Abstract
Background:
Tau phosphorylation is associated with neuronal division and differentiation in the fetal brain, in neuroblastoma cells, in the hibernating brains of ground squirrels and black bears, and in post-mitotic neurons in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain. The disassembly of the rigid microtubule structure of neurons for neuronal division and neurite remodeling requires the removal of the microtubule stabilizing protein tau via its phosphorylation.
Objective:
To determine if tau phosphorylation is required during neural embryogenesis.
Methods:
Using an in vitro human model of early embryonic development, human embryonic stem cells (hESC) were differentiated into embryoid bodies (EBs; akin to an early blastocyst) and then into neuroectodermal rosettes (akin to a rudimentary neural tube containing neuroectodermal precursor cells) upon treatment with progesterone. The neuroectodermal rosettes were then treated with and without LiCl (Cdk5 inhibitor) or roscovitine (GSK-3β inhibitor) and assayed for the expression of tau, P-tau, nestin (an early marker of neurogenesis), Cdk5 and GSK-3β.
Results:
Tau was not expressed in hESC, but tau expression and its phosphorylation increase upon progesterone-induced differentiation of hESC into neuroectodermal rosettes. Both Cdk5 and GSK-3β, enzymes associated with tau phosphorylation, were expressed in hESCs, EBs, and neuroectodermal rosettes. The GSK-3β inhibitor LiCl, but not the Cdk-5 inhibitor roscovitine, prevented tau phosphorylation and nestin expression and the formation of neuroectodermal precursor cells.
Conclusions:
These preliminary results suggest that progesterone induces tau expression and its phosphorylation during the differentiation of neuroectodermal rosettes from hESC and suggest that tau and its phosphorylation is obligatory for neuronal precursor cell mitosis. The parallels between neural embryogenesis and neurodegeneration are discussed in the context of tau phosphorylation and the aberrant re-entry of neurons into the cell cycle in AD.
Keywords
Introduction
Tau is a microtubule-associated protein normally expressed in neuronal and glial cytoplasm including cell bodies, neurites and axons, and that binds to and stabilizes microtubules.1–3 Tau's major cellular role is thought to involve regulation of neuronal microtubule assembly and stabilization of microtubules against severing and depolymerization in vivo.1–4 It has been shown that disassembly of the rigid microtubule structure of neurons for neuronal division is achieved by the removal of the microtubule stabilizing protein tau via its phosphorylation.5–9 Tau phosphorylation also is required for the assembly and disassembly of MAPs during the extension or retraction of neurites.5–7
Tau phosphorylation was been observed in dividing and differentiating neurons in the fetal brain,2,10 in neuroblastoma cells,5,8,9,11–14 in the hibernating brains of European and arctic ground squirrels, Syrian hamsters and black bears, and with aging,15–17 situations where neuronal division or remodeling occur. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is another situation where post-mitotic neurons are thought to be re-entering the cell cycle.18–23 Goedert et al. experimentally showed that while Ser-202 is a normal phosphorylation site in development, in AD patients this key site undergoes abnormal phosphorylation.24,25 In addition, among the 37 serine and threonine residues that have been found to be phosphorylated in PHF-tau, the C-terminal Ser-396 and Ser-404 represent one of the major AD epitopes.26,27 Smith and colleagues elegantly demonstrated that activation of the cell cycle in post-mitotic primary cortical neurons via adenoviral-mediated expression of c-myc and ras oncogenes induced tau phosphorylation and conformational changes similar to that seen in the AD brain. 28
Similarities and differences in the phosphorylation sites of tau between the fetus and the adult brain have been reported.10,29 Phosphorylation of tau normally occurs during metaphase of neuronal division, and during differentiation hyperphosphorylated tau is observed in neurons of the fetal brain, suggesting that it is also developmentally regulated.2,10 In this respect, tau phosphorylation has been demonstrated to be reversible in the brains of hibernating squirrels (tau protein is highly phosphorylated in torpor states and phosphorylation levels decrease after arousal in all species 17 ), supporting a role for tau phosphorylation as a physiological process involved in neuron mitosis and/or the remodeling of neurites.16,30,31 Since tau phosphorylation is involved in developmental processes, we examined when tau expression and phosphorylation first occur during human embryogenesis. Using human embryonic stem cells (hESC) as a model of human embryogenesis, we find that tau is not expressed in hESC, but that tau phosphorylation increases upon progesterone-induced differentiation of hESC into embryoid bodies (akin to a blastocyst) and neuroectodermal rosettes (akin to a rudimentary neural tube). The GSK-3β inhibitor LiCl prevented tau phosphorylation and nestin expression, implicating GSK-3β as one mediator of tau phosphorylation and neurogenesis during early embryogenesis.
