BioMEMS integrates various interdisciplinary research domains to facilitate biological detection of analytes on electromechanically integrated microchips. It inherently utilizes electrical supplies to the system to serve the detection in many ways except colorimetric detection. In the context of microchip-based devices, the electric pulses generally serve one of the two primary purposes, either as low-level excitation signal or as a source of analyte manipulation in some manner. Among these effects, the study of the effect of electric pulses on the solution flow causing analyte manipulation is termed as electrokinetics. Depending on the kind of applied signal, there can be alternating current (AC) or direct current (DC) electrokinetics. These effects can be integrated into the detection system through various means. In this context, this review article discusses in detail the utility of integrating electrokinetics in detection, the associated parameters, the various electrokinetics effects, and their applications in biological detection. Some important applications chosen for discussion are particle pre-concentration, particle separation, particle rotation, and gene transformation.
BhattG and BhattacharyaS.Biosensors on chip: A critical review from an aspect of micro/nanoscales. J Micromanuf2019; 2(2): 198–219, Nov. 2019, DOI: 10.1177/2516598419847913.
2.
TathireddyP, ChoiYH and SkliarM.Particle AC electrokinetics in planar interdigitated microelectrode geometry. J Electrostat2008; 66(11–12): 609–619. DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2008.09.002.
3.
VenkatesanBM and BashirR.Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis. Nat Nanotechnol2011; 6(10): 615–624. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.129.
4.
SassolasA, Leca-BouvierBD and BlumLJ.DNA biosensors and microarrays. Chem Rev2008; 108(1): 109–139. DOI: 10.1021/cr0684467.
5.
SuXL and LiY.A self-assembled monolayer-based piezoelectric immunosensor for rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biosens Bioelectron20004; 19(6): 563–574. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00254-9.
6.
KumarS, BhushanP, KrishnaV, . Tapered lateral flow immunoassay based point-of-care diagnostic device for ultrasensitive colorimetric detection of dengue NS1. Biomicrofluidics2018; 12(3). DOI: 10.1063/1.5035113.
7.
HuangX, El-SayedIH, QianW, . Cancer cells assemble and align gold nanorods conjugated to antibodies to produce highly enhanced, sharp, and polarized surface Raman spectra: A potential cancer diagnostic marker. Nano Lett2007; 7(6): 1591–1597. DOI: 10.1021/nl070472c.
8.
BasuAK, SarkarH and BhattacharyaS.Fabrication and resilience measurement of thin aluminium cantilevers using scanning probe microscopy. in Foundations and Frontiers in Computer, Communication and Electrical Engineering - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Foundations and Frontiers in Computer, Communication and Electrical Engineering, C2E2 - 2016, 2016.
9.
LiuP, YangX, SunS, . Enzyme-free colorimetric detection of DNA by using gold nanoparticles and hybridization chain reaction amplification. Anal Chem2013; 85(16): 7689–7695. DOI: 10.1021/ac4001157.
10.
LisdatF and SchäferD.The use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for biosensing. Anal Bioanal Chem2008; 391(5): 1555–1567. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-1970-7.
11.
BhattG and BhattacharyaG.DNA based sensors. In BhattacharyaS, AgarwalA, ChandaN, PandeyA, SenA (eds) Environmental, chemical, and medical sensors. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 2018, pp. 343–370. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7751-7_15.
12.
TaylorRF, MarenchicIG and SpencerRH.Antibody- and receptor-based biosensors for detection and process control. Anal Chim Acta1999; 249(1): 67–70. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(91)87009-V.
13.
TangL, GuoZ and ZhengX.Increasing target hybridization kinetics by immobilizing DNA probes at Au nanoflower ultramicroelectrode. Sens Actuators B Chem2018; 279(September): 1–6, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.078.
14.
ZhaoX, Tapec-DytiocoR and TanW.Ultrasensitive DNA detection using highly fluorescent bioconjugated nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc2003; 125(38): 11474–11475. DOI: 10.1021/ja0358854.
15.
LiuH, XiangY, LuY, . Aptamer-based origami paper analytical device for electrochemical detection of Adenosine.pdf. Angewandte Chemie International Edition2012; 51: 6925–6928. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201202929.
16.
KantR, BhattG, SundriyalP, . Relevance of adhesion in fabrication of microarrays in clinical diagnostics. In MittalKL and EtzlerFM (eds), Adhesion in pharmaceutical, biomedical and dental fields. Wiley, USA: Scrivener Publishing LLC, 2017, pp. 257–298.
17.
