Civic Performance Outcomes and Market Morality: Using NAEP to Address the Civic Efficacy of Charter Schools

Abstract

Advancing civic learning and competence remains a fundamental objective in social studies education. Persistent civic performance outcome gaps, similar to other educational achievement disparities, are influenced by race, class, and other social constraints. Charter schools, known for their innovative structures and curricula, are often proposed as a solution for enhancing civic outcomes, particularly for Black and Hispanic youth. This study analyzes the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2014 and 2018 Civics Grade 8 results using a multilevel regression model to assess whether charter schools improve civic outcomes compared to traditional public and private schools. Key variables examined include race/ethnicity, school type, and teacher credentials. The findings reveal that charter schools perform comparably to traditional public schools in fostering civic knowledge and skills. Teacher time spent on civics instruction nor teacher credentials relate to student civic performance outcomes.

Keywords

charter schools civics achievement NAEP scores civic learning opportunity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulkadiroglu

Angrist

Cohodes

Dynarski

Fullerton

Kane

Pathak

(2009). Informing the debate: Comparing Boston’s charter, pilot, and traditional schools. Boston Foundation.

Betts

J. R.

Tang

Y. E.

(2016). A meta-analysis of the literature on the effect of charter schools on student achievement [Conference session]. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE) Spring 2016 Conference, Evanston, IL.

Bifulco

Ladd

H. F.

(2006). The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: Evidence from North Carolina. American Education Finance Association.

Black

(2013). Charter schools, vouchers, and the public good. Wake Forest Law Review, 48(2), 445–489.

Booker

Gilpatric

Gronberg

Jansen

(2007). The impact of charter school attendance on student performance. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5), 849–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.09.011

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Buckley

Schneider

(2007). Charter schools: Hope or hype? Princeton University Press.

Buras

K. L.

Randels

Salaam

(Eds.). (2010). Pedagogy, policy, and the privatized city: Stories of dispossession and defiance from New Orleans (Vol. 44). Teachers College Press.

Burrell

D. N.

Finch

Luna

B. A.

Rahim

Dawson

(2011). A theoretical evaluation of charter schools in the development of student change agents that are knowledgeable about sustainability, environmental education, and environmental public health that can be effective in Green STEM opportunities. International Handbook of Academic Research and Teaching, 17, 20–27.

10.

Campbell

D. E.

(2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30, 437–454.

11.

Campbell

D. E.

(2012). Civic education in traditional public, charter, and private schools: Moving from comparison to explanation. In Levinson

Hess

F. M.

(Eds.), Making civics count: Citizenship for a new generation (pp. 229–246). Harvard Education Press.

12.

Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO). (2023). National Charter School Study III. Stanford University. Retrieved from https://credo.stanford.edu/reports/item/national-charter-school-study-iii/

13.

Chubb

J. E.

Moe

T. M.

(1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Brookings Institution.

14.

Chudowsky

Kober

Yoshioka

McMurrer

(2013). Civic education and charter schools: Current knowledge and future research issues. Center on Education Policy. https://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=417

15.

Colvin

R. L.

(2013). Creating capital citizens: Cesar Chavez public charter schools for public policy and civic education (Policy Brief 8, AEI Paper & Studies). AEI.

16.

Davis

Raymond

(2012). Choices for studying choice: Assessing charter school effectiveness using two quasi-experimental methods. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 225–236.

17.

Dixson

A. D.

(2011). Whose choice? A critical race perspective on charter schools. In Johnson

(Ed.), The neoliberal deluge: Hurricane Katrina, late capitalism, and the remaking of New Orleans (pp. 130–151). University of Minnesota Press.

18.

Dixson

A. D.

Buras

K. L.

Jeffers

E. K.

(2015). The color of reform: Race, education reform, and charter schools in post-Katrina New Orleans. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557826

19.

Gainous

Martens

A. M.

(2012). The effectiveness of civic education: Are “good” teachers actually good for “all” students? American Politics Research, 40(2), 232–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X11419492

20.

Gill

Whitesell

E. R.

Corcoran

S. P.

Tilley

Finucane

Potamites

(2020). Can charter schools boost civic participation? The impact of democracy Prep public schools on voting behavior. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1386–1392. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305542000057x

21.

Ginwright

(2011). Hope, healing, and care: Pushing the boundaries of civic engagement for African American youth. Liberal Education, 97(2), 34–39.

22.

Ginwright

Cammorata

(2007). Youth activism in the urban community: Learning critical civic praxis within community organizations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(6), 693–710.

23.

Giroux

H. A.

(2012). Can democratic education survive in a neoliberal society. In Reitz

(Ed.), Crisis and commonwealth (pp. 137–152). Lexington Books.

24.

Gordon

P. J.

(2011). Building voice, taking action: Experiences of youth from a civic-focused school [Unpublished dissertation, Havard University].

25.

Haass

(2023). The bill of obligations: The ten habits of good citizens. Penguin.

26.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

O’Brien

Rivkin

S. G.

(2005). The market for teacher quality (NBER Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research.

27.

Henig

J. R.

(2018). Charter schools in a changing political landscape. In Rotberg

I. C.

Glazer

J. L.

(Eds.), Choosing charters: Better schools or more segregation? (pp. 6–23). Teachers College Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1811420&site=ehost-live

28.

Hess

Zola

(2012). Professional development as a tool for improving civic education. In Campbell

Levinson

Hess

F. M.

(Eds), Making civics count: Citizenship education for a new generation (pp. 229–246). Harvard Education Press.

