The role of nanoparticle diameter and solid-fluid interfacial layer behavior under low oscillating magnetic fields: A response surface methodology and ANOVA approach
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
The role of nanoparticle diameter and solid-fluid interfacial layer behavior under low oscillating magnetic fields: A response surface methodology and ANOVA approach
The present analysis investigates the influence of nanoparticle diameter, low-oscillating magnetic field, and slip conditions on the Boger nanoliquid flow across a rotating rough disk under the impact of solid-fluid interfacial layer. Additionally, the consequence of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux and non-linear thermal radiation is taken into account to analyze the heat transmission attributes. The governing partial differential equations (PDEs) are reduced into dimensionless ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with the use of suitable similarity transformations. Further, the resulting equations are solved numerically by utilizing the Runge Kutta Fehlberg’s fourth-fifth order (RKF-45) approach. Furthermore, response surface methodology (RSM) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were utilized for statistical assessment, executed by the fitting of a general linear model. The computational study on the heat transport rate for different parameters is conducted with the help of RSM. Additionally, a visual depiction is provided for the consequence of several dimensionless factors on temperature and velocity profiles. The velocity profile rises as solid volume fraction and solvent fraction parameter values rise. The velocity profiles decrease as the relaxation time ratio increases. The temperature profile upsurges as the radiation parameter values grow, and the thermal profile declines as the thermal relaxation time parameter increases.
SajidTJamshedWEidMR, et al. Thermal case examination of inconstant heat source (sink) on viscous radiative Sutterby nanofluid flowing via a penetrable rotative cone. Case Stud Therm Eng2023; 48: 103102.
2.
GangadharKGNCDinarvandS. Stagnation point of the triple nanoparticle nanofluid flow through the spinning sphere with radiation absorption. Pramana2024; 98(3): 95.
3.
Al-TurefGAObalaluAMSalehW, et al. Computational Study and application of the Hamilton and Crosser model for ternary hybrid nanofluid flow past a Riga wedge with heterogeneous catalytic reaction. NANO2025; 20(01): 2450105.
4.
AlraddadiIAyubAHussainSM, et al. The significance of ternary hybrid cross bio-nanofluid model in expanding/contracting cylinder with inclined magnetic field. Front Mater2023; 10: 1242085.
5.
RameshGKSaadehRMadhukeshJK, et al. Neural network algorithms of a curved riga sensor in a ternary hybrid nanofluid with chemical reaction and Arrhenius kinetics. J Radiat Res Appl Sci2024; 17(4): 101078.
6.
NagalakshmiPSSVijayaN. Three Dimensional Boger nanofluid flow explored with carbon nanotubes over a Riga Plate. J Nanofluids2020; 9(2): 114–120.
7.
AliBSiddiqueIHussainS, et al. Boger nanofluid: significance of Coriolis and Lorentz forces on dynamics of rotating fluid subject to suction/injection via finite element simulation. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 1612.
8.
AliBSharifHHabibD, et al. Significance of tri-hybrid nanoparticles in thermal management subject to magnetized squeezing flow of a Boger-micropolar nanofluid between concentring disks. J Mol Liq2024; 397: 124141.
9.
RazaQWangXAliB. Influence of viscosity and thermal conductivity in boger nanofluid flow through porous disk: finite difference analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim2025; 150(1): 451–477.
10.
PandaSBaithaluRMishraSR. Thermal characteristics of Boger-micropolar tri-hybrid nanofluid magnetized squeezing flow within concentric parallel discs. J Therm Anal Calorim2024; 149(22): 13071–13080.
11.
HwangJHMaF. On the flow of a thin liquid film over a rough rotating disk. J Appl Phys1989; 66(1): 388–394.
12.
TurkyilmazogluM. The MHD boundary layer flow due to a rough rotating disk. ZAMM2010; 90(1): 72–82.
13.
TurkyilmazogluMSenelP. Heat and mass transfer of the flow due to a rotating rough and porous disk. Int J Therm Sci2013; 63: 146–158.
14.
Al-MalkiMASGarrettSJCamarriS, et al. The effects of roughness levels on the instability of the boundary-layer flow over a rotating disk with an enforced axial flow. Phys Fluids2021; 33(10): 104109.
15.
KhanMSalahuddinTAwaisM, et al. Thermo-physical properties of fluid and gases near a solar rough rotating disk. Waves Random Complex Media2022; 1–16.
16.
HassanMZeeshanAMajeedA, et al. Particle shape effects on ferrofuids flow and heat transfer under influence of low oscillating magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater2017; 443: 36–44.
17.
SharmaKKumarS. Impacts of low oscillating magnetic field on ferrofluid flow over upward/downward moving rotating disk with effects of nanoparticle diameter and nanolayer. J Magn Magn Mater2023; 575: 170720.
18.
RamzanMRiasatSZhangY, et al. Significance low oscillating magnetic field and hall current in the nano-ferrofluid flow past a rotating stretchable disk. Sci Rep2021; 11(1): 23204.
19.
AcharyaN. Spectral simulation to investigate the effects of nanoparticle diameter and nanolayer on the ferrofluid flow over a slippery rotating disk in the presence of low oscillating magnetic field. Heat Transf2021; 50(6): 5951–5981.
20.
HassanMMohyud-DinSTRamzanM. Study of heat transfer and entropy generation in ferrofluid under low oscillating magnetic field. Indian J Phys2019; 93(6): 749–758.
21.
GangadharKSreeTSWakifA, et al. Stefan blowing impact and chemical response of Rivlin–Reiner fluid through rotating convective disk. Pramana2024; 98(4): 160.
22.