Methods
Human embryonic stem cell culture
Pluripotent H9 hESCs (passage 22 to 32; XX karyotype; also known as WA09, a National Institute of Health registered line) were obtained from the WiCell Research Institute (Madison, WI). The research was approved by the UW-Madison Department of Medicine. Propagation of hESC, and their differentiation into EBs and into neural precursor cells is extensively described in Porayette et al.,32,33 and Gallego et al.,.34,35 Essentially, SD1 cultures were generated by culturing hESCs on a mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder layer for 10 d; SD2 cultures were generated by culturing hESCs on Matrigel supplemented with defined media (mTeSR1) for 10 d; EB generation – hESC colonies were removed intact from the MEF feeder layer and grown in serum-containing medium with constant gentle rocking for 10 d to produce EBs; Rosettes generation – hESC colonies were detached intact from the MEF feeder layer using dispase. The ESC aggregates after 4–6 d in suspension culture were adhered to the culture surface where they form monolayer colonies in defined neural induction medium (containing N2 supplement). Under this culture condition, columnar neuroectodermal cells appear in the center of each colony and organize into neural tube-like rosettes after 14 d of differentiation culture. The neuroectodermal cells in the rosettes were isolated through differential enzymatic and adhesion treatment.
Inhibition of GSK-3β and Cdk-5 in hESC
Undifferentiated H9 hESCs were evenly plated in 6-well plates coated with MatrigelTM in 2.5 mL of mTeSR1 media per well. The cells in each well of one plate were trypsinized after 24 h using 400 μL of TrypLETM Express (Invitrogen) per well. TrypLE was neutralized after 5 min. by adding 1 mL of MEF culture media. To confirm even plating, cells were counted using a hemocytometer after mixing equal volumes of neutralized sample and trypan blue stain (0.4%, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). After confirmation of even plating, cells cultured in mTeSR1 media were treated with either doubly deionized H2O, NaCl (5 mM; Fisher Scientific, PA, USA), the GSK-3β inhibitor LiCl (5 mM; Sigma-Aldrich Co., MO, USA), the Cdk-5 inhibitor roscovitine (300 nM dissolved in DMSO; Calbiochem, CA, USA) or a corresponding concentration of DMSO (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). After 5 days of treatment, the cells were trypsinized and cell proliferation was assessed using the trypan blue assay. Cells were also collected in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline and stored at −80°C for examination of protein expression.
Inhibition of GSK-3β and Cdk-5 in neuroectodermal cells
H9 hESC cultured in neural induction medium were treated as described above with H2O, NaCl, LiCl, roscovitine or DMSO for 10 days. Cells were then trypsinized and cell proliferation, and GSK-3β and Cdk-5 expression, assessed.
Immunoblotting
Following collection of the lineages, these samples, M17 neuroblastoma cells and MEFs were quantitated for protein, equal amounts of protein run on SDS-PAGE and the immunoblot probed using well characterized monoclonal antibodies against Oct3/4 (against C-terminal 10 amino acids, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX, USA), Nestin (Millipore Sigma, MA, USA), tau (tau-1; clone PC1C6; recognizes most forms of tau and some bias towards dephosphorylated serine sites at 195, 198, 199 and 202; Millipore Sigma, MA, USA), P-tau (AT8; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA; recognizes tau phosphorylated at both serine 202 and threonine 205) and PHF-1 (which recognizes phosphorylated ser 396 and/or ser 404, kindly provided by Dr Peter Davies). 36 Polyclonal antibodies were used to detect human Cdk5 (Stressgen Bioreagent Corp., BC, Canada) and GSK-3β (Biolegend, CA, USA). Results are representative of 2–3 experiments.