29.

Homana

Barber

Torney-Purta

(2006). Assessing school citizenship education climate: Implications for social studies (CIRCLE Working Paper 48). Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), University of Maryland.

30.

Hoxby

C. M.

Muraka

Kang

(2009). How New York City’s charter schools affect achievement. The New York City Charter Schools Evaluation Project.

31.

Imig

Koziol

Pilato

Imig

(2009). Teacher certification and credentials: From a focus on qualification to a commitment to performance. International handbook of research on teachers and teaching, 141–157.

32.

Johnson

C. S.

Gyimah

(2024). The civic side of American charter schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 110, 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103130

33.

Johnson

C. S.

Maeda

Sdunzik

Gyimah

Dwomoh

(2023). Charters as counter publics: Addressing the civic side of charter schooling. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 14(3), 258–286.

34.

Johnson

C. S.

Qin

Hinton

(2020). The civic efficacy of charter schools: A literature review. Journal of School Choice, 14(2), 254–279.

35.

Kahne

J. E.

Middaugh

(2008). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school (Working Paper 59). The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning. http://www.civicyouth.org/?p=s278764.

36.

Ladd

H. F.

Sorensen

L. C.

(2015). Do master’s degrees matter? Advanced degrees, career paths, and the effectiveness of teachers (Working Paper 136). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER).

37.

Ladson-Billings

(2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.

38.

Lasley

T. J.

II Ridenour

C. R.

(2005). School choice: Structured through markets and morality. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 18(2), 6.

39.

Lautzenheiser

Kelly

A. P.

(2013). Charter schools as nation builders: Democracy prep and civic education (Policy Brief 4). American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

40.

Lave

Wenger

(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

41.

Levinson

(2007). The civic achievement gap (CIRCLE Working Paper 51). Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE). https://civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP51Levinson.pdf

42.

Levinson

(2010). The civic empowerment gap: Defining the problem and locating solutions. In Sherrod

L. R.

Torney-Purta

Flanagan

C. A.

(Ed). Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 331–361). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470767603.ch13

43.

Lipman

Haines

(2007). From accountability to privatization and African American exclusion: Chicago’s “Renaissance 2010”. Educational Policy, 21(3), 471–502.

44.

Malin

Ballard

P. J.

Damon

(2015). Civic purpose: An integrated construct for understanding civic development in adolescence. Human Development, 58(2), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381655

45.

McEachin

Lauen

D. L.

Fuller

S. C.

Perera

R. M.

(2020). Social returns to private choice? Effects of charter schools on behavioral outcomes, arrests, and civic participation. Economics of Education Review, 76, 1–16.

46.

Miron

Nelson

(2002). What’s public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Corwin Press.

47.

Mulholland

L. A.

(1996). Charter schools: The reform and the research. Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State University.

48.

National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). (2024). Civics. https://www.nagb.gov/naep-subject-areas/civics.html

49.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2014a). Social studies teacher questionnaire. Grade 8 [Teacher Questionnaire]. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/about/pdf/bgq/teacher/2014_bq_teacher_g08_cgh.pdf

50.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). (2014b). Social Studies school questionnaire. Grade 8 [School Questionnaire]. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/about/pdf/bgq/school-sdlep/2014_bq_school_g08_cgh.pdf

51.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). NAEP technical documentation: Plausible values versus individual scores. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/tdw/analysis/est_pv_individual.asp

52.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Civics 2018: National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4, 8, 12. U.S. Department of Education.

53.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). An overview of NAEP. U.S. Department of Education.

54.

National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. NCSS.

55.

Niemi

R. G.

Junn

(2005). Civic education: What makes students learn. Yale University Press.

56.

R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

57.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

Congdon

(2017). HLM 7.03 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.

58.

Rofes

Stulberg

(2004). The emancipatory promise of charter schools: Toward a progressive politics of school choice. State University of New York Press.

59.

Sloan

(2008). The expanding educational services sector: Neoliberalism and the corporatization of curriculum at the local level in the US. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(5), 555–578.

60.

Spence

L. K.

(2015). Knocking the hustle: Against the neoliberal turn in black politics. Punctum Books.

61.

Torney-Purta

Lehmann

Oswald

Schulz

(2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

62.

Wilson

T. S.

(2016). Contesting the public school: Reconsidering charter schools as counter publics. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 919–952.

63.

Winthrop

(2020, June). The need for civic education in 21st-century schools. Brookings Institute. BrookingsPolicy2020_BigIdeas_Winthrop_CivicEducation.pdf

64.

Wolf

P. J.

(2010). School vouchers in Washington, DC: Achievement impacts and their implications for social justice. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(2), 131–150.

65.

Woodson

A. N.

Love

B. L.

(2019). Outstanding: Centering Black kids’ enoughness in civic education research. Multicultural Perspectives, 21(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2019.1606631

66.

Yang

Maeda

Gentry

(2024). The relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: Multilevel analysis with NAEP 2019. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 12, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00204-z

67.

Zhang

Torney-Purta

Barber

(2012). Students’ conceptual knowledge and process skills in civic education: Identifying cognitive profiles and classroom correlates. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(1), 1–34.

68.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Sass

Witte

(2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. RAND Corporation. https://www-jstor-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/10.7249/mg869bmg-joy-wpf

69.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Witte

(2012). Examining charter student achievement effects across seven states. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 213–224.