In the present analysis, heat and mass transfer of micropolar nanofluid flow over vertical nonlinear Riga stretching sheet is considered. Effects of velocity slip, thermal slip, Joule heating, thermal radiations, variable thermal conductivity, and heat generation are examined. Thermophoresis and Brownian motion effects are highlighted in current study. The mathematical model is developed under flow assumptions, the partial differential equations are formed by implementing the boundary layer approximations. The partial differential equations are further reduced in form of ordinary differential equations by means of suitable transformations. The ordinary differential equations are solved through numerical procedure. The effects physical parameters presented through tables and graphs for the both case of suction/injection. Velocity function declined due to higher values of micropolar parameter. The velocity function declined due to increasing the values of velocity slip. The concentration function declined due to larger values of Brownian motion. The positive values of velocity slip increases the Sherwood number and Nusselt number. The Nusselt number and Sherwood number declined for higher values of thermal slip . The values of Sherwood number and Nusselt number declined for higher values of Eckert number .
SakiadisBC. Boundary-layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: I. Boundary-layer equations for two-dimensional and axisymmetric flow. AIChE J1961; 7(1): 26–28.
2.
CraneLJ. Flow past a stretching plate. Z Angew Math Phys1970; 21(4): 645–647.
3.
CortellR. Effects of viscous dissipation and work done by deformation on the MHD flow and heat transfer of a viscoelastic fluid over a stretching sheet. Phys Lett A2006; 357(4–5): 298–305.
4.
GireeshaBJChamkhaAJManjunathaS, et al. Mixed convective flow of a dusty fluid over a vertical stretching sheet with non-uniform heat source/sink and radiation. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2013; 23: 598–612.
5.
RashidiMMHosseiniAPopI, et al. Comparative numerical study of single and two-phase models of nanofluid heat transfer in wavy channel. Appl Math Mech2014; 35(7): 831–848.
6.
NadeemSMehmoodRAkbarNS. Combined effects of magnetic field and partial slip on obliquely striking rheological fluid over a stretching surface. J Magn Magn Mater2015; 378: 457–462.
7.
GangadharKKannanTJayalakshmiP. Magnetohydrodynamic micropolar nanofluid past a permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with Newtonian heating. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2017; 39(11): 4379–4391.
8.
AlarifiIAbokhalilAOsmanM, et al. MHD flow and heat transfer over vertical stretching sheet with heat sink or source effect. Symmetry2019; 11(3): 297.
9.
Anantha KumarKSugunammaVSandeepN. Influence of viscous dissipation on MHD flow of micropolar fluid over a slendering stretching surface with modified heat flux model. J Therm Anal Calorim2020; 139(6): 3661–3674.
10.
NadeemSFuzhangWAlharbiFM, et al. Numerical computations for Buongiorno nano fluid model on the boundary layer flow of viscoelastic fluid towards a nonlinear stretching sheet. Alex Eng J2022; 61(2): 1769–1778.
11.
WangFAhmadSAl MdallalQ, et al. Natural bio-convective flow of Maxwell nanofluid over an exponentially stretching surface with slip effect and convective boundary condition. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 2220.
12.
ChoiSUEastmanJA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Argonne National Lab (ANL), Argonne, IL, United States, 1October1995.
13.
KhanaferKVafaiKLightstoneM. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf2003; 46(19): 3639–3653.
14.
Abu-NadaEMasoudZHijaziA. Natural convection heat transfer enhancement in horizontal concentric annuli using nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2008; 35(5): 657–665.
15.
DadheechPKAgrawalPMebarek-OudinaF, et al. Comparative heat transfer analysis of MoS2/C2H6O2 and SiO2-MoS2/C2H6O2 nanofluids with natural convection and inclined magnetic field. J Nanofluids2020; 9(3): 161–167.
16.
WarkeASRameshKMebarek-OudinaF, et al. Numerical investigation of the stagnation point flow of radiative magnetomicropolar liquid past a heated porous stretching sheet. J Therm Anal Calorim2022; 147(12): 6901–6912.
17.