SatoK, HosokawaK and MaedaM.Colorimetric biosensors based on DNA-nanoparticle conjugates.,”Anal Sci2007; 23(1): 17–20. DOI: 10.2116/analsci.23.17.
18.
VermaMS, RogowskiJL, JonesL, . Colorimetric biosensing of pathogens using gold nanoparticles. Biotechnol Ad2015; 33(6): 666–680. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.03.003.
19.
LiuD, WangZ and JiangX.Gold nanoparticles for the colorimetric and fluorescent detection of ions and small organic molecules. Nanoscale2011; 3(4): 1421–1433. DOI: 10.1039/c0nr00887g.
20.
DengH, XuY, LiuY, . Gold nanoparticles with asymmetric polymerase chain reaction for colorimetric detection of DNA sequence. Anal Chem2012; 84(3): 1253–1258. DOI: 10.1021/ac201713t.
21.
NayakM, SinghD, SinghH, . Integrated sorting, concentration and real time PCR based detection system for sensitive detection of microorganisms. Sci Rep2013; 3: 3266. DOI: 10.1038/srep03266.
22.
DooleyJJ, PaineKE, GarrettSD, . Detection of meat species using TaqMan real-time PCR assays. Meat Sci2004; 68(3): 431–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.010.
23.
PoddarSK.Detection of adenovirus using PCR and molecular beacon. J Virol Methods1999; 82(1): 19–26. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00074-9.
ParkWH and KimZH.Charge transfer enhancement in the SERS of a single molecule. Nano Lett2010; 10(10): 4040–4048. DOI: 10.1021/nl102026p.
26.
SuaifanG and ZourobM.Rapid detection of prostate specific antigen biomarker using magnetic-nanoparticles. Procedia Technol2017; 27: 122–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2017.04.054.
27.
WabuyeleMB and Vo-DinhT.Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA sequence using plasmonics nanoprobes. Anal Chem2005; 77(23): 7810–7815. DOI: 10.1021/ac0514671.
28.
FronczekCF, YouDJ and YoonJY.Single-pipetting microfluidic assay device for rapid detection of Salmonella from poultry package. Biosens Bioelectron2013; 40(1): 342–349, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.076.
29.
LepeshevaGI, AzevaTN, KnyukshtoVN, . Model of optical immunosensor for hemoproteins based on Langmuir-Blodgett films of FITC-labelled immunoglobulin G. Sens Actuators B Chem2000; 68(1): 27–33. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00457-3.
30.
KamemotoLE, MisraAK, SharmaSK, . Near-infrared micro-raman spectroscopy for in vitro detection of cervical cancer. Appl Spectrosc2010; 64(3): 255–261. DOI: 10.1366/000370210790918364.
31.
LiuYS, BanadaPP, BhattacharyaS, . Electrical characterization of DNA molecules in solution using impedance measurements. Appl Phys Lett2008; 92(14): 143902. DOI: 10.1063/1.2908203.
LiuX, ChengZ, FanH, . Electrochemical detection of avian influenza virus H5N1 gene sequence using a DNA aptamer immobilized onto a hybrid nanomaterial-modified electrode. Electrochim Acta2011; 56(18): 6266–6270. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.05.055.
34.
BhattG, MishraK, RamanathanG, . Dielectrophoresis assisted impedance spectroscopy for detection of gold-conjugated amplified DNA samples. Sens Actuators B Chem2019; 288: 442–453. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.02.081.
35.
IdilN, HedströmM, DenizliA, . Whole cell based microcontact imprinted capacitive biosensor for the detection of Escherichia coli. Biosens Bioelectron2017; 87: 807–815. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.08.096.
36.
GebbertA, AlvarezMI, StockleinW, . Real-time monitoring of immunochemical interactions with a tantalum capacitance flow-through cell. Anal Chem1992; 64(9): 997–1003. DOI: 10.1021/ac00033a007.
JohnsonBN and MutharasanR.Biosensing using dynamic-mode cantilever sensors: a review. Biosens Bioelectron2012; 32(1): 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.10.054.
41.
RijalK and MutharasanR.PEMC-based method of measuring DNA hybridization at femtomolar concentration directly in human serum and in the presence of copious noncomplementary strands. Anal Chem2007; 79(19): 7392–7400. DOI: 10.1021/ac0712042.
42.
HosakaS, ChiyomaT, IkeuchiA, . Possibility of a femtogram mass biosensor using a self-sensing cantilever. Curr Appl Phys2006; 6(3): 384–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2005.11.024.
43.
