A pilot,randomized,feasibility study to improve health self-management behaviors in older adults with multiple chronic conditions and functional limitations: Protocol for the Behavioral Activation and Occupational Therapy Trial (BA+OT)

Abstract

Background

Approximately 45% of older adults in the U.S. have 2 or more chronic health conditions (e.g., arthritis, hypertension, diabetes) in addition to functional limitations that prevent performance of health self-management activities. Self-management continues to be the gold standard for managing MCC, but functional limitations create difficulty with these activities (e.g., physical activity, symptom monitoring). Restricted self-management accelerates the downward spiral of disability and accumulating chronic conditions which, in turn, increases rates of institutionalization and death by 5-fold. Currently, there are no tested interventions designed to improve independence in health self-management activities in older adults with MCC and functional limitations. Research suggests that older adults are more likely to change behavior with interventions that assist with planning health-promoting daily activities, especially when contending with complex medical regimens and functional limitations. Our team asserts that combining occupational therapy (OT) and behavioral activation (BA) shows promise to improve health self-management in populations with chronic conditions and/or functional limitations. This innovative combination uses the goal setting, scheduling/monitoring activities, and problem-solving components of the BA approach as well as the environmental modification, activity adaptation, and focus on daily routines from OT practice.

Objectives

We will test the effect of this combined approach in a Stage I, randomized controlled pilot feasibility study compared to enhanced usual care. We will recruit 40 older adults with MCC and functional limitation and randomize 20 to the PI- delivered BA-OT protocol. This research will inform modification and larger-scale testing of this novel intervention.

Keywords

Chronic illness multimorbidity disability intervention

Introduction

Increasing burden of MCC-related functional impairments

MCC is disabling and costly for the individual and the health system.¹ Older adults with MCC, the presence of 2 or more chronic conditions, have poor health outcomes,² poor quality of life,³ high health care costs,⁴ and high health care utilization⁴ including potentially avoidable hospital readmissions.⁵ Common chronic conditions include type 2 diabetes (T2D), arthritis, heart disease, lung disease, and kidney disease; each of these conditions has separate recommendations for healthy eating, physical activity, pharmacological management, and monitoring symptoms and disease progression.⁶ Approximately half of older adults with MCC report having functional limitations,⁷ which compounds the difficulties in managing MCC and accelerates aging and disability processes (See Figure 1). Our best tool against this spiral of accelerated aging and disability is self-management, however, having MCC and functional limitations complicates the self-management process, due to the involvement of multiple health care providers, time consuming and conflicting treatment recommendations, and difficulty performing daily health self-management activities.⁶

Figure 1.

Accelerated aging consequences of MCC and functional limitations. BA-OT may interrupt this cycle to increase independence in daily health self-management activities.

Existing chronic condition self-management programs

Most empirically tested chronic condition self-management programs are not designed for individuals with MCC or functional limitations.⁸ First, these programs typically address single diseases, ignoring the complexity that comes with managing MCC.¹ In fact, having MCC is frequently listed as an exclusion criteria in clinical trials.⁹ Second, self-management programs are designed to change individual behaviors, typically using a combination of disease-specific education and behavior change techniques. Functional limitations are a frequently reported barrier to success in self-management programs¹⁰ because, in addition to individual behavior, multiple intervention foci are required to address the environment and attributes of the self-management activity.¹¹ Further, despite recognition that integration of self-management activities into daily routines leads to optimal uptake and maintenance of behaviors,¹² widely-used self-management programs do not contain this powerful task integration component.¹³ Typical self-management support programs may effect change in individuals without MCC or functional limitations, but this added complexity requires individual-tailoring that combines the potent motivational elements of behavioral activation (BA) and holistic-minded expertise of occupational therapy (OT).

Rationale for BA

With the BA approach, practitioners coach clients to engage in activities that will lead to a more rewarding life.¹⁴ By scheduling and performing meaningful daily activity and monitoring the results, participants begin to connect accomplishments to feelings of success. This process engages an upward cycle of goal attainment that can develop active self-managers.^14,15 BA is a powerful tool for building mastery and motivation to change.¹⁶ However, on its own, the BA approach does not develop skills needed to continue to perform daily activity in the presence of functional limitations, a condition that forces individuals to modify or adapt how they complete daily activity.

