Research has broadly investigated the role of line managers in human resource management. However, several studies have shown that line managers perceive there to be high pressure on their operational performance, often at the expense of their role as people managers. Combining Giddens’ theory of structuration and paradox lens as theoretical backgrounds, I aim to explain this phenomenon by accounting for the embeddedness of line managers in organizations as social and political systems. Therefore, I developed a circular structuration model displaying the process and dynamics that influence the development and change of norms for coping with paradoxical tensions. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
AustIBrandlJKeeganA (2015) State-of-the-art and future directions for HRM from a paradox perspective: Introduction to the Special Issue. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung29(3–4): 194–213.
2.
BarleySR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly31(1): 78–108.
3.
BesharovMLSmithWK (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review39(3): 364–381.
4.
BoseliePBrewsterCPaauweJ (2009) Search of balance – managing the dualities of HRM: An overview of the issues. Personnel Review38(5): 461–471.
5.
BrandlJPohlerD (2010) The human resource department’s role and conditions that affect its development: Explanations from Austrian CEOs. Human Resource Management49(6): 1025–1046.
6.
BudhwarPS (2000) Evaluating levels of strategic integration and devolvement of human resource management in the UK. Personnel Review29(1/2): 141–157.
7.
CaldwellR (2011) HR directors in UK boardrooms: A search for strategic influence or symbolic capital?Employee Relations33(1): 40–63.
8.
CameronKSQuinnRE (1988) Organizational paradox and transformation. In: QuinnRECameronKS (eds) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1–18.
9.
Cascón-PereiraRValverdeMRyanG (2006) Mapping out devolution: An exploration of the realities of devolution. Journal of European Industrial Training30(2): 129–151.
10.
CleggSRda CunhaPJe CunhaPM (2002) Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations55(5): 483–503.
11.
DanyFGuedriZHattF (2008) New insights into the link between HRM integration and organizational performance: The moderating role of influence distribution between HRM specialists and line managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management19 (11): 2095–2112.
12.
e CunhaPMRegoAVaccaroA (2014) Organizations as human communities and internal markets: Searching for duality. Journal of Business Ethics120(4): 441–455.
13.
EhnertI (2009) Sustainable Human Resource Management: A Conceptual and Exploratory Analysis from a Paradox Perspective. Berlin, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
14.
EisenhardtKMBourgeoisLJIII (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal31(4): 737–770.
15.
EvansPAL (1999) HRM on the edge: A duality perspective. Organization6(2): 325–338.
16.
FestingMMaletzkyM (2011) Cross-cultural leadership adjustment: A multilevel framework based on the theory of structuration. Human Resource Management Review21(3): 186–200.
17.
FinkelsteinS (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurements, and validation. Academy of Management Journal35(3): 505–538.
18.
FloydSWLanePJ (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review25(1): 154–177.
19.
FrancisHKeeganA (2006) The changing face of HRM: In search of balance. Human Resource Management Journal16(3): 231–249.
20.
GendersenDETinsleyDB (1996) Empirical assessment of impression management biases: The potential for performance appraisal error. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality11(5): 57–77.
21.
GibbS (2003) Line manager involvement in learning and development: Small beer or big deal?Employee Relations25(3): 281–293.
22.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GotsisGKorteziZ (2010) Ethical considerations in organizational politics: Expanding the perspective. Journal of Business Ethics93(4): 497–517.
24.
GuestDKingZ (2004) Power, innovation and problem-solving: The personnel managers’ three steps to heaven?Journal of Management Studies41(3): 401–423.
25.
GuestDE (2011) Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal21(1): 3–13.
26.
HeZ-LWongP-K (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science15(4): 481–494.
27.
HildischAK (2012) Zur strategischen Integration der Personalabteilung. Eine erweiterte strukturationstheoretische Betrachtung. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
28.
HileyDR (1987) Power and values in corporate life. Journal of Business Ethics6(5): 343–353.
29.
JarzabkowskiP (2008) Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal51(4): 621–650.
30.
JarzabkowskiPLêJVan de VenAH (2013) Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization11(3): 245–280.
31.
JayJ (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 137–159.
32.
KeeganAHuemannMTurnerRJ (2012) Beyond the line: Exploring the HRM responsibilities of line managers, project managers and the HRM department in four project-oriented companies in the Netherlands, Austria, the UK and the USA. The International Journal of Human Resource Management23(5): 3085–3104.
33.
KellyJGennardJ (2007) Business strategic decision making: The role and influence of directors. Human Resource Management Journal17(2): 99–117.
34.
KozicaABrandlJ (2015) Handling paradoxical tensions through conventions: The case of performance appraisal. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung29(1): 49–68.
