Upper extremity deficits are one of the most common impairments in individuals with stroke. Mental practice is exercised cognitively in the absence of the physical trials. The effects of the combination of mental and physical practice remain unclear.
Objectives:
This study aimed to examine the effects of combined physical practice and mental practice on the upper extremity functional ability poststroke, to identify which stroke population is most likely to benefit from the intervention, and to determine the effective treatment dosage.
Methods:
We searched in the PubMed, SCOPUS, National Rehabilitation Information REHABDATA, PEDro, and Web of Science until February 2020. Randomized clinical trials examined the effects of combined physical practice and mental practice on the upper extremity functional ability in people with a stroke. The risk of bias was evaluated and the effect sizes were calculated.
Results:
Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. In total, 230 stroke survivors were included in this analysis (mean age: 60.84 years). This review found that combining physical practice and mental practice has beneficial effects in improving the upper extremity functional ability poststroke.
Conclusion:
Combining physical practice and mental practice improves the upper extremity functional ability poststroke, this improvement can extend for 3 months after the treatment intervention. We propose that using 30 to 60 min of physical practice followed by 30 min of mental practice, 2 to 3 times weekly for 6 to 10 weeks, may give meaningful effects in individuals with stroke.
AliMAtulaSBathP. Stroke outcome in clinical trial patients deriving from different countries. Stroke. 2009;40(1):35-40.
2.
WolfeC.The impact of stroke. Br Med Bull. 2000;56(2):275-286.
3.
Nichols-LarsenDClarkPZeringueAGreenspanABlantonS.Factors influencing stroke survivors quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005;36(7):1480-1484.
4.
AndersonTP.Stroke and Cerebral Trauma: Medical Aspects. In: StolovWCClowersMH eds. Handbook of Severe Disability. Washington, DC: Diane Publishing Co.; 1981.
5.
TysonSChillalaJHanleyMSelleyATallisR.Distribution of weakness in the upper and lower limbs poststroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(1):715-719.
6.
TromblyC.Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46(9):887-897.
7.
CirsteaMLevinM.Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000;123(5):940-953.
8.
WelmerAHolmqvistLSommerfeldD.Limited fine hand use after stroke and its association with other disabilities. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):603-608.
9.
CarrJShepherdR.Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999.
10.
SimkinsMKimHAbramsGBylNRosenJ.Robotic unilateral and bilateral upper-limb movement training for stroke survivors afflicted by chronic hemiparesis. Paper presented at: IEEE, International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2013:6650506.
11.
PageSJLevineP.Back from the brink: electromyography-triggered stimulation combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(1):27-31.
12.
FriedmanNChanVReinkensmeyerA. Retraining and assessing hand movement after stroke using the MusicGlove: comparison with conventional hand therapy and isometric grip training. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):76.
13.
AlashramAPaduaERomagnoliCAnninoG.Effectiveness of focal muscle vibration on hemiplegic upper extremity spasticity in individuals with stroke: a systematic review. Neuro Rehabil. 2019;45(4):471-481.
14.
LinKWuCWeiTGungCLeeCLiuJ.Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(12):1075-1086.
15.
ChangWKimY.Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation. J Stroke. 2013;15(3):174-181.
16.
AlashramAAnninoGMercuriN.Task-oriented motor learning in upper extremity rehabilitation post stroke. J Stroke Med. 2019;2(2):95-104.
17.
ParkSWolfSBlantonSWinsteinCNichols-LarsenD.The excite trial: predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(5):486-493.
18.
LoAGuarinoPRichardsLHaselkornJWittenbergGFedermanD.Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper- limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(19):1749-1749.
19.
LanghornePCouparFPollockA.Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741-754.
20.
BernhardtJDeweyHThriftADonnanG.Inactive and alone. Stroke. 2004;35:1005-1009.
21.
Bear-LehmanJBassileCGillenGA.Comparison of time use on an acute rehabilitation unit: subjects with and without a stroke. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2001;20:17-27.
