Abstract
Category:
Sports; Ankle
Introduction/Purpose:
In general, Static Stretching (SS) is widely used during warm-ups and cool-downs at competitive practices and events. Previous studies have shown that SS have improved muscle stiffness. On the other hand, previous studies have not shown range of motion, or vertical jump. Recently, acute effects of Cyclic Stretching (CS) have suggested to improve muscle stiffness and dynamic balance. CS is moved at a constant speed and angle using continuous passive and dynamometer-equipped exercise equipment. However, long-term CS and SS programs have been shown to improve muscle stiffness, hardness, and It is not known if muscle strength or physical performance is altered. This study aimed to examine the effects of a 4-week CS and SS program on muscle stiffness and hardness, muscle strength, and jump performance.
Methods:
The subjects participated 18 healthy men and were randomly assigned to a CS or SS group. Each stretching program was stretched in each condition for 2 minutes in a standing position in 5 days a week for 4 weeks. To assess muscle stiffness, muscle- tendon junction (MTJ) displacement and MTJ angle of gastrocnemius medialis (MG) were measured using ultrasonography and 20° before (pre-training) and after (post-training) conducting CS and SS program. MG hardness was measured using ultrasound real- time tissue elastography (RTE). ROM max and normalized peak torque (NPT) of ankle plantar flexor, squat jump (SJ) performance were measured in the pre- and post-training. The effects of the intervention on all outcome measures were determined using 2- way repeated-measures ANOVA with two group as a between participants factor and time (pre-training, post-training) When interaction effects were detected, post hoc comparisons were performed to test the differences in physical variables between pre- and post-training.
Results:
ROM max was significantly affected by time between CS and SS program (P < .001, F = 26.0). MTJ displacement from 0°to 20°were significantly affected by time (P < .05, F = 5.49; P < .01, F = 10.26; P < .01, F = 9.74). RTE from 0°to 20°were significantly affected by time (P < .01, F = 13.27; P < .01, F = 8.33; P < .01, F = 53.52). There was significantly interaction for NPT between CS and SS program (P < .01, F = 4.80). SJ were significantly affected by time (P < .05, F = 5.70).
Conclusion:
This study examined the long-term effect of CS and SS on ROM max, muscle stiffness, NPT, and SJ. The results indicate that CS training had greater improvement than SS training in muscle strength between pre- and post-training. A significant decrease in muscle stiffness and hardness after SS was observed compared with CS. However, CS not only improves muscle stiffness and hardness as shown the effect of SS but also suggests the possibility of being a new extension method to improve muscle strength.