BryanAK, GoranovA, AmonA, . Measurement of mass, density, and volume during the cell cycle of yeast. Proc National Acad Sci2010; 107(3): 999–1004. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901851107.
44.
GuptaAK, NairPR, AkinD, . Anomalous resonance in a nanomechanical biosensor. Proc National Acad Sci2006; 103(36): 13362–13367. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602022103.
45.
VigneshvarS, SudhakumariCC, SenthilkumaranB, . Recent advances in biosensor technology for potential applications - an overview. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2016; 4(FEB): 1–9. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00011.
46.
YunH, KimK and LeeWG.Cell manipulation in microfluidics. Biofabrication2013; 5: 022001. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/022001.
47.
Crosland-TaylorPJ.A device for counting small particles suspended in a fluid through a tube. Nature1953; 171(4340): 37–38. DOI: 10.1038/171037b0.
48.
KantR, SinghH, NayakM, . Optimization of design and characterization of a novel micro-pumping system with peristaltic motion. Microsyst Technol2013; 19(4): 563–575. DOI: 10.1007/s00542-012-1658-y.
MartenI, DeekenR, HedrichR, . Light-induced modification of plant plasma membrane ion transport. Plant Biol2010; 12(s1): 64–79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00384.x.
51.
RobertsLK and DaynesRA.Modification of the immunogenic properties of chemically induced tumors arising in hosts treated concomitantly with ultraviolet light. J Immunol1980; 125(1): 438–447. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.125.1.438.
52.
MayerG and HechelA.Biologically active molecules with a ‘light switch’”. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition2006; 45(30): 4900–4921. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200600387.
53.
NealeSL, MaziluM, WilsonJIB, . The resolution of optical traps created by Light Induced Dielectrophoresis (LIDEP).”Optic Express2007; 15(20): 12619–12626.
54.
GilboaT and MellerA.Optical sensing and analyte manipulation in solid-state nanopores. Analyst2015; 140(14): 4733–4747, Royal Society of Chemistry. DOI: 10.1039/c4an02388a.
55.
RamserK and HanstorpD.Optical manipulation for single-cell studies. J Biophotonics2010; 3(4): 187–206. DOI: 10.1002/jbio.200910050.
56.
BarbicM, MockJ and GrayA.Apparatus and method for magnetic-based manipulation of microscopic particles. US Patent 20,040,021,073, vol. 1, no. 19, 2004.
57.
WataraiH, SuwaM and IiguniY.Magnetophoresis and electromagnetophoresis of microparticles in liquids. Anal Bioanal Chem2004. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-003-2354-7.
58.
LiuA, WallTA, OzcelikD, . Electro-optical detection of single λ-DNA. Chem Commun2015; 51(11): 2084–2087. DOI: 10.1039/C4CC07591A.
59.
PethigR and SmithS.Introductory bioelectronics. UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013.
60.
PohlHA.Dielectrophoresis, the behavior of matter in nonuniform electric fields. London: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
61.
JonesTB.Electromechanics of particles. 1995. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-5910(97)82724-6.
62.
Walid RezanoorM and DuttaP.Combined AC electroosmosis and dielectrophoresis for controlled rotation of microparticles. Biomicrofluidics2016; 10(2):. DOI: 10.1063/1.4943032.
63.
LinIJ and BenguiguiL.High-intensity, high-gradient electric separation and dielectric filtration of particulate and granular materials. J Electrostat1982; 13(3): 257–278. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3886(82)90046-8.
64.
DemierreN, BraschlerT, MullerR, . Focusing and continuous separation of cells in a microfluidic device using lateral dielectrophoresis. TRANSDUCERS and EUROSENSORS ’07 - 4th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. 2007; 132: 1777–1780. DOI: 10.1109/SENSOR.2007.4300498.
IliescuC, XuGL, SamperV, . Fabrication of a dielectrophoretic chip with 3D silicon electrodes. J Micromech Microeng2005; 15(3): 494–500. DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/15/3/009.
69.
ChouCF, TegenfeldtJO, BakajinO, . Electrodeless dielectrophoresis of single- and double-stranded DNA. Biophys J2002; 83(4): 2170–2179. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73977-5.
70.
ShafieeH, CaldwellJL, SanoMB, . Contactless dielectrophoresis: a new technique for cell manipulation. Biomed Microdevices2009; 11(5): 997–1006. DOI: 10.1007/s10544-009-9317-5.
71.