22.
JacksonPLafleurMMalouinFRichardsCDoyonJ.Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1133-1141.
23.
LindenCUhleyJSmithDBushM.The effects of mental practice on walking balance in an elderly population. Occup Ther J Res. 1989;9(3):155-169.
24.
Barclay-GoddardRStevensonTThalmanLPoluhaW.Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42(5):CD005950.
25.
DecetyJJeannerodMPrablancC.The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res. 1989;34(1-2):35-42.
26.
RoureRColletCDeschaumes-MolinaroCDelhommeGDittmarAVernet-MauryE.Imagery quality estimated by autonomic response is correlated to sporting performance enhancement. Physiol Behav. 1999;66(1):63-72.
27.
DecetyJJeannerodM.Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitt’s law hold in motor imagery. Behav Brain Res. 1995;72(1-2):127-134.
28.
Zimmermann-SchlatterASchusterCPuhanMSiekierkaESteurerJ.Efficacy of motor imagery in poststroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008;5:8.
29.
BraunSKleynenMvan HeelTKruithofNWadeDBeurskensA.The effects of mental practice in neurological rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:390.
30.
NilsenDGillenGGordonA.Use of mental practice to improve upper: limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(5):695-708.
31.
IetswaartMJohnstonMDijkermanH. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain. 2011;134(5):1373-1386.
32.
ParkSKimJYangY.Mental practice for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018:41(3):197-203.
33.
HigginsJPAltmanDGGotzschePC.: The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
34.
IalongoC.Understanding the effect size and its measures. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 26(8): 2016:150-163.
35.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence 519 Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
36.
PageSLevinePKhouryJ.Modified constraint: induced therapy combined with mental practice. Stroke. 2009;40(2):551-554.
37.
PageSDunningKHermannVLeonardALevineP.Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(7):627-637.
38.
PageSLevinePLeonardA.Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):399-402.
39.
TimmermansAVerbuntJvan WoerdenRMoennekensMPernotDSeelenH.Effect of mental practice on the improvement of function and daily activity performance of the upper extremity in patients with sub-acute stroke: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(3):204-212.
40.
RiccioIIolasconGBarillariMGimiglianoRGimiglianoF.Mental practice is effective in upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized single-blind cross-over study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(1):19-25.
41.
PageSLevinePSistoSJohnstonM.A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(3):233-240.
42.
PageSLevinePLeonardA.Mental practice in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(4):1293-1297.
43.
PageSHadeEPangJ.Retention of the spacing effect with mental practice in hemi paretic stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2016;234(10):2841-2847.
44.
Bovend’EerdtTDawesHSackleyCIzadiHWadeD.An integrated motor imagery program to improve functional task performance in neurorehabilitation: a single blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(6):939-946.
45.
LiberatiA.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W64-W95.
46.
SongKWangLWuW.Mental practice for upper limb motor restoration after stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;26(2):1-7.
ChatelleCLesenfantsDGullerYLaureysSNoirhommeQ.Brain-Computer Interface for Assessing Consciousness in Severely Brain-Injured Patients. Clinical Neurophysiology in Disorders of Consciousness. Vienna: Springer; 2015:133-148.
49.
HwangSH-SJeonC-HYiO-YKwonS-HChoS-H.YouLocomotor imagery training improves gait performance in people with chronic hemi paretic stroke: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(6):514-522.
50.
LiuHSongLZhangT.Mental practice combined with physical practice to enhance hand recovery in stroke patients. Behav Neurol. 2014;2014:1-9.
51.
PortneyLWatkinsM.Foundations Of Clinical Research: Applications To Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2009.
52.
AlashramAAnninoGMercuriN.Changes in spasticity following functional electrical stimulation cycling in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020;14(5):1-14.
53.
AnninoGAlashramAAlghwiriA. Effect of segmental muscle vibration on upper extremity functional ability poststroke. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(7):e14444.
54.
EggerMDavey SmithG.Meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ. 1998;316(7124):61-66.