Rationale for OT

Occupational therapists bring a unique expertise to health self-management by supporting performance of health-promoting activities, such as medication management and exercise.¹⁷ Occupational therapy researchers have demonstrated an established track record of interventions that improve health management, wellness and prevention of chronic illness and disability¹⁸ making OT a strong additive approach to a BA intervention. Using an OT conceptual practice model (the Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance Model), occupational therapists assist clients through modifications to the environment, adaptations to the activity, adjustments to daily routines and roles, and remediation of functional limitations.¹⁹ Many intervention outcomes in trials for older adults with MCC are difficult to improve (e.g., organization of care delivery, quality of life); however, studies that specifically target functional outcomes (i.e., independence in daily activity) show promise.²⁰ Improved independence in health self-management activities is a proximal and modifiable outcome that has potential to drive the upward cycle of mastery and motivation.

Integration of BA and OT components

With the BA-OT approach, the PI will use an evidence-based 4-step process (GOAL-PLAN-DO-CHECK: Figure 2) to assist the older adults to develop strategies to plan and execute daily health self-management activities.^21,22 BA-OT teaches older adults with MCC and functional limitations to 1) set achieveable and meaningful activity goals, 2) engage in action planning that includes brainstorming strategies to overcome barriers, 3) evaluate the results after performing the activity, and 4) modify the plan or choose a new goal, then generalize strategies to new problems. Our approach to improving independence in health self-management is consistent with self-regulation models that emphasize congruence between goals, client-level factors, and broader circumstances (e.g., environmental and activity demands).²³ By assisting participants to develop daily routines and integrate safe health self-management activities into these routines, occupational therapists provide strategies that support adaptation in the face of stressful situations.²⁴ We hypothesize that by deliberately targeting improved independence in meaningful self-management activities, and then habitualizing those activities into daily routines, these activities become routinized health behaviors. With time, sustained engagement in these routines is part of healthy self-management. Participants may choose goals such as creating, adapting, and integrating an exercise plan or, or exploring assistive devices and strategies for safe and healthy meal preparation to ensure adequate nutritional intake.

Figure 2.

Active ingredients of intervention.

Our hypothesis regarding the translation of health promoting activities into sustained engagement in self-management arose from clinical and research observations. Previous research revealed increased complexity of medical management was related to decreased daily activity individuals with chronic conditions.²⁵ Follow-up qualitative studies²⁶ strengthened existing evidence^12,27 that inability to translate self-management recommendations into everyday life and existing routines is an enormous barrier.²⁶ Research has recently characterized deficits in daily activity²⁸ and functional mobility²⁵ for older adults with MCC. In addition, having a stable daily routine is a primary contributor to good medication management²⁵ and participation in meaningful daily activities.²⁵ Based on empirical evidence and a strong theoretical foundation, our intervention has potential to improve independence in health self-management activities and prevent further disease and functional decline in older adults with MCC and functional limitations.

Objectives

Specific Aim 1: Collect preliminary data to test the effect of BA-OT for improving independence in health self-management activities for older adults with MCC and functional limitation compared to enhanced usual care. Hypothesis: Older adults who receive BA-OT will demonstrate improved independence in health self-management activity as measured by the self-report Canadian Occupational Performance Measure²⁹ and the Self-Management Assessment Scale.³⁰ Rationale: Though similar interventions have shown promise in populations with different disease courses,^21,22,31 BA-OT has not been tested in older adults with MCC and functional limitations.

Specific Aim 2: Examine the feasibility of recruitment and delivery of the BA-OT intervention with older adults with MCC and functional limitation. Quantitative feasibility measures include recruitment rates, proportions of participants who initiate and complete the intervention, and adherence to study procedures. In-depth qualitative interviews will be conducted to understand acceptability and suitability of the intervention. Rationale: Similar interventions have been successful, but not with older adults with MCC and functional limitations, a group that is difficult to treat. We will begin answer the critical question “can it work?” and seek evidence to inform adaptation to a larger study.

Combining these two approaches to address the persistent problem of health self-management in this population is novel and promising. This specific combination of active ingredients has the potential to prevent functional limitations and costly hospitalizations and may reduce disability in older adults with MCC. This project will inform the modification and testing of BA-OT with a larger sample, as well as generating preliminary data for a collaborative federal grant submission.

Methods

Intervention design

This is a single-blind, pilot feasibility randomized trial (Stage I³²) comparing BA-OT (n = 20) to enhanced usual care (n = 20). Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to conceal allocation to BA-OT, however, the unbiased study evaluator will be blinded to participation condition.