GascoynePRC and VykoukalJ.Particle separation by dielectrophoresis. Electrophoresis2002; 23(13): 1973–1983. DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200207)23:13<1973::AID-ELPS1973>3.0.CO;2-1.
ChangH, ChenCH, ChengIF, . Manipulation of bioparticles on electrodeless dielectrophoretic chip based on AC electrokinetic control. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems, IEEE NEMS 2007, pp. 1175–1178, 2007, DOI: 10.1109/NEMS.2007.352228.
74.
SonnenbergA, MarciniakJY, KrishnanR, . Dielectrophoretic isolation of DNA and nanoparticles from blood. Electrophoresis2012; 33(16): 2482–2490. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201100700.
75.
GreenNG, RamosA, GonzálezA, . Fluid flow induced by nonuniform ac electric fields in electrolytes on microelectrodes. III. Observation of streamlines and numerical simulation. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics2002; 66(2): 1–11. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.026305.
76.
WangX, ChengC, WangS, . Electroosmotic pumps and their applications in microfluidic systems. Microfluid Nanofluidics2009; 6(2): 145–162. DOI: 10.1007/s10404-008-0399-9.
77.
BuieCR, PosnerJD, FabianT, . Water management in proton exchange membrane fuel cells using integrated electroosmotic pumping. J Power Sources2006; 161(1): 191–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.021.
78.
JorgensonJW and LukacsKD.High-Resolution separations based on electrophoresis and electroosmosis. J Chromatogr A. 1981; 218: 209–216.
79.
SmoluchowskiM.Contribution to the theory of electro-osmosis and related phenomena. Bulletin international de l’Académie des sciences de Cracovie1903; 3: 184–199.
80.
AaijC and BorstP.The gel electrophoresis of DNA. BBA Section Nucleic Acids And Protein Synthesis1972; 269(2): 192–200. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(72)90426-1.
OcvirkG, MunroeM, TangT, . Electrokinetic control of fluid flow in native poly (dimethylsiloxane) capillary electrophoresis devices. ELECTROPHORESIS: An Int J2000; 21(1): 107–115, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683.
83.
GhoshA, PatraTK, KantR, . Surface electrophoresis of ds-DNA across orthogonal pair of surfaces. Appl Phys Lett2011; 98(16): 2009–2012. DOI: 10.1063/1.3565238.
84.
YeoWH, ChungJH, LiuY, . Size-specific concentration of DNA to a nanostructured tip using dielectrophoresis and capillary action. J Phys Chem B2009; 113(31): 10849–10858. DOI: 10.1021/jp900618t.
85.
ParkK, SukHJ, AkinD, . Dielectrophoresis-based cell manipulation using electrodes on a reusable printed circuit board. Lab Chip2009; 9(15): 2224–2229. DOI: 10.1039/b904328d.
86.
LewpiriyawongN, YangC and LamYC.Electrokinetically driven concentration of particles and cells by dielectrophoresis with DC-offset AC electric field. Microfluid Nanofluidics2012; 12(5): 723–733. DOI: 10.1007/s10404-011-0919-x.
87.
HenningA, BierFF and HolzelR.Dielectrophoresis of DNA: quantification by impedance measurements. Biomicrofluidics2010; 4(2): 1–9. DOI: 10.1063/1.3430550.
88.
LiS, YuanQ, MorshedBI, . Dielectrophoretic responses of DNA and fluorophore in physiological solution by impedimetric characterization. Biosens Bioelectron2013; 41(1):649–655. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.09.036.
89.
D’AmicoL, AjamiNJ, AdachiJA, . Isolation and concentration of bacteria from blood using microfluidic membraneless dialysis and dielectrophoresis. Lab Chip2017; 17(7): 1340–1348. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01277a.
90.
HanSI, Soo KimH and HanA.In-droplet cell concentration using dielectrophoresis. Biosens Bioelectron;97(May): 41–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.05.036.
91.
GhubadeA, MandalS, ChaudhuryR, . Dielectrophoresis assisted concentration of micro-particles and their rapid quantitation based on optical means. Biomed Microdevices2009; 11(5): 987–995. DOI: 10.1007/s10544-009-9316-6.
92.
TajikP, SaidiMS, KashaninejadN, . Simple, cost-effective, and continuous 3D dielectrophoretic microchip for concentration and separation of bioparticles. Ind Eng Chem Res2019. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00771.
93.
BhattG, KantR, MishraK, . Impact of surface roughness on Dielectrophoretically assisted concentration of microorganisms over PCB based platforms. Biomed Microdevices2017; 19(2): 28. DOI: 10.1007/s10544-017-0172-5.