Punith GowdaRJNaveen KumarRKumarR, et al. Three-dimensional coupled flow and heat transfer in non-newtonian magnetic nanofluid: an application of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model. J Magn Magn Mater2023; 567: 170329.
23.
HayatTMuhammadTAlsaediA, et al. A comparative study for flow of viscoelastic fluids with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux. PLoS One2016; 11(5): e0155185.
24.
SarmaSKGangadharKLakshmiK, et al. Memory effects on MHD Williamson fluid over a stretched lubricated surface with microbes. Mod Phys Lett B2025; 2550113.
25.
VasuBRayAKGorlaRS. Free convective heat transfer in Jeffrey fluid with suspended nanoparticles and Cattaneo–Christov heat flux. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2020; 234(3–4): 99–114.
26.
GangadharKSujana SreeTChamkhaAJ. Binary chemical interaction and nonlinearity radiative flux of Williamson fluidic flow through Riga plate. Int J Model Simul2024; 0(0): 1–15.
27.
YasirMKhanMModassir HussainS, et al. Numerical aggregation for dissipative flow of hybrid nanomaterial: darcy Forchheimer model. Ain Shams Eng J2024; 15(4): 102628.
28.
GasmiHObalaluAMKaswanP, et al. Features of melting heat transfer in magnetized squeezing radiative flow of ternary hybrid nanofluid. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 61: 104842.
29.
KhanMIrfanMKhanWA, et al. A new modeling for 3D Carreau fluid flow considering nonlinear thermal radiation. Results Phys2017; 7: 2692–2704.
30.
GangadharKNaga ChandrikaGDinarvandS. Simulation of radiative nonlinear heat dynamism on buongiorno-modeled nanoliquid through porous inclined plate with adjustable chemical response. Mod Phys Lett B2024; 38(34): 2450347.
31.
Saad AlbalawiKKarthikKMadhuJ, et al. Nanoparticle aggregation kinematics and nanofluid flow in convectively heated outer stationary and inner stretched coaxial cylinders: influenced by linear, nonlinear, and quadratic thermal radiation. Mod Phys Lett B2025; 39(01): 2450361.
32.
GireeshaBJPavithraCGGorlaRSR. Enhanced heat transfer analysis of Casson hybrid nanofluid in blood with thermal radiation through a stretching sheet: a comprehensive study of analytical and numerical method. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2025; 23977914241304063.
33.
MathurPMishraSPattnaikPK. Marangoni convection of γ-Al2O3-water/ethylene glycol nanofluids with the inclusion of nonlinear thermal radiation. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2023; 237(3–4): 131–143.
34.
GangadharKMary VictoriaEWakifA. Irreversibility analysis for the EMHD flow of silver and magnesium oxide hybrid nanofluid due to nonlinear thermal radiation. Mod Phys Lett B2024; 38(33): 2450337.
35.
GangadharKPrameelaMChamkhaAJ, et al. Evaluation of homogeneous-heterogeneous chemical response on Maxwell-fluid flow through spiraling disks with nonlinear thermal radiation using numerical and regularized machine learning methods. Int J Model Simul2024; 0(0): 1–23.
36.
MadhuJKarthikKVarun KumarRS, et al. Dynamics of pollutant dispersion and solid–fluid interfacial layer in Jeffrey nanofluid flow subjected to waste discharge concentration: implementation of probabilists’ Hermite polynomial collocation method. Numer Heat Transf A Appl2024; 0(0): 1–19.
37.
da SilvaCBHuntJCREamesI, et al. Interfacial layers between regions of different turbulence intensity. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2014; 46(2014): 567–590.
38.
ShafiqAÇolakABNaz SindhuT. Designing artificial neural network of nanoparticle diameter and solid–fluid interfacial layer on single-walled carbon nanotubes/ethylene glycol nanofluid flow on thin slendering needles. Int J Numer Methods Fluids2021; 93(12): 3384–3404.
39.
SrilathaPKumarRSVKumarRN, et al. Impact of solid-fluid interfacial layer and nanoparticle diameter on Maxwell nanofluid flow subjected to variable thermal conductivity and uniform magnetic field. Heliyon2023; 9(11): e21189.
40.
DawarA. Exploring the effects of nanoparticle radius and inter-particle spacing on mixed convective dusty nanofluid flow over an extending heated surface: a numerical analysis. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanomaterials, Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2025; 23977914241312366.
41.
AbbasMKhanNHashmiMS, et al. Numerical simulation of chemical reactive flow of Boger fluid over a sheet with heat source and local thermal non-equilibrium conditions. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 59: 104498.
42.
AlsulamiMDNaveen KumarRPunith GowdaRJ, et al. Analysis of heat transfer using local thermal non-equilibrium conditions for a non-Newtonian fluid flow containing Ti6Al4V and AA7075 nanoparticles in a porous media. ZAMM2023; 103(5): e202100360.
43.
PreethiKHanumagowdaBNPavithraKM, et al. Thermal scrutinization of MHD darcy–Forchheimer flow of hybrid nanofluid over a stretching sheet with Richardson number and quadratic thermal radiation: hyperbolic tangent model. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des2025; 8(3): 171.
44.
JagadhaSGopalDPatilN, et al. Effect of higher order chemical reaction and joule heating on rotational and permeable radiative MHD flow of casson manganese ferrite fluid with heat generation/absorption. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des2025; 8(3): 164.
45.
SreehariPGopalDKishanN, et al. A numerical study on the radiative flow of magneto-Casson fluid via a vertical microchannel with entropy generation. J Korean Phys Soc2025; 86(5): 372–382.
46.
KelsonNDesseauxA. Note on porous rotating disk flow. ANZIAM J2000; 42: C837–C855.