35.
KozicaAKaiserS (2012) A sustainability perspective on flexible HRM: How to cope with paradoxes of contingent work. Management Revue23(3): 239–261.
36.
KroonBPaauweJ (2014) Structuration of precarious employment in economically constrained firms: The case of Dutch agriculture. Human Resource Management Journal24(1): 19–37.
37.
KuvaasBDysvikABuchR (2014) Antecedents and employee outcomes of line managers’ perceptions of enabling HR practices. Journal of Management Studies51(6): 845–868.
38.
LarsenHHBrewsterC (2003) Line management responsibility for HRM: What is happening in Europe?Employee Relations25(3): 228–244.
39.
LeggeK (1995) Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
40.
LewisMW (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review25(4): 760–776.
41.
LewyPEWilliamsJR (2004) The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management30(6): 881–905.
42.
LinkKMüllerB (2015) Delegating HR work to the line: Emerging tensions and insights from a paradox perspective. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung29(3–4): 280–302.
43.
LüscherLSLewisMW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal51(2): 221–240.
44.
McGovernFGrattonLHope-HaileyV. (1997) Human resource management on the line?Human Resource Management Journal7(4): 12–29.
45.
MarchJ (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science2(1): 71–87.
46.
MarshAIGilliesJG (1983) The involvement of line and staff managers in industrial relations. In: ThurleyKWoodS (eds) Industrial Relations and Management Strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–38.
47.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology82(2): 340–363.
48.
MillerBRutherfordMKolodinskyR (2008) Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology22(3): 209–222.
49.
NarayananVKFaheyL (1982) The micro-politics of strategy formulation. Academy of Management Review7(1): 25–34.
50.
Neu MorénE (2013) The negotiated character of performance appraisal: How interrelations between managers matters. International Journal of Human Resource Management24(4): 853–870.
51.
NortonRSKaplanDP (1996) The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
52.
OkhuysenGBonardiJ-P (2011) The challenges of theory building through the combination of lenses. Academy of Management Review36(1): 6–12.
53.
OliverC (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review16(1): 145–179.
54.
OrtmannGSydowJWindelerA (2000): Organisation als reflexive Strukturation. In: OrtmannGSydowJTürkK (eds) Theorien der Organisation. Wiesbaden: Springer, 315–354.
55.
PooleMSVan den VenAH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review14(4): 562–578.
56.
PurcellJHutchinsonS (2007) Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: Theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal17(1): 3–20.
57.
ReesCEdwardsT (2009) Management strategy and HR in international mergers: Choice, constraint and pragmatism. Human Resource Management Journal19(1): 24–39.
58.
RenwickD (2003) Line manager involvement in HRM: An inside view. Employee Relations25(3): 262–280.
59.
RobertsJScapensRW (1985) Accounting systems and systems of accountability: Understanding accounting practices in their organisational contexts. Accounting, Organizations and Society10(4): 443–456.
60.
SheehanC (2005) A model for HRM strategic integration. Personnel Review34(2): 192–209.
61.
SheehanCde CieriHDCooperB, et al. (2014) Exploring the power dimensions of the human resource function. Human Resource Management Journal24(2): 193–210.
62.
SmithWK (2014) Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal57(6): 1592–1623.
63.
SmithWKLewisMW (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review36(2): 381–403.
64.
SmithWKTushmanML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovative streams. Organization Science16(5): 522–536.
65.
SüßS (2009) Die Institutionalisierung von Managementkonzepten. Eine strukturations-theoretisch-politische Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft79(2): 187–213.
66.
TostLPGinoFLarrickRP (2013) When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance. Academy of Management Journal56(5): 1465–1486.
67.
TrussC (2009) Changing HR functional forms in the UK public sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management20(4): 717–737.
68.
TushmanMLSmithWKWoodR. (2010) Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change19(5): 1331–1366.
69.
VinceRBroussineM (1996) Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies17(1): 1–12.
70.
VredenburghDBrenderY (1998) The hierarchical abuse of power in work organizations. Journal of Business Ethics17(12): 1337–1347.
71.
WatsonSMaxwellGAFarquarsonL (2006) Line managers’ views on adapting human resource roles: The case of Hilton (UK) hotels. Employee Relations29(1): 30–49.
72.
WayhanVBWernerS (2000) The impact of workforce reductions on financial performance: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Management26(2): 341–363.
73.
WhittakerSMarchingtonM (2003) Devolving HR responsibility to the line: Threat, opportunity or partnership?Employee Relations25(3): 245–261.
74.
ZhangYWaldmanDAHanY-L (2015) Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal58(2): 538–566.