94.
TurcanI, CarasI, SchreinerTG, . Dielectrophoretic and electrical impedance differentiation of cancerous cells based on biophysical phenotype. Biosensors (Basel)2021; 11(10). doi: 10.3390/bios11100401.
95.
SahaR, SinghSN, SamalJ, . Impedance spectroscopy-based detection of viral RNA from clinical samples. IEEE Sens Lett2023; 7(8). DOI: 10.1109/LSENS.2023.3297368.
96.
NakabayashiR, KoyamaR, InabaM, . Quantitative evaluation of dielectrophoretic separation efficiency of cancer exosomes based on fluorescence imaging. Jpn J Appl Phys2024; 63(3). DOI: 10.35848/1347-4065/ad2657.
97.
LiC, WangY, ZhangJ, . DNA network construction by optically induced dielectrophoresis. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Manipulation, Manufacturing and Measurement on the Nanoscale, 3M-NANO 2023 - Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1109/3M-NANO58613.2023.10305363.
98.
Abedini-NassabR, WirfelJ, TalebjediB, TasnimN, . Quantifying the dielectrophoretic force on colloidal particles in microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluidics2022; 26(5). DOI: 10.1007/s10404-022-02544-0.
99.
D’AmicoL, AjamiNJ, AdachiJA, . Isolation and concentration of bacteria from blood using microfluidic membraneless dialysis and dielectrophoresis. Lab Chip2017; 17(7): 1340–1348. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc01277a.
100.
PohlHA and HawkI.Separation of living and dead cells by dielectrophoresis. Science (1979)1966; 152(3722): 647–649. DOI: 10.1126/science.152.3722.647-a.
101.
StatonSJR, ChenKP, TaylorTJ, . Characterization of particle capture in a sawtooth patterned insulating electrokinetic microfluidic device. Electrophoresis2010; 31(22): 3634–3641. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201000438.
ChenX, RenY, LiuW, . A simplified microfluidic device for particle separation with two consecutive steps: induced charge electro-osmotic prefocusing and dielectrophoretic separation. Anal Chem2017; 89(17): 9583–9592. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02892.
104.
ZhangJ, YuanD, ZhaoQ, . Tunable particle separation in a hybrid dielectrophoresis (DEP)- inertial microfluidic device. Sens Actuators B Chem2018; 267: 14–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.04.020.
105.
HuangC, HanS-I and HanA.In-droplet cell separation based on different dielectrophoretic response. Transducers2019; EUROSENSORS XXXIII, no. June: 492–495.
106.
Zahedi SianiZ, Zabetian TarghiM, SojoodiM, . Dielectrophoretic separation of monocytes from cancer cells in a microfluidic chip using electrode pitch optimization. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng2020; 43(9). DOI: 10.1007/s00449-020-02349-x.
107.
NakabayashiR, KoyamaR, InabaM, . Quantitative evaluation of dielectrophoretic captured fluorescent-labeled exosomes. In Proceedings of IEEE Sensors, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/SENSORS56945.2023.10325029.
108.
Vaghef-KoodehiA, DillisC and Lapizco-EncinasBH.High-resolution charge-based electrokinetic separation of almost identical microparticles. Anal Chem2022; 94(17). DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00355.
109.
AlipourZ, VameghR and FardmaneshM.A new slopping micro-channel dielectrophoresis-based system for non-invasive same-size cells separation. In 2023 30th National and 8th International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME), IEEE, Nov. 2023, pp. 110–114. DOI: 10.1109/ICBME61513.2023.10488594.
110.
WuM, GaoY, LuanQ, . Three-dimensional lab-on-a-foil device for dielectrophoretic separation of cancer cells. Electrophoresis2023; 44(23). DOI: 10.1002/elps.202200287.
111.
CaleroV, Fernández-MateoR, MorganH, . Low-frequency electrokinetics in a periodic pillar array for particle separation. J Chromatogr A2023; 1706. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464240.
112.
Vaghef-KoodehiA, ErnstOD and Lapizco-EncinasBH.Separation of Cells and Microparticles in Insulator-Based Electrokinetic Systems. Anal Chem2023; 95(2). DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04366.
113.
StatonSJR, ChenKP, TaylorTJ, . Characterization of particle capture in a sawtooth patterned insulating electrokinetic microfluidic device. Electrophoresis2010; 3122: 3634–3641. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201000438.
114.
