Abstract
Urban housing markets exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity shaped by multiple spatial factors, resulting in scaling characteristics and hierarchical structures typical of complex systems. These properties provide an alternative perspective for delineating housing market areas and interpreting inter-market linkages. This study introduces the concept of natural submarkets, defined as spatially contiguous housing clusters exhibiting both hierarchical scaling in price patterns and consistent hedonic price determinants. We implement this concept through a bottom-up segmentation framework that combines an improved head/tail breaks with hedonic model fit, enabling data-driven delineation of market boundaries and comparative regional analysis. Applied to 26 cities in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China, the proposed method yields a more objective and interpretable representation of price differentiation and scaling properties than conventional classifications. The results indicate that economically advanced cities may exhibit either multi-level submarket structures with well-defined hedonic relationships or more complex hierarchical structures with weakly defined pricing mechanisms. Further submarkets clustering by shared pricing mechanism reveals two dominant spatial patterns, comprising interconnected development corridors and isolated market structures. These morphologies are generally driven by network centrality and accessibility to amenities. As a result, the YRD housing price distribution is characterized by a polycentric structure and ongoing cross-boundary integration. The proposed framework complements traditional regional analyses by revealing structural patterns of mechanical similarity and supporting differentiated policy interventions aligned with housing market dynamics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