MouradAAissaAMebarek-OudinaF, et al. Galerkin finite element analysis of thermal aspects of Fe3O4-MWCNT/water hybrid nanofluid filled in wavy enclosure with uniform magnetic field effect. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2021; 126: 105461.
18.
PushpaBVSankarMMebarek-OudinaF. Buoyant convective flow and heat dissipation of Cu–H2O nanoliquids in an annulus through a thin baffle. J Nanofluids2021; 10(2): 292–304.
19.
MarzouguiSMebarek-OudinaFMagherbiM, et al. Entropy generation and heat transport of Cu–water nanoliquid in porous lid-driven cavity through magnetic field. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2022; 32: 2047–2069.
20.
SwainKMebarek-OudinaFAbo-DahabSM. Influence of MWCNT/Fe3O4 hybrid nanoparticles on an exponentially porous shrinking sheet with chemical reaction and slip boundary conditions. J Therm Anal Calorim2022; 147(2): 1561–1570.
21.
EringenA. Theory of micropolar fluids. J Math Mech1966; 16: 1–18.
22.
ArimanTTurkMASylvesterND. Microcontinuum fluid mechanics—a review. Int J Eng Sci1973; 11(8): 905–930.
23.
KelsonNADesseauxA. Effect of surface conditions on flow of a micropolar fluid driven by a porous stretching sheet. Int J Eng Sci2001; 39(16): 1881–1897.
24.
AhmadKIshakANazarR. Micropolar fluid flow and heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching plate with viscous dissipation. Math Probl Eng2013; 2013: 1–5.
25.
ReddyGJKethireddyBRaniHP. Bejan’s heat flow visualization for unsteady micropolar fluid past a vertical slender hollow cylinder with large Grashof number. Int J Appl Comput Math2018; 4(1): 1–25.
26.
Mohammed AlshehriAHuseyin CobanHAhmadS, et al. Buoyancy effect on a micropolar fluid flow past a vertical Riga surface comprising water-based SWCNT–MWCNT hybrid nanofluid subject to partially slipped and thermal stratification: Cattaneo–Christov model. Math Probl Eng 2021; 2021: 1–13. 2021.
27.
AmjadMZehraINadeemS, et al. Thermal analysis of Casson micropolar nanofluid flow over a permeable curved stretching surface under the stagnation region. J Therm Anal Calorim2021; 143(3): 2485–2497.
28.
AhmadSNadeemSKhanMN. Heat enhancement analysis of the hybridized micropolar nanofluid with Cattaneo–Christov and stratification effects. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2022; 236(2): 943–955.
29.
LanjwaniHBChandioMSAnwarMI, et al. Triple Solutions with stability analysis of MHD mixed convection flow of micropolar nanofluid with radiation effect. J Nanomat 2022; 2022: 1–21. 2022.
30.
AliRAsjadMIAldalbahiA, et al. Convective flow of a Maxwell hybrid nanofluid due to pressure gradient in a channel. J Therm Anal Calorim2021; 143(2): 1319–1329.
31.
ReddyMGRaniSKumarKG, et al. Transverse magnetic flow over a Reiner–Philippoff nanofluid by considering solar radiation. Mod Phys Lett B2019; 33(36): 1950449.
32.
KumarRNGowdaRJPAlamMM, et al. Inspection of convective heat transfer and KKL correlation for simulation of nanofluid flow over a curved stretching sheet. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf2021; 126: 105445.
33.
ImranMAShaheenASherifESM, et al. Analysis of peristaltic flow of Jeffrey six constant nano fluid in a vertical non-uniform tube. Chin J Phys2020; 66: 60–73.
34.
HassanMEl-ZaharERKhanSU, et al. Boundary layer flow pattern of heat and mass for homogenous shear thinning hybrid-nanofluid: an experimental data base modeling. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ2021; 37(2): 1234–1249.
35.
CortellR. Viscous flow and heat transfer over a nonlinearly stretching sheet. Appl Math Comput2007; 184(2): 864–873.
36.
MakindeOD. Similarity solution of hydromagnetic heat and mass transfer over a vertical plate with a convective surface boundary condition. Int J Phys Sci2010; 5(6): 700–710.
