Amiodarone: Is it Safe in Stress Cardiomyopathy?

Introduction

Amiodarone belongs to the Class 3 Vaughan-William classification of anti-arrhythmic drugs. ¹ It is a broad-spectrum antiarrhythmic agent used in clinical practice to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT), and atrial flutter/fibrillation. ¹ Mechanism of action is K+ channel blockade which increases cardiac action potential duration and effective repolarization period and prevents arrhythmias, also exhibiting beta blockade and calcium channel blockade. ¹ It can cause QT prolongation and rarely precipitate life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias like Torsade de Pointes (TdP). ¹ Torsades is characterized by prolonged ventricular repolarization with QT intervals generally exceeding 500 milliseconds.^{1, 2} Risk factors for drug-induced QT prolongation are female sex, congestive heart failure, and so on. ² This case report describes a woman with stress cardiomyopathy^3–8 and atrial fibrillation who was treated with Amiodarone which precipitated Torsades.

Case Report

Day 7

QTc was 574 milliseconds at discharge

OPEN IN VIEWER

Discussion

Stress cardiomyopathy^3–8 is a common clinical entity in today’s practice in various clinical settings. A variety of triggers, physical and emotional, have been described to cause Stress cardiomyopathy.^{3, 4} In this patient, Stress Cardiomyopathy was entertained as a working diagnosis on grounds of history (past history of anxiety disorder),^{3, 4} age, and sex category (post-menopausal woman).^{3, 4} ECG findings described in Stress cardiomyopathy like ST segment elevation in lead aVR and absence of reciprocal ST segment depressions are seen in this patient.^{3, 4} 2D Echocardiography showed Severe left ventricular dysfunction and apical ballooning and well-contracting basal segments.^3–8 InterTAK diagnostic score was 78 (>70 indicates stress cardiomyopathy). ⁴ Other corroborative findings include mild Trop I elevation and raised NTproBNP levels.^{3, 4} Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in Takotsubo Syndrome and has been reported in about 5% to 15% of patients.^{11, 12} This is a poor prognostic sign and is associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction higher incidence of cardiogenic shock, and cardio-embolic events.^{11, 12}

For the atrial fibrillation, the patient was started on rate, rhythm control, and thromboprophylaxis. ¹ Beta Blockers could have been ideal in this situation except for hypotension. ¹ Therefore, Amiodarone with less hemodynamic impact was chosen. ¹ There was initial clinical improvement. However, the later clinical course was complicated by the occurrence of ill-sustained VT leading to hemodynamic compromise. There was a marked prolongation of QT interval noticed following Amiodarone administration which probably precipitated Torsades. ² Other possible causes (dyselectrolytemia and ischemia) were ruled out. The clinical course stabilized after the withdrawal of Amiodarone with no further episodes of VT. Moreover, a slow reduction of QT interval duration was observed in the following days. ¹ Additionally, QT interval prolongation has been reported in 4%−9%^{3, 4} of cases of Stress Cardiomyopathy. Therefore, after all the above observations, we believe that the event of ventricular tachyarrhythmia was precipitated due to combined QT prolonging effects of Amiodarone and stress cardiomyopathy (as it is independently known to cause QT prolongation).

Amiodarone is used extensively in clinical practice although QT prolongation is well-known to occur. This is due to its least pro-arrhythmic potential. However, Amiodarone is prophylactically withdrawn when QTc is greater than 550 milliseconds. Stress cardiomyopathy is a common clinical condition requiring ICU medical care, it is debatable if amiodarone is safe in these cases considering our experience. Does this warrant a lower threshold for drug withdrawal that is, at a lower QTc in cases of stress cardiomyopathy? Whether or not additional diagnostics should be sought before administering Amiodarone in stress cardiomyopathy?

Conclusion

The patient suffered a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia because of an interplay of factors such as stress cardiomyopathy and QT-prolonging drugs (Amiodarone in this case). This case report has brought to light once again that although amiodarone has the least pro-arrhythmic properties, it is not devoid of it especially when another arrhythmogenic factor co-exists.