The current study used convective heat transfer properties to investigate the Marangoni convection flow of oxide particles within water and ethylene glycol past a linearly expanding sheet. The flow characteristic is enhanced by the inclusion of nonlinear thermal radiation in the heat transfer phenomenon. The model is properly designed in conjunction with the appropriate assumption of the effective properties of the nanofluid, such as viscosity, conductivity, and the Prandtl number, among others. However, the flow analysis of γ−Al2O3 nanofluid embedding with the permeable medium affects the behavior of the contributing parameters. The non-dimensional forms of the governing equations designed with the above-mentioned properties are obtained by selecting the appropriate similarity transformation. Furthermore, the Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg numerical method is used to solve these sets of formulated problems from case studies. The flow domain’s behavior when several relevant parameters are varied is depicted graphically and briefly described. However, the major contributions are; inclusion of particle concentration accelerates the nanofluid temperature whereas the fluid velocity decelerates near the sheet region, and further it shows its opposite impact. The resistance offered by the permeability of the porous medium attenuates the fluid velocity significantly.
CazabatAMHeslotFTroianSM, et al. Fingering instability of thin spreading films driven by temperature gradients. Nature1990; 346:824–826.
2.
ArafuneKHirataA. Thermal and solutal Marangoni convection in In–Ga–Sb system. J Cryst Growth1999; 197:811–817.
3.
ChristopherDMWangBX. Similarity simulation for Marangoni convection around a vapor bubble during nucleation and growth. Int J Heat Mass Transf2001; 44:799–810.
4.
ChristopherDMWangB. Prandtl number effects for Marangoni convection over a flat surface. Int J Therm Sci2001; 40:564–570.
5.
BestehornMPototskyAThieleU. 3D large scale Marangoni convection in liquid films. Eur Phys J B2003; 33:457–467.
6.
ThieleUKnoblochE. Thin liquid films on a slightly inclined heated plate. Physica D2004; 190:213–248.
7.
RashadAMChamkhaAJModatherM. Mixed convection boundary-layer flow past a horizontal circular cylinder embedded in a porous medium filled with a nanofluid under convective boundary condition. Comput Fluids2013; 86:380–388.
8.
ZhengLZhangCZhangX, et al. Flow and radiation heat transfer of a nanofluid over a stretching sheet with velocity slip and temperature jump in porous medium. J Franklin Inst2013; 350(5): 990–1007.
9.
AbbasiFMHayatTAhmadB. Peristaltic transport of copper–water nanofluid saturating porous medium. Physica E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct2015; 67:47–53.
10.
GaneshNVKameswaranPKAl-MdallalQM, et al. Non-linear thermal radiative marangoni boundary layer flow of gamma Al2O3 nanofluids past a stretching sheet. J Nanofluids2018; 7:944–950.
11.
KeblinskiPEastmanJACahillDG. Nanofluids for thermal transport. Mater Today2005; 8:36–44.
12.
BhattadASarkarJGhoshP. Improving the performance of refrigeration systems by using nanofluids: A comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2018; 82:3656–3669.
13.
ShadlaghaniAFarzanehMShahabadiM, et al. Numerical investigation of serrated fins on natural convection from concentric and eccentric annuli with different cross sections. J Therm Anal Calorim2019; 135:1429–1442.
14.
GoodarziMToghraieDReiszadehM, et al. Experimental evaluation of dynamic viscosity of ZnO–MWCNTS/engine oil hybrid nanolubricant based on changes in temperature and concentration. J Therm Anal Calorim2019; 136:513–525.
15.
Hajatzadeh PordanjaniAAghakhaniSKarimipourA, et al. Investigation of free convection heat transfer and entropy generation of nanofluid flow inside a cavity affected by magnetic field and thermal radiation. J Therm Anal Calorim2019; 137(3): 997–1019.
16.
ArastehHMashayekhiRGoodarziM, et al. Heat and fluid flow analysis of metal foam embedded in a double-layered sinusoidal heat sink under local thermal non-eq42 condition using nanofluid. J Therm Anal Calorim2019; 138(2): 1461–1476.
17.
AhmadiAAArabbeikiMAliHM, et al. Configuration and optimization of a minichannel using water-alumina nanofluid by Non-Dominated sorting genetic algorithm and response surface method.. Nanomater2020; 10:901.