Results
To examine when tau expression and its phosphorylation commences during human embryogenesis, we differentiated hESC towards embryoid bodies and neuroectodermal rosettes as previously described.32–35 Non-phosphorylated tau expression was not detected in pluripotent hESC or EBs but was observed in neuroectodermal rosettes (53 kDa; Figure 1A) indicating that tau expression is functionally important during the development of the neural tube. Immunoblot analysis of the hESC and differentiated lineages using the monoclonal antibody AT8 which recognizes tau phosphorylated at both serine 202 and threonine 205 25 indicated two phosphorylated tau (43–61 kDa) isoforms in rosettes (Figure 1B, third panel). In a separate experiment, but using an antibody against tau phosphorylated at serine 396 and/or serine 404 (PHF-1 36 ), we detected a single phosphorylated tau species at ∼56 kDa in both EBs and rosettes, but not pluripotent hESC or hESC maintained in MEF conditioned media for 50 days (CM; Figure 1C). These results indicate that tau becomes expressed and is phosphorylated at different residues along the path of differentiation toward neural stem cells, and that microtubule disassembly is required during cell division associated with neuroectodermal differentiation. Moreover, the progesterone present in the neural induction media, which is obligatory for the formation of neuroectodermal rosettes,34,35 is inducing the expression of tau and its phosphorylation during NPC differentiation from hESC.

Differentiation of hESC towards a neural phenotype promotes tau expression and phosphorylation. Pluripotent H9 hESC were cultured and differentiated into neural lineages as described in the methods. Following collection of the lineages, these samples, together with M17 neuroblastoma cells, MEFs, and control and AD brain were quantitated for protein, and equal amounts of protein run on SDS-PAGE and the immunoblots probed using well characterized antibodies against (A) anti-tau-1 (clone PC1C6), (B) Oct3/4, nestin, P-tau (AT8), Cdk5, and (C) PHF-1. Molecular weight markers are shown on the left-hand side.
Although tau is expressed in aged control brain, multiple tau species are phosphorylated in the AD brain as can be seen by the smear in Figure 1C. Thus, like differentiation-induced changes in AβPP processing,32,33 the tau results suggest a developmental component to the neurodegeneration associated with AD.
Tau is phosphorylated by a number of kinases, of which most evidence for a role in vivo has been reported for GSK-3β and Cdk5.37–39 To examine the expression of these kinases during hESC differentiation into rosettes, we probed the immunoblot described above with anti-GSK-3β and anti-Cdk5 polyclonal antibodies. GSK-3β (64 kDa) expression was detected in hESCs, increased in SD1 and SD2 differentiated cells and decreased in embryoid bodies to low levels in rosettes (data not shown). Cdk5 expression increased with differentiation of hESCs and was maximal at the rosette stage (Figure 1B). Despite the early expression of Cdk-5 in hESC, the Cdk-5 inhibitor roscovitine did not decrease hESC proliferation or tau phosphorylation (data not shown). However, treatment with LiCl, an inhibitor of GSK-3β did result in a decrease in hESC and neural precursor cell numbers. LiCl also decreased the expression of phosphorylated tau (Figure 2), and the expression of nestin, an early neural precursor cell marker (Figure 2), suggesting that LiCl inhibits the differentiation of hESC into neuroectodermal cells.

LiCl prevents neuroectodermal differentiation and tau phosphorylation. hESC were cultured in neural induction media treated with H2O, NaCl (5 mM) or LiCl (5 mM) for 10 d, collected and then analyzed by immunoblot with antibodies against nestin, P-tau (AT8), tau-1, and β-actin. Molecular weight markers are shown on the left-hand side.