Participants and recruitment

Forty older adults (aged 60+) will be randomized to the intervention or control groups. Eligible participants will have ≥2 chronic conditions (using ICD-10 list of 21 chronic conditions³³) and ≥1 functional limitation (as measured by the Work and Social Adjustment Scale³⁴), intention to set ≥1 physical activity goal, and live within 15 miles of the OU Schusterman Center. Participants are ineligible if they have a life expectancy <6 months, a progressive neurological condition, are in active treatment for cancer, are not English-speaking, have moderate-severe cognitive impairment (measured by score <19 on the Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment: T-MOCA³⁵), have current or history of severe mental illness (i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), or are in concurrent treatment with physical or occupational therapy. The intervention sample size of 20, given 80% retention at 3 months (n = 16), will result in > 95% power to detect change between pre- and post-tests on the primary outcome, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM: MCID = 3.0, SD = 2.0).²⁹ The primary recruitment strategy will be referrals from collaborating physicians at OU Health’s Schusterman Center Internal Medicine. If additional recruitment strategies are needed, the PI will use ‘direct-to-consumer’ approaches, including presentations to local senior organizations, and advertisements in senior newsletters.

Assessments

Research staff will establish study eligibility, consent, and gather demographic and clinical characteristics (age, chronic medical conditions, years of education, marital status, race/ethnicity, medications). Baseline assessment interviews will be conducted by the PI.

The primary outcome is independence in health self-management activities, as measured by the COPM and the Self-Management Assessment Scale (SMASc).³⁰ The COPM was designed to facilitate goal setting and detect change in self-report performance of daily activity.³⁶ The COPM is valid, reliable, clinically useful, and responsive in community-dwelling older adults.²⁹ The SMASc, an assessment for measuring effective self-management of chronic conditions, is valid, reliable, and sensitive to change in a sample with T2D and other chronic conditions.³⁰

Given that MCC and depression often coexist,³⁷ improvements in mood will be assessed using the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS).³⁸ The BADS has good factor structure, internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability in community-dwelling adults.³⁹

A major determinant of success in chronic condition self-management is self-efficacy.⁴⁰ The PROMIS© Measures for Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions are highly validated and reliable with good internal consistency in multiple samples with chronic conditions.^40,41

Research staff will collect quantitative feasibility measures including recruitment rates, proportions of participants who initiate and complete the intervention, and adherence to study procedures. In addition, qualitative information regarding suitability and acceptability of the study procedures and intervention will be collected by the unbiased study evaluator at 10 weeks and 22 weeks. Fidelity of the PI-delivered intervention will be ensured using established procedures for checklist assessment methods.²²

Study procedure

Following screening by trained research staff and enrollment in the study, participants will be 1:1 randomized into either BA-OT or enhanced usual care control group. Baseline assessments for all participants will be collected by the PI. Following baseline assessment, the PI, a BA-trained, licensed occupational therapist will deliver a 10-session manualized program in the participants’ homes to ensure optimal uptake of the active ingredients and integration into daily life routines. This intervention will occur over 10 weeks; in similar studies, 10 weeks is sufficient to make behavior changes.⁴² The intervention manual will include educational materials for the 4-step approach, and worksheets for goal setting and developing daily routines. In the 1^st BA-OT session, the PI will collect baseline assessments and use COPM data to facilitate goal setting. The top 5 participant-selected goals chosen will be the subject of the 4-step process in sessions 2 – 10. At least one goal must be related to improving physical activity routines; each participant will receive a Fitbit Charge 5 to self-monitor fitness progress. The unbiased evaluator will carry out follow-up assessments at 10 weeks and 22 weeks with participants in both conditions. The enhanced usual care control group will receive the same assessment battery, a Fitbit Charge 5 with 1 hour training, and a handout about living with chronic conditions.

Attrition management

Participant attrition is a risk we will work to mitigate. First, by collaborating with the primary care physician for referrals, we will build participant trust in the intervention. Second, to reduce participant burden, we will offer flexible appointment times in the homes of participants and research staff will make reminder calls prior to appointments. Lastly, we are providing remuneration for each testing event. In the unforeseen event of loss of the unbiased study evaluator the PI will use funds to purchase an occupational therapist colleague’s time for follow-up testing.

Data management and planned analyses

Data capture, quality assurance, management and processing will be consolidated in Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap); including direct data entry of screening information by study personnel and double data entry of assessments by study personnel. We will test for baseline differences between groups in demographic and clinical characteristics and assessments.

