ThomasBJMehtaNYonekawaY. Pars plana vitrectomy for late vitreoretinal sequelae of infectious endophthalmitis: surgical management and outcomes [published online July 26, 2016]. Retina.
2.
FoosRY. Nonvascular proliferative extraretinal retinopathies. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;86(5):723–725.
3.
AppiahAPHiroseTKadoM. A review of 324 cases of idiopathic premacular gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;106(5):533–535.
4.
RaoPYonekawaYThomasBJDrenserKA. Spectral versus time-domain OCT in detecting preoperative epiretinal membranes that accompany macular holes [published online September 17, 2016]. Eur J Ophthalmol.
5.
MessnerKH. Spontaneous separation of preretinal macular fibrosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;83(1):9–11.
6.
SumersKDJampolLMGoldbergMFHuamonteFU. Spontaneous separation of epiretinal membranes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(2):318–320.
7.
de BustrosSThompsonJTMichelsRGRiceTAGlaserBM. Vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes causing macular pucker. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988;72(9):692–695.
8.
SmiddyWEMichelsRGGilbertHDGreenWR. Clinicopathologic study of idiopathic macular pucker in children and young adults. Retina. 1992;12(3):232–236.
9.
MargherioRRCoxMSJrTreseMTMurphyPLJohnsonJMinorLA. Removal of epimacular membranes. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(8):1075–1083.
10.
PolinerLSOlkRJGrandMGEscofferyRFOkunEBoniukI. Surgical management of premacular fibroplasia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106(6):761–764.
11.
YonekawaYMammoDAThomasBJWolfeJDHassanTS. A comparison of intraoperative dexamethasone intravitreal implant and triamcinolone acetonide used during vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peeling: a case control study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47(3):232–237.
12.
GrewingRMesterU. Results of surgery for epiretinal membranes and their recurrences. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(4):323–326.
13.
PesinSROlkRJGrandMG. Vitrectomy for premacular fibroplasia. Prognostic factors, long-term follow-up, and time course of visual improvement. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(7):1109–1114.
14.
DonatiGKapetaniosADPournarasCJ. Complications of surgery for epiretinal membranes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236(10):739–746.
15.
ParkDWDugelPUGardaJ. Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):62–64.
16.
GibranSKFlemmingBStapplerT. Peel and peel again. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(3):373–377.
17.
KuhnF. Point: to peel or not to peel, that is the question. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(1):9–11.
18.
MittlemanDGreenWRMichelsRGde la CruzZ. Clinicopathologic correlation of an eye after surgical removal of an epiretinal membrane. Retina. 1989;9(2):143–147.
19.
SivalingamAEagleRCJrDukerJS. Visual prognosis correlated with the presence of internal-limiting membrane in histopathologic specimens obtained from epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(11):1549–1552.
GaudricAFardeauCGobervilleMCohenDPaquesMMikolJ. Ablation of the internal limiting membrane, macular unfolding and visual outcome in surgery of idiopathic epimacular membranes [in French]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1993;16(11):571–576.
22.
AlmonyANudlemanEShahGK. Techniques, rationale, and outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina. 2012;32(5):877–891.
23.
KwokAKLiWWPangCP. Indocyanine green staining and removal of internal limiting membrane in macular hole surgery: histology and outcome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(2):178–183.
24.
FreemanWRAzenSPKimJWel-HaigWMishellDRIIIBaileyI. Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes. Results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(1):11–21.
25.
BrooksHLJr. Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(10):1939–1948; discussion 1948-1939.
26.
KwokALaiTYYuenKS. Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2005;33(4):379–385.
27.
SandaliOEl SanharawiMBasliE. Epiretinal membrane recurrence: incidence, characteristics, evolution, and preventive and risk factors. Retina. 2013;33(10):2032–2038.
28.
SchechetSADeVienceEThompsonJT. The effect of internal limiting membrane peeling on idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery, with a review of the literature [published online September 9, 2016]. Retina.
29.
SorcinelliR. Surgical management of epiretinal membrane with indocyanine-green-assisted peeling. Ophthalmologica. 2003;217(2):107–110.
30.
CarpentierCZanolliMWuL; Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group. Residual internal limiting membrane after epiretinal membrane peeling: results of the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group. Retina. 2013;33(10):2026–2031.
31.
BeyazyildizOTirhisMHHekimogluER. Histopathological analysis of internal limiting membrane surgically peeled from eyes with epiretinal membrane. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(2):258–265.
32.