Discussion
We have previously shown that progesterone is the hormonal factor that induces the differentiation of hESC into neuroectodermal rosettes.34,35 We now show that GSK-3β-induced tau phosphorylation is necessary for the formation of neuroectodermal precursor cells during the differentiation of hESCs into neuroectodermal rosettes. Progesterone induced an increase in the expression of tau, and tau phosphorylation at both serine 202 and threonine 205 (AT8) and at ser 396 and/or ser 404 (PHF-1) (Figure 1) during differentiation of hESC into neuroectodermal rosettes. This is consistent with studies reporting that long-term progesterone treatment increases cortical tau and MAP2 expression in ovariectomized rats, 40 and induces the phosphorylation of tau (PHF-1) via the upregulation of GSK-3β activity. 41 Blocking tau phosphorylation with LiCl, an inhibitor of GSK-3β, inhibited neural precursor cell differentiation as indicated by the suppression of nestin expression (Figure 2). This is consistent with previous findings that neurite elongation is dependent upon tau and microtubule stabilization. 42 Taken together, the dramatic hCG-induced synthesis and secretion of progesterone from hESC of the pre-implantation embryo34,35 and also from the corpus luteum at this time, 43 indicates progesterone may be the physiological signal that upregulates tau and its phosphorylation during early embryonic neurogenesis.
Our data indicate tau expression and its phosphorylation commences with the division and differentiation of hESC into a neural phenotype (Figures 1 and 2). This data is consistent with tau phosphorylation reported during neuronal division and/or differentiation in (1) the fetal brain,2,10 (2) neuroblastoma cells,5,8,9,11–14 and (3) in the hibernating brains of European and arctic ground squirrels, Syrian hamsters and black bears, with aging,15–17 situations where neuronal division, differentiation or remodeling occur. Interestingly, tau phosphorylation is a hallmark of neurofibrillary tangles in the AD cortex and hippocampus, suggesting post-mitotic pyramidal neurons in the AD brain that display tau phosphorylation are receiving a signal to divide, differentiate and/or remodel. Post-mitotic neurons in the AD brain have been demonstrated to re-enter the cell cycle,18–23 while activation of the cell cycle in post-mitotic primary cortical neurons via adenoviral-mediated expression of c-myc and ras oncogenes induces tau phosphorylation. 28 Together, this data illustrates the parallels that exist between neural embryogenesis and neurodegeneration and how neural precursor cells can be a useful model for examining microtubule assembly and disassembly.44,45 Future complimentary in vivo neuroimaging studies of tau and thymidine labeling (of DNA) in control versus AD subjects would allow spatial correlation of tau expression with (attempted) neuronal proliferation of post-mitotic, terminally differentiated neurons.
The physiological signals regulating tau phosphorylation/dephosphorylation for microtubule disassembly/assembly have been unclear, although it is clear that these signals fluctuate between seasons in hibernating animals, but are constant in those with AD. It had been suggested that temperature dependent mechanisms may drive the reversible phosphorylation of tau in hibernating animals. 17 Indeed, early studies46–49 demonstrated that heat shock of rats to 42°C induced a rapid dephosphorylation of tau and a concomitant increase in non-phosphorylated tau. 49 By 6 h after heat shock, there was progressive hyperphosphorylation of tau in female but not male rats. Since both low and high temperatures are stresses that modulate the reproductive axis (e.g., suppress progesterone and other sex steroid production), the temperature-induced changes in tau phosphorylation in normal and hibernating animals may be regulated by changes in HPG axis hormones.15–17,50,51 This is supported by our current findings, but also by the finding that tau rephosphorylation is estrogen-independent but is prevented by androgens.46,48 Testosterone was subsequently shown to prevent the hyperphosphorylation of tau by inhibiting the heat shock-induced overactivation of GSK-3β. 47 Further evidence to support reproductive hormones in the phosphorylation of tau has been demonstrated in neuroblastoma cells where luteinizing hormone (LH) dose-dependently alters tau phosphorylation 52 and promotes adult neurogenesis. 53 Likewise, intraperitoneal injections of FSH that cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) upregulate both the expression and phosphorylation of brain tau in female 3xTg mice. 54 Similarly, gonadectomized male and female 3xTg-AD mice (elevated LH/FSH, suppressed sex steroids) also displayed increases in tau hyperphosphorylation compared with sham gonadectomized mice, and treatment with testosterone, progesterone and/or estradiol reduced tau hyperphosphorylation to levels equivalent to or lower than observed in sham animals).55,56 Conversely, marked reductions in the elevated levels of phosphorylated tau were reported in APPsw+ mice lacking the LHCGR 57 or following FSH blockade. 54 Importantly, the phosphorylation of tau during torpor15–17 correlates with increases in the gonadotropins LH and FSH during the winter and spring in hibernating golden-mantled ground squirrels. 58 Importantly, it remains to be determined from the above studies whether the change in tau phosphorylation is a direct effect of gonadotropins or an indirect effect of alterations in peripheral or brain sex steroids.