Data Analysis for Aim 1

To test within-group effects, mean changes in pre-post intervention (at 10 and 22 weeks) in COPM and SMASc scores will be assessed using a repeated measures ANOVA with a 2-sided 0.05 alpha level. Non-parametric approaches will be used if ANOVA assumptions are not satisfied. For between-group effects, we will use independent t-tests at each time point. T-test results will provide parameter estimates, standard errors, and 95% confidence intervals, which we will use to determine the magnitude of intervention effect. If necessary, we will use a non-parametric equivalent. Statistical significance will be based on an alpha level of ≤0.05.

Data Analysis for Aim 2

We will use rates and proportions as appropriate to calculate quantitative feasibility benchmarks. We will also categorize reasons for non-participation, withdrawal, or missed visits. For qualitative feasibility, the unbiased study evaluator will record responses to questions about suitability and acceptability of the intervention. The PI (a trained qualitative investigator) and research staff will use thematic analysis to identify suitability and acceptability of the intervention as well as suggested modifications.⁴³

A plan to maintain participants’ safety and prevent injury has been developed for the study. Occupational therapists are trained to support older adults to safely execute daily activity in the presence of functional limitations. To prevent illness, we will follow CDC recommendations for COVID-19 safety for home health workers, including prophylaxis use and testing as necessary. This research study, all participant education and recruitment materials, and other documents have been approved by the Institutional Review board at the University of Oklahoma health Sciences Center (approval # 14683). This protocol is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (registration # NCT05600465) This manuscript was prepared using the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials (SPIRIT) Statement, which provides guidance on reporting study protocols. ⁴⁴ Any modifications to the protocol which impact the conduct of the study will require an amendment to be submitted to the Institutional Review Board and may require approval from the study funder, the Presbyterian Health Foundation. This protocol was submitted for publication 12/21/22, this publication represents version 1 of the protocol.

Discussion

This research will begin to fill a current gap in service delivery for older adults with multiple chronic conditions and functional limitations by providing an evidence-based, practical, and eventually billable intervention that can help decrease functional limitations and improve health self-management behaviors. The findings of this study will be disseminated via publication and presentation to healthcare professionals and other stakeholders as well as relevant professional societies. This pilot study will inform modification and development of this intervention to a full-scale randomized controlled trial.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Juleen Rodakowski for providing guidance on preparation of fidelity and participant worksheet materials, and Dr. Martina Jelley for assisting with recruitment.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Presbyterian Health Foundation New Investigator Seed Grant (grant number # GRF00005992; to TCK). Additional support was provided by Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (TSET) grant R23-02 (to DEK).

Ethical statement

We obtained approval from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. Approval # 14683.

Informed consent

Participants provide written informed consent.

ORCID iD

Tara C Klinedinst

References

Pearson-Stuttard

Ezzati

Gregg

. Multimorbidity—a defining challenge for health systems. The Lancet Public Health 2019; 4: e599–e600.

Anderson

. Chronic care: making the case for ongoing care. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2010.

Institute of Medicine . Living Well with Chronic Illness: A Call for Public Health Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012, p. 350.

Buttorff

Ruder

Bauman

. Multiple chronic conditions in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2017.

Aubert

Schnipper

Fankhauser

. Patterns of multimorbidity associated with 30-day readmission: a multinational study. BMC public health 2019; 19: 1–8.

Garnett

Ploeg

Markle-Reid

. Self-management of multiple chronic conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A concept analysis. SAGE Open Nursing 2018; 4: 2377960817752471.

Gerteis

Izrael

Deitz

, et al. Multiple chronic conditions chartbook. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2014: 7-14.

Warner

Packer

Kervin

, et al. A systematic review examining whether community-based self-management programs for older adults with chronic conditions actively engage participants and teach them patient-oriented self-management strategies. Patient education and counseling 2019; 102: 2162–2182.

Du Vaure

Dechartres

Battin

. Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials. gov: a systematic review of registration details. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e012265.

10.

Bratzke

Muehrer

Kehl

. Self-management priority setting and decision-making in adults with multimorbidity: A narrative review of literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2015; 52: 744–755. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.10.010

11.

Ravesloot

. Living Well with a Disability, a self-management program. MMWR supplements 2016; 65.

12.

Fritz

. The influence of daily routines on engaging in diabetes self-management. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2014; 21: 232–240. DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2013.868033

13.

Berger

Escher

Mengle

. Effectiveness of health promotion, management, and maintenance interventions within the scope of occupational therapy for community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2018; 72: 7204190010p7204190011–7204190010p7204190010.

14.

Vranceanu

A-M

Greer

Safren

. The Massachusetts General Hospital Handbook of Behavioral Medicine: A Clinician's Guide to Evidence-based Psychosocial Interventions for Individuals with Medical Illness. Humana Press, 2016.

