manninen

van den Berg

(2016). Stepping into other people’s shoes proves to be a difficult task for high school students: Assessing historical empathy through simulation exercise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1122092

42.

Reich

(2009). Testing historical knowledge: Standards, multiple-choice questions and student reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 37(3), 325–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2009.10473401

43.

Riess

(2017). The science of empathy. Journal of Patient Experience, 4(2), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373517699267

44.

VanSledright

B. A.

(2013). Assessing historical thinking and understanding: Innovative designs for new standards. Routledge.

45.

Yeager

E. A.

Foster

S. J.

Maley

S. D.

Anderson

Morris

J. W

III . (1998). Why people in the past acted as they did: An exploratory study in historical empathy. International Journal of Social Education, 13(1), 8–24.

46.

Young

(2020). How to become a more reflective practitioner/researcher. International Journal of Psychotherapy, 24(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.36075/IJP.2020.24.1.5/Young