Restoring Dignity in Academic Publishing Is a Collective Duty

Abstract

Keywords

electronic publishing ethics in publishing open access publishing peer review scholarly communication academic performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Journal Experts. 2012. Past, present, and future of scholarly publishing [accessed 2018 September 23]. http://pisis.fime.uanl.mx/ftp/open_access/The_Past_Present_and_Future_of_Scholarly_Publishing_Manual.pdf.

Beall

2017. What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 27(2):273–278.

Franco

EL.

2017. The downside of the shifting paradigm of scholarly publishing in the biomedical sciences: predatory publishing. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 39(7):513–515.

Larivière

Haustein

Mongeon

2015. The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS One. 10(6):e0127502.

Townsend

2003. October 1: history and the future of scholarly publishing. Perspectives on History. 41(7):32–41.

Worlock

2004. The pros and cons of open access. Nature [accessed 2018 September 23]. https://www-nature-com-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/nature/focus/accessdebate/34.html.