OhHNLeeJEKimHWYunIH. Clinical outcomes of double staining and additional ILM peeling during ERM surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2013;27(4):256–260.
33.
ClarkABalducciNPichiF. Swelling of the arcuate nerve fiber layer after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina. 2012;32(8):1608–1613.
34.
ItoYTerasakiHTakahashiAYamakoshiTKondoMNakamuraM. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(8):1415–1420.
35.
MitamuraYOhtsukaK. Relationship of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance to internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(10):1766–1770.
36.
ParkSHKimYJLeeSJ. Incidence of and risk Factors for dissociated optic nerve fiber layer after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina. 2016;36(8):1469–1473.
37.
HisatomiTNotomiSTachibanaT. Ultrastructural changes of the vitreoretinal interface during long-term follow-up after removal of the internal limiting membrane. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(3):550–556.e551.
38.
MitamuraYSuzukiTKinoshitaTMiyanoNTashimoAOhtsukaK. Optical coherence tomographic findings of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(6):1155–1156.
39.
KishimotoHKusuharaSMatsumiyaWNagaiTNegiA. Retinal surface imaging provided by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography prominently visualizes a dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after macular hole surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2011;31(5):385–392.
40.
TadayoniRPaquesMMassinPMouki-BenaniSMikolJGaudricA. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2279–2283.
41.
LeeJWKimIT. Outcomes of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: a comparative study. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54(2):129–134.
42.
ChangSGregory-RobertsEMParkSLaudKSmithSDHoangQV. Double peeling during vitrectomy for macular pucker: the Charles L. Schepens Lecture. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(4):525–530.
RipandelliGScarinciFPiaggiP. Macular pucker: to peel or not to peel the internal limiting membrane? A microperimetric response. Retina. 2015;35(3):498–507.
45.
DeltourJBGrimbertPMasseHLebretonOWeberM. Detrimental effects of active internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane surgery: microperimetric analysis [published online July 14, 2016]. Retina.
46.
GassJD. Muller cell cone, an overlooked part of the anatomy of the fovea centralis: hypotheses concerning its role in the pathogenesis of macular hole and foveomacualr retinoschisis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(6):821–823.
47.
RodriguesEBCostaEFPenhaFM. The use of vital dyes in ocular surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009;54(5):576–617.
48.
YonekawaYAbbeyAMShahARThomasBJCaponeAJr. Endoilluminator phototoxic maculopathy associated with ICG-assisted epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:2501–2506.
49.
ArevaloJFGarciaRA. Macular hole surgery complicated by accidental massive subretinal indocyanine green, and retinal tear. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245(5):751–753.
50.
EjstrupRla CourMHeegaardSKiilgaardJF. Toxicity profiles of subretinal indocyanine green, brilliant blue G, and triamcinolone acetonide: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(5):669–677.
51.
TreumerFWackerNJungeOHedderichJRoiderJHillenkampJ. Foveal structure and thickness of retinal layers long-term after surgical peeling of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(2):744–750.
52.
KodjikianLRichterTHalberstadtM. Toxic effects of indocyanine green, infracyanine green, and trypan blue on the human retinal pigmented epithelium. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(9):917–925.
53.
KandaSUemuraAYamashitaTKitaHYamakiriKSakamotoT. Visual field defects after intravitreous administration of indocyanine green in macular hole surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(10):1447–1451.
54.
TsuikiEFujikawaAMiyamuraNYamadaKMishimaKKitaokaT. Visual field defects after macular hole surgery with indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(4):704–705.
55.
YonemuraNHirataAHasumuraTNegiA. Fundus changes corresponding to visual field defects after vitrectomy for macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(9):1638–1643.
56.
HaritoglouCGandorferAGassCASchaumbergerMUlbigMWKampikA. The effect of indocyanine-green on functional outcome of macular pucker surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(3):328–337.
57.
HaritoglouCEiblKSchaumbergerM. Functional outcome after trypan blue-assisted vitrectomy for macular pucker: a prospective, randomized, comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(1):1–5.
58.
PerrierMSebagM. Epiretinal membrane surgery assisted by trypan blue. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(6):909–911.
59.
JinYUchidaSYanagiYAiharaMAraieM. Neurotoxic effects of trypan blue on rat retinal ganglion cells. Exp Eye Res. 2005;81(4):395–400.
60.
NarayananRKenneyMCKamjooS. Trypan blue: effect on retinal pigment epithelial and neurosensory retinal cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(1):304–309.
61.
RohMEliottD. Internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: literature review. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2015;55(4):91–101.