15.

Kanter

Manos

Bowe

. What is behavioral activation?: A review of the empirical literature. Clinical Psychology Review 2010; 30: 608–620.

16.

Santos

Puspitasari

Nagy

, et al. Behavioral activation. 2021.

17.

American Occupational Therapy Association . Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & process, 4th Edition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2020; 74.

18.

Leland

Fogelberg

Halle

. Occupational Therapy and Management of Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Context of Health Care Reform. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2016; 71: 7101090010p7101090011–7101090010p7101090016. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2017.711001.

19.

Baum

Christiansen

Bass

. The person-environment-occupation-performance (PEOP) model. Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being 2015; 4: 49-56.

20.

Smith

Wallace

O'Dowd

. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016; 3. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3.

21.

Skidmore

Butters

Whyte

. Guided training relative to direct skill training for individuals with cognitive impairments after stroke: a pilot randomized trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2017; 98: 673–680.

22.

Rodakowski

Golias

Reynolds

III . Preventing disability in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A strategy training intervention study. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2019; 15: 100368.

23.

Maes

Karoly

. Self‐regulation assessment and intervention in physical health and illness: A review. Applied psychology 2005; 54: 267–299.

24.

Zisberg

Young

Schepp

. A concept analysis of routine: relevance to nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2007; 57: 442–453.

25.

Klinedinst

Nelson

Gloeckner

. Depression and polypharmacy are risk factors for activity limitation in type 2 diabetes. Chronic Illness 2020; 0. DOI: 10.1177/1742395320959434

26.

Klinedinst

Swink

Atler

. The experience of type 2 diabetes: Application of the Model of Human Occupation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2021; 85: 351–359.

27.

Pyatak

. The role of occupational therapy in diabetes self-management interventions. OTJR: Occupation, Participation & Health 2013; 33: 89–96. DOI: 10.3928/15394492-20100622-01

28.

Klinedinst

Terhorst

Rodakowski

. Multimorbidity groups based on numbers of chronic conditions are associated with daily activity. Chronic Illness 2021: 17423953211023964. DOI: 10.1177/17423953211023964

29.

Tuntland

Aaslund

Langeland

. Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in home-dwelling older adults. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare 2016; 9: 411.

30.

Öberg

Hörnsten

Isaksson

. The Self‐Management Assessment Scale: Development and psychometric testing of a screening instrument for person‐centred guidance and self‐management support. Nursing Open 2019; 6: 504–513.

31.

Lyons

Hull

Kaufman

. Development and initial evaluation of a telephone-delivered, behavioral activation, and problem-solving treatment program to address functional goals of breast cancer survivors. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 2015; 33: 199–218.

32.

Onken

Carroll

Shoham

. Reenvisioning clinical science: unifying the discipline to improve the public health. Clinical Psychological Science 2014; 2: 22–34.

33.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services . Chronic Conditions, https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Chronic-Conditions/CC_Main (2021).

34.

Cella

Sharpe

Chalder

. Measuring disability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: reliability and validity of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2011; 71: 124–128.

35.

Katz

Wang

Nester

. T‐MoCA: A valid phone screen for cognitive impairment in diverse community samples. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring 2021; 13: e12144.

36.

Carswell

McColl

Baptiste

. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2004; 71: 210-222.

37.

Triolo

Harber-Aschan

Murri

. The complex interplay between depression and multimorbidity in late life: risks and pathways. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 2020; 192: 111383.

38.

Kanter

Mulick

Busch

. The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS): psychometric properties and factor structure. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 2007; 29: 191–202.

39.

Kanter

Rusch

Busch

. Validation of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) in a community sample with elevated depressive symptoms. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 2009; 31: 36–42.

40.

Gruber-Baldini

Velozo

Romero

. Validation of the PROMIS® measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions. Quality of Life Research 2017; 26: 1915–1924.

41.

Hsieh

Chen

, et al. Individualized home-based exercise and nutrition interventions improve frailty in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2019; 16: 119.

42.

Smagula

Isenberg

Stahl

. Adaptation and Pilot Study of a Behavioral Intervention Targeting Morning Activation Deficits in Dementia Caregivers: Scheduling Activity and Monitoring Mornings (SAMM). The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2022; 30: 494-503.

43.

O’Cathain

Hoddinott

Lewin

. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers. Pilot and feasibility studies 2015; 1: 1–13.

44.

Chan

A-W

Tetzlaff

Gøtzsche

. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ : British Medical Journal 2013; 346: e7586. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7586