‘Preparation’ and ‘Readiness’: The Education Paradigm for the Organisation Development Certificate Programme

Abstract

The organisation development certificate programme (ODCP) offered by the Indian Society for Applied Behavioural Science—ISABS (www.isabs.org) is a unique blend of learning about organisations, the process of OD with deep awareness about self as an instrument of change.

ISABS as an institution has been engaged with T-groups for the past 50 years, having learnt the same from National Training Laboratories (NTL) Institute for Applied Behavioural Science (www.ntl.org). The focus of ISABS has been on discovering oneself through the process of engagement in small groups. ISABS pedagogy has evolved over years after initial learning from NTL This pedagogy distinguishes itself from any typical university education by stressing on experiencing and reflection of the learning process held together by a process facilitator. The expectation is that the participants will conceptualise and apply their learning through their own volition. However, this needed to change for the ODCP programme. This article unfolds the process for the reader.

The process of OD is based on the quality of the interaction/engagement between the client system and the OD practitioner. Hence, the quality of the ‘preparedness’ and ‘readiness’ of the OD practitioner plays a big role in the ‘process of OD’.

ISABS addresses the twin issues of ‘preparedness’ and ‘readiness’ of participants to enter the field of OD through a pedagogy that is a combination of experiential, cognitive, reflective and peer learning. In addition, OD competencies and values are internalised through a learner-centred approach to teaching, classroom as organisation simulations and support systems provided through coaching and learning facilitation.

Keywords

Organisation development self-as-an-instrument competencies values preparedness readiness experiential learning pedagogy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

L. D.

(2009). Organization development: The process of leading organization change . SAGE Publications.

Beckhard

(1969). Organization development: Strategies and models . Addison-Wesley.

Bushe

Marshak

(2015). Dialogic OD—Theory and practice of transformational change . Koehler Publications.

Cheung-Judge

Jamieson

(2020, April). Summary of the global use of self (UoS) research report. Organization Development Review , 52, 64–70.

Cummings

Worely

(2009). Organization development and change (9th ed.). South Western Cengage Learning.

Freedman

A. M.

(1999). The history of organization development and the NTL institute: What we have learned, forgotten, and rewritten. The Psychologist-Manager Journal , 3(2), 125–141.

French

W. L.

Bell

(1973). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organizational improvement . Prentice-Hall.

Highhouse

(2002, December). A history of T-Groups and its early application in management development. Group Dynamics Theory, Research and Practice , 6(4), 277–290.

Jamieson

Gellermann

(2006). Values, ethics and OD practice” NTL handbook of organizational development and change: Principles, practices and perspectives . Pfeiffer (Wiley).

10.

Jones

Brazzel

(2006). NTL handbook of organizational development and change: Principles, practices and perspectives . Pfeiffer (Wiley).

11.

Kenward

(2020, April). Radical times, radical selves, radical learning: Facilitating the self to own learning and build stronger practice. Organization Development Review , 52, 35–40.

12.

Kolb

(2015). Experiential learning—Experience as a source for learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

13.

Ramnarayan

Rao

T. V.

Singh

(1998). Organization development: Interventions and strategies . SAGE Publications.

14.

Rao

T. V.

(2016, June). OD and HRD in India: A historical perspective . http://www.tvrls.com

15.

Sinha

(1974). Readings in laboratory education . ISABS.

16.

Tannenbaum

(2020 [1979, March]). Of time and the river. Organization Development Review , 52, 71–73 (originally appeared in Organization Development Practitioner, Volume II).