Since LH/FSH can cross the BBB,54,59 the brain itself can synthesize gonadotropins 60 and sex steroids (neurosteroids), 61 and hESC colonies also express LH/hCG and synthesize sex steroids,34,35 it is likely that a higher ratio of brain sex steroids to gonadotropins regulate tau expression and the induction of specific tau phosphorylation during neurogenesis. We have previously discussed the importance of the sex steroid:gonadotropin ratio as dictating normal or dyotic signaling. 62 A higher ratio (reproductive adult concentrations of sex steroids and gonadotropins) is associated with normal cell cycle signaling, while a lower ratio (menopausal/andropausal concentrations of sex steroids and gonadotropins) is associated with aberrant cell cycle dynamics as for example seen in the AD brain. 63 Mey and colleagues 64 and Meethal and colleagues 65 have indicated the complexity of this signaling as it refers to the brain following menopause in women and andropause in men. The loss of circulating gonadal hormones and concurrent elevations in circulating gonadotropins at this time may result in (1) elevated brain gonadotropins dependent upon BBB entry, (2) resulting in suppression or elevation of LHCGR and FSHR expression and/or signaling, and/or (3) lowered or elevated production of brain LH/FSH. Understanding these brain-related dynamics in LH/FSH signaling will dictate neurosteroid production under these scenarios, and ultimately the gonadotropin to sex steroid ratio and signaling. The respective contributions of gonadotropins and sex (neuro)steroids ratios in regulating tau phosphorylation can explain the neuroplasticity observed during development, but also the presence of excessive tau phosphorylation during gonadotropin-induced, aberrant, re-entry of post-mitotic neurons into the cell cycle during disease states such as AD.
The above observations suggest certain post-reproductive therapeutic strategies that involve maintaining or rebalancing of the HPG axis to produce a brain sex steroid:gonadotropin ratio found during reproductive life as a treatment for cognitive decline and AD. These strategies include hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to increase brain steroids, upregulation of neurosteroid production, or the suppression of circulating gonadotropin concentrations (that might elevate brain gonadotropin expression and signaling). There is evidence supporting each of these therapies in animal and/or human studies. HRT has been demonstrated to improve cognitive performance in ovariectomized mice,66–69 and to halt or improve cognitive performance in post-reproductive men and women with and without AD (reviewed in 70 ). Recently, Mey and colleagues71,72 have demonstrated that intracerebroventricular hCG, that likely upregulates neurosteroid production, increases hippocampal dendritic spine density and cognitive function in ovariectomized mice back to that of reproductively intact mice. Finally, suppression of circulating LH/FSH using GnRH agonists/antagonists has been demonstrated to improve AD neuropathology and cognitive performance in rodents.63,73–76 Human studies have demonstrated that leuprolide-induced suppression of circulating gonadotropins together with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor halts the progression of AD for 48 weeks in a Phase II trial of women with mild-moderate AD. 77 A second Phase II clinical trial testing leuprolide plus acetylcholinesterase inhibitors as a treatment for AD in women with mild to moderate AD is currently underway. 78
Our preliminary data indicates that progesterone upregulates the expression of tau and its phosphorylation by GSK-3β in the differentiation of hESC into neuroectodermal rosettes. The data adds support to the idea that reproductive hormones play a pivotal role in embryonic neurogenesis,44,45 just as they do in adult neurogenesis, neuritogenesis and dendritic spine formation.79–81 Further studies are required to determine which embryonic sex hormones regulate tau expression and specific tau post-translational modifications for neuronal differentiation and/or remodeling.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We thank the WiCell Research Institute (Madison, WI) for providing hESCs and technical expertise. Portions of this research were performed as part of a Senior Honors Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison (MMK). This material is the result of work supported with the use of facilities at the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI. The contents do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. This is Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center VA paper number 09-2025.
Ethical considerations
The research was approved by the UW-Madison Department of Medicine.
Author contributions
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of conflicting interests
Craig Atwood and George Perry are Editorial Board Members of this journal but were not involved in the peer-review process of this article nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review.
The remaining authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data availability statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