18.
MishraAKPattnaikPKMishraSR, et al. Dissipative heat energy on Cu and Al2O3 ethylene–glycol-based nanofluid flow over a heated semi-infinite vertical plate. J Therm Anal Calorim2021; 145:129–137.
19.
NazariSEllahiRSarafrazMM, et al. Numerical study on mixed convection of a non-Newtonian nanofluid with porous media in a two lid-driven square cavity. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 140:1121–1145.
20.
MishraSRMathurP. Williamson nanofluid flow through porous medium in the presence of melting heat transfer boundary condition: semi-analytical approach. Multidiscip Model Mater Struct2020; 17(1): 19–33.
21.
MishraSRMathurPAliHM. Analysis of homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions in a micropolar nanofluid past a nonlinear stretching surface: semi-analytical approach. J Therm Anal Calorim2021; 144(6): 2247–2257.
22.
NaïmiMHasnaouiMPlattenJK. Buoyant Marangoni convection of weakly non-Newtonian power law fluids in a shallow rectangular cavity. Eng Comput2002; 19(1): 49–91.
23.
SheikholeslamiMChamkhaAJ. Influence of Lorentz forces on nanofluid forced convection considering Marangoni convection. J Mol Liq2017; 225:750–757.
24.
LinYLiBZhengL, et al. Particle shape and radiation effects on Marangoni boundary layer flow and heat transfer of copper-water nanofluid driven by an exponential temperature. Powder Technol2016; 301(1): 379–386.
25.
MushtaqAMustafaMHayatT, et al. Nonlinear radiative heat transfer in the flow of nanofluid due to solar energy: A numerical study. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng2014; 45:1176–1183.
26.
MaıägaSEBNguyenCTGalanisN, et al. Heat transfer behaviours of nanofluids in a uniformly heated tube. Superlattices Microstruct2004; 35:543–557.
27.
HamiltonRLCrosserOK. Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems. Ind Eng Chem Fundam1962; 1(3): 187–191.
28.
AlluguvelliRBallaCSBandariL, et al. Investigation on natural convective flow of ethylene glycol nanofluid containing nanoparticles Fe3O4 in a porous cavity with radiation. In Hyderabad, India. http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/5.0019589 (2020, accessed 28 December 2021)
29.
BallaCSNaikotiK. Finite element analysis of magnetohydrodynamic transient free convection flow of nanofluid over a vertical cone with thermal radiation. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2016; 230(3): 161–173.
30.
Chandra SekharBKishanNHarithaC. Convection in nanofluid-filled porous cavity with heat, absorption/generation and radiation. J Thermophys Heat Transf2017; 31(3): 549–562.
31.
BallaCSNaikotiK. Radiation effects on unsteady MHD convective heat and mass transfer past a vertical plate with chemical reaction and viscous dissipation. Alex Eng J2015; 54:661–671.
32.
ReddyCSKishanNShekarBC. MHD boundary layer flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid over a shrinking sheet with mass suction and chemical reaction. J Nanofluids2015; 4(4): 518–527.
33.
SowmyaGGireeshaBSindhuS. Thermal exploration of radial porous fin fully wetted with SWCNTs and MWCNTs along with temperature-dependent internal heat generation. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2020; 234(24): 4945–4952.
34.
GireeshaBSowmyaGSindhuS. Analysis of thermal behavior of moving longitudinal porous fin wetted with water-based SWCNTs and MWCNTs. Heat Transf2020; 49:2044–2058.
35.
SowmyaGGireeshaBJPrasannakumaraBC. Scrutinization of different shaped nanoparticle of molybdenum disulphide suspended nanofluid flow over a radial porous fin. HFF2019; 30(7): 3685–3699.
36.
GireeshaBSowmyaGGorlaRSR. Nanoparticle shape effect on the thermal behaviour of moving longitudinal porous fin. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2020; 234(3-4): 115–121.
37.
AgrawalPDadheechPKJatRN, et al. Magneto Marangoni flow of g-Al2O3 nanofluids with theral radiation and heat source/sink effect over a stretching surface ebedded in porous ediu. Case Std Ther Eng2021; 23:100802.