GrosseC and ShilovVN.Theory of the low-frequency electrorotation of polystyrene particles in electrolyte solution. J Phys Chem1996; 100(5): 1771–1778. DOI: 10.1021/jp951729a.
115.
GeorgievaR, NeuB, ShilovVM, . Low frequency electrorotation of fixed red blood cells. Biophys J1998; 74(4): 2114–2120. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77918-4.
116.
HuangL, ZhaoP and WangW.3D cell electrorotation and imaging for measuring multiple cellular biophysical properties. Lab Chip2018; 18(16): 2359–2368. DOI: 10.1039/c8lc00407b.
117.
HuangL, HeW and WangW.A cell electro-rotation micro-device using polarized cells as electrodes. Electrophoresis2019; 40(5): 784–791. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201800360.
118.
WangY, TongN, LiF, . Trapping of a single microparticle using AC dielectrophoresis forces in a microfluidic chip. Micromachines (Basel)2023; 14(1). DOI: 10.3390/mi14010159.
119.
PuttaswamySV, BhallaN, KelseyC, . Independent and grouped 3D cell rotation in a microfluidic device for bioimaging applications. Biosens Bioelectron2020; 170. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112661.
120.
HuangL and FangQ.Electrical properties characterization of single yeast cells by dielectrophoretic motion and electro-rotation. Biomed Microdevices2021; 23(1). DOI: 10.1007/s10544-021-00550-7.
121.
SongC, TaoY, LiuW, . Electrokinetic behavior of an individual liquid metal droplet in a rotating electric field. Phys Fluids2024; 36(1). DOI: 10.1063/5.0184230.
122.
HuangL, ZhaoP and WangW.3D cell electrorotation and imaging for measuring multiple cellular biophysical properties. Lab Chip. 2018; 18(16): 2359–2368. DOI: 10.1039/c8lc00407b.
123.
HuangL, HeW and WangW.A cell electro-rotation micro-device using polarized cells as electrodes. Electrophoresis2019; 40(5): 784–791. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201800360.
124.
GriffithBYF.The Significance of pneumococcal types. Occurrence of a Variety of Serological Types in the Sputum from an individual case of pneumonia. J Hygiene1928; 27(2): 113–159.
YoshidaN and SatoM.Plasmid uptake by bacteria: a comparison of methods and efficiencies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2009; 83(5): 791–798. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2042-4.
127.
MandelM and HigaA.Calcium-dependent bacteriophage DNA infection. J Mol Biol1970; 53(1): 159–162. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90051-3.
128.
ZimmermannU, VienkenJ and ScheurichP.Electric field induced fusion of biological cells. Biophys Struct Mech1980; 6(1) Supplement:86. DOI: 10.1007/BF00647558.
129.
BaoS, ThrallBD and MillerDL.Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol1997; 23(6): 953–959. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00025-2.
130.
KleinTM, SanfordJC, WolfED, . High-velocity microprojectiles for delivering nucleic acids into living cells. Nature1987; 327(6117): 70–73. DOI: 10.1038/327070a0.
131.
ZhanY, CaoZ, BaoN, . Low-frequency ac electroporation shows strong frequency dependence and yields comparable transfection results to dc electroporation. J Controlled Release2012; 160(3): 570–576. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.006.
NeumannE, Schaefer-RidderM, WangY, . Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J1982; 1(7): 841–845. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01257.x.
134.
FiedlerS and WirthR.Transformation of bacteria with plasmid DNA by electroporation. Anal Biochem1988; 170(1): 38–44. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90086-3.
135.
DowerWJ, MillerJF and RagsdaleCW.High efficiency transformation of E.coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res1988; 16(13): 6127–6145. DOI: 10.1093/nar/16.13.6127.
136.
SatkauskasS, BureauMF, PucM, . Mechanisms of in vivo DNA electrotransfer: respective contribution of cell electropermeabilization and DNA electrophoresis. Mol Ther2002; 5(2): 133–140. DOI: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0526.
137.
KlenchinVA, SukharevSI, SerovSM, . Electrically induced DNA uptake by cells is a fast process involving DNA electrophoresis. Biophys J1991; 60(4): 804–811. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82115-4.
138.
SukharevSI, KlenchinVA, SerovSM, . Electroporation and electrophoretic DNA transfer into cells. The effect of DNA interaction with electropores. Biophys J1992; 63(5): 1320–1327. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81709-5.
139.
BureauMF, GehlJ, DeleuzeV, . Importance of association between permeabilization and electrophoretic forces for intramuscular DNA electrotransfer. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj2000; 1474(3): 353–359. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4165(00)00028-3.
